Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2)

2020; Wiley; Volume: 12; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1029/2019ms001916

1942-2466

Gökhan Danabasoglu, Jean‐François Lamarque, Julio T. Bacmeister, David A. Bailey, Alice K. DuVivier, James Edwards, L. K. Emmons, John Fasullo, Rolando R. García, Andrew Gettelman, Cécile Hannay, Marika M. Holland, William G. Large, P. H. Lauritzen, David M. Lawrence, Jan T. M. Lenaerts, Keith Lindsay, William H. Lipscomb, Michael Mills, Richard Neale, Keith W. Oleson, Bette L. Otto‐Bliesner, Adam S. Phillips, William J. Sacks, Simone Tilmes, Leo van Kampenhout, Mariana Vertenstein, Alice Bertini, John M. Dennis, Clara Deser, C. Fischer, Baylor Fox‐Kemper, Jennifer E. Kay, Douglas E. Kinnison, Paul J. Kushner, Vincent E. Larson, Matthew C. Long, Sheri Mickelson, J. Keith Moore, Eric Nienhouse, Lorenzo M. Polvani, Philip J. Rasch, Gary Strand,

Atmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics

An overview of the Community Earth System Model Version 2 (CESM2) is provided, including a discussion of the challenges encountered during its development and how they were addressed. In addition, an evaluation of a pair of CESM2 long preindustrial control and historical ensemble simulations is presented. These simulations were performed using the nominal 1° horizontal resolution configuration of the coupled model with both the "low-top" (40 km, with limited chemistry) and "high-top" (130 km, with comprehensive chemistry) versions of the atmospheric component. CESM2 contains many substantial science and infrastructure improvements and new capabilities since its previous major release, CESM1, resulting in improved historical simulations in comparison to CESM1 and available observations. These include major reductions in low-latitude precipitation and shortwave cloud forcing biases; better representation of the Madden-Julian Oscillation; better El Niño-Southern Oscillation-related teleconnections; and a global land carbon accumulation trend that agrees well with observationally based estimates. Most tropospheric and surface features of the low- and high-top simulations are very similar to each other, so these improvements are present in both configurations. CESM2 has an equilibrium climate sensitivity of 5.1–5.3 °C, larger than in CESM1, primarily due to a combination of relatively small changes to cloud microphysics and boundary layer parameters. In contrast, CESM2's transient climate response of 1.9–2.0 °C is comparable to that of CESM1. The model outputs from these and many other simulations are available to the research community, and they represent CESM2's contributions to the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6.