Comparison of Paracentesis and Diuretics in the Treatment of Cirrhotics With Tense Ascites
1987; Elsevier BV; Volume: 93; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.5555/uri
ISSN1528-0012
AutoresPere Ginès, Vicente Arroyo, Enrique Quintero, Ramón Planas, Felipe Bory, Juan J. Cabrera, Antoni Rimola, Josep Maria Viver, Jordi Camps, Wladimiro Jiménez, Ricardo Mastaï, Joan Gaya, Joan Rodés,
Tópico(s)Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
ResumoAbstract To investigate whether paracentesis could be an alternative therapy for ascites, 117 cirrhotics with tense ascites were randomly allocated into two groups. Fifty-eight patients (group 1) were treated with paracentesis (4–6 L/day until disappearance of ascites) and intravenous albumin infusion (40 g after each tap). Fifty-nine patients (group 2) were treated with spironolactone (200–400 mg/day) plus furosemide (40–240 mg/day). Patients from group 2 not responding to diuretics were treated with a LeVeen shunt. After disappearance of ascites, patients from both groups were discharged from hospital and were instructed to take diuretics. Patients developing tense ascites during follow-up were readmitted to hospital and treated according to their initial schedule. Paracentesis was effective in eliminating the ascites in 56 patients from group 1 (96.5%) and did not induce significant changes in renal and hepatic function, plasma volume, cardiac index, peripheral resistance, plasma renin activity, plasma norepinephrine and antidiuretic hormone concentration, and urinary excretion of prostaglandin E 2 and 6-keto-prostaglandin F 1α . Diuretics were effective in eliminating the ascites in 43 patients from group 2 (72.8%) (p
Referência(s)