Inflammation, Autoimmunity, Infection, and Stroke
2020; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 51; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1161/strokeaha.119.024157
ISSN1524-4628
AutoresNeal S. Parikh, Alexander E. Merkler, Costantino Iadecola,
Tópico(s)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
ResumoHomeStrokeVol. 51, No. 3Inflammation, Autoimmunity, Infection, and Stroke Free AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBAboutView PDFView EPUBSections ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationsTrack citationsPermissions ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyReddit Jump toFree AccessResearch ArticlePDF/EPUBInflammation, Autoimmunity, Infection, and StrokeEpidemiology and Lessons From Therapeutic Intervention Neal S. Parikh, MD, MS, Alexander E. Merkler, MD and Costantino Iadecola, MD Neal S. ParikhNeal S. Parikh From the Department of Neurology, Columbia University Medical College (N.S.P.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Department of Neurology (N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. , Alexander E. MerklerAlexander E. Merkler Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Department of Neurology (N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. and Costantino IadecolaCostantino Iadecola Correspondence to Costantino Iadecola, MD, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, 407 E 61st St, RR-303, New York, NY 10065. Email E-mail Address: [email protected] Clinical and Translational Neuroscience Unit, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute (N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Department of Neurology (N.S.P., A.E.M., C.I.), Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY. Originally published12 Feb 2020https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.024157Stroke. 2020;51:711–718is accompanied byPopulation Impact of Potentially Modifiable Risk Factors for StrokeIntroduction for Focused Updates in Cerebrovascular DiseaseEffects of Genetic Variants on Stroke Riskis companion ofTwenty Years of Progress Toward Understanding the Stroke BeltRisk Factors for Ischemic Stroke in Younger AdultsOther version(s) of this articleYou are viewing the most recent version of this article. Previous versions: February 12, 2020: Ahead of Print See related articles, p 708, 719, 729, 736, 742Inflammation, a complex response to danger signals that is fundamental to host survival, has been implicated in the pathogenesis of many human diseases, including stroke.1 In this review, we discuss the impact of inflammation, including in the context of autoimmune conditions and infectious diseases, on ischemic stroke risk and outcomes (Figure). We complement a critical evaluation of epidemiological evidence with results of intervention studies.Download figureDownload PowerPointFigure. Putative mechanisms of increased ischemic stroke risk in autoimmune disorders and infectious diseases. Autoimmune disorders and infectious diseases share overlapping mechanisms that may contribute to an increased risk of ischemic stroke. Apart from cerebral vasculitis, autoimmune disorders contribute to ischemic stroke risk through multiple mechanisms. Increased systemic inflammation may itself increase stroke risk and magnify the effect of conventional stroke risk factors, which are common comorbidities in individuals with autoimmune disorders, such as rheumatoid arthritis. Treatment of autoimmune disorders often involves the use of glucocorticoids, which may worsen control of conventional stroke risk factors, such as diabetes mellitus and hypertension. Similarly, some infectious diseases contribute to ischemic stroke through infectious cerebral vasculitis. Infectious diseases, especially chronic diseases, also contribute to systemic inflammation and are associated with a higher burden of conventional stroke risk factors, such as atherosclerosis in the case of HIV.Inflammation and Inflammatory MarkersInflammation is a coordinated response to both extrinsic and intrinsic danger signals associated with innate and adaptive immunity.2 Foreign molecular complexes common to many infectious pathogens, termed pathogen-associated molecular patterns, are recognized by immune cell pattern recognition receptors, which, in turn, initiate innate and adaptive immune responses directed at neutralizing the threat. Similarly, host-derived danger-associated molecular patterns released from host cells during injury or stress engage pattern recognition receptors triggering immune responses. Immune cell activation leads to cascading effects on local and distant systems through the release of chemokines and cytokines. Coactivation of immune-regulatory mechanisms leads to eventual resolution of inflammation. The molecular mechanisms that trigger, sustain, and resolve inflammation are multiple and complex and are outside this scope of this review. Broadly, however, aberrations of these immune-regulatory processes can lead to under-active, over-active, nonresolving, or otherwise maladaptive inflammatory responses that can contribute to disease risk, pathology, and tissue injury.Inflammatory Biomarkers, Stroke Risk, and OutcomesInflammatory biomarkers include the cytokines, chemokines, and acute phase reactants that govern the inflammatory response. Elevations in inflammatory mediators IL (interleukin)-6, CRP (C-reactive protein), and Lp-PLA2 (lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A) have been associated with increased stroke risk.3 An additional biomarker of increasing interest is soluble lectinlike oxidized LDL (low-density lipoprotein) receptor-1, which is an inflammation-induced lipid receptor that contributes to atherogenesis and has been associated with stroke risk.4,5 Elevated CRP has also been associated with stroke recurrence6 in addition to recurrent vascular events, vascular death, and nonvascular death.7–10 IL-6 and Lp-PLA2 have similarly been linked to stroke recurrence, poststroke myocardial infarction, and death.8,11–16 The bulk of evidence supports an association between elevated inflammatory biomarkers and an increased risk of stroke, recurrent stroke, and poststroke vascular events and mortality.In addition to stroke recurrence, sources of poststroke disability include physical disability, cognitive impairment, depression, and fatigue. Inflammatory biomarkers have been extensively studied as putative predictors of functional outcomes after ischemic stroke.17 Although the data are heterogeneous, several studies found elevated CRP to be independently associated with poor clinical outcomes after stroke.17,18 IL-6, an upstream inflammatory cytokine, has more robustly been associated with poor functional outcomes in large meta-analysis.19 With respect to cognitive outcomes, limited data suggest that CRP,20 IL-12,21 and erythrocyte sedimentation rate,22 but not IL-6,20,21 are associated with poststroke cognitive impairment. Data regarding poststroke depression are conflicting,23 with no evidence of an association between CRP levels and poststroke depression in a recent multicenter prospective study.24 Evidence regarding poststroke fatigue is similarly limited, with most studies including <50 subjects.25 CRP was also not consistently associated with fatigue across studies.26 In summary, inflammatory biomarkers at the time of stroke are fairly consistently associated with functional outcomes, but data regarding poststroke cognitive impairment, depression, and fatigue are not definitive.Insights From Therapeutic TrialsA causal association between inflammatory biomarkers and stroke risk can be inferred from clinical trials of immunomodulatory therapies. The JUPITER (Justification for the Use of Statins in Prevention: An Intervention Trial Evaluating Rosuvastatin) seminally demonstrated that rosuvastatin for individuals with elevated hs-CRP (high-sensitivity CRP) levels and with normal LDL-C (low-density lipoprotein C) levels reduced cardiovascular risk, including for the secondary outcome of stroke.27,28 Rosuvastatin reduced stroke risk in subjects who either achieved LDL-C levels of <70 mg/dL or hs-CRP levels of <2 mg/L. Importantly, achieved LDL-C and hs-CRP levels had poor correlation, suggesting that risk reductions could also be attributed to anti-inflammatory effects of rosuvastatin alone. This hypothesis was then specifically tested in the Canakinumab Antiinflammatory Thrombosis Outcome Study, which randomized patients with a history of myocardial infarction and elevated hs-CRP level to canakinumab, a monoclonal antibody against IL-1beta, or placebo.29 Canakinumab reduced hs-CRP levels in a dose-dependent fashion, without impact on LDL-C levels. There was a dose-dependent reduction in the primary cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome, and stroke risk was nominally reduced in patients on the highest dose. In contrast, a related trial of methotrexate did not demonstrate reductions in inflammatory markers or CVD risk.30 Taken together, these data suggest that reduction of hs-CRP, whether with statin therapy or canakinumab, results in a reduction of CVD risk, including stroke.Trials of immunomodulatory therapy for the prevention of poststroke unfavorable outcomes are few. The Japan Statin Treatment Against Recurrent Stroke trial randomized patients with prior stroke to pravastatin or placebo, and a secondary analysis evaluated whether changes in hs-CRP were associated with recurrent event risk.31 Like in JUPITER, achieved LDL and achieved hs-CRP levels did not correlate. Higher hs-CRP levels during treatment were associated with a greater risk of recurrent stroke and vascular events. With regards to poststroke functional outcomes, in an exploratory analysis of the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial, high dose atorvastatin was nonsignificantly associated with better functional outcomes compared with placebo (P=0.065).32 In a meta-analysis, statin therapy at the time of stroke was associated with less poststroke disability.33 Last, 2 immunomodulatory multiple sclerosis therapies have been trialed in ischemic stroke. Natalizumab, a monoclonal antibody that reduces leukocyte infiltration, did not lower final infarct volumes but marginally improved functional outcomes.34 Fingolimod, an immunomodulator that reduces circulating lymphocytes, limited infarct volume, and hemorrhagic transformation and improved functional outcomes when added to alteplase.35Other stroke outcomes have been less studied. In the natalizumab trial mentioned above,34 exploratory analyses found nonsignificantly improved cognitive and mood outcomes among those randomized to natalizumab. In the absence of trials of anti-inflammatory therapies for poststroke cognitive impairment, depression, and fatigue, pharmacoepidemiology studies provide insights. A registry analysis found that anti-inflammatory treatment at the time of stroke was associated with a lower risk of depression within the first year.36 Although data are conflicting,37 a prospective cohort study found that statins reduced the risk of poststroke depression.38 Mechanistically, admission IL-6 levels have been associated with poststroke depression at 1 year among statin nonusers but not among statin-users.39 These data suggest that statins may ameliorate poststroke inflammatory drivers of depression. Taken together, there is circumstantial evidence of a therapeutic effect of anti-inflammatory treatments on poststroke outcomes. Trials that strategically target inflammation are needed.Autoimmune Disorders and Ischemic StrokeAutoimmune disorders are frequently associated with stroke risk and provide insights into the impact of inflammation on cerebrovascular disease (Figure). Here, we focus on autoimmune disorders characterized by chronic systemic inflammation (Table 1). Cerebral vasculitides were reviewed elsewhere.40Table 1. Select Autoimmune Conditions and Data* Regarding Associations With Ischemic Stroke RiskAutoimmune ConditionAssociation With Ischemic Stroke†Dose-Dependence‡Reduction With Anti-Inflammatories§Rheumatoid arthritis++++++Systemic lupus erythematous+−−Inflammatory bowel disease+++−Psoriasis+++++Ankylosing spondylitis+−−Polymyalgia rheumatica+−+Inflammatory myositis+−−See text for synthesis, summaries and results of individual studies, and references.*The strength of associations was judged based on the number, quality, and consistency of studies for each metric. Where meta-analyses were available, the totality of evidence was considered. The following categories of strength of evidence were used: +++compelling evidence; ++modest evidence; +limited evidence; −no evidence.†Association with ischemic stroke was evaluated based on studies investigating the epidemiological association between individual conditions and stroke risk.‡Dose-dependence was inferred from studies that investigated the association between severity or duration of each condition and ischemic stroke risk.§Results of pharmacoepidemiological studies investigating the association between treatment and stroke risk were evaluated.Rheumatoid ArthritisRheumatoid arthritis (RA) is associated with an increased risk of CVD and has been included alongside conventional risk factors in a CVD risk score.41 Data specific to stroke are less abundant but consistent. A meta-analysis found that patients with RA had 1.6× the odds of stroke as the general population, including when accounting for corticosteroid use.42–44 Although patients with RA have more vascular risk factors, this alone does not explain the increased risk of CVD since both conventional risk factors and markers of RA disease activity and severity, including elevated inflammatory markers, are associated with CVD risk.45–49 In administrative claims analyses, RA was associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke,50 but not other stroke outcomes.51 Several pharmacoepidemiological studies, including a meta-analysis, provide mixed evidence that disease-modifying immunomodulatory therapies reduced CVD and stroke risk.52–54 In summary, RA is consistently associated with an increased stroke risk, and that risk can in part be attributed to inflammation, but whether targeting this inflammation reduces stroke risk remains unclear.Systemic Lupus ErythematosusIn a recent meta-analysis, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was associated with a 2-fold increased odds of stroke compared with the general population.42 However, a subsequent large cohort study did not find an association.44 In an additional subsequent cohort study, SLE was not associated with stroke after accounting for steroid therapy as a confounder.55 Apart from inflammation, stroke mechanisms in SLE include cerebral arteritis, antiphospholipid syndrome, and cardioembolism due to noninfectious endocarditis. Nephritis and related hypertension may also directly contribute to atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction risk.56,57 Lastly, active steroid use is associated with CVD in patients with SLE.58 Therefore, there is insufficient evidence that SLE increases stroke risk through inflammation alone. Consistent with this notion, there is comparatively little data regarding disease-modifying drugs and CVD risk in SLE.Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseInflammatory bowel disease is associated with a modestly increased risk of stroke, with a meta-analysis reporting a hazard ratio of 1.3.59 Most studies reported an increased risk of stroke for both ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease, with the exception of 2 studies that found an association only for ulcerative colitis.60,61 Several studies found the risk of stroke to be increased during times of greater disease activity.60,62 Although the increased risk could also be attributable to treatment or detection bias, the evidence generally indicate that stroke is an inflammatory complication of these disorders.PsoriasisPsoriasis, with or without arthritis, is also associated with an increased stroke risk, with stroke risk paralleling disease severity.42,63,64 Disease duration was associated with vascular inflammation, assessed with 18F-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, and ischemic stroke.65 A meta-analysis of observational studies found that systematic anti-inflammatory therapies were associated with a significantly decreased CVD risk compared with no systemic therapy or topical therapy.52 TNF (tumor necrosis factor) α inhibition was associated with nearly an 50% reduction in stroke and transient ischemic attack, compared with methotrexate.66 Similarly, TNFα inhibition was associated with a lower CVD risk than phototherapy, despite phototherapy being used in milder cases.67 These data, in concert with the correspondence between psoriasis severity and duration and stroke, support a causal relationship between inflammation and stroke in this condition.Other Systemic Inflammatory DiseasesOther conditions preliminarily associated with stroke include ankylosing spondylitis,68 polymyalgia rheumatica,69 polymyositis, and dermatomyositis.70 In polymyalgia, cumulative exposure to glucocorticoids was associated with a tendency towards a decreased stroke and CVD risk.71 Because treatment with high dose steroids is typical in patients with more active disease, this finding raises the possibility that the anti-inflammatory effect of glucocorticoids mitigated the increased stroke and CVD risk.To summarize, the autoimmune conditions reviewed here are associated with an increased stroke risk, with evidence of a dose-response relationship with disease duration and severity. Furthermore, targeting inflammation in some of these conditions reduces or mitigates stroke risk. These clinical data complement findings of inflammatory biomarker studies.Chronic Infection and Ischemic StrokeInflammation is also seen in infectious diseases. Here, we focus on select infectious conditions that may impact stroke risk and outcomes through inflammation (Table 2). Infectious diseases that cause stroke through other mechanisms were comprehensively reviewed elsewhere72 and are not discussed.Table 2. Select Chronic Infections and Data* Regarding Associations With Ischemic Stroke RiskInfectionAssociation With Ischemic StrokeDose-DependenceReduction With Infection ControlTuberculosis+++++++Syphilis++−++Lyme disease++−+HIV++++++Varicella zoster virus+++−+Cytomegalovirus−−−Hepatitis C virus+++Helicobacter pylori−−−Chronic osteomyelitis+−−Periodontal disease++++*Please refer to Table 1 footnote for details regarding the rating of evidence provided in this Table.Infectious Burden, Systemic Infections, and StrokeChronic infectious burden, the cumulative exposure to persistent or previous infections,73 may be associated with an increased stroke risk (Figure). Underlying mechanisms may include endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation–promoting atherosclerosis73,74—and vascular injury from direct pathogenic invasion of the vessel wall.72–74 The chronic infectious burden construct includes Chlamydia pneumoniae, Mycoplasma Pneumoniae, Helicobacter pylori, Hemophilus influenza, Herpes simplex 1 and 2, Cytomegalovirus, and Epstein-Barr virus. The Northern Manhattan Study found a 1.4-fold increased risk of stroke among patients with high chronic infectious burden, defined by seropositivity.75 However, others have not replicated this finding, for example, when adjusting for socioeconomic confounders.76 Further studies are needed to understand whether chronic infectious burden confers an independently increased stroke risk.Bacterial InfectionsSeveral chronic bacterial infections have been variably associated with stroke risk. Periodontitis, a polymicrobial destructive disease of the gums and supportive tissues, may increase stroke risk through systemic inflammation.77 For example, periodontal disease was associated with an increased risk of ischemic stroke in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities cohort.78 Periodontitis was independently associated with an increased stroke risk in a meta-analysis as well.79 Chronic osteomyelitis, another indolent infectious condition, was associated with an increased stroke risk in an administrative claims analysis.80 Finally, peptic ulcer, a common disease caused by H.pylori, was not associated with stroke in a recent, updated meta-analysis.81Viral InfectionsSeveral chronic viral infections have also been implicated. Cytomegalovirus, a prevalent DNA herpesvirus, was observed in atherosclerotic plaque, raising the possibility that it contributes to atherosclerosis.82Cytomegalovirus was not associated with stroke in the Framingham Heart Study,83 the Northern Manhattan Study,75 or in a meta-analysis.84 However, the Vascular effects of Infection in Pediatric Stroke study found that serological evidence of acute herpesvirus infections (a combination of Herpes simplex 1 and 2, Cytomegalovirus, Epstein-Barr virus, and varicella zoster virus [VZV]) was associated with a 2-fold odds of stroke.85 The lack of competing conventional risk factors may make infectious etiologies more relevant in children. In adults, hepatitis C virus was associated with a 2-fold increased risk of cerebrovascular death in a large cohort study, and a dose-response relationship with hepatitis C virus RNA levels was seen.86 Furthermore, antiviral treatment has been associated with a decreased ischemic stroke risk.87Neurovascular InfectionsMultiple infections lead to cerebral arterial inflammation through direct arterial wall invasion or immune complex deposition (Figure).88Strokes can occur from tuberculosis meningitis, a progressive, necrotizing meningoencephalitis.89 It causes an exudative encasement and infiltration of vessels, leading to endarteritis.89 This, combined with mechanical stress from hydrocephalus,90 leads to stroke predominantly in the deep structures. Strokes occur in ≈6% of cases of pulmonary tuberculosis and up to 20% of patients with tuberculous meningitis.91,92 Stroke risk is also heightened among patients with pulmonary tuberculosis alone, compared with uninfected controls.91Neurological involvement occurs in 10% of cases of untreated syphilis.93 Approximately 10% of patients with neurosyphilis, and 3% with any syphilis, develop stroke.93,94 Patients with stroke are often young and with fewer conventional stroke risk factors, and may experience a prodrome of headache, malaise, and behavioral changes.95 The mechanism of stroke in syphilis is thought to be due to inflammation of the arterial wall secondary to an obliterative endarteritis of the medium to large arteries. Lyme disease, caused by Borrelia burgdorferi, is another disease with protean cerebral manifestations, including stroke.96 Stroke is thought to be due to an inflammatory vasculitic process of the cerebral vasculature.97In a recent meta-analysis, HIV was associated with 1.8× higher stroke risk compared with noninfected individuals.98 Lower CD4 counts and unsuppressed viral load were risk factors. HIV affects the central nervous system days after systemic infection and produces an inflammatory cascade within the cerebrospinal fluid and the brain parenchyma.99 On autopsy, arteries from HIV positive patients had more inflammation than arteries from HIV negative controls, though the association was attenuated after adjusting for possible confounders.100 Individuals with HIV have accelerated atherosclerosis, exemplified by higher carotid intima-media thickness and coronary artery calcium progression.101 Individuals with HIV also have evidence of arterial remodeling—leading to atherosclerosis and dolichoectasia—which may be a consequence of arterial inflammation.102Following VZV (chickenpox) infection, VZV becomes latent in ganglionic neurons throughout the neuroaxis, and reactivation causes herpes zoster (shingles).103 VZV can also directly infect large and small cerebral arteries to cause a vasculopathy, resulting in both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke.103,104 In a meta-analysis, zoster was associated with a 1.5-fold increased stroke risk for 4 weeks after zoster.105 The risk of stroke was up to 4.5× higher in the first 12 months after zoster ophthalmicus.106 The observation that antiviral treatment may mitigate stroke risk105 increases confidence in the causality of VZV's association with stroke. Although the strength of associations and exact mechanisms vary, epidemiological data support the notion that several microbial infections are independent stroke risk factors, often acting through chronic inflammation.Postinfectious Stroke and Poststroke InfectionThere is a short-term increase in stroke risk after multiple acute infections. In a large, self-controlled case series analysis107 and in the Cardiovascular Health Study,108 short-term stroke risk markedly increased after respiratory and urinary infections. Influenza-like illnesses and sepsis also appear to increase short-term stroke risk.109,110 The inflammatory response to the infection is thought to contribute to accelerated atherosclerosis, plaque rupture, and thrombosis.72,111 Conversely, due in part to poststroke immunosuppression,2 the rate of infection after stroke is as high as 30%.112 Infections, often pneumonia and urinary infections, are associated with poor outcomes and mortality.113,114 However, a meta-analysis found that randomization to prophylactic antibiotics reduced infection risk without improving outcomes.115 Therefore, whether infection silently precedes stroke, is an epiphenomenon, or causally linked to outcomes remains unclear.ConclusionsA rich body of literature demonstrates that inflammation is associated with increased stroke risk and may be an important determinant of outcomes. Data from pharmacological interventions and the study of autoimmune and infectious diseases provide additional support of a causal relationship between inflammation and increased stroke risk and severity. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the use of immunomodulatory therapies specifically to reduce stroke risk or improve outcomes. However, trials of newer immunomodulatory therapies, such as fingolimod and targeted inflammatory cytokine-neutralizing antibodies, combined with improved patient selection, may yield effective interventions to reduce the burden of stroke risk and improve stroke outcomes among the general population and in individuals with autoimmune and infectious diseases.Sources of FundingDr Parikh is supported by National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke T32NS07153 (principal investigator: Mitchell S.V. Elkind), Dr Merkler by American Heart Association grant 18CDA34110419 and the Leon Levy Fellowship in Neuroscience, and Dr Iadecola by National Institutes of Health/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke grants R01NS34179, R37-NS089323, R01-NS100447, 1R01-NS095441, and R01-NS/HL37853.DisclosuresDr Iadecola serves on the Strategic Advisory Board of Broadview Ventures. The other authors report no conflicts.FootnotesCorrespondence to Costantino Iadecola, MD, Feil Family Brain and Mind Research Institute, 407 E 61st St, RR-303, New York, NY 10065. Email [email protected]cornell.eduReferences1. Netea MG, Balkwill F, Chonchol M, Cominelli F, Donath MY, Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, et al. A guiding map for inflammation.Nat Immunol. 2017; 18:826–831. doi: 10.1038/ni.3790Google Scholar2. Anrather J, Iadecola C. Inflammation and stroke: an overview.Neurotherapeutics. 2016; 13:661–670. doi: 10.1007/s13311-016-0483-xCrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Esenwa CC, Elkind MS. Inflammatory risk factors, biomarkers and associated therapy in ischaemic stroke.Nat Rev Neurol. 2016; 12:594–604. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2016.125CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Markstad H, Edsfeldt A, Yao Mattison I, Bengtsson E, Singh P, Cavalera M, et al. High levels of soluble lectinlike oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 are associated with carotid plaque inflammation and increased risk of ischemic stroke.J Am Heart Assoc. 2019; 8:e009874. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.009874LinkGoogle Scholar5. Skarpengland T, Skjelland M, Kong XY, Skagen K, Holm S, Otterdal K, et al. Increased levels of lectin-like oxidized low-density lipoprotein receptor-1 in ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018; 7:e006479.LinkGoogle Scholar6. Arenillas JF, Alvarez-Sabín J, Molina CA, Chacón P, Montaner J, Rovira A, et al. C-reactive protein predicts further ischemic events in first-ever transient ischemic attack or stroke patients with intracranial large-artery occlusive disease.Stroke. 2003; 34:2463–2468. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000089920.93927.A7LinkGoogle Scholar7. Whiteley W, Jackson C, Lewis S, Lowe G, Rumley A, Sandercock P, et al. Association of circulating inflammatory markers with recurrent vascular events after stroke: a prospective cohort study.Stroke. 2011; 42:10–16. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.588954LinkGoogle Scholar8. Elkind MS, Tai W, Coates K, Paik MC, Sacco RL. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein, lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2, and outcome after ischemic stroke.Arch Intern Med. 2006; 166:2073–2080. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.19.2073CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar9. Di Napoli M, Papa F, Bocola V. Prognostic influence of increased C-reactive protein and fibrinogen levels in ischemic stroke.Stroke. 2001; 32:133–138. doi: 10.1161/01.str.32.1.133LinkGoogle Scholar10. Di Napoli M, Papa F; Villa Pini Stroke Data Bank Investigators. Inflammation, hemostatic markers, and antithrombotic agents in relation to long-term risk of new cardiovascular events in first-ever ischemic stroke patients.Stroke. 2002; 33:1763–1771. doi: 10.1161/01.str.0000019124.54361.08LinkGoogle Scholar11. Welsh P, Lowe GD, Chalmers J, Campbell DJ, Rumley A, Neal BC, et al. Associations of proinflammatory cytokines with the risk of recurrent stroke.Stroke. 2008; 39:2226–2230. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.107.504498LinkGoogle Scholar12. Castillo J, Alvarez-Sabín J, Martínez-Vila E, Montaner J, Sobrino T, Vivancos J; MITICO Study Investigators. Inflammation markers and prediction of post-stroke vascular disease recurrence: the MITICO study.J Neurol. 2009; 256:217–224. doi: 10.1007/s00415-009-0058-4Googl
Referência(s)