Feedback and Incentives on Nonfinancial Value Drivers: Effects on Managerial Decision Making*
2007; Wiley; Volume: 24; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1506/q5x8-5912-w613-0utl
ISSN1911-3846
Autores Tópico(s)Accounting and Organizational Management
ResumoContemporary Accounting ResearchVolume 24, Issue 2 p. 523-556 Feedback and Incentives on Nonfinancial Value Drivers: Effects on Managerial Decision Making* Khim Ong Kelly, Khim Ong Kelly Nanyang Technological UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Khim Ong Kelly, Khim Ong Kelly Nanyang Technological UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 15 January 2010 https://doi.org/10.1506/Q5X8-5912-W613-0UTLCitations: 38 * Accepted by Steve Salterio. This paper is based on my dissertation at the University of Southern California. I am thankful to my dissertation committee: Sarah Bonner, Mitchell Earleywine, Wim Van der Stede, and especially my chair, Kenneth Merchant, for their guidance and support. I am grateful to Mihail Bota for programming assistance. I appreciate the helpful comments on earlier drafts of the paper from Marlys Lipe, Kin Yew Low, Steve Salterio, Sandra Vera-Muñoz, Bill Waller, anonymous reviewers, seminar participants at the University of Ulster, Nanyang Technological University, and the 2004 Management Accounting Section Research and Case Conference, and particularly Hun Tong Tan. Finally, I thank Nanyang Technological University and the University of Southern California for providing financial support. AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Amir, E., and B. Lev. 1996. Value relevance of nonfinancial information: The wireless communication industry. Journal of Accounting and Economics 22 (1): 3–30. Baber, W., P. Fairfield, and J. Haggard. 1991. The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. The Accounting Review 66 (4): 818–29. Balzer, W. K., M. E. Doherty, and R. O'Connor Jr. 1989. Effects of cognitive feedback on performance. Psychological Bulletin 106 (3): 410–33. Bonner, S. E. 1994. A model of audit task complexity. Accounting, Organizations and Society 19 (3): 213–34. Brehmer, B. 1990. Strategies in real-time, dynamic decision making. In Insights in Decision Making: A Tribute to Hillel J. Einhorn, ed. R. Hogarth, 262–79. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1990. Brehmer, B. 1992. Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica 81 (3): 211–41. Brehmer, B., and R. Allard. 1991. Dynamic decision making: The effects of task complexity and feedback delay. In Distributed Decision Making: Cognitive Models for Cooperative Work, eds. J. Rasmussen, B. Brehmer, and J. Leplat, 319–33. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Bushman, R. M., R. J. Indjejikian, and A. Smith. 1996. CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting and Economics 21 (2): 161–93. Campbell, D. J. 1988. Task complexity: A review and analysis. Academy of Management Review 13 (1): 40–52. Datar, S., S. C. Kulp, and R. A. Lambert. 2001. Balancing performance measures. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (1): 75–92. Dechow, P., and R. Sloan. 1991. Executive incentives and horizon problem. Journal of Accounting and Economics 14 (1): 51–89. Dhaliwal, J. S., and I. Benbasat. 1996. The use and effects of knowledge-based system explanations: Theoretical foundations and a framework for empirical evaluation. Information Systems Research 7 (3): 342–62. Diehl, E., and J. D. Sterman. 1995. Effects of feedback complexity on dynamic decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 62 (2): 198–215. Dikolli, S. S. 2001. Agent employment horizons and contracting demand for forward-looking performance measures. Journal of Accounting Research 39 (3): 481–94. Eccles, R., R. Hertz, E. Keegan, and D. M. H. Phillips. 2001. The value reporting revolution. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Einhorn, H., and R. Hogarth. 1986. Judging probable cause. Psychological Bulletin 99 (1): 3–19. Farrell, A. M., K. Kadous, and K. L. Towry. 2005. Contracting on contemporaneous vs. forward-looking measures: An experimental investigation. Working paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and Emory University. Feltham, G. A., and J. Xie. 1994. Performance measure congruity and diversity in multi-task principal/agent relations. The Accounting Review 69 (3): 429–53. Goodman, J. S. 1998. The interactive effects of task and external feedback on practice performance and learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 76 (3): 223–52. Gu, F. 2005. Innovation, future earnings, and market efficiency. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance 20 (4): 385–418. Ho, S. K., and R. B. McKay. 2002. Balanced scorecard: Two perspectives. The CPA Journal 72 (3): 20–5. Holm, S. 1979. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 6: 65–70. Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 1998. Are nonfinancial measures leading indicators of financial performance? An analysis of customer satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research 36 (Supplement): 1–35. Ittner, C. D., and D. F. Larcker. 2001. Assessing empirical research in managerial accounting: A value-based management perspective. Journal of Accounting and Economics 32 (December): 349–410. Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and M. W. Meyer. 2003. Subjectivity and the weighting of performance measures: Evidence from a balanced scorecard. The Accounting Review 78 (3): 725–58. Ittner, C. D., D. F. Larcker, and M. V. Rajan. 1997. The choice of performance measures in annual bonus contracts. The Accounting Review 72 (2): 231–55. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 1996. Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system. Harvard Business Review 74 (1): 75–85. Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. 2001. The strategy focused organization: How balanced scorecard companies thrive in the new business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Klein, H. J. 1991. Further evidence on the relationship between goal setting and expectancy theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49: 230–57. Lee, J. W., and J. F. Yates. 1992. How quantity judgment changes as the number of cues increases: An analytical framework and review. Psychological Bulletin 112 (2): 363–77. Lev, B. 2001. Intangibles †Management, measurement, and reporting. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press. Lev, B., and P. Zarowin. 1999. The boundaries of financial reporting and how to extend them. Journal of Accounting Research 37 (2): 353–85. Levene, H. 1960. Robust tests for the equality of variances. In Contributions to Probability and Statistics, ed. I. Olkin, 278–92. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. Libby, T., S. E. Salterio, and A. Webb. 2004. The balanced scorecard: The effects of assurance and process accountability on managerial judgment. The Accounting Review 79 (4): 1075–94. Lipe, M. G., and S. E. Salterio. 2000. The balanced scorecard: Judgmental effects of common and unique performance measures. The Accounting Review 75 (3): 283–98. Locke, E. A., K. N. Shaw, L. M. Saari, and G. P. Latham. 1981. Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980. Psychological Bulletin 90 (1): 125–52. Luft, J. L., and M. D. Shields. 2001a. The effects of financial and nonfinancial performance measures on judgment and decision performance. Working paper, Michigan State University. Luft, J. L., and M. D. Shields. 2001b. Why does fixation persist? Experimental evidence on judgment performance effects of expensing intangibles. The Accounting Review 76 (4): 561–88. Malina, M. A., and F. H. Selto. 2001. Communicating and controlling strategy: An empirical study of the effectiveness of the balanced scorecard. Journal of Management Accounting Research 13: 47–90. Mitchell, T. R., and A. E. Mickel. 1999. The meaning of money: An individual-difference perspective. Academy of Management Review 24 (3): 568–78. Prendergast, C. 1999. The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature 37 (1): 7–63. Rucci, A. J., S. P. Kirn, and R. T. Quinn. 1998. The employee customer profit chain at Sears. Harvard Business Review 76 (1): 83–97. Schiehll, E., and P. Andrã©. 2003. Corporate governance and the information gap: The use of financial and non-financial information in executive compensation. Ivey Business Journal 67 (4): 1–6. Sengupta, K., and T. K. Abdel-Hamid. 1993. Alternative conceptions of feedback in dynamic decision environments: An experimental investigation. Management Science 39 (4): 411–28. Shanks, D. R., S. M. Pearson, and A. Dickinson. 1989. Temporal contiguity and the judgment of causality by human subjects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 41B (2): 139–59. Smith, T. W. 2002. Standard & Poor's semiconductors industry survey, July 18, 2002. New York: Standard & Poor's. Varian, H. R. 1996. Intermediate microeconomics: A modern approach, 4th ed. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Van Eerde, W., and H. Thierry. 1996. Vroom's expectancy models and work-related criteria: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 81 (5): 575–86. Vroom, V. 1964. Work and motivation. New York: Wiley. Wasserman, E. A., and D. J. Neunaber. 1986. College students' responding to and rating of contingency relations: The role of temporal contiguity. Journal of Experimental Analysis of Behavior 46 (1): 15–35. Welch, B. L. 1951. On the comparison of several mean values: An alternative approach. Biometrika 38 (3/4): 330–36. Citing Literature Volume24, Issue2Summer 2007Pages 523-556 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)