Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Reducing the risk of venous thromboembolism following superficial endovenous treatment: A UK and Republic of Ireland consensus study

2020; SAGE Publishing; Volume: 35; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1177/0268355520936420

1758-1125

Nikesh Dattani, Joseph Shalhoub, Sandip Nandhra, Tristan Lane, Abdulsalam Abu-Own, Ahmed Elbasty, Aled Jones, Andrew Duncan, Andrew Garnham, Ankur Thapar, Anna Murray, Anzar Baig, Athanasios Saratzis, Atif Sharif, Bella Huasen, Claire Dawkins, Craig Nesbitt, Daniel Carradice, Darren Morrow, David C. Bosanquet, Eamon G. Kavanagh, Faisal Shaikh, Gergely Gósi, Graeme K. Ambler, Gregory J. Fulton, Gurdas V. Singh, Hannah Travers, Hayley Moore, James Olivier, Louise Hitchman, Martin K. O’Donohoe, Matthew Popplewell, Mekki Medani, Michael Jenkins, Mingzheng Aaron Goh, Oliver Lyons, Olivia McBride, Paul Moxey, Philip Stather, Phillipa Burns, Rachel Forsythe, R.C. Sam, Ranjeet Brar, Robert Brightwell, Ruth Benson, Sarah Onida, Sharath C.V. Paravastu, Simon Lambracos, S. Rao Vallabhaneni, Stewart R. Walsh, Tasleem Aktar, Tony Moloney, Zola Mzimba, Isaac Nyamekye,

Peripheral Artery Disease Management

Objectives Venous thromboembolism is a potentially fatal complication of superficial endovenous treatment. Proper risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis could mitigate this hazard; however, there are currently no evidence-based or consensus guidelines. This study surveyed UK and Republic of Ireland vascular consultants to determine areas of consensus. Methods A 32-item survey was sent to vascular consultants via the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network (phase 1). These results generated 10 consensus statements which were redistributed (phase 2). ‘Good’ and ‘very good’ consensus were defined as endorsement/rejection of statements by >67% and >85% of respondents, respectively. Results Forty-two consultants completed phase 1. This generated seven statements regarding risk factors mandating peri-procedural pharmacoprophylaxis and three statements regarding specific pharmacoprophylaxis regimes. Forty-seven consultants completed phase 2. Regarding venous thromboembolism risk factors mandating pharmacoprophylaxis, ‘good’ and ‘very good’ consensus was achieved for 5/7 and 2/7 statements, respectively. Regarding specific regimens, ‘very good’ consensus was achieved for 3/3 statements. Conclusions The main findings from this study were that there was ‘good’ or ‘very good’ consensus that patients with any of the seven surveyed risk factors should be given pharmacoprophylaxis with low-molecular-weight heparin. High-risk patients should receive one to two weeks of pharmacoprophylaxis rather than a single dose.