Artigo Revisado por pares

Gender differences in decision satisfaction within established dyads: Effects of competitive and cooperative behaviors

2006; Wiley; Volume: 23; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/mar.20113

ISSN

1520-6793

Autores

Robert J. Fisher, Yany Grégoire,

Tópico(s)

Psychology of Social Influence

Resumo

Psychology & MarketingVolume 23, Issue 4 p. 313-333 Research Article Gender differences in decision satisfaction within established dyads: Effects of competitive and cooperative behaviors Robert J. Fisher, Corresponding Author Robert J. Fisher [email protected] The University of Western OntarioRichard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7Search for more papers by this authorYany Grégoire, Yany Grégoire Washington State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author Robert J. Fisher, Corresponding Author Robert J. Fisher [email protected] The University of Western OntarioRichard Ivey School of Business, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 3K7Search for more papers by this authorYany Grégoire, Yany Grégoire Washington State UniversitySearch for more papers by this author First published: 24 February 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20113Citations: 15AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Abstract The research develops and tests a model of gender differences on the effects of competition and cooperation on decision satisfaction. It was hypothesized and found that males' satisfaction is dependent on their ability to impose their preferences on their female counterpart within a mixed-gender dyad. In contrast, females' satisfaction is only affected by the degree to which dyad members behave cooperatively. The model is tested within the context of 76 mixed-gender dyads that are in an established relationship. The dyads are sampled from shoppers at a national retailer, and report on their decision-making process as they exit the store. A partial-least-squares (PLS) methodology is used to test for differences in the effects of cooperative and competitive behaviors on males' and females' satisfaction with a dyadic decision. © 2006 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. REFERENCES Alper, S., Tjosvold, D., & Law, K. S. (1998). Interdependence and controversy in group decision making: Antecedents to effective self-managing team. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 33– 52. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence; an essay on psychology and religion. Chicago: Rand McNally. Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Barron, L. A. (2003). Ask and you shall receive? Gender differences in negotiators' beliefs about requests for a higher salary. Human Relations, 56, 635– 662. Bollen, K. A. (1984). Multiple indicators: Internal consistency or no necessary relationship? Quality and Quantity, 18, 377– 385. Bollen, K. A., & Lennox, R. (1991). Conventional wisdom on measurement: A structural equation perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 110, 305– 314. Brody, L. (2000). The socialization of gender differences in emotional expression: Display rules, infant temperament, and differentiation. In A. H. Fischer (Ed.), Gender and emotion: Social psychological perspective (pp. 24– 47). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E., & Rosenkrantz, P. S. (1972). Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 59– 78. Chin, W.W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern methods for business research (pp. 295– 336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L., & Newsted, P. R. (2003). A partial least square latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and voice electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information System Research, 14, 189– 217. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences ( 2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum. Corfman, K. P. (1991). Perceptions of relative influence: Formation and measurement. Journal of Marketing Research, 28, 125– 136. Crombag, H. F. (1966). Cooperation and competition in means-interdependent triads. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 692– 695. Davis, H. L. (1976). Decision making within the household. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 241– 260. Deutsch, M.A. (1949). A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations, 2, 129– 152. Deutsch, M. A. (1980). Over fifty years of conflict research. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Four decades of social psychology (pp. 46– 77). New York: Oxford University Press. Duxbury, L. E., & Higgins, C. A. (1991). Gender differences in work–family conflict. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 60– 74. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (1991). Gender and emergence of leaders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 685– 710. Fischer, E., & Arnold, S. J. (1994). Sex, gender identity, gender role attitudes, and consumer behavior. Psychology & Marketing, 11, 163– 182. Fisher, R. J. (1993). Social desirability bias and the validity of indirect questioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 303– 315. Fisher, R. J., & Grégoire, Y. (2003). The role of cooperation and competition in consumer behavior. Unpublished. Fornell, C., & Bookstein, F. L. (1982). Two structural equations models: LISREL and PLS applied to consumer exit-voice theory. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 440– 452. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39– 50. French, J., & Raven, B. (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power ( pp. 150– 165). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research. Garthwaite, P. H. (1994). An interpretation of partial least squares. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 89, 122– 127. Griffin, D., & Gonzalez, R. (1995). Correlational analysis of dyad-level data in the exchangeable case. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 430– 439. Howell, J. M., & Hall-Merenda, E. A. (1999). The ties that bind: The impact of leader–member exchange, transformational and transactional leadership, and distance on predicting follower performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 680– 694. Kellaris, J. J., & Rice, R. C. (1993). The influence of tempo, loudness, and gender of listener on responses to music. Psychology & Marketing, 10, 15– 29. Kelman, H. C. (1961). Processes of opinion change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57– 78. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1986). Consequences of violating the independence assumption in analysis of variance. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 422– 431. Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., & Bolger, N. (1998). Data analysis in social psychology. In S. Fiske and G.D. Gilbert (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology ( Vol. 1, pp. 233– 265). Boston: McGraw-Hill. Leary, M. R. (1996). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Lohmoller, J. B. (1988). The PLS program system: Latent variables path analysis with partial least squares estimation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 125– 127. Louie, T. A., & Obermiller, C. (2000). Gender stereotypes and social-desirability effects on charity donation. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 121– 136. Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory ( 2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the consumer. New York: McGraw-Hill. Palan, K. M., & Wilkes, R. E. (1997). Adolescent–parent interaction in family decision-making. Journal of Consumer Research, 24, 159– 169. Ridgeway, C. L. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76– 87. Sharma, S., Durand R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291– 399. Sosik, J. J., Avolio, B. J., & Kahai, S. S. (1997). Effects of leadership style and anonymity on group potency and effectiveness in a group decision support system environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 89– 103. Tannen, D. (1990). You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation. New York: Ballantine Books. Thomas, K. (1976). Conflict and conflict management. In M. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 889– 935). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. Tichenor, V. J. (1999). Status and income as gendered resources: The case of marital power. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 638– 650. Tjosvold, D. (1984). Cooperation theory and organization. Human Relations, 37, 743– 767. Van de Vliert, E. (1997). Complex interpersonal conflict behavior: Theoretical frontiers. Hove: Psychology Press. Walters, A. E., Stuhlmaker, A. F., & Meyer, L. L. (1998). Gender and negotiator competitiveness: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 1– 29. Wheelan, S. A., & Verdi, A. F. (1992). Differences in male and female patterns of communication in groups: A methodological artifact? Sex Roles, 27, 1– 15. Wiggins, J. S. (1982). Circumplex models of interpersonal behavior in clinical psychology. In P. C. Kendall & J. N. Butcher (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology (pp. 183– 221). New York:Wiley. Wood, W., & Karten, S. J. (1986). Sex differences in interaction style as a product of perceived sex differences in competence. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 50, 341– 347. Citing Literature Volume23, Issue4April 2006Pages 313-333 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX