Artigo Revisado por pares

Comparison of the Transitional Boundary Layer During Pitching and Heaving Motions

2020; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Volume: 58; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2514/1.c035858

ISSN

1533-3868

Autores

Hassan Akhlaghi, M. R. Soltani,

Tópico(s)

Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies

Resumo

No AccessEngineering NotesComparison of the Transitional Boundary Layer During Pitching and Heaving MotionsH. Akhlaghi and M. R. SoltaniH. AkhlaghiSharif University of Technology, 145888 Tehran, Iran*Ph.D. Candidate, Department of Aerospace Engineering, P.O. Box 11365-8639; .Search for more papers by this author and M. R. SoltaniSharif University of Technology, 145888 Tehran, Iran†Professor, Department of Aerospace Engineering, P.O. Box 11365-8639; also Affiliate Professor, William E. Boeing Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; (Corresponding Author).Search for more papers by this authorPublished Online:26 Oct 2020https://doi.org/10.2514/1.C035858SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Popov A. V., Botez R. M. and Labib M., “Transition Point Detection from the Surface Pressure Distribution for Controller Design,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 45, No. 1, 2008, pp. 23–28. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.31488 LinkGoogle Scholar[2] Carta F. O., “A Comparison of the Pitching and Plunging Response of an Oscillating Airfoil,” NASA CR-3172, 1979. Google Scholar[3] Tyler J. C. and Leishman G. J., “Analysis of Pitch and Plunge Effects on Unsteady Airfoil Behavior,” Journal of the American Helicopter Society, Vol. 37, No. 3, 1992, pp. 69–82. https://doi.org/10.4050/JAHS.37.69 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[4] Leishman G. J., Principles of Helicopter Aerodynamics, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2006, Chap. 8. Google Scholar[5] Rival D. and Tropea C., “Characteristics of Pitching and Plunging Airfoils Under Dynamic-Stall Conditions,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2010, pp. 80–86. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.42528 LinkGoogle Scholar[6] Soltani M. R., Seddighi M. and Rasi Marzabadi F. R., “Comparison of Pitching and Plunging Effects on the Surface Pressure Variation of a Wind Turbine Blade Section,” Wind Energy, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2009, pp. 213–239. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.286 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Khalid M. S., Akhtar I. and Durrani N. I., “Analysis of Strouhal Number Based Equivalence of Pitching and Plunging Airfoils and Wake Deflection,” Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 229, No. 8, 2014, pp. 1423–1434. https://doi.org/10.1177/0954410014551847 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[8] Visbal M. R. and Daniel J. G., “Comparison of Pitch Versus Plunge Maneuvers of a Finite Wing,” AIAA Aviation 2019 Forum, AIAA Paper 2019-3334, 2019.https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2019-3334 LinkGoogle Scholar[9] Soltani M. R. and Bakhshalipour A., “Effect of Amplitude and Mean Angle-of-Attack on the Boundary Layer of an Oscillating Aerofoil,” Aeronautical Journal, Vol. 112, No. 1138, 2008, pp. 705–713. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0001924000002670 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Soltani M. R. and Marzabadi F. R., “Experimental Investigation of Transition on a Plunging Airfoil,” Scientia Iranica, Transaction B, Mechanical Engineering, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2010, pp. 468–479. Google Scholar[11] Soltani M. R., Marzabadi F. R. and Mohammadi Z., “Experimental Study of the Plunging Motion with Unsteady Wind Tunnel Wall Interference Effects,” Experimental Techniques, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2012, pp. 30–45. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2010.00696.x CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Marzabadi F. R. and Soltani M. R., “Effect of Leading-Edge Roughness on Boundary Layer Transition of an Oscillating Airfoil,” Scientia Iranica, Vol. 20, No. 3, 2013, pp. 508–515.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scient.2012.12.035 Google Scholar[13] Marzabadi F. R. and Soltani M. R., “Experimental Study of the Boundary Layer over an Airfoil in Plunging Motion,” Acta Mechanica Sinica, Vol. 28, No. 2, 2012, pp. 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-012-0039-1 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[14] Soltani M. R., Marzabadi F. R., Sedighi F. R. and Bakhshalipour A., “An Experimental Investigation of Time Lag in Pressure-Measuring Systems,” 3rd Ankara International Aerospace Conference, Middle East Technical University (METU), Paper AIAC-2005-028, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-012-0039-1 Google Scholar[15] Hodson H. P., Huntsman I. and Steele A. B., “An Investigation of Boundary Layer Development in a Multistage LP Turbine,” Journal of Turbomachinery, Vol. 116, No. 3, 1994, pp. 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.2929424 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[16] Akhlaghi H., Soltani M. R. and Maghrebi M. J., “Time-Frequency Analysis and Transitional Boundary Layer Investigation over a Pitching Airfoil,” Scientia Iranica, Transaction B, Mechanical Engineering (accepted for publication). Google Scholar[17] Akhlaghi H., Soltani M. R. and Maghrebi M. J., “Transitional Boundary Layer Study over an Airfoil in Combined Pitch-Plunge Motions,” Aerospace Science and Technology, Vol. 98, March 2020, Paper 105694. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ast.2020.105694 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Discetti S. and Ianiro A., Experimental Aerodynamics, CRC Press, New York, 2017, Chap. 3. CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Stack J., Mangalam S. and Berry S., “A Unique Measurement Technique to Study Laminar-Separation Bubble Characteristics on an Airfoil,” 19th AIAA Fluid Dynamics, Plasma Dynamics, and Lasers Conference, AIAA Paper 1987-1271, 1987. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.1987-1271 LinkGoogle Scholar[20] Lee T. and Basu S., “Measurement of Unsteady Boundary Layer Developed on an Oscillating Airfoil Using Multiple Hot-Film Sensors,” Experiments in Fluids, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1998, pp. 108–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003480050214 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Rudmin D., Benaissa A. and Poirel D., “Detection of Laminar Flow Separation and Transition on a NACA-0012 Airfoil Using Surface Hot-Films,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 135, No. 10, 2013, Paper 101104. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024807 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[22] Poels A., Rudmin D., Benaissa A. and Poirel D., “Localization of Flow Separation and Transition over a Pitching NACA0012 Airfoil at Transitional Reynolds Numbers Using Hot-Films,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 137, No. 12, 2015, Paper 124501. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4031008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[23] Freymuth P., “Propulsive Vortical Signature of Plunging and Pitching Airfoils,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 26, No. 7, 1988, pp. 881–883. https://doi.org/10.2514/3.9982 LinkGoogle Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails What's Popular Volume 58, Number 1January 2021 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2020 by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc. All rights reserved. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3868 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerodynamic PerformanceAerodynamicsAeronautical EngineeringAeronauticsBoundary LayersComputational Fluid DynamicsFlow RegimesFluid DynamicsFluid Flow PropertiesTurbulenceVortex DynamicsWind Tunnels KeywordsLaminar Boundary LayerLift CoefficientPressure CoefficientAirfoil ChordSeparated FlowsAerodynamic DampingShear StressLow Speed Wind TunnelStrouhal NumberDifferential Pressure SensorsPDF Received29 December 2019Accepted14 September 2020Published online26 October 2020

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX