Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A renaming proposal: “The Auger–Meitner effect”

2019; AIP Publishing; Volume: 72; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1063/pt.3.4281

1945-0699

Demetrios Matsakis, A. J. Coster, Zvi Laster, Ruth Lewin Sime,

International Science and Diplomacy

We are writing to propose that the Auger effect be renamed the Auger–Meitner effect to recognize Lise Meitner's contribution to it. Meitner is better known for her work on nuclear fission, for which she was nominated for the Nobel Prize more than 30 times (reference 11. R. L. Sime, Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics, U. California Press (1996); "This Month in Physics History: December 1938: Discovery of Nuclear Fission," APS News 16(11), 2 (2007).; see also the article "A Nobel tale of postwar injustice," by Elisabeth Crawford, Ruth Lewin Sime, and Mark Walker, Physics Today, September 1997, page 26). However, she is less widely recognized for her discovery of what has since become known as the Auger effect and her subsequent publications on the topic22. L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 9, 145 (1922), p. 147; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326963L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 17, 54 (1923), p. 64 (trans. by R. Sime). in 1922 and 1923.When an electron from an atom's inner shell is ejected—for example, by UV radiation or nuclear beta decay—an electron from a higher energy level will drop into the vacancy and emit a photon or eject another electron. A cascade develops as other electrons change their state by falling into the energy levels abandoned by the earlier ones. According to Meitner's 1922 description, "a primary (nuclear) β-ray transforms itself in the nucleus into a γ-ray. The γ-ray either goes through unchanged as a γ-ray, or it ejects secondary β-rays from the electron shells. In this way the characteristic x-ray spectrum of the atom is excited, which itself can of course also eject electrons from lower energy levels."22. L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 9, 145 (1922), p. 147; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326963L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 17, 54 (1923), p. 64 (trans. by R. Sime). Again, in 1923 Meitner wrote that "the primary β-rays eject outer electrons from the daughter atom, which excites the Kα radiation, which in turn ejects L-, M- or N-electrons from the same atom."22. L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 9, 145 (1922), p. 147; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326963L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 17, 54 (1923), p. 64 (trans. by R. Sime). She also pointed to the possibility that radiationless transitions could account for the ejection of orbital electrons during beta decay. Lise Meitner (left) talking with student Susan Jones Swisher and faculty member Rosalie Hoyt at Bryn Mawr College, April 1959. (Photo by Heka Davis, courtesy of AIP Emilio Segrè Visual Archives, Physics Today Collection.) PPT|High resolutionThe significance of Meitner's discovery was not immediately realized, undoubtedly because she did not emphasize it in her publications; she instead focused on the emission energies of the original beta decay, which due to the simultaneous emission of the then-unknown neutrino resulted in a puzzling energy distribution.In 1923, a year after Meitner first described the effect, Pierre Auger's cloud-chamber work allowed him to independently observe the cascade that now bears his name.33. P. Auger, C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. 177, 169 (1923). There followed a lively correspondence involving Meitner; Auger; theorists Niels Bohr, Oskar Klein, and Svein Rosseland (who had raised the possibility of radiationless transitions in 1921); and others.44. C. Jensen, Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934, Birkhäuser (2000), p. 99. The Auger effect remains an area of active research, and Auger, a truly great scientist in many ways, went on to do wonderful things in astronomy. Among his many honors were adoption of the related terminology "Auger electrons" and "Auger peaks," and naming of the Pierre Auger Observatory in Argentina, which observes high-energy cosmic rays with "Auger showers."Crediting Meitner for being the first to observe the effect has been discussed for at least 30 years. Science writer Richard Sietmann states that "Meitner was the person who really should have taken credit for the so-called 'Auger' effect," although he also suggests that shared credit would be acceptable.55. R. Sietmann, Phys. Bull. 39, 316 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9112/39/8/017O. H. Duparc, Int. J. Mater. Res. 100, 1162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110163 In another review, Olivier Duparc writes, "While L. Meitner should have shared the Nobel Prize with [Otto] Hahn, the Auger effect has rightly been attributed to Auger."55. R. Sietmann, Phys. Bull. 39, 316 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9112/39/8/017O. H. Duparc, Int. J. Mater. Res. 100, 1162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110163 We think there is a strong enough claim to honor both contributors.Such renaming has precedent. In astronomy, for example, according to a private communication last year between David DeVorkin of the Smithsonian's National Air and Space Museum and one of us (Matsakis), the Hertzsprung–Russell diagram was originally called the Russell diagram. And in October 2018, a resolution to rename the Hubble law as the Hubble–Lemaître law was approved by 78% of the International Astronomical Union's voting membership.ReferencesSection:ChooseTop of pageReferences <<CITING ARTICLES1. R. L. Sime, Lise Meitner: A Life in Physics, U. California Press (1996); Google Scholar"This Month in Physics History: December 1938: Discovery of Nuclear Fission," APS News 16(11), 2 (2007). Google Scholar2. L. Meitner, Z. Phys. 9, 145 (1922), p. 147; https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01326963, Google ScholarCrossrefL. Meitner, Z. Phys. 17, 54 (1923), p. 64 (trans. by R. Sime). , Google ScholarCrossref3. P. Auger, C. R. Hebd. Séances Acad. Sci. 177, 169 (1923). Google Scholar4. C. Jensen, Controversy and Consensus: Nuclear Beta Decay 1911–1934, Birkhäuser (2000), p. 99. Google ScholarCrossref5. R. Sietmann, Phys. Bull. 39, 316 (1988); https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9112/39/8/017, Google ScholarCrossrefO. H. Duparc, Int. J. Mater. Res. 100, 1162 (2009). https://doi.org/10.3139/146.110163, , Google ScholarCrossref© 2019 American Institute of Physics.