Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Decline in Rehab Transfers Among Rehab-Eligible Stroke Patients During the COVID-19 Pandemic

2021; Elsevier BV; Volume: 30; Issue: 8 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105857

ISSN

1532-8511

Autores

Lauren Thau, Taylor Siegal, Mark Heslin, Ameena Rana, Siyuan Yu, Scott Kamen, Austin Chen, Nicholas Vigilante, Sheri Gallagher, K Wegner, Jesse Thon, Ryna Then, Pratit Patel, Terri Yeager, Tudor Jovin, Rohini J. Kumar, David E. Owens, James E. Siegler,

Tópico(s)

Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Resumo

ObjectiveTo characterize differences in disposition arrangement among rehab-eligible stroke patients at a Comprehensive Stroke Center before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed a prospective registry for demographics, hospital course, and discharge dispositions of rehab-eligible acute stroke survivors admitted 6 months prior to (10/2019-03/2020) and during (04/2020-09/2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcome was discharge to an inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF) as opposed to other facilities using descriptive statistics, and IRF versus home using unadjusted and adjusted backward stepwise logistic regression.ResultsOf the 507 rehab-eligible stroke survivors, there was no difference in age, premorbid disability, or stroke severity between study periods (p>0.05). There was a 9% absolute decrease in discharges to an IRF during the pandemic (32.1% vs. 41.1%, p=0.04), which translated to 38% lower odds of being discharged to IRF versus home in unadjusted regression (OR 0.62, 95%CI 0.42-0.92, p=0.016). The lower odds of discharge to IRF persisted in the multivariable model (aOR 0.16, 95%CI 0.09-0.31, p<0.001) despite a significant increase in discharge disability (median discharge mRS 4 [IQR 2-4] vs. 2 [IQR 1-3], p<0.001) during the pandemic.ConclusionsAdmission for stroke during the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a significantly lower probability of being discharged to an IRF. This effect persisted despite adjustment for predictors of IRF disposition, including functional disability at discharge. Potential reasons for this disparity are explored.

Referência(s)