5-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate Cancer
1994; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 152; Issue: 5 Part 2 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32397-2
ISSN1527-3792
AutoresWilliam J. Catàlona, Deborah S. Smith,
Tópico(s)Urologic and reproductive health conditions
ResumoNo AccessJournal of Urology1 Nov 19945-Year Tumor Recurrence Rates After Anatomical Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy For Prostate Cancer William J. Catalona, and Deborah S. Smith William J. CatalonaWilliam J. Catalona More articles by this author , and Deborah S. SmithDeborah S. Smith More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5347(17)32397-2AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail The new anatomical approach to radical retropubic prostatectomy with its nerve sparing option allows for preservation of erections, improved urinary continence, decreased blood loss, and lower operative mortality and morbidity rates. We sought to evaluate cancer control with this operation by determining the 5-year tumor recurrence rates using detectable serum prostate specific antigen levels as a criterion for tumor recurrence in a series of 925 consecutive men with clinical stage T1 or T2 prostate cancer. Overall, the 5-year probability of nonprogression was 78% (95% confidence limits 74 to 82%). The 5-year nonprogression rate was higher in patients whose tumors were not palpable (90% for impalpable tumors detected through transurethral resection of the prostate, 97% for impalpable prostate specific antigen detected tumors and 74% for palpable tumors). Nonprogression correlated with pathological tumor stage (91% for organ confined disease, 74% for positive margins or microscopic capsular perforation, 32% for seminal vesical invasion and virtually nil for lymph node metastases) and tumor grade (89% for well, 78% for moderately and 51% for poorly differentiated tumors). We conclude that anatomical radical prostatectomy achieves excellent cancer control for patients with organ confined prostate cancer. References 1. : Radical prostatectomy with preservation of sexual function: anatomical and pathological considerations. Prostate1983; 4: 473. Google Scholar 2. : The role of radical prostatectomy in the treatment of prostate cancer. CA1992; 42: 212. Google Scholar 3. : Nerve-sparing radical prosta tectomy: evaluation of results after 250 patients. J. Urol.1990; 143: 538. Link, Google Scholar 4. : Return of erections and urinary continence following nerve sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. J. Urol.1993; 150: 905. Link, Google Scholar 5. : Patient selection for, results of, and impact on tumor resection of potency-sparing radical prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. N. Amer.1990; 17: 819. Google Scholar 6. : Serum PSA after anatomic radical prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. N. Amer.1993; 20: 713. Google Scholar 7. : Detection of organ-confined prostate cancer is increased through prostate-specific antigen-based screening. J.A.M.A.1993; 270: 948. Google Scholar 8. : Nerve-sparing radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urol. Clin. N. Amer.1985; 12: 187. Google Scholar 9. : Staging errors in clinically localized prostate cancer. J. Urol1982; 127: 452. Link, Google Scholar 10. : New staging systems for prostate cancer. J. Urol1989; 142: 1302. Link, Google Scholar 11. : Pathological stage is higher in older men with clinical stage B1 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. J. Urol1989; 141: 880. Link, Google Scholar 12. : Effect of patient age on early detection of prostate cancer with serum prostate-specific antigen and digital rectal examination. Urology1993; 42: 365. Google Scholar 13. : The nature of prostate cancer detected through prostate specific antigen based screening. J. Urol1994; 152: 1732. Link, Google Scholar © 1994 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited ByLowrance W, Breau R, Chou R, Chapin B, Crispino T, Dreicer R, Jarrard D, Kibel A, Morgan T, Morgans A, Oh W, Resnick M, Zietman A and Cookson M (2020) Advanced Prostate Cancer: AUA/ASTRO/SUO Guideline PART IJournal of Urology, VOL. 205, NO. 1, (14-21), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2021.Bishoff J, Freedland S, Gerber L, Tennstedt P, Reid J, Welbourn W, Graefen M, Sangale Z, Tikishvili E, Park J, Younus A, Gutin A, Lanchbury J, Sauter G, Brawer M, Stone S and Schlomm T (2014) Prognostic Utility of the Cell Cycle Progression Score Generated from Biopsy in Men Treated with ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 192, NO. 2, (409-414), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2014.Liss M, Lusch A, Morales B, Beheshti N, Skarecky D, Narula N, Osann K and Ahlering T (2012) Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: 5-Year Oncological and Biochemical OutcomesJournal of Urology, VOL. 188, NO. 6, (2205-2211), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2012.PAZONA J, HAN M, HAWKINS S, ROEHL K and CATALONA W (2018) SALVAGE RADIATION THERAPY FOR PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN PROGRESSION FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: 10-YEAR OUTCOME ESTIMATESJournal of Urology, VOL. 174, NO. 4 Part 1, (1282-1286), Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005.MITCHELL J, COOPERBERG M, ELKIN E, LUBECK D, MEHTA S, KANE C and CARROLL P (2018) ABILITY OF 2 PRETREATMENT RISK ASSESSMENT METHODS TO PREDICT PROSTATE CANCER RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: DATA FROM CaPSUREJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 4, (1126-1131), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2005.TRABULSI E and GUILLONNEAU B (2018) LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 4, (1072-1079), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2005.TOUIJER K, KUROIWA K, SARANCHUK J, HASSEN W, TRABULSI E, REUTER V and GUILLONNEAU B (2018) QUALITY IMPROVEMENT IN LAPAROSCOPIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR pT2 PROSTATE CANCER: IMPACT OF VIDEO DOCUMENTATION REVIEW ON POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINJournal of Urology, VOL. 173, NO. 3, (765-768), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2005.KUNDU S, ROEHL K, EGGENER S, ANTENOR J, HAN M and CATALONA W (2018) POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATIONS IN 3,477 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 6 Part 1, (2227-2231), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.HAN M, BRANNIGAN R, ANTENOR J, ROEHL K and CATALONA W (2018) ASSOCIATION OF HEMOSPERMIA WITH PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 6 Part 1, (2189-2192), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2004.ROEHL K, HAN M, RAMOS C, ANTENOR J and CATALONA W (2018) CANCER PROGRESSION AND SURVIVAL RATES FOLLOWING ANATOMICAL RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY IN 3,478 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS: LONG-TERM RESULTSJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 3, (910-914), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2004.PETTUS J, WEIGHT C, THOMPSON C, MIDDLETON R and STEPHENSON R (2018) BIOCHEMICAL FAILURE IN MEN FOLLOWING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY: IMPACT OF SURGICAL MARGIN STATUS AND LOCATIONJournal of Urology, VOL. 172, NO. 1, (129-132), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2004.COOPERBERG M, BROERING J, LITWIN M, LUBECK D, MEHTA S, HENNING J and CARROLL P (2018) THE CONTEMPORARY MANAGEMENT OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE UNITED STATES: LESSONS FROM THE CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR (CAPSURE), A NATIONAL DISEASE REGISTRYJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 4, (1393-1401), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2004.MATSUI Y, ICHIOKA K, TERADA N, YOSHIMURA K, TERAI A, DODO Y and ARAI Y (2018) Impact of Volume Weighted Mean Nuclear Volume on Outcomes Following Salvage Radiation Therapy After Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 171, NO. 2, (687-691), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2004.HORWITZ E, UZZO R, HANLON A, GREENBERG R, HANKS G and POLLACK A (2018) Modifying the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology Definition of Biochemical Failure to Minimize the Influence of Backdating in Patients With Prostate Cancer Treated With 3-dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy AloneJournal of Urology, VOL. 169, NO. 6, (2153-2159), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2003.SOFER M, SAVOIE M, KIM S, CIVANTOS F and SOLOWAY M (2018) Biochemical And Pathological Predictors Of The Recurrence Of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma With Seminal Vesicle InvasionJournal of Urology, VOL. 169, NO. 1, (153-156), Online publication date: 1-Jan-2003.HAN M, PARTIN A, ZAHURAK M, PIANTADOSI S, EPSTEIN J and WALSH P (2018) Biochemical (Prostate Specific Antigen) Recurrence Probability Following Radical Prostatectomy for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 169, NO. 2, (517-523), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2003.SOFER M, HAMILTON-NELSON K, CIVANTOS F and SOLOWAY M (2018) Positive Surgical Margins After Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy: The Influence of Site and Number on ProgressionJournal of Urology, VOL. 167, NO. 6, (2453-2456), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2002.Grossfeld G, Li Y, Lubeck D, Broering J, Mehta S and Carroll P (2018) Predictors of Secondary Cancer Treatment in Patients Receiving Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: Data From Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research EndeavorJournal of Urology, VOL. 168, NO. 2, (530-535), Online publication date: 1-Aug-2002.WARD J, SANDS J, NOWACKI M and AMLING C (2018) MALIGNANT CYTOLOGICAL WASHINGS FROM PROSTATE SPECIMENS: : AN INDEPENDENT PREDICTOR OF BIOCHEMICAL PROGRESSION AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 2, (469-473), Online publication date: 1-Feb-2001.GROSSFELD G, CHANG J, BROERING J, LI Y, LUBECK D, FLANDERS S and CARROLL P (2018) UNDER STAGING AND UNDER GRADING IN A CONTEMPORARY SERIES OF PATIENTS UNDERGOING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: RESULTS FROM THE CANCER OF THE PROSTATE STRATEGIC UROLOGIC RESEARCH ENDEAVOR DATABASEJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 3, (851-856), Online publication date: 1-Mar-2001.SHAH O, MELAMED J and LEPOR H (2018) ANALYSIS OF APICAL SOFT TISSUE MARGINS DURING RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 165, NO. 6 Part 1, (1943-1949), Online publication date: 1-Jun-2001.SOERGEL T, KOCH M, FOSTER R, BIHRLE R, WAHLE G, GARDNER T and JUNG S (2018) ACCURACY OF PREDICTING LONG-TERM PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN OUTCOME BASED ON EARLY PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN RECURRENCE RESULTS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 166, NO. 6, (2198-2201), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2001.Okegawa T, Nutahara K and Higashihara E (2018) DETECTION OF MICROMETASTATIC PROSTATE CANCER CELLS IN THE LYMPH NODES BY REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION IS PREDICTIVE OF BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE IN PATHOLOGICAL STAGE T2 PROSTATE CANCER.Journal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 4, (1183-1188), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2000.STAMEY T, YEMOTO C, NEAL J, SIGAL B and JOHNSTONE I (2018) PROSTATE CANCER IS HIGHLY PREDICTABLE: A PROGNOSTIC EQUATION BASED ON ALL MORPHOLOGICAL VARIABLES IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSJournal of Urology, VOL. 163, NO. 4, (1155-1160), Online publication date: 1-Apr-2000.HAN M, WALSH P, PARTIN A and RODRIGUEZ R (2018) ABILITY OF THE 1992 AND 1997 AMERICAN JOINT COMMITTEE ON CANCER STAGING SYSTEMS FOR PROSTATE CANCER TO PREDICT PROGRESSION-FREE SURVIVAL AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR STAGE T2 DISEASEJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 1, (89-92), Online publication date: 1-Jul-2000.KOCH M, FOSTER R, BELL B, BECK S, CHENG L, PAREKH D and JUNG S (2018) CHARACTERIZATION AND PREDICTORS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN PROGRESSION RATES AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 3 Part 1, (749-753), Online publication date: 1-Sep-2000.THOMAS G, SCHRAGE M, ROSENFELT L, KIM J, SALUR G, deKERNION J, DOREY F, SAID J and REITER R (2018) PREOPERATIVE PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY p27 CORRELATES WITH SUBSEQUENT RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY p27, GLEASON GRADE AND PATHOLOGICAL STAGEJournal of Urology, VOL. 164, NO. 6, (1987-1991), Online publication date: 1-Dec-2000.CATALONA W, CARVALHAL G, MAGER D and SMITH D (2018) POTENCY, CONTINENCE AND COMPLICATION RATES IN 1,870 CONSECUTIVE RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMIESJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 2, (433-438), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1999.TANEJA S, PENSON D, EPELBAUM A, HANDLER T and LEPOR H (2018) DOES SITE SPECIFIC LABELING OF SEXTANT BIOPSY CORES PREDICT THE SITE OF EXTRACAPSULAR EXTENSION IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SURGICAL SPECIMEN?Journal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 4, (1352-1357), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.STACKHOUSE G, SESTERHENN I, BAUER J, MOSTOFI F, CONNELLY R, SRIVASTAVA S and MOUL J (2018) P53 AND BCL-2 IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY IN PRETREATMENT PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSIES TO PREDICT RECURRENCE OF PROSTATE CANCER AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 6, (2040-2045), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1999.OHORI M, ABBAS F, WHEELER T, KATTAN M, SCARDINO P and LERNER S (2018) PATHOLOGICAL FEATURES AND PROGNOSTIC SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATE CANCER IN THE APICAL SECTION DETERMINED BY WHOLE MOUNT HISTOLOGYJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 2, (500-504), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1999.POUND C, CHRISTENS-BARRY O, GURGANUS R, PARTIN A and WALSH P (2018) DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND IMAGING STUDIES ARE UNNECESSARY IN MEN WITH UNDETECTABLE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOLLOWING RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 162, NO. 4, (1337-1340), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1999.OH J, COLBERG J, ORNSTEIN D, JOHNSON E, CHAN D, VIRGO K and JOHNSON F (2018) CURRENT FOLLOWUP STRATEGIES AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY: A SURVEY OF AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION UROLOGISTSJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 2, (520-523), Online publication date: 1-Feb-1999.SCHWARTZ E and LEPOR H (2018) RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY REDUCES SYMPTOM SCORES AND IMPROVES QUALITY OF LIFE IN MEN WITH MODERATE AND SEVERE LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMSJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 4, (1185-1188), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1999.CRITZ F, LEVINSON A, WILLIAMS W, HOLLADAY C, GRIFFIN V and HOLLADAY D (2018) PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN NADIR ACHIEVED BY MEN APPARENTLY CURED OF PROSTATE CANCER BY RADIOTHERAPYJournal of Urology, VOL. 161, NO. 4, (1199-1205), Online publication date: 1-Apr-1999.YANG R, NAITOH J, MURPHY M, WANG H, PHILLIPSON J, DEKERNION J, LODA M and REITER R (2018) LOW P27 EXPRESSION PREDICTS POOR DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 159, NO. 3, (941-945), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1998.WIEDER J and SOLOWAY M (2018) INCIDENCE, ETIOLOGY, LOCATION, PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF POSITIVE SURGICAL MARGINS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 2, (299-315), Online publication date: 1-Aug-1998.GROSSFELD G, STIER D, FLANDERS S, HENNING J, SCHONFELD W, WAROLIN K and CARROLL P (2018) USE OF SECOND TREATMENT FOLLOWING DEFINITIVE LOCAL THERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER: DATA FROM THE caPSURE DATABASEJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 4, (1398-1404), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1998.ROGERS R, GROSSFELD G, ROACH M, SHINOHARA K, PRESTI J and CARROLL P (2018) RADIATION THERAPY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF BIOPSY PROVED LOCAL RECURRENCE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMYJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 5, (1748-1753), Online publication date: 1-Nov-1998.D'AMICO A, WHITTINGTON R, MALKOWICZ S, FONDURULIA J, CHEN M, TOMASZEWSKI J and WEIN A (2018) THE COMBINATION OF PREOPERATIVE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN AND POSTOPERATIVE PATHOLOGICAL FINDINGS TO PREDICT PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN OUTCOME IN CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 6 Part 1, (2096-2101), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998.CATALONA W and SMITH D (2018) CANCER RECURRENCE AND SURVIVAL RATES AFTER ANATOMIC RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE CANCERJournal of Urology, VOL. 160, NO. 6 Part 2, (2428-2434), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1998.Fesseha T, Sakr W, Grignon D, Banerjee M, Wood D and Pontes J (2018) PROGNOSTIC IMPLICATIONS OF A POSITIVE APICAL MARGIN IN RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY SPECIMENSJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 6, (2176-2179), Online publication date: 1-Dec-1997.Patel A, Dorey F, Franklin J and deKernion J (2018) RECURRENCE PATTERNS AFTER RADICAL RETROPUBIC PROSTATECTOMY: CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN DOUBLING TIMES AND LOG SLOPE PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGENJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 4, (1441-1445), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1997.Stephenson R, Middleton R and Abbott T (2018) Wide Excision (Nonnerve Sparing) Radical Retropubic Prostatectomy Using an Initial Perirectal DissectionJournal of Urology, VOL. 157, NO. 1, (251-255), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1997.O'Dowd G, Veltri R, Orozco R, Miller M and Oesterling J (2018) Update on the Appropriate Staging Evaluation for Newly Diagnosed Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 3, (687-698), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1997.Theodorescu D, Broder S, Boyd J, Mills S and Frierson H (2018) p53, bcl-2 and Retinoblastoma Proteins as Long-Term Prognostic Markers in Localized Carcinoma of the ProstateJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 1, (131-137), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1997.Haggman M, Macoska J, Wojno K and Oesterling J (2018) The Relationship Between Prostatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia and Prostate Cancer: Critical IssuesJournal of Urology, VOL. 158, NO. 1, (12-22), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1997.Olsson C, de Vries G, Raffo A, Benson M, O'Toole K, Cao Y, Buttyan R and Katz A (2018) Preoperative Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction for Prostate Specific Antigen Predicts Treatment Failure Following Radical ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 155, NO. 5, (1557-1562), Online publication date: 1-May-1996.Lerner S, Blute M, Bergstralh E, Bostwick D, Eickholt J and Zincke H (2018) Analysis of Risk Factors for Progression in Patients with Pathologically Confined Prostate Cancers After Radical Retropubic ProstatectomyJournal of Urology, VOL. 156, NO. 1, (137-143), Online publication date: 1-Jul-1996.Geary E and Stamey T (2018) Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Nonpalpable and Palpable Prostate Cancers with a Hybritech Prostate Specific Antigen of 4 to 10 ng./mlJournal of Urology, VOL. 156, NO. 3, (1056-1058), Online publication date: 1-Sep-1996.Badalament R, Craig M, Peller P, Young D, Bahn D, Kochie P, O'Dowd G and Veltri R (2018) An Algorithm for Predicting Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer Using the Results Obtained from Sextant Core Biopsies with Prostate Specific Antigen LevelJournal of Urology, VOL. 156, NO. 4, (1375-1380), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1996.deKernion J (2018) Editorial: Prostate CancerJournal of Urology, VOL. 155, NO. 1, (226-227), Online publication date: 1-Jan-1996. (2018) Original Articles: Prostate Cancer: Editorial: Prostate Cancer: Some Issues of Treatment and Tumor BehaviorJournal of Urology, VOL. 153, NO. 3S, (1032-1033), Online publication date: 1-Mar-1995.Stone N, Stock R and Unger P (2018) Indications for Seminal Vesicle Biopsy and Laparoscopic Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Men With Localized Carcinoma of ProstateJournal of Urology, VOL. 154, NO. 4, (1392-1396), Online publication date: 1-Oct-1995. Volume 152Issue 5 Part 2November 1994Page: 1837-1842 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 1994 by The American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.Keywordsprostatectomyprostatic neoplasmsrecurrenceMetricsAuthor Information William J. Catalona More articles by this author Deborah S. Smith More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Loading ...
Referência(s)