Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA‐GMO‐NL‐2005‐24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40‐3‐2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto
2012; Wiley; Volume: 10; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2753
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Insect Resistance and Genetics
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 10, Issue 6 2753 OpinionOpen Access Scientific Opinion on an application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-24) for the placing on the market of the herbicide tolerant genetically modified soybean 40-3-2 for cultivation under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 from Monsanto EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)Search for more papers by this author EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO), EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)Search for more papers by this author First published: 21 June 2012 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2753Citations: 8 Panel members: Hans Christer Andersson, Salvatore Arpaia, Detlef Bartsch, Josep Casacuberta, Howard Davies, Patrick du Jardin, Gerhard Flachowsky, Lieve Herman, Huw Jones, Sirpa Kärenlampi, Jozsef Kiss, Gijs Kleter, Harry Kuiper, Antoine Messéan, Kaare Magne Nielsen, Joe Perry, Annette Pöting, Jeremy Sweet, Christoph Tebbe, Atte Johannes von Wright and Jean-Michel Wal Correspondence: gmo@efsa.europa.eu Acknowledgement: The Panel wishes to thank the members of the Standing Working Groups on Molecular Characterisation, Food and Feed, and Environment on GMO applications, the external experts Paolo Bàrberi, Boet Glandorf and Niels Bohse Hendriksen, and the EFSA staff member Yann Devos for the preparatory work on this scientific opinion, as well as EFSA staff members Yann Devos (ENV), Zoltán Divéki (MC) and Claudia Paoletti (FF) for the support provided in the development of this EFSA scientific output. Adoption date: 31 May 2012 Published date: 21 June 2012 Question number: EFSA-Q-2005-251 On request from: Competent Authority of the Netherlands for an application (EFSA-GMO-NL-2005-24) submitted by Monsanto AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract This Scientific Opinion reports on an evaluation of a risk assessment for the placing on the market for cultivation of genetically modified soybean 40-3-2, and updates the previous EFSA GMO Panel Scientific Opinion on the renewal applications for the continued marketing of soybean 40-3-2. The EFSA GMO Panel considered that soybean 40-3-2 is unlikely to raise additional environmental safety concerns compared with conventional soybean, but that the management of its cultivation could result in environmental harm under certain conditions. The Panel therefore recommended managing the use of glyphosate on soybean 40-3-2 in ways that result in similar or reduced environmental impacts compared with conventional soybean cultivation. There is no evidence of adverse effects on non-target organisms (including pollinators) due to the expression of the CP4 EPSPS protein, and there are no indications of the occurrence of adverse effects on non-target predators, herbivores and decomposers due to potential unintended changes in soybean 40-3-2. Owing to the lack of event-specific data on plant-pollinator interactions, scientific uncertainty on the occurrence of adverse effects on pollinators, due to potential unintended changes in soybean 40-3-2, remains, and strategies for resolving this uncertainty are discussed. The Panel recommended the deployment of case-specific monitoring to address: (1) changes in weed community diversity; and (2) the evolution of resistance to glyphosate in weeds due to changes in herbicide and cutivation regimes. The Panel agreed with the general surveillance plan of the applicant, but requested that the Panel's proposals to strengthen general surveillance are implemented. The Panel concluded that the information available for soybean 40-3-2 addresses the scientific comments raised by Member States and that soybean 40-3-2, as described in this application, is as safe as its conventional counterpart and commercial non-GM soybean varieties with respect to potential adverse effects on human and animal health. If subjected to appropriate management measures, the cultivation of soybean 40-3-2 is unlikely to have environmental effects any more adverse than those associated with conventional soybean cultivation. References Abe J, Hasegawa A, Fukushi H, Mikami T, Ohara M, Shimamoto Y, 1999. Introgression between wild and cultivated soybeans of Japan revealed by RFLP analysis for chloroplast DNAs. Economic Botany 53, 285– 291. Abrams RI, Edwards CR, Harris T, 1978. Yields and cross-pollination of soybeans as affected by honey bees and alfalfa leafcutting bees. American Bee Journal 118, 555– 556, 558. Abud S, de Souza PIM, Vianna GR, Leonardecz E, Moreira CT, Faleiro FG, Júnior JN, Monteiro PMFO, Rech EL, Aragão FJL, 2007. Gene flow from transgenic to nontransgenic soybean plants in the Cerrado region of Brazil. Genetics and Molecular Research 6, 445– 452. ACRE, 2007. Managing the footprint of agriculture: towards a comparative assessment of risks and benefits for novel agricultural systems. DEFRA, London, www.defra.gov.uk/environment/acre/fsewiderissues/pdf/acre-wi-final.pdf Ahrent DK, Caviness CE, 1994. Natural cross-pollination of 12 soybean cultivars in Arkansas. CropScience 34, 376– 378. Albajes R, Eizaguirre M, Casado D, Pérez M, López C, Lumbierres B, Pons X, 2008. Impact of glyphosate use on arthropods in transgenic herbicide-tolerant maize; preliminary results from studies in Spain. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 33, 23– 29. Albajes R, Lumbierres B, Pons X, 2009. Responsiveness of arthropod herbivores and their natural enemies to modified weed management in corn. Environmental Entomology 38, 944– 954. Albajes R, Lumbierres B, Pons X, 2010. Managing weeds in herbicide-tolerant GM maize for biological control enhancement. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 52, 1– 8. Albajes R, Lumbierres B, Pons X, 2011. Two heteropteran predators in relation to weed management in herbicide-tolerant corn. Biological Control, DOI:10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.03.008 (in press). Alibhai MF, Stallings WC, 2001. Closing down on glyphosate inhibition – with a new structure for drug discovery. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 98, 2944– 2946. Anderson RL, 2009. Impact of preceding crop and cultural practices on rye growth in winter wheat. Weed Technology 23, 564– 568. Andreasen C, Andresen LC, 2011. Managing farmland flora to promote biodiversity in Europe. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 6, 047, 1– 11. Arpaia S, 2010. Genetically modified plants and "non-target" organisms: analysing the functioning of the agro-ecosystem. Collection of Biosafety Reviews 5, 12– 80. Arpaia S, de Cristofaro A, Guerrieri E, Bossi S, Cellini F, Di Leo GM, Germinara GS, Iodice L, Maffei ME, Petrozza A, Sasso R, Vitagliano S, 2011. Foraging activity of bumblebees (Bombus terrestris L.) on Bt-expressing eggplants. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 5, 255– 261. Arregui MC, Scotta RR, Sánchez D, 2006. Improved weed control with broadleaved herbicides in glyphosate-tolerant soybean (Glycine max). Crop Protection 25, 653– 656. Arregui MC, Sánchez D, Althaus R, Scotta RR, Bertolaccini I, 2010. Assessing the risk of pesticide environmental impact in several Argentinian cropping systems with a fuzzy expert indicator. Pest Management Science 66, 736– 740. Assaad FF, Signer ER, 1990. Cauliflower mosaic virus p35Spromoter activity in Escherichia coli. Molecular and General Genetics 223, 517– 520. Ateh CM, Harvey RG 1999. Annual weed control by glyphosate in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 13, 394– 398. Badea E, Rosca I, Sabau I, Ciocazanu I, 2006. Monitoring of Roundup Ready soybean in Romania. IOBC/wprs Bulletin 29, 27– 37. Bagavathiannan MV, Van Acker RC, 2008. Crop ferality: Implications for novel trait confinement. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 127, 1– 6. Ball DA, 1992. Weed seedbank response to tillage, herbicides, and crop rotation sequence. Weed Science 40, 654– 659. Balmford A, Green RE, Scharlemann JPW, 2005. Sparing land for nature: exploring the potential impact of changes in agricultural yield on the area needed for crop production. Global Change Biology 11, 1594– 1605. Bàrberi P, Lo Cascio B, 2001. Long-term tillage and crop rotation effects on weed seedbank size and composition. Weed Research 41, 325– 340. Bàrberi P, Burgio G, Dinelli G, Moonen AC, Otto S, Vazzana C, Zanin G, 2010. Functional biodiversity in the agricultural landscape: relationships between weeds and arthropod fauna. Weed Research 50, 388– 401. Barriuso J, Marín S, Mellado RP, 2010. Effect of the herbicide glyphosate on glyphosate-tolerant maize rhizobacterial communities: a comparison with pre-emergency applied herbicide consisting of a combination of acetochlor and terbuthylazine. Environmental Microbiology 12, 1021– 1030. Barriuso J, Marín S, Mellado RP, 2011. Potential accumulative effect of the herbicide glyphosate on glyphosate-tolerant maize rhizobacterial communities over a three-year cultivation period. PLoS ONE 6, e27558. Barriuso J, Mellado RP, 2012. Glyphosate affects the rhizobacterial communities in glyphosate-tolerant cotton. Applied Soil Ecology 55, 20– 26. Basso B, Sartori L, Bertocco M, Cammarano D, Martin EC, Grace PR, 2011. Economic and environmental evaluation of site-specific tillage in a maize crop in NE Italy. European Journal of Agronomy 35, 83– 92. Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ, Goudriaan J, van Laar HH, 2000. Design of weed management systems with a reduced reliance on herbicides poses new challenges and prerequisites for modeling crop-weed interactions. Field Crops Research 67, 161– 179. Baylis AD, 2000. Why glyphosate is a global herbicide: strengths, weaknesses and prospects. Pest Management Science 56, 299– 308. Beckie HJ, 2006. Herbicide-resistant weeds: management tactics and practices. Weed Technology 20, 793– 814. Beckie HJ, 2011. Herbicide-resistant weed management: focus on glyphosate. Pest Management Science 67, 1037– 1048. Beckie HJ, Reboud X, 2009. Selecting for weed resistance: herbicide rotation and mixture. Weed Technology 23, 363– 370. Beckie HJ, Harker KN, Hall LM, Warwick SI, Légère A, Sikkema PH, Clayton GW, Thomas AG, Leeson JY, Seguin-Swartz G, Simard MJ, 2006. A decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86, 1243– 1264. Bennett R, Phipps R, Strange A, Grey P, 2004. Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide-tolerant sugar beet: a life-cycle assessment. Plant Biotechnology Journal 2, 273– 278. Benton TG, 2007. Managing farming's footprint on biodiversity. Science 315, 341– 342. Benton TG, Vickery JA, Wilson JD, 2003. Farmland biodiversity: is habitat heterogeneity the key? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 18, 182– 188. Bindraban PS, Franke AC, Ferraro DO, Ghersa CM, Lotz LAP, Nepomuceno A, Smulders MJM, van De Wiel CCM, 2009. GM-related sustainability: agro-ecological impacts, risks and opportunities of soy production in Argentina and Brazil. Report Plant Research International, Wageningen, edepot.wur.nl/7954 Bitzer RJ, Buckelew LD, Pedigo LP, 2002. Effects of transgenic herbicide-resistant soybean varieties and systems on surface-active springtails (Entognatha: Collembola). Environmental Entomology 31, 449– 461. Bohan DA, Hawes C, Haughton AJ, Denholm I, Champion GT, Perry JN, Clark SJ, 2007. Statistical models to evaluate invertebrate-plant trophic interactions in arable systems. Bulletin of Entomological Research 97, 265– 280. Bohan DA, Boursault A, Brooks DR, Petit S, 2011. National-scale regulation of weed seedbank by carabid predators. Journal of Applied Ecology 48, 888– 898. Bohm GM, Alves BJR, Urquiaga S, Boddey RM, Xavier GR, Hax F, Rombaldi CV, 2009. Glyphosate- and imazethapyr-induced effects on yield, nodule mass and biological nitrogen fixation in field-grown glyphosate-resistant soybean. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 41, 420– 422. Bonny S, 2008. Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 28, 21– 32. Bonny S, 2011. Herbicide-tolerant transgenic soybean over 15 years of cultivation: pesticide use, weed resistance, and some economic issues. The case of the USA. Sustainability 3, 1302– 1322. Borggaard OK, Gimsing AL, 2008. Fate of glyphosate in soil and the possibility of leaching to ground and surface waters: a review. Pest Management Science 64, 441– 456. Bott S, Tesfamariam T, Candan H, Cakmak I, Römheld V, Neumann G, 2008. Glyphosate-induced impairment of plant growth and micronutrient status in glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max L.). Plant Soil 312, 185– 194. Bott S, Tesfamariam T, Kania A, Eman B, Aslan N, Römheld V, Neumann G, 2011. Phytotoxicity of glyphosate soil residues re-mobilised by phosphate fertilisation. Plant Soil 342, 249– 263. Bradshaw LD, Padgette SR, Kimball SL, Wells BH, 1997. Perspectives on glyphosate resistance. Weed Technology 11, 189– 198. Brigulla M, Wackernagel W, 2010. Molecular aspects of gene transfer and foreign DNA acquisition in prokaryotes with regard to safety issues. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology 86, 1027– 1041. Brimner TA, Gallivan GJ, Stephenson GR, 2005. Influence of herbicide-resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management. Pest Management Science 61, 47– 52. Brookes G, 2005. The farm-level impact of herbicide-tolerant soybeans in Romania. AgBioForum 8, 235– 241. Brookes G, Barfoot P, 2005. Global impact of biotech crops: socio-economic and environmental effects in the first ten years of commercial use. AgBioForum 9, 139– 151. Brooks DR, Bohan DA, Champion GT, Haughton AJ, Hawes C, Heard MS, Clark SJ, Dewar AM, Firbank LG, Perry JN, Rothery P, Scott RJ, Woiwod IP, Birchall C, Skellern MP, Walker JH, Baker P, Bell D, Browne EL, Dewar AJG, Fairfax CM, Garner BH, Haylock LA, Horne SL, Hulmes SE, Mason NS, Norton LR, Nuttall P, Randle Z, Rossall MJ, Sands RJN, Singer EJ, Walker MJ, 2003. Invertebrate responses to the management of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant and conventional spring crops. I. Soil-surface-active invertebrates. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358, 1847– 1862. Buckelew LD, Pedigo LP, Mero HM, Owen MDK, Tylka GL, 2000. Effects of weed management systems on canopy insects in herbicide-resistant soybeans. Journal of Economic Entomology 93, 1437– 1443. Bückmann H, Petersen J, Schlinker G, Märländer B, 2000. Weed control in genetically modified sugar beet – Two years experiences of a field trial series in Germany. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection XVII, 353– 362. Bühler C, 2006. Biodiversity monitoring in Switzerland: what can we learn for general surveillance of GM crops? Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety 1, 37– 41. Burks AW, Fuchs RL, 1995. Assessment of the endogenous allergens in glyphosate-tolerant and commercial soybean varieties. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 96, 1008– 1010. Busi R, Powles SB, 2009. Evolution of glyphosate resistance in a Lolium rigidum population by glyphosate selection at sublethal doses. Heredity 103, 318– 325. Busse MD, Ratcliff AW, Shestack CJ, Powers RF, 2001. Glyphosate toxicity and the effects of long term vegetation control on soil microbial communities. Soil Biology & Biochemistry 33, 1777– 1789. Butler SJ, Vickery JA, Norris K, 2007. Farmland biodiversity and the footprint of agriculture. Science 315, 381– 384. CAC, 2003. Codex principles and guidelines on foods derived from biotechnology. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, www.bfr.bund.de/cm/208/codex_principles_and_guidelines_on_foods_derived_from_biotechnology.pdf CaJacob CA, Feng PCC, Heck GR, Alibhai MF, Sammons RD, Padgette SR, 2004. Engineering resistance to herbicides. In: P Christou, H Klee (Eds), Handook of Plant Biotechnology, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp 353– 372. Cakmak I, Yazici A, Tutus Y, Ozturk L, 2009. Glyphosate reduced seed and leaf concentrations of calcium, manganese, magnesium, and iron in non-glyphosate resistant soybean. European Journal of Agronomy 31, 114– 119. Cardina J, Herms CP, Doohan DJ, 2002. Crop rotation and tillage system effects on weed seedbanks. Weed Science 50, 448– 460. Caron-Lormier G, Bohan DA, Hawes C, Raybould A, Haughton AJ, Humphry RW, 2009. How might we model an ecosystem? Ecological Modeling 220, 1935– 1949. Caron-Lormier G, Bohan DA, Dye R, Hawes C, Humphrey RW, Raybould A, 2011. Modelling an ecosystem: the example of agroecosystems. Ecological Modeling 222, 1163– 1173. Carpenter JE, 2011. Impacts of GM crops on biodiversity. GM Crops 2, 1– 17. Castellazzi MS, Perry JN, Colbach N, Monod H, Adamczyk K, Viaud V, Conrad KF, 2007. New measures and tests of temporal and spatial pattern of crops in agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 118, 339– 349. Castellazzi MS, Wood GA, Burgess PJ, Morris J, Conrad MF, Perry JN, 2008. A systematic representation of crop rotations. Agricultural Systems 97, 26– 33. Castro JV, Peralba MCR, Ayub MAZ, 2007. Biodegradation of the herbicide glyphosate by filamentous fungi in platform shaker and batch bioreactor. Journal of Environmental Science and Health – Part B 42, 883– 886. Caviness CE, 1966. Estimates of natural cross-pollination in Jackson soybeans in Arkansas. CropScience 6, 211– 212. Ceccherini MT, Poté J, Kay E, Van VT, Marechal J, Pietramellara G, Nannipieri P, Vogel TM, Simonet P, 2003. Degradation and transformability of DNA from transgenic leaves. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69, 673– 678. CERA, 2010. A review of the environmental safety of the CP4 EPSPS protein, ILSI Research Foundation, Washington D.C., cera-gmc.org/docs/cera_publications/pub_01_2010.pdf Cerdeira AL, Duke SO, 2006. The current status and environmental impacts of glyphosate-resistant crops: A review. Journal of Environmental Quality 35, 1633– 1658. Cerdeira AL, Duke SO, 2007. Environmental impacts of transgenic herbicide-resistant crops. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2, 1– 14. Cerdeira AL, Duke SO, 2010. Effects of glyphosate-resistant crop cultivation on soil and water quality. GM crops 1, 1– 9. Cerdeira AL, Gazziero DLP, Duke SO, Matallo MB, Spadotto CA, 2007. Review of potential environmental impact of transgenic glyphosate-resistant soybean in Brazil. Journal of Environmental Science and Health – Part B 42, 539– 549. Cerdeira AL, Gazziero DLP, Duke SO, Matallo MB, 2011. Agricultural impacts of glyphosate-resistant soybean cultivation in South America. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 59, 5799– 5807. Chamberlain DE, Fuller RJ, Bunce RGH, Duckworth JC, Shrubb M, 2000. Changes in the abundance of farmland birds in relation to the timing of agricultural intensification in England and Wales. Journal of Applied Ecology 37, 771– 788. Champion GT, May MJ, Bennett S, Brooks DR, Clark SJ, Daniels RE, Firbank LG, Haughton AJ, Hawes C, Heard MS, Perry JN, Randle Z, Rossall MJ, Rothery P, Skellern MP, Scott RJ, Squire GR, Thomas MR, 2003. Crop management and agronomic context of the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 358, 1801– 1818. Chiari WC, de Toledo VDA, Ruvolo-Takasusuki MCC, de Oliveira AJB, Sakaguti ES, Attencia VM, Costa FM, Mitsui MH, 2005. Pollination of soybean (Glycine max L. Merril) by honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 48, 31– 36. Chiari WC, Ruvolo-Takasusuki MCC, Chambó ED, Arias CA, Hoffmann-Campo CB, de Toledo VDA, 2011. Gene flow between conventional and transgenic soybean pollinated by honeybees. In MN Abd and EG Hasaneenh (Eds), Herbicides - Mechanisms and Mode of Action, InTech Open Access Publisher. Clarke JH, Cook SK, Harris D, Wiltshire JJJ, Henderson IG, Jones NE, Boatman ND, Potts SG, Westbury DB, Woodcock BA, Ramsay AJ, Pywell RF, Goldsworthy PE, Holland JM, Smith BM, Tipples J, Morris AJ, Chapman P, Edwards P, 2007. The SAFFIE project report. ADAS, Boxworth, UK, www.hgca.com/document.aspx?fn=noad&media_id=3567&publicationId=3919 Clergue B, Amiaud B, Pervanchon F, Lasserre-Joulin F, Plantureux S, 2005. Biodiversity: function and assessment in agricultural areas. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 25, 1– 15. Cordeau S, Reboud X, Chauvel B, 2011. Relative importance of farming practices and landscape context on the weed flora of sown grass strips. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 139, 595– 602. Corrigan KA, Harvey RG, 2000. Glyphosate with and without residual herbicides in no till glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 14, 569– 577. Coyette B, Tencalla F, Brants I, Fichet Y, Rouchouze D, 2002. Effect of introducing glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet on pesticide usage in Europe. Pesticide Outlook 13, 219– 223. Cromwell GL, Lindemann MD, Randolph JH, Parker GR Coffey RD, Laurent KM, Armstrong CL, Mikel WB, Stanisiewski EP, Hartnell GF, 2002. Soybean meal from roundup ready or conventional soybeans in diets for growing-finishing swine. Journal of Animal Sciences 80, 708– 715. Culpepper SA, 2006. Glyphosate-induced weed shifts. Weed Technology 20, 277– 281. Culpepper AS, Webster TM, Sosnoskie LM, York AC, 2010. Glyphosate resistant Palmer amaranth in the United States. In: VK Nandula (Ed), Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp 195– 212. Dalley CD, Kells JJ, Renner KA, 2004a. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max) yields. Weed Technology 18, 165– 176. Dalley CD, Kells JJ, Renner KA, 2004b. Effect of glyphosate application timing and row spacing on weed growth in corn (Zea mays) and soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technology 18, 177– 182. Dauer JT, Luschei EC, Mortensen DA, 2009. Effects of landscape composition on spread of an herbicide-resistant weed. Landscape Ecology 24, 735– 747. Davis VM, Kruger GR, Stachler JM, Loux MM, Johnson WG, 2009. Growth and seed production of horseweed (Conyza canadensis) populations resistant to glyphosate, ALS-inhibiting, and multiple (glyphosate + ALS-inhibiting) herbicides. Weed Science 57, 494– 504. de la Fuente EB, Suarez SA, Ghersa CM, 2006. Soybean weed community composition and richness between 1995 and 2003 in the Rolling Pampas (Argentina). Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 115, 229– 236. de Vries J, Heine M, Harms K, Wackernagel W, 2003. Spread of recombinant DNA by roots and pollen of transgenic potato plants, identified by highly specific biomonitoring using natural transformation of an Acinetobacter sp. Applied and Environmental Microbiology 69, 4455– 4462. de Vries J, Herzfeld T, Wackernagel W, 2004. Transfer of plastid DNA from tobacco to the soil bacterium Acinetobacter sp. by natural transformation. Molecular Microbiology 53, 323– 334. Deaville ER, Maddison BC, 2005. Detection of transgenic and endogenous plant DNA fragments in the blood, tissues, and digesta of broilers. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 53, 10268– 10275. Delannay X, Bauman TT, Beighley DH, Buettner MJ, Coble HD, DeFelice MS, Derting CW, Diedrick TJ, Friffin JL, Hagood ES, Hancock FG, Hart SE, LaVallee BJ, Loux MM, Lueschen WE, Matson KW, Moots CK, Murdock E, Nickell AD, Owen MDK, Paschal II EH, Prochaska LM, Raymond PJ, Reynolds DB, Rhodes WK, Roeth FW, Sprankle PL, Tarochione LJ, Tinius CN, Walker RH, Wax LM, Weigelt HD, Padgette SR, 1995. Yield evaluation of a glyphosate-tolerant soybean line after treatment with glyphosate. CropScience 35, 1461– 1467. Desneux N, Ramírez-Romero R, Bokonon-Ganta AH, Bernal JS, 2010. Attraction of the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris to host (Spodoptera frugiperla) frass is affected by transgenic maize. Ecotoxicology 19, 1183– 1192. Devos Y, Cougnon M, Vergucht S, Bulcke R, Haesaert G, Steurbaut W, Reheul D, 2008. Environmental impact of herbicide regimes used with genetically modified herbicide-resistant maize. Transgenic Research 17, 1059– 1077 (Erratum: 18, 315–316). Devos Y, de Schrijver A, Reheul D, 2009a. Quantifying the introgressive hybridisation propensity between transgenic oilseed rape and its wild/weedy relatives. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 149, 303– 322. Devos Y, Demont M, Dillen K, Reheul D, Kaiser M, Sanvido O, 2009b. Coexistence of genetically modified (GM) and non-GM crops in the European Union. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 29, 11– 30. Dewar AM, 2009. Weed control in glyphosate-tolerant maize in Europe. Pest Management Science 10, 1047– 1058. Dewar AM, 2010. GM glyphosate-tolerant maize in Europe can help alleviate the global food shortage. Outlooks on Pest Management 21, 55– 63. Dewar AM, Haylock LA, Bean KM, May MJ, 2000. Delayed control of weeds in glyphosate-tolerant sugar beet and consequences on aphid infestation and yield. Pest Management Science 56, 345– 350. Dewar AM, May MJ, Woiwod IP, Haylock LA, Champion GT, Garner BH, Sands RJN, Qi A, Pidgeon JD, 2003. A novel approach to the use of genetically modified herbicide tolerant crops for environmental benefit. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270, 335– 340. Dewar AM, Champion GT, May MJ, Pidgeon JD, 2005. The UK Farm Scale Evaluations of GM crops – a post script. Outlooks on Pest Management 16, 164– 173 Dill GM, 2005. Glyphosate-resistant crops: history, status and future. Pest Management Science 61, 219– 224. Dill GM, Sammons RD, Feng PCC, Kohn F, Kretzmer K, Mehrsheikh A, Bleeke M, Honegger JL, Farmer D, Wright D, Haupfear EA, 2010. Glyphosate: discovery, development, applications and properties. In: VK Nandula (Ed), Glyphosate Resistance in Crops and Weeds: History, Development, and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, pp 1– 33. Donald PF, Green RE, Heath MF, 2001. Agricultural intensification and the collapse of Europe's farmland bird populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 268, 25– 29. Dorokhov D, Ignatov A, Deineko E, Serjapin A, Ala A, Skryabin K, 2004. In: HCM Nijs, D Bartsch, J Sweet (Eds), Introgression from Genetically Modified Plants into Wild Relatives, CAB International, pp 151– 161. Doucet C, Weaver SE, Hamill AS, Zhang J, 1999. Separating the effects of crop rotation from weed management on weed density and diversity. Weed Science 47, 729– 735. Dos Santos JB, Ferreira EA, Kasuya MCM, DaSilva AA, Procopio SO, 2005. Tolerance of Bradyrhizobium strains to glyphosate formulations. Crop Protection 24, 543– 547. Duggan PS, Chambers, PA, Heritage, J, and Forbes, JM, 2000. Survival of free DNA encoding antibiotic resistance from transgenic maize and the transformation activity of DNA in ovine saliva, ovine rumen fluid and silage effluent. FEMS Microbiology Letters 191, 71– 77. Duggan PS, Chambers, PA, Heritage, J, and Forbes, JM, 2003. Fate of genetically modified maize DNA in the oral cavity and rumen of sheep. British Journal of Nutrition 89, 159– 166. Duke SO, 2005. Taking stock of herbicide-resistant crops ten years after introduction. Pest Management Science 61, 211– 218. Duke SO, Powles SB, 2008a. Glyphosate-resistant weeds and crops. Pest Management Science 64, 317– 318. Duke SO, Powles SB, 2008b. Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Management Science 64, 319– 325. Dunfield KE, Germida JJ, 2004. Impact of genetically modified crops on soil- and plant-associated microbial communities. Journal of Environmental Quality 33, 806– 815. EC, 1996. Commission Decision (96/281/EC) of 3 April 1996 concerning the placing on the market of gen
Referência(s)