Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Design of the PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) Trial

2019; Elsevier BV; Volume: 65; Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.avsg.2019.02.034

1615-5947

Jesse A. Columbo, Ravinder Kang, Emily L. Spangler, Karina Newhall, Benjamin S. Brooke, Hasan H. Dosluoglu, Eugene S. Lee, J.D. Raffetto, Peter K. Henke, Gale Tang, Leila Mureebe, Panagoitis Kougias, Jason M. Johanning, Shipra Arya, Salvatore T. Scali, David H. Stone, Bjoern D. Suckow, Kristine Orion, Vivienne J. Halpern, Jessica O’Connell, Daniel Inhat, Peter R. Nelson, Edith Tzeng, Wei Zhou, Michael J. Barry, Brenda Sirovich, Philip P. Goodney, Cory Gaudette, Francisco Grippa, Amy Voorhees, Kayla Moore, Catherine Dowse, Sarah Barbey, Ann M. Galla, Lori Grove, Karen Belanger, Angela Karamoto, Veep Patel, Susan Bigda, Sinan Jabori, Kevin C. Chun, Julie Beckstrom, Maria Maloney, Molly Schieber, Adam Zoble, Stephanie Anderson, Michael Morrison,

Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

For patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), randomized trials have found endovascular AAA repair (EVAR) is associated with lower perioperative morbidity and mortality than open surgical repair (OSR). However, OSR has fewer long-term aneurysm-related complications, such as endoleak or late rupture. Patients treated with EVAR and OSR have similar survival rates within two years after surgery, and OSR does not require intensive surveillance. Few have examined if patient preferences are aligned with the type of treatment they receive for their AAA. Although many assume that patients may universally prefer the less-invasive nature of EVAR, our preliminary work suggests that patients who value the lower risk of late complications may prefer OSR. In this study, called The PReferences for Open Versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm (PROVE-AAA) trial, we describe a cluster-randomized trial to test if a decision aid can better align patients' preferences and their treatment type for AAA. Patients enrolled in the study are candidates for either endovascular or open repair and are followed up at VA hospitals by vascular surgery teams who regularly perform both types of repair. In Aim 1, we will determine patients' preferences for endovascular or open repair and identify domains associated with each repair type. In Aim 2, we will assess alignment between patients' preferences and the repair type elected and then compare the impact of a decision aid on this alignment between the intervention and control groups. This study will help us to accomplish two goals. First, we will better understand the factors that affect patient preference when choosing between EVAR and OSR. Second, we will better understand if a decision aid can help patients be more likely to receive the treatment strategy they prefer for their AAA. Study enrollment began on June 1, 2017. Between June 1, 2017 and November 1, 2018, we have enrolled 178 of a total goal of 240 veterans from 20 VA medical centers and their vascular surgery teams across the country. We anticipate completing enrollment in PROVE-AAA in June 2019, and study analyses will be performed thereafter.