Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Direct Pulp Capping: Which is the Most Effective Biomaterial? A Retrospective Clinical Study

2019; Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Volume: 12; Issue: 20 Linguagem: Inglês

10.3390/ma12203382

1996-1944

Anabela Paula, Eunice Carrilho, Mafalda Laranjo, Ana Margarida Abrantes, João Casalta‐Lopes, Maria Filomena Botelho, Carlos Miguel Marto, Manuel Marques Ferreira,

Dental Radiography and Imaging

(1) Background: Recently, tricalcium silicate cements, such as Biodentine™, have emerged. This biomaterial has a calcium hydroxide base and characteristics like mineral aggregate trioxide cements, but has tightening times that are substantially more suitable for their application and other clinical advantages. (2) Methods: A retrospective clinical study was conducted with 20 patients, which included a clinical evaluation of the presence or absence of pulp inflammation compatible symptoms, radiographic evaluation of the periapical tissues, and structural alterations of the coronary restoration that supports pulp capping therapies with Biodentine™ and WhiteProRoot®MTA. (3) Results: This clinical study revealed similar success rates between mineral trioxide cement and tricalcium silicates cements at 6 months, with 100% and 95% success rates, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between both biomaterials and between these and the various clinical circumstances, namely the absolute isolation of the operating field, exposure size, the aetiology of exposure, and even the type of restorative material used. (4) Conclusions: Biodentine™ demonstrated a therapeutic effect on the formation of a dentin bridge accompanied by slight inflammatory signs, with a high clinical success rate, indicating the possibility of its effective and safe use in dental pulp direct capping in humans, similar to the gold standard material.