Current and Future Trends of Silk Fibroin-Based Bioinks In 3D Printing
2020; Future Medicine; Volume: 4; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2217/3dp-2020-0005
ISSN2059-4763
Autores Tópico(s)Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
ResumoJournal of 3D Printing in MedicineVol. 4, No. 2 EditorialCurrent and future trends of silk fibroin-based bioinks in 3D printingJoaquim M OliveiraJoaquim M Oliveira *Author for correspondence: Tel.: +351 253 510 931; Fax: +351 253 510 909; E-mail Address: miguel.oliveira@i3bs.uminho.pthttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-7052-88373B's Research Group, I3Bs – Research Institute on Biomaterials, Biodegradables & Biomimetics, University of Minho, Headquarters of The European Institute of Excellence on Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine, AvePark, Zona Industrial da Gandra, 4805-017 Barco GMR, PortugalICVS/3B's - PT Government Associate Laboratory, Braga/Guimaraes, PortugalPublished Online:9 Jul 2020https://doi.org/10.2217/3dp-2020-0005AboutSectionsView ArticleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInReddit View articleKeywords: 3D printingbioinkenzymatic cross-linkingsilk fibrointissue engineeringReferences1. Henney AM. The promise and challenge of personalized medicine: aging populations, complex diseases, and unmet medical need. Croat. Med J. 53(3), 207–210 (2012).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar2. Conte F, Fiscon G, Licursi V et al. A paradigm shift in medicine: a comprehensive review of network-based approaches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Gene Regul. Mech. 1863(6), 194416 (2019).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar3. Fong ELS, Harrington DA, Farach-Carson MC, Yu H. Heralding a new paradigm in 3D tumor modeling. Biomaterials 108, 197–213 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar4. Garrett B. 3D printing: new economic paradigms and strategic shifts. Glob. Policy 5(1), 70–75 (2014).Crossref, Google Scholar5. Qiao H, Tang T. Engineering 3D approaches to model the dynamic microenvironments of cancer bone metastasis. Bone Res. 6(1), 3 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar6. Carvalho MR, Barata D, Teixeira LM et al. Colorectal tumor-on-a-chip system: a 3D tool for precision onco-nanomedicine. Sci. Adv. 5(5), eaaw1317 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar7. Canadas RF, Ren T, Marques AP, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, Demirci U. Biochemical gradients to generate 3D heterotypic-like tissues with isotropic and anisotropic architectures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 28(48), 1804148 (2018).Crossref, Google Scholar8. Kundu SC, Dash BC, Dash R, Kaplan DL. Natural protective glue protein, sericin bioengineered by silkworms: potential for biomedical and biotechnological applications. Prog. Polym. Sci. 33(10), 998–1012 (2008).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar9. Vepari C, Kaplan DL. Silk as a biomaterial. Prog. Polym. Sci. 32(8), 991–1007 (2007).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar10. Na K, Shin S, Lee H et al. Effect of solution viscosity on retardation of cell sedimentation in DLP 3D printing of gelatin methacrylate/silk fibroin bioink. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 61, 340–347 (2018).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar11. Lee H, Kwak H, Na K, Shin S, Shin D, Hyun J. Noncytotoxic biocomposite hydrogel fabricated by digital light processing 3D printing. In: ECCM 2018 – 18th European Conference on Composite Materials. Athens, Greece, 24–28 June 2020.Google Scholar12. Kim SH, Yeon YK, Lee JM et al. Precisely printable and biocompatible silk fibroin bioink for digital light processing 3D printing. Nat. Commun. 9(1), 1620 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar13. Wen Z, Jiang F, Wu F et al. Photocurable silk fibroin-polyvinylpyrrolidone hydrogel. Materialia 9, 100525 (2020).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar14. Zheng Z, Wu J, Liu M et al. 3D bioprinting of self-standing silk-based bioink. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 7(6), 1701026 (2018).Crossref, Google Scholar15. Jiang JP, Liu XY, Zhao F et al. Three-dimensional bioprinting collagen/silk fibroin scaffold combined with neural stem cells promotes nerve regeneration after spinal cord injury. Neural Regen. Res. 15(5), 959–968 (2020).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar16. Singh YP, Bandyopadhyay A, Mandal BB. 3D bioprinting using cross-linker-free silk-gelatin bioink for cartilage tissue engineering. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(37), 33684–33696 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar17. Li Z, Zhang X, Yuan T et al. Addition of platelet-rich plasma to silk fibroin hydrogel bioprinting for cartilage regeneration. Tissue Eng. Part A. doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2019.0304 (2020) (Epub ahead of print).Crossref, Google Scholar18. Nguyen TT, Ratanavaraporn J, Yodmuang S. Alginate-silk fibroin Bioink: a printable hydrogel for tissue engineering. In: BMEiCON 2019 – 12th Biomedical Engineering International Conference. Ubon Ratchathani, Thailand, 19–22 November 2019.Crossref, Google Scholar19. Sharma A, Desando G, Petretta M et al. Investigating the role of sustained calcium release in silk-gelatin-based three-dimensional bioprinted constructs for enhancing the osteogenic differentiation of human bone marrow derived mesenchymal stromal cells. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 5(3), 1518–1533 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar20. Das S, Pati F, Choi YJ et al. Bioprintable, cell-laden silk fibroin–gelatin hydrogel supporting multilineage differentiation of stem cells for fabrication of three-dimensional tissue constructs. Acta Biomater. 11, 233–246 (2015).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar21. Binder KW, Zhao W, Aboushwareb T, Dice D, Atala A, Yoo JJ. In situ bioprinting of the skin for burns. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 211(3), S76 (2010).Crossref, Google Scholar22. Chameettachal S, Midha S, Ghosh S. Regulation of chondrogenesis and hypertrophy in silk fibroin-gelatin-based 3D bioprinted constructs. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2(9), 1450–1463 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar23. Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Fast setting silk fibroin bioink for bioprinting of patient-specific memory-shape implants. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 6(22), 1701021 (2017).Crossref, Google Scholar24. Costa JB, Silva-Correia J, Ribeiro VP, da Silva Morais A, Oliveira JM, Reis RL. Engineering patient-specific bioprinted constructs for treatment of degenerated intervertebral disc. Mater. Today Commun. 19, 506–512 (2019).Crossref, CAS, Google Scholar25. Hasturk O, Jordan KE, Choi J, Kaplan DL. Enzymatically crosslinked silk and silk-gelatin hydrogels with tunable gelation kinetics, mechanical properties and bioactivity for cell culture and encapsulation. Biomaterials 232, 119720 (2020).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar26. Compaan AM, Christensen K, Huang Y. Inkjet bioprinting of 3D silk fibroin cellular constructs using sacrificial alginate. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3(8), 1519–1526 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar27. Mehrotra S, Melo BAG, Hirano M et al. Nonmulberry silk based ink for fabricating mechanically robust cardiac patches and endothelialized myocardium-on-a-chip application. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(12), 1907436 (2020).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar28. Yan LP, Silva-Correia J, Ribeiro VP et al. Tumor growth suppression induced by biomimetic silk fibroin hydrogels. Sci. Rep. 6(1), 31037 (2016).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar29. Yan L-P, Oliveira JM, Oliveira AL, Reis RL. Core-shell silk hydrogels with spatially tuned conformations as drug-delivery system. J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med. 11(11), 3168–3177 (2017).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar30. Ribeiro VP, Pina S, Costa JB et al. Enzymatically cross-linked silk fibroin-based hierarchical scaffolds for osteochondral regeneration. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(4), 3781–3799 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google Scholar31. Costa L, Costa JB, Oliveira JM, Reis RL, Silva-Correia J. Evaluating the effect of elastin in the angiogenic response of silk fibroin 3d printed scaffolds. In: Transactions of the Annual Meeting of the Society for Biomaterials and the Annual International Biomaterials Symposium. Seattle, WA, USA (2019).Google Scholar32. Carvalho MR, Maia FR, Vieira S, Reis RL, Oliveira JM. Tuning enzymatically crosslinked silk fibroin hydrogel properties for the development of a colorectal cancer extravasation 3D model on a chip. Glob. Challenges 2(5–6), 1700100 (2018).Crossref, Medline, Google Scholar33. Vieira S, da Silva Morais A, Garet E et al. Self-mineralizing Ca-enriched methacrylated gellan gum beads for bone tissue engineering. Acta Biomater. 93, 74–85 (2019).Crossref, Medline, CAS, Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited By3D Bioprinting Technology and Hydrogels Used in the Process3 November 2022 | Journal of Functional Biomaterials, Vol. 13, No. 4Silk Fibroin as a Bioink – A Thematic Review of Functionalization Strategies for Bioprinting Applications5 July 2022 | ACS Biomaterials Science & Engineering, Vol. 8, No. 8Medical 3D Printing: Tools and Techniques, Today and TomorrowAnnual Review of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, Vol. 13, No. 1Extraction of Silk Fibroin with Several Sericin Removal Processes and its Importance in Tissue Engineering: A Review20 January 2022 | Journal of Polymers and the Environment, Vol. 30, No. 63D Printing of Monolithic Proteinaceous Cantilevers Using Regenerated Silk Fibroin26 March 2022 | Molecules, Vol. 27, No. 73D bioprinted silk fibroin hydrogels for tissue engineering29 October 2021 | Nature Protocols, Vol. 16, No. 12Bioprinting Au Natural: The Biologics of Bioinks28 October 2021 | Biomolecules, Vol. 11, No. 11In Situ 3D Printing: Opportunities with Silk InksTrends in Biotechnology, Vol. 39, No. 7Emerging Silk Material Trends: Repurposing, Phase Separation and Solution-Based Designs1 March 2021 | Materials, Vol. 14, No. 5 Vol. 4, No. 2 Follow us on social media for the latest updates Metrics Downloaded 124 times History Received 27 March 2020 Accepted 2 July 2020 Published online 9 July 2020 Published in print June 2020 Information© 2020 Future Medicine LtdKeywords3D printingbioinkenzymatic cross-linkingsilk fibrointissue engineeringAuthor contributionsJM Oliveira was responsible for the preparation of the manuscript.Financial & competing interests disclosureThe author thank the financial support provided through the project NanOptoNerv (PTDC/NAN-MAT/29936/2017), financed by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) and COMPETE 2020. This work has been cofunded through the project 0624_2IQBIONEURO_6, Fundo Europeu de Desenvolvimento Regional (FEDER) through the Program Interreg V-A España-Portugal (POCTEP) 2014–2020. The FCT distinction attributed to JM Oliveira (IF/01285/2015) under the Investigator FCT program is also greatly acknowledged. The author has no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed.No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.PDF download
Referência(s)