Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Early intervention in psychosis: health economic evaluation using the net benefit approach in a real-world setting

2019; Cambridge University Press; Volume: 217; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1192/bjp.2019.126

1472-1465

Caragh Behan, Brendan Kennelly, Eric Roche, Laoise Renwick, Sarah Masterson, John Lyne, Brian O’Donoghue, John L. Waddington, Catherine McDonough, Paul McCrone, Mary Clarke,

Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Background Early intervention in psychosis is a complex intervention, usually delivered in a specialist stand-alone setting, which aims to improve outcomes for people with psychosis. Previous studies have been criticised because the control used did not accurately reflect actual practice. Aims To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of early intervention by estimating the incremental net benefit (INB) of an early-intervention programme, delivered in a real-world setting. INB measures the difference in monetary terms between alternative interventions. Method Two contemporaneous incidence-based cohorts presenting with first-episode psychosis, aged 18–65 years, were compared. Costs and outcomes were measured over 1 year. The main outcome was avoidance of a relapse that required admission to hospital or home-based treatment. Results From the health sector perspective, the probability that early intervention was cost-effective was 0.77. The INB was €2465 per person (95% CI − €4418 to €9347) when society placed a value of €6000, the cost of an in-patient relapse, on preventing a relapse requiring admission or home care. Following adjustment, the probability that early intervention was cost-effective was 1, and the INB to the health sector was €3105 per person (95% CI −€8453 to €14 663). From a societal perspective, the adjusted probability that early intervention was cost-effective was 1, and the INB was €19 928 per person (95% CI − €2075 to €41 931). Conclusions Early intervention has a modest INB from the health sector perspective and a large INB from the societal perspective. The perspective chosen is critical when presenting results of an economic evaluation of a complex intervention.