Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Duhem on Good Sense and Theory Pursuit: From Virtue to Social Epistemology

2020; Routledge; Volume: 33; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1080/02698595.2021.1888191

1469-9281

Jamie Shaw,

Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies

The emerging consensus in the secondary literature on Duhem is that his notion of 'good sense' is a virtue of individual scientists that guides them choosing between empirically equal rival theories (Stump 2007 Stump, D. 2007. "Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38: 149–159.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. "Pierre Duhem's Virtue Epistemology." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (1): 149–159; Ivanova 2010 Ivanova, M. 2010. "Pierre Duhem's Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41: 58–64.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. "Pierre Duhem's Good Sense as a Guide to Theory Choice." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1): 58–64; Fairweather 2011 Fairweather, A. 2011. "The Epistemic Value of Good Sense." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43: 139–146.[Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. "The Epistemic Value of Good Sense." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1): 139–146; Bhakthavatsalam (2017 Bhakthavatsalam, S. 2017. "Duhemian Good Sense and Agent Reliabilism." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64: 22–29.[Crossref], [PubMed], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]). "Duhemian Good Sense and Agent Reliabilism." Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 64: 22–29). In this paper, I argue that good sense is irrelevant for theory choice within Duhem's conception of scientific methodology. Theory choice, for Duhem, is either a pseudo-problem or addressed purely by empirical and formal desiderata depending on how it is understood. I go on to provide a positive interpretation of good sense as a feature of scientific communities that undergo particular forms of education that allow scientists to abandon theory pursuit. I conclude by suggesting that this interpretation entails that virtue epistemological readings of Duhem are insufficient for understanding good sense; we must employ a social epistemological perspective.