Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Editors’ Comments: Is Research on Corporate Social Responsibility Undertheorized?

2020; Academy of Management; Volume: 45; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.5465/amr.2019.0450

1930-3807

Heli Wang, Cristina B. Gibson, Udo Zander,

Corporate Identity and Reputation

Academy of Management ReviewVol. 45, No. 1 From the EditorsEditors’ Comments: Is Research on Corporate Social Responsibility Undertheorized?Heli Wang, Cristina Gibson and Udo ZanderHeli Wang, Cristina Gibson and Udo ZanderAssociate EditorsPublished Online:9 Jan 2020https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0450AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESAgle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., Jensen, M. C., Mitchell, R. K., & Wood, D. J. 2008. Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 153–190. Google ScholarAgle, B. R., Mitchell, R. K., & Sonnenfeld, J. A. 1999. Who matters to CEOs? An investigation of stakeholder attributes and salience, corporate performance, and CEO values. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 507–525.Link , Google ScholarAguinis, H., & Glavas, A. 2012. What we know and don’t know about corporate social responsibility: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 38: 932–968. Google ScholarAlmandoz, J. 2012. Arriving at the starting line: The impact of community and financial logics on new banking ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 55: 1381–1406.Link , Google ScholarAsmussen, C. G., & Fosfuri, A. 2019. Orchestrating corporate social responsibility in the multinational enterprise. Strategic Management Journal, 40: 894–916. Google ScholarBarnett, M. L. 2019. The business case for corporate social responsibility: A critique and an indirect path forward. Business & Society, 58: 167–190. Google ScholarCaligiuri, P., Mencin, A., & Jiang, K. 2013. Win-win-win: The influence of company‐sponsored volunteerism programs on employees, NGOs, and business units. Personnel Psychology, 66: 825–860. Google ScholarCarlos, W. C., & Lewis, B. W. 2018. Strategic silence: Withholding certification status as a hypocrisy avoidance tactic. Administrative Science Quarterly, 63: 130–169. Google ScholarCuypers, I. R., Koh, P. S., & Wang, H. 2015. Sincerity in corporate philanthropy, stakeholder perceptions and firm value. Organization Science, 27: 173–188. Google ScholarDonaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.Link , Google ScholarEbrahim, A., & Rangan, V. K. 2010. Putting the brakes on impact: A contingency framework for measuring social performance, Academy of Management Proceedings. Google ScholarFlammer, C. 2015. Does corporate social responsibility lead to superior financial performance? A regression discontinuity approach. Management Science, 61: 2549–2568. Google ScholarFriedman, A. L., & Miles, S. 2002. Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39: 1–21. Google ScholarGibson, C. B. 2011. Sustainability through synergy: Collaborative capacity building across stakeholders to increase social impact. Presentation at the 2011 Academy of International Business Conference, Nagoya, Japan. Google ScholarGibson, C. B. 2019. Corporate community investment: Forging new ground through psychological, social and relational pathways. Working paper, Pepperdine University, Malibu, CA. Google ScholarGlavas, A. 2016. Corporate social responsibility and organizational psychology: An integrative review. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 144. Google ScholarGodfrey, P. C. 2005. The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review, 30: 777–798.Link , Google ScholarGodfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. 2009. The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: An empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 425–445. Google ScholarHarrison, J. S., Bosse, D. A., & Phillips, R. A. 2010. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 58–74. Google ScholarHawn, O., & Ioannou, I. 2016. Mind the gap: The interplay between external and internal actions in the case of corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 2569–2588. Google ScholarHilliard, I. 2019. Coherency management: An alternative to CSR in a changing world. Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave MacMillian. Google ScholarHoward-Grenville, J., Buckle, S. J., Hoskins, B. J., & George, G. 2014. Climate change and management. Academy of Management Journal, 57: 615–623.Link , Google ScholarJawahar, I. M., & McLaughlin, G. L. 2001. Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26: 397–414.Link , Google ScholarJones, T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.Link , Google ScholarJones, T. M., Harrison, J. S., & Felps, W. 2018. How applying instrumental stakeholder theory can provide sustainable competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 43: 371–391.Link , Google ScholarKaul, A., & Luo, J. 2018. An economic case for CSR: The comparative efficiency of for-profit firms in meeting consumer demand for social goods. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 1650–1677. Google ScholarKoh, P. S., Qian, C., & Wang, H. 2014. Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1464–1482. Google ScholarLaplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. 2008. Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34: 1152–1189. Google ScholarLee, C. K., Song, H. J., Lee, H. M., Lee, S., & Bernhard, B. J. 2013. The impact of CSR on casino employees’ organizational trust, job satisfaction, and customer orientation: An empirical examination of responsible gambling strategies. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33: 406–415. Google ScholarLin, C. P., Lyau, N. M., Tsai, Y. H., Chen, W. Y., & Chiu, C. K. 2010. Modeling corporate citizenship and its relationship with organizational citizenship behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 95: 357–372. Google ScholarLuo, J., Kaul, A., & Seo, H. 2018. Winning us with trifles: Adverse selection in the use of philanthropy as insurance. Strategic Management Journal, 39: 2591–2617. Google ScholarLuo, X., Wang, H., Raithel, S., & Zheng, Q. 2015. Corporate social performance, analyst stock recommendations, and firm future returns. Strategic Management Journal, 36: 123–136. Google ScholarMakov, T., & Newman, G. E. 2016. Economic gains stimulate negative evaluations of corporate sustainability initiatives. Nature Climate Change, 6: 844–846. Google ScholarMargolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. 2003. Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48: 268–305. Google ScholarMcWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. 2001. Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26: 117–127.Link , Google ScholarMueller, K., Hattrup, K., Spiess, S. O., & Lin-Hi, N. 2012. The effects of corporate social responsibility on employees’ affective commitment: A cross-cultural investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97: 1186–1200. Google ScholarPache, A. C., & Santos, F. 2013. Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56: 972–1001.Link , Google ScholarPorter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. 2011. The big idea: Creating shared value, rethinking capitalism. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2): 62–77. Google ScholarRupp, D. E., Shao, R., Thornton, M. A., & Skarlicki, D. P. 2013. Applicants’ and employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: The moderating effects of first-party justice perceptions and moral identity. Personnel Psychology, 66: 895–933. Google ScholarSeivwright, A. N., & Unsworth, K. L. 2016. Making sense of corporate social responsibility and work. Frontiers in Psychology, 7: 1–8. Google ScholarShiu, Y. M., & Yang, S. L. 2017. Does engagement in corporate social responsibility provide strategic insurance–like effects? Strategic Management Journal, 38: 455–470. Google ScholarSlack, R. E., Corlett, S., & Morris, R. 2015. Exploring employee engagement with (corporate) social responsibility: A social exchange perspective on organizational participation. Journal of Business Ethics, 127: 537–548. Google ScholarSundaram, A. K., & Inkpen, A. C. 2004. The corporate objective revisited. Organization Science, 15: 350–363. Google ScholarSutton, R. I., & Staw, B. M. 1995. What theory is not. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 371–384. Google ScholarWang, H., & Choi, J. 2013. A new look at the corporate social–financial performance relationship: The moderating roles of temporal and interdomain consistency in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 39: 416–441. Google ScholarWang, H., Tong, L., Takeuchi, R., & George, G. 2016. Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions: Thematic issue on corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Journal, 59: 534–544.Link , Google ScholarWernicke, G. 2016. CEO hypocrisy: How does CSR policy influence the reaction to excessive CEO pay? Working paper, Ivey, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byDignity Inherent and Earned: The Experience of Dignity at WorkCristina Gibson, Bobbi Thomason, Jaclyn Margolis, Kevin Groves, Stephen Gibson and Jennifer Franczak24 January 2023 | Academy of Management Annals, Vol. 17, No. 1Investing In Communities: Forging New Ground in Corporate Community Codevelopment through Relational and Psychological PathwaysCristina B. Gibson30 June 2022 | Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 65, No. 3Guilt and Corporate Philanthropy: The Case of the Privatization in ChinaJunkang Ji, Zhi Huang and Qi Li21 December 2021 | Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 64, No. 6A Bait-and-Switch Model of Corporate Social ResponsibilityPatrick Haack, Dirk Martignoni and Dennis Schoeneborn15 July 2021 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 3CSR: Undertheorized or Essentially Contested?Barry M. Mitnick, Duane Windsor and Donna J. Wood15 July 2021 | Academy of Management Review, Vol. 46, No. 3 Vol. 45, No. 1 Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 9 January 2020 Published in print 1 January 2020 Information© Academy of Management ReviewDownload PDF