Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Back to Which Future? Recalibrating the Time-Calibrated Narratives of Entrepreneurial Action to Account for Nondeliberative Dynamics

2020; Academy of Management; Volume: 49; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.5465/amr.2020.0358

1930-3807

Wim Van Lent, Richard A. Hunt, Daniel Lerner,

Private Equity and Venture Capital

Academy of Management ReviewIn-Press DialogueBack to Which Future? Recalibrating the Time-Calibrated Narratives of Entrepreneurial Action to Account for Nondeliberative DynamicsWim van Lent, Richard A. Hunt and Daniel A. LernerWim van LentIESEG School of Management, Montpellier Business School, Richard A. HuntVirginia Polytechnic Institute & State University and Daniel A. LernerIE Business SchoolAccepted by Donald E. ConlonPublished Online:4 Jan 2024https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0358AboutSectionsView articleView Full TextPDF/EPUB ToolsDownload CitationsAdd to favoritesTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail View articleREFERENCESBhawe, N., Rawhouser, H., & Pollack, J. M. 2016. Horse and cart: The role of resource acquisition order in new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 6: 7–13. Google ScholarBlock, R. A. 2014. Cognitive models of psychological time. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google ScholarBort, J., Wiklund, J., Crawford, G. C., Lerner, D. A., & Hunt, R. A. 2023. The strategic advantage of impulsivity in entrepreneurial action: An agent-based modeling approach. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice: 104225872311788. Google ScholarBrown, L., Packard, M., & Bylund, P. 2018. Judgment, fast and slow: Toward a judgment view of entrepreneurs' impulsivity. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10: Article e00095. Google ScholarBuber, M. 1955/2013. The legend of the Baal-Shem. London, U.K.: Routledge. Google ScholarCzarniawska, B. 2004. Narratives in social science research. London, U.K.: SAGE. Google ScholarDavidsson, P. 2015. Entrepreneurial opportunities and the entrepreneurship nexus: A re-conceptualization. Journal of Business Venturing, 30: 674–695. Google ScholarDavidsson, P., & Gruenhagen, J. H. 2020. Fulfilling the process promise: A review and agenda for new venture creation process research. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45: 1083–1118. Google ScholarDimov, D. 2011. Grappling with the unbearable elusiveness of entrepreneurial opportunities. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35: 57–81. Google ScholarDimov, D. 2020. Opportunities, language, and time. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34: 333–351.Link , Google ScholarFritsch, M., & Storey, D. 2014. Entrepreneurship in a regional context: Historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional Studies, 48: 939–954. Google ScholarHerbert, R. F., & Link, A. N. 1988. The entrepreneur: Mainstream views and radical critiques. New York, NY: Praeger. Google ScholarHerman, D. 2002. Story logic: Problems and possibilities of narrative. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press. Google ScholarHunt, R.A. 2015. Contagion entrepreneurship: Institutional support, strategic incoherence, and the social costs of over‐entry. Journal of Small Business Management, 53: 5–29. Google ScholarHunt, R. A., & Lerner, D. A. 2018. Entrepreneurial action as human action: Sometimes judgment-driven, sometimes not. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 10: e00102. Google ScholarHunt, R., Lerner, D., Johnson, S., Badal, S., & Freeman, M. 2022. Cracks in the wall: Entrepreneurial action theory and the weakening presumption of intended rationality. Journal of Business Venturing, 37: 106190. Google ScholarKaplan, S., & Orlikowski, W. J. 2013. Temporal work in strategy making. Organization Science, 24: 965–995. Google ScholarKnight, F. H. 1921. Risk, uncertainty and profit. New York, NY: Houghton-Mifflin. Google ScholarLerner, D. A., Hatak, I., & Rauch, A. 2018. Deep roots? Behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation system (BIS/BAS) sensitivity and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 9: 107–115. Google ScholarLerner, D. A., Alkærsig, L., Fitza, M., Lomberg, C., & Johnson, S. 2021. Nothing ventured, nothing gained: Parasite infection is associated with entrepreneurial initiation, engagement and performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45: 118–144. Google ScholarLerner, D. A., Hunt, R. A., & Dimov, D. 2018. Action! Moving beyond the intendedly-rational logics of entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 33: 52–69. Google ScholarLerner, D. A., Hunt, R. A., & Verheul, I. 2018. Dueling banjos: Harmony and discord between ADHD and entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32: 266–286.Link , Google ScholarLerner, D. A., Verheul, I., & Thurik, R. 2019. Entrepreneurship and attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a large-scale study involving the clinical condition of ADHD. Small Business Economics, 53: 381–392. Google ScholarLévesque, M., & Stephan, U. 2020. It's time we talk about time in entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 44: 163–184. Google ScholarLwin, S. M. 2017. Narrativity and creativity in oral storytelling: Co-constructing a story with the audience. Language and Literature, 26: 34–53. Google ScholarMcKeever, E., Jack, S., & Anderson, A. 2015. Embedded entrepreneurship in the creative re-construction of place. Journal of Business Venturing, 30: 50–65. Google ScholarMcMullen, J. S., & Dimov, D. 2013. Time and the entrepreneurial journey: The problems and promise of studying entrepreneurship as a process. Journal of Management Studies, 50: 1481–1512. Google ScholarMcMullen, J. S., Ingram, K. M., & Adams, J. 2020. What makes an entrepreneurship study entrepreneurial? Toward A unified theory of entrepreneurial agency. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. Google ScholarMcMullen, J. S., & Shepherd, D. A. 2006. Entrepreneurial action and the role of uncertainty in the theory of the entrepreneur. Academy of Management Review, 31: 132–152.Link , Google ScholarNair, S., Gaim, M., & Dimov, D. 2020. Toward the emergence of entrepreneurial opportunities: Organizing early-phase new-venture creation support systems. Academy of Management Review, 1: 162–183. Google ScholarSchumpeter, J. A. 1934. The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google ScholarSternberg, M. 1992. Telling in time (II): Chronology, teleology, narrativity. Poetics Today, 13: 463–541. Google ScholarSuddendorf, T., & Corballis, M. C. 2007. The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 30: 299–313. Google ScholarToms, S., Wilson, N., & Wright, M. 2020. Innovation, intermediation, and the nature of entrepreneurship: A historical perspective. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14: 105–121. Google ScholarTownsend, D. M., & Hunt, R. A. 2018. Heroic action and the problem of emergence: An analytical approach to entrepreneurial action theory. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 10565. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management. Google ScholarTownsend, D. M., & Hunt, R. A. 2019. Addressing entrepreneurship's false dichotomization of risk and uncertainty through modal logics. Academy of Management Proceedings, 1: 18448. Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management. Google ScholarTownsend, D. M., & Hunt, R. A. 2020. Manipulating time: Temporal agency and entrepreneurial action [Working Paper No. 2020:8-1, VPI]. Google ScholarVan Lent, W., Hunt, R. A., & Lerner, D. A. 2023. Historiography and the excavation of nascent business venturing. Small Business Economics, 61: 285–303. Google ScholarWadhwani, R., Kirsch, D., Welter, F., Gartner, W., & Jones, G. 2020. Context, time, and change: Historical approaches to entrepreneurship research. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 14: 3–19. Google ScholarWiklund, J. 2019. Entrepreneurial impulsivity is not rational judgment. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 11: e00105. Google ScholarWiklund, J., Patzelt, H., & Dimov, D. 2016. Entrepreneurship and psychological disorders: How ADHD can be productively harnessed. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 6: 14–20. Google ScholarWiklund, J., Yu, W., & Patzelt, H. 2018. Impulsivity and entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32: 379–403.Link , Google ScholarWiklund, J., Yu, W., Tucker, R., & Marino, L. 2017. ADHD, impulsivity and entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 32: 627–656. Google ScholarWood, M. S., Bakker, R. M., & Fisher, G. 2021. Back to the future: A time-calibrated theory of entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 147–171.Abstract , Google ScholarWood, M. S., Williams, D. W., & Drover, W. 2017. Past as prologue: Entrepreneurial inaction decisions and subsequent action judgments. Journal of Business Venturing, 32: 107–127. Google ScholarYu, W., Wiklund, J., & Pérez-Luño, A. 2021. ADHD symptoms, entrepreneurial orientation (EO), and firm performance. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 45: 92–117. Google ScholarZemeckis, R. L. (Director) 1989. Back to the Future II [Motion picture]. Universal Pictures. Google ScholarFiguresReferencesRelatedDetails In-Press Permissions Metrics in the past 12 months History Published online 4 January 2024 Information© Academy of Management ReviewAcknowledgmentsThe authors all contributed equally to this work. Dialogue in response to: Wood, M. S., Bakker, R. M., & Fisher, G. 2021. Back to the future: A time-calibrated theory of entrepreneurial action. Academy of Management Journal, 46: 147–171.Download PDF