End-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) and ventricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) for shock outcome prediction in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Are they two sides of the same coin?
2020; Elsevier BV; Volume: 160; Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/j.resuscitation.2020.10.032
ISSN1873-1570
AutoresLaura Frigerio, Enrico Baldi, Elisabete Aramendi, Beatriz Chicote, Unai Irusta, Enrico Contri, Alessandra Palo, Sara Compagnoni, Rosa Fracchia, Giorgio Antonio Iotti, Luigi Oltrona Visconti, Simone Savastano, Sara Compagnoni, Rosa Fracchia, Antonio Cuzzoli, Andrea Pagliosa, Guido Matiz, Alessandra Russo, Andrea Vecchi, Cecilia Fantoni, Cristian Fava, Cinzia Franzosi, C Vimercati, D Franchi, Enrico Storti, Erika Taravelli, Fulvio L F Giovenzana, Giovanni Buetto, Guido Garzena, Giorgio Antonio Iotti, Guido Villa, Marco Botteri, Salvatore Ivan Caico, Irene Raimondi Cominesi, Livio Carnevale, Matteo Caresani, Mario Luppi, Maurizio Migliori, Paola Centineo, Paola Genoni, Roberta Bertona, Roberto De Ponti, Riccardo Osti, Stefano Buratti, Gian Battista Danzi, Arianna Marioni, Antonella De Pirro, Simone Molinari, Vito Sgromo, Valeria Musella, Martina Paglino, Francesco Mojoli, Bruno Lusona, Michele Pagani, Moreno Curti,
Tópico(s)Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
ResumoVentricular fibrillation amplitude spectral area (AMSA) and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ETCO2) are predictors of shock success, understood as restoration of an organized rhythm, and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). However, little is known about their combined use. We aimed to assess the prediction accuracy when combined, and to clarify if they are correlated in out of hospital cardiac arrest' victims.Records acquired by external defibrillators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients of the Lombardia Cardiac Arrest registry were processed. The 1-min pre-shock ETCO2 median value (METCO2) was computed from the capnogram and AMSA (2-48 mV.Hz range) computed applying the Fast Fourier Transform to a 2-second pre-shock filtered ECG interval (0.5-30 Hz). Support Vector Machine (SVM) predictive models based on METCO2, AMSA and their combination were fit; results were given as the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.We considered 112 patients with 391 shocks delivered. METCO2 and AMSA were predictors of shock success [AUC (IQR) of the ROC curve: 0.59 (0.56-0.62); 0.68 (0.65-0.72), respectively] and of ROSC [0.56 (0.53-0.59); 0.74 (0.71-0.78),]. Their combination in a SVM model increased the accuracy for predicting shock success [AUC (IQR) of the ROC curve: 0.71 (0.68-0.75)] and ROSC [0.77 (0.73-0.8)]. AMSA and METCO2 were significantly correlated only in patients who achieved ROSC (rho = 0.33 p = 0.03).AMSA and ETCO2 predict shock success and ROSC after every shock, and their predictive power increases if combined. Notably, they were correlated only in patients who achieved ROSC.
Referência(s)