Voltar
Artigo Acesso aberto Produção Nacional Revisado por pares
BIBTEX RIS

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature

2020; BioMed Central; Volume: 5; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1186/s41073-020-00101-3

ISSN

2058-8615

Autores

Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, Victor G. S. Queiroz, Thiago C. Moulin, Carlos Alberto Marques de Carvalho, Clarissa Branco Haas, Danielle Rayêe, David Henshall, Evandro A. De‐Souza, Felippe E. Amorim, Flávia Zacouteguy Boos, Gerson D. Guercio, Igor Costa, Karina L. Hajdu, Lieve van Egmond, Martin Modrák, Pedro Batista Tan, Richard J. Abdill, Steven Burgess, Sylvia F. S. Guerra, Vanessa Trindade Bortoluzzi, Olavo B. Amaral,

Tópico(s)

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

Resumo

Preprint usage is growing rapidly in the life sciences; however, questions remain on the relative quality of preprints when compared to published articles. An objective dimension of quality that is readily measurable is completeness of reporting, as transparency can improve the reader's ability to independently interpret data and reproduce findings.

Referência(s)