Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Risk and Protective Factors for Adolescent and Young Adult Mental Health Within the Context of COVID-19: A Perspective From Nepal

2020; Elsevier BV; Volume: 67; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.04.006

ISSN

1879-1972

Autores

Vinita Sharma, Miguel Reina Ortiz, Nandita Sharma,

Tópico(s)

COVID-19 Prevention and Impact

Resumo

On December 31, 2019, the World Health Organization (WHO) was alerted about a cluster of pneumonia cases of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China [[1]WHOPneumonia of unknown cause – China (5 January 2020).https://www.who.int/csr/don/05-january-2020-pneumonia-of-unkown-cause-china/en/Date accessed: April 10, 2020Google Scholar]. By January 12, 2020, China had shared the genetic sequence of a novel coronavirus [[2]WHONovel coronavirus – China (12 January 2020).https://www.who.int/csr/don/12-january-2020-novel-coronavirus-china/en/Date accessed: April 10, 2020Google Scholar], later named severe acute coronavirus syndrome 2 (SARS-CoV-2), the etiological agent of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) [[3]WHONaming the Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) and the virus that causes it.https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/technical-guidance/naming-the-coronavirus-disease-(covid-2019)-and-the-virus-that-causes-itDate accessed: April 10, 2020Google Scholar]. Until today, the virus has spread to more than 200 countries, causing over 1.5 million cases and over 100,000 deaths [[4]WHOCoronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic.https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019Date accessed: April 12, 2020Google Scholar]. COVID-19 was declared first a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC) [[5]WHOStatement on the second meeting of the International Health Regulations (2005) Emergency Committee regarding the outbreak of novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV).https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/30-01-2020-statement-on-the-second-meeting-of-the-international-health-regulations-(2005)-emergency-committee-regarding-the-outbreak-of-novel-coronavirus-(2019-ncov)Date accessed: April 10, 2020Google Scholar] and later a pandemic disease [[6]WHOWHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020 (11 March 2020).https://www.who.int/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020Date accessed: April 10, 2020Google Scholar] by the WHO. While recent published evidence describes the physical health impacts of COVID-19, there is paucity of research [[7]Torales J. O'Higgins M. Castaldelli-Maia J.M. Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health.Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020; (20764020915212)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1852) Google Scholar] regarding COVID-19–related mental health outcomes. Previously, quarantine measures had led to post-traumatic stress symptoms, confusion, and anger [[8]Brooks S.K. Webster R.K. Smith L.E. et al.The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence.Lancet. 2020; 395: 912-920Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (9573) Google Scholar]. Although it is likely that COVID-19–related mental health impacts will only be manifested in the future, we can act today to prevent exposed adolescents and young adults (i.e., youths) from carrying mental health complications for decades after COVID-19. In the following paragraphs, we will explore the unique mental health risk and protective factors of Nepalese youths, who have been in complete lockdown since March 23 [[9]The Government of NepalMinistry of Health and Population'Situation report of COVID-19 #43'.https://drive.google.com/file/d/1z6XBao8nCS9OTmhlY-nU6sg15WUV4L-R/viewDate accessed: April 9, 2020Google Scholar]. The following are some COVID-19–related mental health risk factors in Nepalese youths: (1) deficient youth mental health services funding; (2) social media use; (3) a suddenly-imposed lockdown; (4) lack of understanding of lockdown restrictions; (5) sudden work/student life changes; (6) abrupt postponement of the Secondary Education Examination (SSE); and (7) exposure to devastating earthquakes in 2015. In Nepal, there is insufficient funding of youth mental health services [[10]Chaulagain A. Kunwar A. Watts S. et al.Child and adolescent mental health problems in Nepal: A scoping review.Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019; 13: 53Crossref PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar]. Underfunded mental health services may lead to increased negative mental health outcomes. Access to Internet and social media has increased in recent years in Nepal. Social media use has been correlated with negative mental health outcomes such as stress and depression [[11]Kim K. Ryu E. Chon M.Y. et al.Internet addiction in Korean adolescents and its relation to depression and suicidal ideation: A questionnaire survey.Int J Nurs Stud. 2006; 43: 185-192Crossref PubMed Scopus (550) Google Scholar]. In addition, social media may become a source of health-related information during crises [[12]Westerman D. Spence P.R. Van Der Heide B. Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information.J Computer-Mediated Commun. 2014; 19: 171-183Crossref Scopus (439) Google Scholar]. Youths might not have the capacity to handle the frequency or to analyze the accuracy [[7]Torales J. O'Higgins M. Castaldelli-Maia J.M. Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health.Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020; (20764020915212)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1852) Google Scholar] of information shared via social media. Recency [[12]Westerman D. Spence P.R. Van Der Heide B. Social media as information source: Recency of updates and credibility of information.J Computer-Mediated Commun. 2014; 19: 171-183Crossref Scopus (439) Google Scholar] and sender (i.e., echo chambers [[13]Choi D. Chun S. Oh H. et al.Rumor propagation is amplified by echo chambers in social media.Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 310Crossref PubMed Scopus (92) Google Scholar]) of information may play an unbalanced role in assessing credibility, which may lead to misinformation and related stress/anxiety. The implementation of a lockdown mandate with only a few hours of notice in Nepal left people unprepared for a long-term restriction on mobility. In addition, the social distancing and isolation that accompanies long-term lockdowns might be a risk factor for anxiety, mood disorders, and addictive and thought disorders [[14]Sani G. Janiri D. Di Nicola M. et al.Mental health during and after the COVID-19 emergency in Italy.Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1111/pcn.13004Crossref PubMed Scopus (154) Google Scholar]. Working youths cannot continue their work, either because their places of employment are closed or because they lack resources (i.e., computers) at home. For students, engagement in schools, in colleges, and with peers, which is a protective factor against adverse mental health outcomes [[15]Bond L. Butler H. Thomas L. et al.Social and school connectedness in early secondary school as predictors of late teenage substance use, mental health, and academic outcomes.J Adolesc Health. 2007; 40 (357.e9–18)Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (590) Google Scholar], was suddenly interrupted. Previous and multiple experiences of Nepali "lockdowns" (i.e., strikes or bandha and curfews) may have created a false expectation of "life-as-usual" activities during evenings. Conflicting information is associated with higher stress [[7]Torales J. O'Higgins M. Castaldelli-Maia J.M. Ventriglio A. The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health.Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020; (20764020915212)Crossref PubMed Scopus (1852) Google Scholar]. Misplaced expectations (arguably a type of conflicting information) may lead to anxiety and/or depression if and when authorities enforce the COVID-19 lockdown more strictly. The SEE, a national examination that is commonly associated with stress/anxiety [[16]Bhattarai Y.B. The school leaving certificate (SLC) examination of Nepal: Exploring negative consequences. [master's thesis]. Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada2014Google Scholar], was also postponed just hours before the scheduled time [[17]'Notification about postponement of SEE exams'. The Government of Nepal. National Examination Board.https://www.see.gov.np/uploads/news/6uKFy6hDlnxstnju.pdfDate accessed: April 9, 2020Google Scholar]. This abrupt cancellation and lack of information about SEE's future course left everyone involved in confusion and stress. Nepalese youths experienced negative post-2015-earthquake mental health outcomes, including post-traumatic stress disorder [[18]Schwind J.S. Formby C.B. Santangelo S.L. et al.Earthquake exposures and mental health outcomes in children and adolescents from Phulpingdanda village, Nepal: A cross-sectional study.Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2018; 12: 54Crossref PubMed Scopus (19) Google Scholar]. A new emergency/crisis scenario may exacerbate those negative outcomes or generate new ones. Post-traumatic stress symptoms have been reported in Wuhan in the middle of the COVID-19 outbreak [[19]Liu N. Zhang F. Wei C. et al.Prevalence and predictors of PTSS during COVID-19 outbreak in China hardest-hit areas: Gender differences matter.Psychiatry Res. 2020; 287: 112921Crossref PubMed Scopus (1061) Google Scholar] in addition to adverse COVID-19 mental health outcomes associated with vicarious exposures [[20]Li Z. Ge J. Yang M. et al.Vicarious traumatization in the general public, members, and non-members of medical teams aiding in COVID-19 control.Brain Behav Immun. 2020; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbi.2020.03.007Crossref Scopus (714) Google Scholar]. Mental health protective factors in Nepal may include the following: (1) cultural acceptance of facemasks; (2) family structure; (3) school space repurposing; and (4) availability of free counseling. Facemasks are a common sight in Nepalese urban centers due to air pollution [[21]Gurung A. Bell M.L. Exposure to airborne particulate matter in Kathmandu Valley, Nepal.J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2012; 22: 235-242Crossref PubMed Scopus (26) Google Scholar]. In the wake of COVID-19, traditional tailors (suchikar) have been sewing and gifting cloth masks. Altogether, these habits/measures may facilitate the implementation of CDC facemasks recommendations [[22]Centers for Disease Control and PreventionRecommendation regarding the use of cloth face coverings, especially in areas of significant community-based transmission.https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.htmlGoogle Scholar]. Joint and extended families are common in Nepal, which provide youths with a support system. As a result, youths are reconnecting with their family values and cultural identity. Increased support from friends and family have been reported in the context of COVID-19 [[23]Zhang Y. Ma Z.F. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health and quality of life among local residents in Liaoning Province, China: A cross-sectional study.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17Google Scholar]. School campuses are being used as potential quarantine and food collection sites, instilling a sense of social responsibility and community support that may negate adverse mental health outcomes [[24]Wickrama K. Bryant C.M. Community context of social resources and adolescent mental health.J Marriage Fam. 2003; 65: 850-866Crossref Scopus (134) Google Scholar]. Finally, trained counselors and psychologists are offering suggestions and psychological first aid (mostly free) via the Internet. COVID-19 pandemic challenges are likely to lead to negative mental health outcomes among youths, especially in Nepal. Table 1 offers an analysis of risk/protective factors by levels of the socio-ecological model, whereas Figure 1 maps the chronological order on which risk/protective factors occurred (Figure 1).Table 1Risk and protective factors for negative COVID-19–related mental health outcomes among adolescents and youths in Nepal by levels of action or interaction within the SEMSEM levelRisk factorsProtective factorsIndividual1. Lack of understanding of lockdown restrictions2. Exposure to 2015 earthquakes1. Personal coping strategies2. History of resiliency in previous stressful situationsRelationship1. Social media1. Family structureCommunity1. Work/sudent life changes1. Free psychological helpSocietal1. Funding of MHS for A/Y2. Sudden lockdown3. Abrupt SSE postponement1. Cultural use of facemasks2. Repurposing of school campusesA/Y = adolescents and youths; MHS = mental health services; SEM = socio-ecological model; SSE = secondary education examination. Open table in a new tab

Referência(s)