History repeated: Applying lessons from the 1918 flu pandemic
2021; Wiley; Volume: 129; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/cncy.22408
ISSN1934-6638
Autores Tópico(s)COVID-19 and healthcare impacts
ResumoCancer CytopathologyVolume 129, Issue 2 p. 97-98 CytoSourceFree Access History repeated: Applying lessons from the 1918 flu pandemic More than a century later, the flu pandemic still offers key lessons on steps to counter COVID-19, but heeding them will require a sharp course correction in the United States Bryn Nelson PhD, Bryn Nelson PhDSearch for more papers by this authorDavid B. Kaminsky MD, FIAC, David B. Kaminsky MD, FIACSearch for more papers by this author Bryn Nelson PhD, Bryn Nelson PhDSearch for more papers by this authorDavid B. Kaminsky MD, FIAC, David B. Kaminsky MD, FIACSearch for more papers by this author First published: 02 February 2021 https://doi.org/10.1002/cncy.22408AboutSectionsPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat In an overwhelmed and understaffed hospital, patients lie dying despite the frantic efforts of exhausted nurses, leaving shell-shocked families to cope with the senseless tragedy. Hearses proliferate, shops close down, and people swath their faces in masks. Emma Donoghue's historical novel, The Pull of the Stars,1 chronicles the experiences of an Irish nurse in a maternity ward during the 1918 flu pandemic. However, some of the scenes, like the one above, could be describing what happened in the spring or fall of 2020 during the COVID-19 pandemic. The parallels are eerily striking, and researchers say that multiple lessons learned more than 100 years ago could still be applied to the COVID-19 pandemic to avert more tragedy. The success of other countries in containing the virus suggests that adopting scientifically sound responses to historical lessons is indeed doable, whereas the 21st century tools of advanced vaccine development have provided a promising means to the pandemic's end. In the United States, an error-riddled and highly politicized response, including months of inconsistent and uncoordinated oversight of testing, supplies, and public health guidelines, has contributed to a patchwork of widely variable approaches by states and cities. For the new administration of President Joe Biden, the question is whether a hard reset in national priorities, coordination, and messaging can flatten the curve until an orderly and ethical mass vaccination can finally quell the disaster. Michael T. Osterholm, PhD, MPH, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota in Minneapolis, was among the first to warn about COVID-19's potential to reach pandemic status. In November 2020, as the US death toll neared 250,000, he was appointed to the coronavirus advisory board of then-President-elect Biden. During a subsequent panel session sponsored by the National Institute for Health Care Management Foundation, Dr. Osterholm pointed out that many communities were most affected by the 1918 pandemic over a relatively short period of 6 to 10 weeks. COVID-19's more extended timeline, he said, has heightened the challenge of sustaining a response as people tire and wonder whether it will ever end. In contrast to 1918 and 1919, though, researchers have procured a more distinct light at the end of the tunnel in the form of effective vaccines. Dr. Osterholm says that breakthrough is all the more reason to tell people, "Now is the time that we really have to dig in, do what we can, what we must to prevent additional transmission, to get us to the day of the vaccine." After nearly a year without a national plan, getting from here to there will require a comprehensive strategy. "Right now, we have 50 governors, many, many large-city mayors, all coming up with their own ideas and approaches to try to limit transmission," he says. A historical review of how Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota, responded to the flu pandemic suggests the power of even basic decisions to shape public opinion and a disease's trajectory as well as the pitfalls of relegating such responsibilities to local officials. "Many steps could have been taken to prevent illness and save lives," the report concluded. "Prior planning, clear orders, as well as consistent and transparent advice and information to the public may have made a significant difference in the number of cases and deaths due to influenza in 1918."2 Study coauthor Richard N. Danila, PhD, MPH, deputy state epidemiologist at the Minnesota Department of Health, says that many of the same countermeasures enacted a century ago have now been instituted statewide. Those actions reflected several lessons learned: "Have a plan in place, try to be transparent in your plan, and communicate the plan to the public," he says. However, Minnesota and other states have faced a more formidable lesson: Given the far more interconnected world of the 21st century, stringent protections in one state are often insufficient without regional or national coordination. For weeks between November 18 and December 7, 2020, North Dakota, South Dakota, and Iowa, all with few COVID-19 restrictions in place at the time, led the nation in per capita cases.3, 4 Then, in December 2020, neighboring Minnesota briefly soared to the top for average daily cases over the previous week despite its stricter regulations. Bridging the Divide Inconsistent measures similarly plagued influenza control measures in 1918 when the lack of a known causative agent, a vaccine, or even antibiotics to treat secondary infections necessitated ad hoc steps such as masking up, keeping surfaces clean, and avoiding crowds. "Governments relied on isolation, disinfection, and essentially personal protection equipment," said Anna M. Groat Carmona, PhD, assistant professor of cellular biology at the University of Washington Tacoma, during a video lecture in September 2020. Many ads and public health directives from 1918 shared remarkably familiar advice to the public. One ad from the Red Cross, entitled, "Wear a Mask and Save Your Life!," warned of physician and nurse shortages and called for mutual protection. "You must wear a mask, not only to protect yourself but your children and your neighbor from influenza, pneumonia and death," it read. An October 4, 1918, headline from The Seattle Daily Times that announced, "Churches, Schools, Shows Closed," with the subhead, "Epidemic Puts Ban on All Public Assemblies," could have been written today. "They didn't call it 'social distancing,' but if you take a look at what they were doing, it was pretty much exactly what we were doing," Dr. Groat Carmona said. "It isn't so much that you have to convince people to behave responsibly so much as to make it possible for them to behave responsibly."–Carolyn M. Orbann, PhD Carolyn M. Orbann, PhD, an associate teaching professor in the Department of Health Sciences at the University of Missouri in Columbia, found records of that town's 1918 ordinance requiring retail locations to maintain a 200-squarefoot buffer around every customer—a century-old rule that is even stricter than the 6-foot rule currently adopted by many stores. Cities diverged sharply on whether and how they instituted such measures, with fateful results. Even then, Dr. Groat Carmona said, data suggested that the cities with the strictest prevention measures suffered the least from excess mortality rates. Some antimask leagues popped up in cities such as San Francisco. However, Dr. Orbann's research suggests that contrarian and fringe views did not take off in Missouri's rural areas. In 1918, some towns not only imposed quarantines but also affixed cards to the windows of homes with quarantined residents. Many of Missouri's hometown newspapers, in fact, posted detailed sick reports of residents who were "fluing," or recuperating. "You would recognize very, very quickly which of your neighbors were sick," Dr. Orbann says. In Minnesota, Dr. Danila says, much of the hate mail railing against the state's COVID-19 mitigation measures now comes from rural residents. When he and his colleagues talked about a pandemic, they never imagined that antiscience sentiments would become such a force or that something as simple as telling people to wear a face mask would be so political. Dr. Danila speculates that people then may have pulled together more at the end of World War I, trusted the government more, or were more conscious of their neighbors. "Now we have more of a schism, I guess," he says. Even the arrival of effective vaccines has engendered divisiveness and misinformation. How can public health officials bridge the divide to help us get to the other side of COVID-19? One answer is to adopt and stick with a clear and consistent message. Another is to normalize common sacrifices, such as wearing masks and forgoing travel. "It's somewhat comforting to know that these things happened before," Dr. Orbann says. A third lesson, she says, is that despite intense opposition by some, many people still want to work together for the common good if given a chance. "People know the right answer, but they're limited economically. They have to go to work," she says. "It isn't so much that you have to convince people to behave responsibly so much as to make it possible for them to behave responsibly." Just as with the 1918 flu pandemic, COVID-19 will not be the end of the story: Other infectious diseases are likely to emerge or reemerge with deadly force. They will bring new lessons and undoubtedly reinforce old ones. However, as the grace and humanity found in The Pull of the Stars1 and in a million different real-life hospitals and homes have demonstrated, empathy and compassion can be powerful forces as well. A nurse in Ireland helps to deliver a newborn, a physician in the United States helps family members to say goodbye to a dying loved one, and another critical lesson endures. References 1Donoghue E. The Pull of the Stars. Little Brown and Company; 2020. 2Ott M, Shaw SF, Danila RN, Lynfield R. Lessons learned from the 1918-1919 influenza pandemic in Minneapolis and St. Paul, Minnesota. Public Health Rep. 2007; 122: 803- 810. doi:10.1177/003335490712200612 3Leatherby L, Harris R. States that imposed few restrictions now have the worst outbreaks. The New York Times. November 18, 2020. Accessed November 18, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/11/18/us/covid-state-restrictions.html 4 Coronavirus in the U.S.: latest map and case count (interactive). The New York Times. Accessed December 7, 2020. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2020/us/coronavirus-us-cases.html Volume129, Issue2February 2021Pages 97-98 This article also appears in:CytoSource: Current issues for Cytopathology ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)