Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Uncertainty Quantification of Global Net Methane Emissions From Terrestrial Ecosystems Using a Mechanistically Based Biogeochemistry Model

2020; Wiley; Volume: 125; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1029/2019jg005428

ISSN

2169-8961

Autores

Licheng Liu, Qianlai Zhuang, Youmi Oh, Narasinha Shurpali, Seung-Bum Kim, Benjamin Poulter,

Tópico(s)

Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies

Resumo

Abstract Quantification of methane (CH 4 ) emissions from wetlands and its sinks from uplands is still fraught with large uncertainties. Here, a methane biogeochemistry model was revised, parameterized, and verified for various wetland ecosystems across the globe. The model was then extrapolated to the global scale to quantify the uncertainty induced from four different types of uncertainty sources including parameterization, wetland type distribution, wetland area distribution, and meteorological input. We found that global wetland emissions are 212 ± 62 and 212 ± 32 Tg CH 4 year −1 (1Tg = 10 12 g) due to uncertain parameters and wetland type distribution, respectively, during 2000–2012. Using two wetland distribution data sets and three sets of climate data, the model simulations indicated that the global wetland emissions range from 186 to 212 CH 4 year −1 for the same period. The parameters were the most significant uncertainty source. After combining the global methane consumption in the range of −34 to −46 Tg CH 4 year −1 , we estimated that the global net land methane emissions are 149–176 Tg CH 4 year −1 due to uncertain wetland distribution and meteorological input. Spatially, the northeast United States and Amazon were two hotspots of methane emission, while consumption hotspots were in the Eastern United States and eastern China. During 1950–2016, both wetland emissions and upland consumption increased during El Niño events and decreased during La Niña events. This study highlights the need for more in situ methane flux data, more accurate wetland type, and area distribution information to better constrain the model uncertainty.

Referência(s)