Artigo Acesso aberto Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

Thresholds of freshwater biodiversity in response to riparian vegetation loss in the Neotropical region

2020; Wiley; Volume: 57; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/1365-2664.13657

ISSN

1365-2664

Autores

Renato Bolson Dala‐Corte, Adriano S. Melo, Tadeu Siqueira, Luís Maurício Bini, Renato Tavares Martins, Almir Manoel Cunico, Ana Maria Pes, André Lincoln Barroso Magalhães, Bruno Spacek Godoy, Cecília Gontijo Leal, Cláudio S. Monteiro-Júnior, Cristina Stenert, Diego Marcel Parreira de Castro, Diego Rodrigues Macedo, Dilermando P. Lima‐Junior, Éder André Gubiani, Fabiana Criste Massariol, Fabrício Barreto Teresa, Fernando Gertum Becker, Francine Novais Souza, Francisco Valente‐Neto, Franco L. Souza, Frederico Falcão Salles, Gabriel Lourenço Brejão, Janaína Gomes de Brito, Jean Ricardo Simões Vitule, Juliana Simião‐Ferreira, Karina Dias‐Silva, Laysson Guillen Albuquerque, Leandro Juen, Leonardo Maltchik, Lílian Casatti, Luciano Fogaça de Assis Montag, Marciel Élio Rodrigues, Marcos Callisto, Maria A. M. Nogueira, Mireile Reis dos Santos, Neusa Hamada, Paulo Augusto Zaitune Pamplin, Paulo dos Santos Pompeu, Rafael P. Leitão, Renata Ruaro, Rodolfo Mariano, Sheyla Regina Marques Couceiro, Vinícius Abilhôa, Vívian Campos de Oliveira, Yulie Shimano, Yara Moretto, Yzél Rondon Súarez, Fábio de Oliveira Roque,

Tópico(s)

Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes

Resumo

Abstract Protecting riparian vegetation around streams is vital in reducing the detrimental effects of environmental change on freshwater ecosystems and in maintaining aquatic biodiversity. Thus, identifying ecological thresholds is useful for defining regulatory limits and for guiding the management of riparian zones towards the conservation of freshwater biota. Using nationwide data on fish and invertebrates occurring in small Brazilian streams, we estimated thresholds of native vegetation loss in which there are abrupt changes in the occurrence and abundance of freshwater bioindicators and tested whether there are congruent responses among different biomes, biological groups and riparian buffer sizes. Mean thresholds of native vegetation cover loss varied widely among biomes, buffer sizes and biological groups: ranging from 0.5% to 77.4% for fish, from 2.9% to 37.0% for aquatic invertebrates and from 3.8% to 43.2% for a subset of aquatic invertebrates. Confidence intervals for thresholds were wide, but the minimum values of these intervals were lower for the smaller riparian buffers (50 and 100 m) than larger ones (200 and 500 m), indicating that land use should be kept away from the streams. Also, thresholds occurred at a lower percentage of riparian vegetation loss in the smaller buffers, and were critically lower for invertebrates: reducing only 6.5% of native vegetation cover within a 50‐m riparian buffer is enough to cross thresholds for invertebrates. Synthesis and applications . The high variability in biodiversity responses to loss of native riparian vegetation suggests caution in the use of a single riparian width for conservation actions or policy definitions nationwide. The most sensitive bioindicators can be used as early warning signals of abrupt changes in freshwater biodiversity. In practice, maintaining at least 50‐m wide riparian reserves on each side of streams would be more effective to protect freshwater biodiversity in Brazil. However, incentives and conservation strategies to protect even wider riparian reserves (~100 m) and also taking into consideration the regional context will promote a greater benefit. This information should be used to set conservation goals and to create complementary mechanisms and policies to protect wider riparian reserves than those currently required by the federal law.

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX