Redefining Palliative Care—A New Consensus-Based Definition
2020; Elsevier BV; Volume: 60; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.04.027
ISSN1873-6513
AutoresLukas Radbruch, Liliana De Lima, Felícia Marie Knaul, Roberto Wenk, Zipporah Ali, Sushma Bhatnaghar, Charmaine Blanchard, Éduardo Bruera, Rosa Buitrago, Claudia Burlá, Mary Callaway, Esther Munyoro, Carlos Centeno, James F. Cleary, Stephen R. Connor, Odontuya Davaasuren, Julia Downing, Kathleen M. Foley, Cynthia Goh, Wendy Gómez García, Richard Harding, Quach T. Khan, P. Larkin, Mhoira Leng, Emmanuel Luyirika, Joan Marston, Sébastien Moine, Hibah Osman, Katherine Pettus, Christina M. Puchalski, M. R. Rajagopal, Dingle Spence, Odette Spruijt, Chitra Venkateswaran, Bee Wee, Roger Woodruff, Jinsun Yong, Tania Pastrana,
Tópico(s)Patient Dignity and Privacy
ResumoContextThe International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care developed a consensus-based definition of palliative care (PC) that focuses on the relief of serious health-related suffering, a concept put forward by the Lancet Commission Global Access to Palliative Care and Pain Relief.ObjectiveThe main objective of this article is to present the research behind the new definition.MethodsThe three-phased consensus process involved health care workers from countries in all income levels. In Phase 1, 38 PC experts evaluated the components of the World Health Organization definition and suggested new/revised ones. In Phase 2, 412 International Association for Hospice and Palliative Care members in 88 countries expressed their level of agreement with the suggested components. In Phase 3, using results from Phase 2, the expert panel developed the definition.ResultsThe consensus-based definition is as follows: Palliative care is the active holistic care of individuals across all ages with serious health-related suffering due to severe illness and especially of those near the end of life. It aims to improve the quality of life of patients, their families and their caregivers. The definition includes a number of bullet points with additional details as well as recommendations for governments to reduce barriers to PC.ConclusionParticipants had significantly different perceptions and interpretations of PC. The greatest challenge faced by the core group was trying to find a middle ground between those who think that PC is the relief of all suffering and those who believe that PC describes the care of those with a very limited remaining life span.
Referência(s)