Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A CIN ful way to overcome addiction: how chromosomal instability enables cancer to overcome its oncogene addiction

2020; Springer Nature; Volume: 12; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.15252/emmm.202012017

1757-4684

Daniel Bronder, Samuel F. Bakhoum,

Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research

News & Views18 February 2020Open Access A CINful way to overcome addiction: how chromosomal instability enables cancer to overcome its oncogene addiction Daniel Bronder Daniel Bronder orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-2896 Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Search for more papers by this author Samuel F Bakhoum Corresponding Author Samuel F Bakhoum [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-8422 Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Daniel Bronder Daniel Bronder orcid.org/0000-0003-1666-2896 Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK Search for more papers by this author Samuel F Bakhoum Corresponding Author Samuel F Bakhoum [email protected] orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-8422 Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA Search for more papers by this author Author Information Daniel Bronder1,2 and Samuel F Bakhoum *,3,4 1Genetics Branch, Center for Cancer Research, NCI, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA 2Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK 3Human Oncology and Pathogenesis Program, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA 4Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA EMBO Mol Med (2020)12:e12017https://doi.org/10.15252/emmm.202012017 See also: L Salgueiro et al (March 2020) PDFDownload PDF of article text and main figures. ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InMendeleyWechatReddit Figures & Info Oncogene-addicted tumors present a valuable target for therapeutic intervention and an opportunity to achieve a wide therapeutic window. Nonetheless, resistance to targeted therapies is frequently observed and it arises through multiple mechanisms, including mutations in the target gene. Chromosomal instability, a defining feature of human cancer, has been linked to targeted therapy resistance, but the mechanism underlying this association is poorly understood. In the current issue of EMBO Molecular Medicine, Salgueiro et al show that chromosomal instability can lead to the generation of alternative oncogenic drivers, thereby providing the ability for cancer cells to overcome the oncogene withdrawal bottleneck. Importantly, this study shows that, by generating de novo genomic diversity, chromosomal instability serves as an adaptive response to therapeutic insult. Oncogene addiction is a common phenomenon in human cancers and hence provides an attractive target for cancer therapy. Intervention works on the premise that all cancer cells harbor the mutant or amplified oncogene and are dependent on the oncogenic signaling pathway for proliferation and survival. Drugs like imatinib or gefitinib and erlotinib have heralded a new era of targeted therapies for the BCR-ABL fusion oncogene in Philadelphia chromosome-rearranged leukemias and non-small-cell lung cancers positive for amplified or mutated EGFR, respectively (Weinstein & Joe, 2008). Patients respond well initially; unfortunately however, disease recurrence is frequent and directly linked to mutations in structural domains required for drug binding (Gorre et al, 2001; Pao et al, 2005). This illustrates the severe bottleneck targeted therapies impose upon cancer cells, which these in turn overcome. Chromosomal instability (CIN) is a process of ongoing missegregation of chromosomes during cell division. CIN is a defining feature of cancer, and it is associated with high intratumor heterogeneity, poor prognosis, metastasis, and drug resistance (Bakhoum & Cantley, 2018; Sansregret et al, 2018). It has long been shown that CIN can drive continued tumor growth in response to withdrawal of the initial oncogenic stimulus in mouse models of breast cancer (Sotillo et al, 2010). However, the mechanism facilitating continued growth of tumors following oncogene withdrawal has remained unknown. Here, Salgueiro et al (2020) present an elegant study based on their previously described genetically engineered mouse models, seeking to understand the underlying mechanism for the regrowth of tumors following oncogene withdrawal that they previously observed (Rowald et al, 2016). Tumors were induced in a doxycycline-dependent manner in mice that overexpressed a mutated, oncogenic Kras allele (K) alone and in combination with the spindle assembly checkpoint gene Mad2 (KM), which facilitates CIN (Fig 1A). When doxycycline administration was interrupted, most tumors regressed, but 6.6 and 21.3% of K and KM tumors, respectively, did not regress and instead continued growing (Fig 1B). Following this observation, the authors cultured cells from non-regressed tumors in vitro and found that independent of Mad2 overexpression, the non-regressed tumor cells displayed high levels of CIN, which exceeded those observed in primary tumors of either genotype (Fig 1C). The non-regressed tumors also displayed genomic aberrations, which were not detected in primary tumors as evaluated by next-generation sequencing, again independent of their Mad2 status. Figure 1. Chromosomal instability promotes oncogene independence in cancer(A) Induction of tumors in Kras (K) or Kras/Mad2 (KM) mutant mice resulted in low and high levels of CIN, respectively. (B) Upon doxycycline withdrawal, the majority of tumors regressed, but a minority persisted independent of genotype. Note, the fraction was smaller in K mice. (C) In vitro culture of non-regressed tumors revealed CIN levels even higher than in primary tumors. In addition, the emergence of an amplification along chromosome 6 containing the oncogene cMet was noted during genomic analyses in non-regressed but not primary tumors and also validated functionally. (D) In summary, CIN levels were shown to increase following oncogene withdrawal in the absence of doxycycline beyond what was observed in primary tumors and independent of mice's Mad2 genotype. Download figure Download PowerPoint These analyses revealed that a region on mouse chromosome 6, which harbors the oncogene cMet, was amplified more frequently in the non-regressed as compared with the primary tumors (Fig 1C). On a functional level, phosphorylated cMet was only detected in non-regressed tumors, but not in primary tumors, which further corroborated the genomic data. Using orthogonal approaches, the authors excluded the possibility that a minor fraction of cells in the primary tumor already harbored such an aberration on chromosome 6 involving cMet. Thus, they concluded that a gain or an amplification of cMet occurs only following Kras or Kras/Mad2 withdrawal and continued growth. Building on the discovery that cMet was amplified specifically in non-regressed tumors, the authors capitalized on the fact that cMet can be targeted pharmacologically. Interestingly, primary tumors, which did not harbor cells with amplified cMet, were resistant to the MET inhibitor tepotinib. In contrast, non-regressed tumors that harbored the cMet amplification were sensitive to tepotinib, and consequently responded to treatment. This study provides compelling evidence that CIN levels can increase in order to overcome a bottleneck such as oncogene withdrawal (Fig 1D). In patients, genomic alterations that underlie targeted therapy resistance have been observed to occur rapidly after therapy initiation. The observation that CIN can provide tumor cells with an alternative oncogenic pathway is provocative and has important clinical implications. Interestingly, Russo et al (2019) observed that colon cancer cells downregulated DNA repair genes and upregulated mutagenic polymerases in response to targeted therapy. Taken together, these data suggest that increasing genomic heterogeneity and mutagenic processes after therapy initiation can provide a substrate for natural selection bypassing the therapeutic bottleneck. This work highlights the importance of longitudinal sampling of tumors prior to and shortly after therapy. While it might be challenging to pinpoint the bypass mechanism for selection in each case in time for clinical intervention, the rapid advances in sequencing technologies and data interpretation might soon enable us to successfully intervene in a subset of cases. Furthermore, it is possible that under given contexts, a relatively limited set of bypass pathways are permissible, therefore enabling a more focused screening approach that would allow rapid intervention. In summary, this work highlights the importance of CIN in tumor evolution, as well as the salient need to account for genomic copy number alterations—in addition to single-nucleotide variants—in the clinical practice of oncology. Given the widespread prevalence of CIN in the metastatic setting, this mechanism of therapeutic resistance might be more common than previously thought. It also highlights the need to develop therapeutic approaches to suppress CIN in order to delay the onset of adaptive resistance. Conflict of interest SFB holds a patent related to targeting CIN and the cGAS-STING pathway in advanced cancer. He owns equity in, receives compensation from, and serves as a consultant and the Scientific Advisory Board and Board of Directors of Volastra Therapeutics Inc. He has also consulted for Sanofi. References Bakhoum SF, Cantley LC (2018) The multifaceted role of chromosomal instability in cancer and its microenvironment. Cell 174: 1347–1360CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gorre ME, Mohammed M, Ellwood K, Hsu N, Paquette R, Rao PN, Sawyers CL (2001) Clinical resistance to STI-571 cancer therapy caused by BCR-ABL gene mutation or amplification. Science 293: 876–880CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Pao W, Miller VA, Politi KA, Riely GJ, Somwar R, Zakowski MF, Kris MG, Varmus H (2005) Acquired resistance of lung adenocarcinomas to gefitinib or erlotinib is associated with a second mutation in the EGFR kinase domain. PLoS Med 2: e73CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Rowald K, Mantovan M, Passos J, Buccitelli C, Mardin BR, Korbel JO, Jechlinger M, Sotillo R (2016) Negative selection and chromosome instability induced by Mad2 overexpression delay breast cancer but facilitate oncogene-independent outgrowth. Cell Rep 15: 2679–2691CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Russo M, Crisafulli G, Sogari A, Reilly NM, Arena S, Lamba S, Bartolini S, Amodio V, Magrì A, Novara L et al (2019) Adaptive mutability of colorectal cancers in response to targeted therapies. Science 366: 1473–1480CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Salgueiro L, Buccitelli C, Rowald K, Somogyi K, Kandala S, Korbel JO, Sotillo R (2020) Acquisition of chromosome instability is a mechanism to evade oncogene addiction. EMBO Mol Med 12: e10941Wiley Online LibraryCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sansregret L, Vanhaesebroeck B, Swanton C (2018) Determinants and clinical implications of chromosomal instability in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 15: 139–150CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sotillo R, Schvartzman JM, Socci ND, Benezra R (2010) Mad2-induced chromosome instability leads to lung tumour relapse after oncogene withdrawal. Nature 464: 436–40CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Weinstein IB, Joe A (2008) Oncogene addiction. Cancer Res 68: 3077–3080CrossrefCASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Previous ArticleNext Article Read MoreAbout the coverClose modalView large imageVolume 12,Issue 3,06 March 2020This month's cover highlights the article Novel Alzheimer risk genes determine the microglia response to amyloid-β but not to TAU pathology by Annerieke Sierksma, Ashley Lu, Bart De Strooper, Mark Fiers and colleagues. In Alzheimer's disease, a person's genetic profile may determine how microglia react to initiating levels of amyloid-β pathology and whether this triggers neurodegeneration across the brain. By analyzing the transcriptional response of microglia to amyloid-β and tangle pathology, novel risk genes were identified which are highlighted in orange in this image. (Cover concept by Sandra Krahl, scientific image by Sandra Krahl) Volume 12Issue 36 March 2020In this issue FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsLoading ...