Do the Benefits of Reducing Accounting Complexity Persist in Markets Prone to Bubble?*
2011; Wiley; Volume: 28; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01089.x
ISSN1911-3846
Autores Tópico(s)Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
ResumoContemporary Accounting ResearchVolume 28, Issue 3 p. 957-989 Do the Benefits of Reducing Accounting Complexity Persist in Markets Prone to Bubble?* Jessen L. Hobson, Jessen L. Hobson University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignSearch for more papers by this author Jessen L. Hobson, Jessen L. Hobson University of Illinois at Urbana-ChampaignSearch for more papers by this author First published: 14 March 2011 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1911-3846.2011.01089.xCitations: 21 † Accepted by Hun-Tong Tan. I am grateful for the assistance of my dissertation committee chair, Steve Kachelmeier, and the members of my committee, Jim Dyer, Jeffrey Hales, Eric Hirst, and Lisa Koonce. I also appreciate the helpful comments of Ozlem Arikan, Allen Blay, Valrie Chambers, Angela Coletti, Brooke Elliott, Linda Hobson, Ryan Huston, Mark Isaac, Kevin Jackson, William Mayew, Tim Salmon, Doug Stevens, Hun-Tong Tan, Jeffrey Wilks, Brian White, Michael Williamson, Jennifer Winchel, two anonymous reviewers, participants in the American Accounting Association Annual Meeting, the International Meeting of the Economic Science Association, the Florida State University Accounting Workshop, the Florida State University Experimental Social Science Workshop, the Annual Brigham Young University Accounting Research Symposium, the University of Florida Accounting Workshop, and workshop participants and Ph.D. students at the University of Texas at Austin. Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Abreu, D., and M. K. Brunnermeier. 2002. Synchronization risk and delayed arbitrage. Journal of Financial Economics 66 (2–3): 341–60. 10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00227-1 Web of Science®Google Scholar Abreu, D., and M. K. Brunnermeier. 2003. Bubbles and crashes. Econometrica 71 (1): 173–204. 10.1111/1468-0262.00393 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ackert, L. F., N. Charupat, R. Deaves, and B. D. Kluger. 2006. The origins of bubbles in laboratory asset markets. Working Paper, FRB of Atlanta (No. 2006-6). Google Scholar Ackert, L. F., B. K. Church, and M. Shehata. 1997. An experimental examination of the effects of forecast bias on individuals’ use of forecasted information. Journal of Accounting Research 35 (1): 25–42. 10.2307/2491465 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ackert, L. F., B. K. Church, and P. Zhang. 2004. Asset prices and informed traders’ abilities: Evidence from experimental asset markets. Accounting Organizations and Society 29 (7): 609–26. 10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.007 Web of Science®Google Scholar Atkins, P. S. 2004. Speech by SEC commissioner: Remarks before the Securities Traders Association. Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar Badrinath, S. G., and S. Wahal. 2002. Momentum trading by institutions. The Journal of Finance 57 (6): 2449–78. 10.1111/1540-6261.00502 Web of Science®Google Scholar Baker, D. 2002. The run-up in home prices: Is it real or is it another bubble? Briefing paper, Center for Economic Research, August 2002. Google Scholar Baron, R. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator mediator variable distinction in social psychological-research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (6): 1173–82. 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Berenson, A. 2003. The number: How the drive for quarterly earnings corrupted Wall Street and corporate America. New York: Random House. Google Scholar Bhojraj, S., R. J. Bloomfield, and W. B. Tayler. 2009. Margin trading, overpricing, and synchronization risk. Review of Financial Studies 22 (5): 2059–85. 10.1093/rfs/hhn045 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J. 1996. The interdependence of reporting discretion and informational efficiency in laboratory markets. The Accounting Review 71 (4): 493–511. Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J. 2002. The “incomplete revelation hypothesis” and financial reporting. Accounting Horizons 16 (3): 233–43. 10.2308/acch.2002.16.3.233 Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J., and R. Libby. 1996. Market reactions to differentially available information in the laboratory. Journal of Accounting Research 34 (2): 183–207. 10.2307/2491499 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J., R. Libby, and M. W. Nelson. 1999. Confidence and the welfare of less-informed investors. Accounting Organizations and Society 24 (8): 623–47. 10.1016/S0361-3682(99)00025-2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J., R. Libby, and M. W. Nelson. 2003. Do investors overrely on old elements of the earnings time series? Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (1): 1–31. 10.1506/N8T8-9QR7-YUCX-91X2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J., M. W. Nelson, and S. D. Smith. 2006. Feedback loops, fair value accounting and correlated investments. Review of Accounting Studies 11 (2–3): 377–416. 10.1007/s11142-006-9003-2 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J., M. O’Hara, and G. Saar. 2005. The “make or take” decision in an electronic market: Evidence on the evolution of liquidity. Journal of Financial Economics 75 (1): 165–99. 10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.07.001 Web of Science®Google Scholar Bloomfield, R. J., and T. J. Wilks. 2000. Disclosure effects in the laboratory: Liquidity, depth, and the cost of capital. The Accounting Review 75 (1): 13–41. 10.2308/accr.2000.75.1.13 Web of Science®Google Scholar Brigagliano, J. 2007. Short sale regulation: A targeted approach for efficient markets. Keynote Address at the MFA Seminar Series, New York. Google Scholar Brunnermeier, M. K., and S. Nagel. 2004. Hedge funds and the technology bubble. Journal of Finance 59 (5): 2013–40. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00690.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Buckless, F. A., and S. P. Ravenscroft. 1990. Contrast coding : A refinement of ANOVA in behavioral analysis. The Accounting Review 65 (4): 933–45. Web of Science®Google Scholar Burton, F. G., M. Coller, and B. Tuttle. 2006. Market responses to qualitative information from a group polarization perspective. Accounting Organizations and Society 31 (2): 107–27. 10.1016/j.aos.2005.01.002 Web of Science®Google Scholar Caginalp, G. 2002. Does the market have a mind of its own, and does it get carried away with excess cash? Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 3 (2): 72–75. 10.1207/S15327760JPFM0302_01 Google Scholar Caginalp, G., and D. Balenovich. 1994. Market oscillations induced by the competition between value-based and trend-based investment strategies. Applied Mathematical Finance 1 (2): 129–64. 10.1080/13504869400000009 Google Scholar Caginalp, G., and D. Balenovich. 1999. Asset flow and momentum: deterministic and stochastic equations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A-Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences 357 (1758): 2119–33. 10.1098/rsta.1999.0421 Web of Science®Google Scholar Caginalp, G., and G. B. Ermentrout. 1990. A kinetic thermodynamics approach to the psychology of fluctuations in financial markets. Applied Mathematics Letters 3 (4): 17–19. 10.1016/0893-9659(90)90038-D Google Scholar Caginalp, G., and G. B. Ermentrout. 1991. Numerical studies of differential equations related to theoretical financial markets. Applied Mathematics Letters 4 (1): 35–38. 10.1016/0893-9659(91)90118-F Web of Science®Google Scholar Caginalp, G., and V. Ilieva. 2008. The dynamics of trader motivations in asset bubbles. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 66 (3–4): 641–56. 10.1016/j.jebo.2006.01.011 Web of Science®Google Scholar Caginalp, G., D. Porter, and V. L. Smith. 2000. Overreactions, momentum, liquidity, and price bubbles in laboratory and field asset markets. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 1 (1): 24–48. 10.1207/S15327760JPFM0101_04 Google Scholar Caginalp, G., D. Porter, and V. L. Smith. 2001. Financial bubbles: Excess cash, momentum, and incomplete information. Journal of Psychology and Financial Markets 2 (2): 80–99. 10.1207/S15327760JPFM0202_03 Google Scholar Calegari, M., and N. L. Fargher. 1997. Evidence that prices do not fully reflect the implications of current earnings for future earnings: An experimental markets approach. Contemporary Accounting Research 14 (3): 397–433. 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1997.tb00534.x Google Scholar Chewning, E. G., M. Coller, and B. Tuttle. 2004. Do market prices reveal the decision models of sophisticated investors? Evidence from the laboratory. Accounting Organizations and Society 29 (8): 739–58. 10.1016/j.aos.2003.10.003 Web of Science®Google Scholar Coller, M. 1996. Information, noise, and asset prices: An experimental study. Review of Accounting Studies 1 (1): 35–50. 10.1007/BF00565411 Google Scholar Coller, M., and B. Tuttle. 2002. The acquisition of price-relevant domain knowledge by a market. Journal of Economic Psychology 23 (1): 77–101. 10.1016/S0167-4870(01)00062-9 Web of Science®Google Scholar Collins, L. M., J. W. Graham, and B. P. Flaherty. 1998. An alternative framework for defining mediation. Multivariate Behavioral Research 33 (2): 295–312. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3302_5 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar DeLong, B. J., A. Shleifer, L. H. Summers, and R. J. Waldmann. 1990a. Noise trader risk in financial-markets. Journal of Political Economy 98 (4): 703–38. 10.1086/261703 Web of Science®Google Scholar DeLong, B. J., A. Shleifer, L. H. Summers, and R. J. Waldmann. 1990b. Positive feedback investment strategies and destabilizing rational speculation. The Journal of Finance 45 (2): 379–95. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb03695.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Dietrich, J. R., S. J. Kachelmeier, D. N. Kleinmuntz, and T. J. Linsmeier. 2001. Market efficiency, bounded rationality, and supplemental business reporting disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (2): 243–68. 10.1111/1475-679X.00011 Web of Science®Google Scholar Donaldson, W. 2003. Speech by SEC Chairman: Remarks to the National Press Club. Washington, DC. Google Scholar Dopuch, N., R. R. King, and R. Schwartz. 2003. Independence in appearance and in fact: An experimental investigation. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (1): 79–114. 10.1506/9B5D-HLLP-BBQE-8N3F Web of Science®Google Scholar Dufwenberg, M., T. Lindqvist, and E. Moore. 2005. Bubbles and experience: An experiment. American Economic Review 95 (5): 1731–37. 10.1257/000282805775014362 Web of Science®Google Scholar Efron, B. 1987. Better bootstrap confidence-intervals. Journal of the American Statistical Association 82 (397): 171–85. 10.1080/01621459.1987.10478410 Web of Science®Google Scholar Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman and Hall. 10.1007/978-1-4899-4541-9 Google Scholar Elliott, B. W., S. D. Krische, and M. E. Peecher. 2010. Expected mispricing: The joint influence of accounting transparency and investor base. Journal of Accounting Research 48 (2): 343–81. 10.1111/j.1475-679X.2010.00370.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Financial Accounting Standards Board. 2007. Conceptual framework: Joint project of the IASB and FASB 2007. Available online at http://www.fasb.org/project/conceptual_framework.shtml#objective. Google Scholar Fischbacher, U. 2007. Z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics 10 (2): 171–78. 10.1007/s10683-006-9159-4 Web of Science®Google Scholar Fiske, S., and S. Taylor. 1991. Social cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar Ganguly, A. R., J. Herbold, and M. E. Peecher. 2007. Assurer reputation for competence in a multiservice context. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (1): 133–70. 10.1506/Y224-5Q33-G6R2-817M Web of Science®Google Scholar Ganguly, A. R., J. H. Kagel, and D. V. Moser. 1994. The effects of biases in probability judgments on market prices. Accounting Organizations and Society 19 (8): 675–700. 10.1016/0361-3682(94)90029-9 Web of Science®Google Scholar Gillette, A. B., D. E. Stevens, S. G. Watts, and A. W. Williams. 1999. Price and volume reactions to public information releases: An experimental approach incorporating traders’ subjective beliefs. Contemporary Accounting Research 16 (3): 437–79. 10.1111/j.1911-3846.1999.tb00590.x Google Scholar Greenspan, A. 1996. The challenge of central banking in a democratic society. Remarks at the Annual Dinner and Francis Boyer Lecture of the American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, DC, December 5. Google Scholar Griffin, J. M., J. H. Harris, T. Shu, and S. Topaloglu. in press. Who drove and burst the tech bubble? The Journal of Finance. Google Scholar Grossman, S. J., and J. E. Stiglitz. 1980. On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. American Economic Review 70 (3): 393–408. Web of Science®Google Scholar Haruvy, E., Y. Lahav, and C. N. Noussair. 2007. Traders’ expectations in asset markets: Experimental evidence. American Economic Review 97 (5): 1901–20. 10.1257/aer.97.5.1901 Web of Science®Google Scholar Haruvy, E., and C. Noussair. 2006. The effect of short selling on bubbles and crashes in experimental spot asset markets. The Journal of Finance 61 (3): 1119–57. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00868.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Hayes, A. F. 2009. Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs 76 (4): 408–20. 10.1080/03637750903310360 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hirshleifer, D., and S. H. Teoh. 2003. Limited attention, information disclosure, and financial reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 (1–3): 337–86. 10.1016/j.jacceco.2003.10.002 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hirst, D. E., and P. E. Hopkins. 1998. Comprehensive income reporting and analysts’ valuation judgments. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement): 47–75. 10.2307/2491306 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hirst, D. E., K. E. Jackson, and L. Koonce. 2003. Improving financial reports by revealing the accuracy of prior estimates. Contemporary Accounting Research 20 (1): 165–93. 10.1506/9T1W-PGGN-L36L-WD21 Web of Science®Google Scholar Hobson, J. L. 2006. Does less complex accounting improve price efficiency in conditions that encourage price bubbles? Dissertation, The University of Texas at Austin. Google Scholar Hong, H., J. Scheinkman, and W. Xiong. 2006. Asset float and speculative bubbles. The Journal of Finance 61 (3): 1073–117. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.00867.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Judd, C. M., and D. A. Kenny. 1981. Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review 5 (5): 602–19. 10.1177/0193841X8100500502 Web of Science®Google Scholar Kachelmeier, S. J. 1996. Do cosmetic reporting variations affect market behavior? A laboratory study of the accounting emphasis on unavoidable costs. Review of Accounting Studies 1 (2): 115–40. 10.1007/BF02918228 Google Scholar Kachelmeier, S. J., S.T. Limberg, and M. S. Schadewald. 1991. A laboratory market examination of the consumer price response to information about producers’ costs and profits. The Accounting Review 66 (4): 694–717. Web of Science®Google Scholar Kenny, D. A. 2009. Mediation. http://davidakenny.net/cm/mediate.htm#BK . Google Scholar Kenny, D. A., D. A. Kashy, and N. Bolger. 1998. Data analysis in social psychology. In The handbook of social psychology, eds. D. T. Gilbert, S. Fiske, and G. Lindzey, 233–65. Boston: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar Kindleberger, C. 2000. Manias, panics, and crashes: A history of financial crises. 4th ed. New York: Wiley. 10.1057/9780230536753 Web of Science®Google Scholar King, R. R. 1991. Private information acquisition in experimental markets prone to bubble and crash. Journal of Financial Research 14 (3): 197–206. 10.1111/j.1475-6803.1991.tb00657.x Web of Science®Google Scholar King, R. R., V. L. Smith, A. W. Williams, and M. van Boening. 1993. The robustness of bubbles and crashes in experimental stock markets. In Nonlinear dynamics and evolutionary economics, eds. I. Prigogine, R. Day, and P. Chen. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Web of Science®Google Scholar Kruschke, J. K., and M. K. Johansen. 1999. A model of probabilistic category learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 25 (5): 1083–119. 10.1037/0278-7393.25.5.1083 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lei, V., C. Noussair, and C. R. Plott. 2001. Nonspeculative bubbles in experimental asset markets: Lack of common knowledge of rationality vs. actual irrationality. Econometrica 69 (4): 831–59. 10.1111/1468-0262.00222 Web of Science®Google Scholar Levitt, A. 1996. Remarks at Commonwealth Club, San Francisco, May 17. Google Scholar Libby, R., R. J. Bloomfield, and M. W. Nelson. 2002. Experimental research in financial accounting. Accounting Organizations and Society 27 (8): 777–812. 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00011-3 Web of Science®Google Scholar Littell, R. C., G. A. Milliken, W. W. Stroup, R. D. Wolfinger, and O. Schabenberger. 2006. SAS for mixed models. 2nd ed. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc. Google Scholar Lundholm, R. J. 1991. What affects the efficiency of a market? Some answers from the laboratory. The Accounting Review 66 (3): 486–515. Web of Science®Google Scholar MacKinnon, D. P., and J. H. Dwyer. 1993. Estimating mediated effects in prevention studies. Evaluation Review 17 (2): 144–58. 10.1177/0193841X9301700202 Web of Science®Google Scholar MacKinnon, D., J. Krull, and C. Lockwood. 2000. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science 1 (4): 173–81. 10.1023/A:1026595011371 CASPubMedGoogle Scholar MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, J. M. Hoffman, S. G. West, and V. Sheets. 2002. A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods 7 (1): 83–104. 10.1037/1082-989X.7.1.83 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar MacKinnon, D. P., C. M. Lockwood, and J. Williams. 2004. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivariate Behavioral Research 39 (1): 99–128. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3901_4 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar MacKinnon, D. P., G. Warsi, and J. H. Dwyer. 1995. A simulation study of mediated effect measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research 30 (1): 41–62. 10.1207/s15327906mbr3001_3 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Maines, L. A. 1995. Judgment and decision-making research in financial accounting: A review and analysis. In Judgment and Decision-Making Research in Accounting and Auditing, ed. R. H. Ashton and A. Ashton. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511720420.006 Google Scholar Maines, L. A., and L. S. McDaniel. 2000. Effects of comprehensive-income characteristics on nonprofessional investors’ judgments: The role of financial-statement presentation format. Accounting Review 75 (2): 179–207. 10.2308/accr.2000.75.2.179 Web of Science®Google Scholar Morgan-Lopez, A. A., and D. P. MacKinnon. 2006. Demonstration and evaluation of a method for assessing mediated moderation. Behavior Research Methods 38 (1): 77–87. 10.3758/BF03192752 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Muller, D., C. M. Judd, and V. Y. Yzerbyt. 2005. When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 89 (6): 852–63. 10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.852 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ng, T. B. P., and H. T. Tan. 2007. Effects of qualitative factor salience, expressed client concern, and qualitative materiality thresholds on auditors’ audit adjustment decisions. Contemporary Accounting Research 24 (4): 1171–92. 10.1506/car.24.4.5 Web of Science®Google Scholar Nisbett, R. E., H. Zukier, and R. E. Lemley. 1981. The dilution effect: Nondiagnostic information weakens the implications of diagnostic information. Cognitive Psychology 13 (2): 248–77. 10.1016/0010-0285(81)90010-4 Web of Science®Google Scholar Ofek, E., and M. Richardson. 2003. Dotcom mania: The rise and fall of internet stock prices. The Journal of Finance 58 (3): 1113–37. 10.1111/1540-6261.00560 Web of Science®Google Scholar Payne, J. W., J. R. Bettman, and E. J. Johnson. 1993. The adaptive decision maker. New York: Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9781139173933 Web of Science®Google Scholar Penman, S. H. 2004. Financial statement analysis and security valuation. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. Google Scholar Porter, D. P., and V. L. Smith. 1995. Futures contracting and dividend uncertainty in experimental asset markets. Journal of Business 68 (4): 509–41. 10.1086/296675 Web of Science®Google Scholar Preacher, K. J., and A. F. Hayes. 2008. Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40 (3): 879–91. 10.3758/BRM.40.3.879 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Preacher, K. J., and G. J. Leonardelli. 2001. Calculation for the Sobel test: An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. http://www.quantpsy.org . Google Scholar Preacher, K. J., D. D. Rucker, and A. F. Hayes. 2007. Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research 42 (1): 185–227. 10.1080/00273170701341316 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Rose, B. M., G. N. Holmbeck, R. M. Coakley, and E. A. Franks. 2004. Mediator and moderator effects in developmental and behavioral pediatric research. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics 25 (1): 58–67. 10.1097/00004703-200402000-00013 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Shankar, P. G., and H. T. Tan. 2006. Determinants of audit preparers’ workpaper justifications. Accounting Review 81 (2): 473–95. 10.2308/accr.2006.81.2.473 Web of Science®Google Scholar Shiller, R. J. 2000. Irrational exuberance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar Shleifer, A., and R. W. Vishny. 1997. The limits of arbitrage. The Journal of Finance 52 (1): 35–55. 10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03807.x Web of Science®Google Scholar Shrout, P. E., and N. Bolger. 2002. Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 7 (4): 422–45. 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Simon, H. A. 1955. A behavioral model of rational choice. Quarterly Journal of Economics 69 (1): 99–118. 10.2307/1884852 Web of Science®Google Scholar Simon, H. A. 1957. Models of man: Social and rational. New York: Wiley. 10.2307/2550441 Google Scholar Slovic, P., D. Fleissner, and W. S. Bauman. 1972. Analyzing use of information in investment decision making: Methodological proposal. Journal of Business 45 (2): 283–301. 10.1086/295448 Web of Science®Google Scholar Smith, V. L., G. Suchanek, and A. W. Williams. 1988. Bubbles, crashes, and endogenous expectations in experimental spot asset markets. Econometrica 56: 1119–51. 10.2307/1911361 Web of Science®Google Scholar Smith, V. L., M. van Boening, and C. P. Wellford. 2000. Dividend timing and behavior in laboratory asset markets. Economic Theory 16 (3): 567–83. Web of Science®Google Scholar Sobel, M. E. 1982. Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociological Methodology: 290–312. 10.2307/270723 Google Scholar Sobel, M. E. 1986. Some new results on indirect effects and their standard errors in covariance structure models. Sociological Methodology: 159–86. 10.2307/270922 Google Scholar Sunder, S. 1995. Experimental asset markets: A survey. In The Handbook of Experimental Economics, ed. J. H. Kagel and A. E. Roth, 445–95. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Web of Science®Google Scholar Tan, S. K., and H. T. Tan. 2008. Effects of exposure to subsequently invalidated evidence on judgments of audit workpaper preparers and reviewers. Contemporary Accounting Research 25 (3): 921–46. 10.1506/car.25.3.10 Web of Science®Google Scholar Temin, P., and H. J. Voth. 2004. Riding the South Sea Bubble. American Economic Review 94 (5): 1654–68. 10.1257/0002828043052268 Web of Science®Google Scholar Tuttle, B., M. Coller, and F. G. Burton. 1997. An examination of market efficiency: Information order effects in a laboratory market. Accounting Organizations and Society 22 (1): 89–103. 10.1016/S0361-3682(96)00026-8 Web of Science®Google Scholar Tuttle, B., M. Coller, and R. D. Plumlee. 2002. The effect of misstatements on decisions of financial statement users: An experimental investigation of auditor materiality thresholds. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 21 (1): 11–27. 10.2308/aud.2002.21.1.11 Web of Science®Google Scholar Tzelgov, J., and A. Henik. 1991. Suppression situations in psychological-research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin 109 (3): 524–36. 10.1037/0033-2909.109.3.524 Web of Science®Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2003a. Final rule: Disclosure in management’s discussion and analysis about off-balance sheet arrangements and aggregate contractual obligations: Section 401(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(SEC release no. 33-8182; January 27, 2003). Washington, DC: SEC. Web of Science®Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2003b. Interpretation: Commission guidance regarding management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations (release nos. 33-8350; 34-48960; FR-72). Washington, DC: SEC. Web of Science®Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2005a. Report and recommendations pursuant to section 401(c) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 on arrangements with off-balance sheet implications, special purpose entities, and transparency of filings by issuers. Washington, DC: SEC. Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission. 2005b. SEC staff report on off-balance sheet arrangements, special purpose entities and related issues. Press Release 2005-91. Washington, DC: SEC. Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2007. Discussion paper for consideration by the SEC advisory committee on improvements to financial reporting (release no. 33-8836; file no. 265-24). Washington, DC: SEC. Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2010a. SEC approves money market fund reforms to better protect investors. Press Release 2010-14. Washington, DC: SEC. Google Scholar United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2010b. SEC proposes new measures to protect investors in options markets. Press Release 2010-56. Washington, DC: SEC. Google Scholar Citing Literature Volume28, Issue3Fall 2011 (September)Pages 957-989 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)