Artigo Produção Nacional Revisado por pares

Simulation-Based Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshops: A Reproducible Model for Sustainable Education

2020; SAGE Publishing; Volume: 57; Issue: 10 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1177/1055665620944781

ISSN

1545-1569

Autores

Rami S. Kantar, Corstiaan C. Breugem, Kristen Keith, Serena N. Kassam, Charanya Vijayakumar, Mikaela Bow, Allyson R. Alfonso, Elsa M. Chahine, Lilian H. Ghotmi, Krishna G. Patel, Pradip R. Shetye, Pedro E. Santiago, Joseph E. Losee, Derek M. Steinbacher, Percy Rossell‐Perry, Daniela Gamba Garib, Nivaldo Alonso, Robert J. Mann, Jose Rolando Prada-Madrid, Elçin Esenlik, María del Carmen Pamplona, Marcus Vinícius Martins Collares, Ricardo D. Bennun, Ann W. Kummer, Carlos Giugliano, Bonnie L. Padwa, Cássio Eduardo Raposo-Amaral, Raymond Tse, Brian C. Sommerlad, Roberto L. Flores, Usama S. Hamdan,

Tópico(s)

Cleft Lip and Palate Research

Resumo

Objective: Evaluate simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops as a reproducible model for education with sustained impact. Design: Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation. Setting: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Participants: Total of 180 participants. Interventions: Three-day simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop. Main Outcome Measures: Number of workshop participants stratified by specialty, satisfaction with the workshop, satisfaction with simulation-based workshops as educational tools, impact on cleft surgery procedural confidence, short-term impact on clinical practice, medium-term impact on clinical practice. Results: The workshop included 180 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 54.5%, with participants reporting high satisfaction with all aspects of the workshop and with simulation-based workshops as educational tools. Participants reported a significant improvement in cleft lip (33.3 ± 5.7 vs 25.7 ± 7.6; P < .001) and palate (32.4 ± 7.1 vs 23.7 ± 6.6; P < .001) surgery procedural confidence following the simulation sessions. Participants also reported a positive short-term and medium-term impact on their clinical practices. Conclusion: Simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshops are well received by participants, lead to improved cleft surgery procedural confidence, and have a sustained positive impact on participants’ clinical practices. Future efforts should focus on evaluating and quantifying this perceived positive impact, as well reproducing these efforts in other areas of need.

Referência(s)