Sexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply]
1995; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 36; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/204427
ISSN1537-5382
AutoresDoug Jones, C. Loring Brace, William Jankowiak, Kevin N. Laland, Lisa Musselman, Judith H. Langlois, Lori A. Roggman, Daniel Pérusse, Barbara Schweder, Donald Symons,
Tópico(s)Hearing Impairment and Communication
ResumoPrevious articleNext article No AccessSexual Selection, Physical Attractiveness, and Facial Neoteny: Cross-cultural Evidence and Implications [and Comments and Reply]Doug Jones, C. Loring Brace, William Jankowiak, Kevin N. Laland, Lisa E. Musselman, Judith H. Langlois, Lori A. Roggman, Daniel Pérusse, Barbara Schweder, and Donald SymonsDoug Jones Search for more articles by this author , C. Loring Brace Search for more articles by this author , William Jankowiak Search for more articles by this author , Kevin N. Laland Search for more articles by this author , Lisa E. Musselman Search for more articles by this author , Judith H. Langlois Search for more articles by this author , Lori A. Roggman Search for more articles by this author , Daniel Pérusse Search for more articles by this author , Barbara Schweder Search for more articles by this author , and Donald Symons Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by Current Anthropology Volume 36, Number 5Dec., 1995 Sponsored by the Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological Research Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/204427 Views: 132Total views on this site Citations: 188Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1995 The Wenner-Gren Foundation for Anthropological ResearchPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:Marina L. Butovskaya, Victoria V. Rostovtseva, Anna A. Mezentseva Facial and body sexual dimorphism are not interconnected in the Maasai, Journal of Physiological Anthropology 41, no.11 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.1186/s40101-021-00276-8M. Gründl Ursachen von Attraktivität und ihre Bedeutung für die ästhetische Medizin, Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie 15, no.44 (Sep 2022): 115–122.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12631-022-00304-1E. Oberzaucher, A. Mühlhauser Evolutionäre Ästhetik, Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie 15, no.44 (Sep 2022): 123–127.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12631-022-00305-0Allysha Powanda Winburn, An‐Di Yim, Michala K. Stock Recentering forensic anthropology within a multifaceted body of evolutionary theory: Strengthening method by making theory explicit, American Journal of Biological Anthropology 4 (Oct 2022).https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.24628Lindsie C. Arthur, Kathleen V. Casto, Khandis R. Blake Hormonal contraceptives as disruptors of competitive behavior: Theoretical framing and review, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology 66 (Jul 2022): 101015.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yfrne.2022.101015Georgios Kanavakis, Anna-Sofia Silvola, Demetrios Halazonetis, Raija Lähdesmäki, Pertti Pirttiniemi Profile shape variation and sexual dimorphism amongst middle-aged Northern Europeans, European Journal of Orthodontics 44, no.11 (Apr 2021): 30–36.https://doi.org/10.1093/ejo/cjab004Adam C. Davis, Steven Arnocky An Evolutionary Perspective on Appearance Enhancement Behavior, Archives of Sexual Behavior 51, no.11 (Oct 2020): 3–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01745-4Adam C. Davis, Steven Arnocky Response to Commentaries: A Socioevolutionary Approach to Self-Presentation Modification, Archives of Sexual Behavior 51, no.11 (Oct 2021): 85–100.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02170-xSouphiyeh Samizadeh Facial Beauty, (Jan 2022): 3–20.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-84099-0_1Madeleine K. Meehan, Todd K. Shackelford Neoteny, (May 2022): 4590–4592.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55065-7_557Eunji Choi, Kelly L. Reddy-Best South Korean Fashion Media: Examining Beauty Ideals, Race, and the Prominence of Whiteness Between 2013 and 2017 in Céci Magazine, International Journal of Costume and Fashion 21, no.22 (Dec 2021): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.7233/ijcf.2021.21.2.001Kai R. Caspar, Marco Biggemann, Thomas Geissmann, Sabine Begall Ocular pigmentation in humans, great apes, and gibbons is not suggestive of communicative functions, Scientific Reports 11, no.11 (Jun 2021).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-92348-zRobert G. Bednarik An etiology of human modernity, Anthropological Review 84, no.33 (Sep 2021): 337–357.https://doi.org/10.2478/anre-2021-0020Goran Šimić, Vana Vukić, Janja Kopić, Željka Krsnik, Patrick R. Hof Molecules, Mechanisms, and Disorders of Self-Domestication: Keys for Understanding Emotional and Social Communication from an Evolutionary Perspective, Biomolecules 11, no.11 (Dec 2020): 2.https://doi.org/10.3390/biom11010002Elisabeth Oberzaucher Evolutionary Standards of Female Attractiveness, (Apr 2021): 2792–2795.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_4David P Schmitt, David M Buss Sex Differences in Long-Term Mating Preferences, (Apr 2021): 7133–7140.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19650-3_2917Madeleine K. Meehan, Todd K. Shackelford Neoteny, (May 2021): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47829-6_557-1Bryan K. C. Choy, Norman P. Li Buss’ Mate Choice Theory, (Jul 2021): 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_44-1Bryan K. C. Choy, Norman P. Li Differences Between Short-Term and Long-Term Relationships Relative to Mate Choice, (Aug 2021): 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59531-3_45-1Victoria V. Rostovtseva, Anna A. Mezentseva, Sonja Windhager, Marina L. Butovskaya Second-to-fourth digit ratio and facial shape in Buryats of Southern Siberia, Early Human Development 149 (Oct 2020): 105138.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105138Aleksandra Mitrovic, Lisa Mira Hegelmaier, Helmut Leder, Matthew Pelowski Does beauty capture the eye, even if it's not (overtly) adaptive? A comparative eye-tracking study of spontaneous attention and visual preference with VAST abstract art, Acta Psychologica 209 (Sep 2020): 103133.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103133Jason Mario Dydynski Modeling Cuteness: Moving towards a Biosemiotic Model for Understanding the Perception of Cuteness and Kindchenschema, Biosemiotics 13, no.22 (Jun 2020): 223–240.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-020-09386-9Kelly A. Nault, Marko Pitesa, Stefan Thau The Attractiveness Advantage At Work: A Cross-Disciplinary Integrative Review, Academy of Management Annals 14, no.22 (Jul 2020): 1103–1139.https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2018.0134Victoria V. Rostovtseva, Anna A. Mezentseva, Sonja Windhager, Marina L. Butovskaya Sexual dimorphism in facial shape of modern Buryats of Southern Siberia, American Journal of Human Biology 3 (Jun 2020).https://doi.org/10.1002/ajhb.23458Katherine Elizabeth Hicks, James Regan Thomas The Changing Face of Beauty, Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America 53, no.22 (Apr 2020): 185–194.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.12.005Prateek Gupta, Tulika Tripathi, Navneet Singh, Neha Bhutiani, Priyank Rai, Ram Gopal A review of genetics of nasal development and morphological variation, Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care 9, no.44 (Jan 2020): 1825.https://doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_1265_19Eleftherios Giovanis Worthy to lose some money for better air quality: applications of Bayesian networks on the causal effect of income and air pollution on life satisfaction in Switzerland, Empirical Economics 57, no.55 (Jun 2018): 1579–1611.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-018-1509-5Mayra B.C. Maymone, Melissa Laughter, Jeffrey Dover, Neelam A. Vashi The malleability of beauty: perceptual adaptation, Clinics in Dermatology 37, no.55 (Sep 2019): 592–596.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clindermatol.2019.05.002William D. Lassek, Steven J.C. Gaulin Evidence supporting nubility and reproductive value as the key to human female physical attractiveness, Evolution and Human Behavior 40, no.55 (Sep 2019): 408–419.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.05.001Julie D. White, David A. Puts, Seth M. Weinberg Genes influence facial attractiveness through intricate biological relationships, PLOS Genetics 15, no.44 (Apr 2019): e1008030.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008030Severi Luoto An Updated Theoretical Framework for Human Sexual Selection: from Ecology, Genetics, and Life History to Extended Phenotypes, Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology 5, no.11 (Dec 2018): 48–102.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0103-6Alexandra N. Fisher, Danu Anthony Stinson, Anastasija Kalajdzic , Basic and Applied Social Psychology 41, no.55 ( 2019): 305.https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2019.1652178David P. Schmitt, David M. Buss Sex Differences in Long-Term Mating Preferences, (Aug 2018): 1–9.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2917-1Jeanne Bovet The Evolution of Feminine Beauty, (Aug 2018): 327–357.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-76054-4_17Caroline F. Keating About Face! Facial Status Cues and Perceptions of Charismatic Leadership, (Sep 2018): 145–170.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-94535-4_7Masaru Hasegawa Beauty alone is insufficient: female mate choice in the barn swallow, Ecological Research 33, no.11 (Nov 2017): 3–16.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11284-017-1527-3Susan G. Brown, Susan Shirachi, Danielle Zandbergen , Journal of Evolutionary Medicine 6 ( 2018): 1.https://doi.org/10.4303/jem/236037Karel Kleisner, Tomáš Kočnar, Petr Tureček, David Stella, Robert Mbe Akoko, Vít Třebický, Jan Havlíček African and European perception of African female attractiveness, Evolution and Human Behavior 38, no.66 (Nov 2017): 744–755.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.07.002Hui Jing Lu, Kam-chuen Wong, Lei Chang The association between life history strategy and mate preference in men, Personality and Individual Differences 116 (Oct 2017): 157–163.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.047Tobias M. Schneider, Claus-Christian Carbon Taking the Perfect Selfie: Investigating the Impact of Perspective on the Perception of Higher Cognitive Variables, Frontiers in Psychology 8 (Jun 2017).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00971Anastasia Makhanova, James K. McNulty, Jon K. Maner Relative Physical Position as an Impression-Management Strategy: Sex Differences in Its Use and Implications, Psychological Science 28, no.55 (Mar 2017): 567–577.https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616688885Scott D. Maddux, Lauren N. Butaric, Todd R. Yokley, Robert G. Franciscus Ecogeographic variation across morphofunctional units of the human nose, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 162, no.11 (Sep 2016): 103–119.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.23100Christian Becker-Carus, Mike Wendt Motivation, (Feb 2017): 485–538.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53006-1_11Michael C. Seto The Puzzle of Male Chronophilias, Archives of Sexual Behavior 46, no.11 (Aug 2016): 3–22.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0799-yBruce Rind Hebephilia and Other Chronophilic Puzzles, Archives of Sexual Behavior 46, no.11 (Nov 2016): 47–51.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0889-xMichael C. Seto The Puzzle of Male Chronophilias: Response to Commentaries, Archives of Sexual Behavior 46, no.11 (Jan 2017): 53–58.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0922-0Urszula M. Marcinkowska, Julien Terraube, Gwenaël Kaminski Imprinting and flexibility in human face cognition, Scientific Reports 6, no.11 (Sep 2016).https://doi.org/10.1038/srep33545Ralf C. Buckley Aww: The Emotion of Perceiving Cuteness, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (Nov 2016).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01740Farid Pazhoohi, Alaeddin Sayahian Jahromi, James Francis Doyle Mate Retention Tactics Decline with Age of Iranian Men, Evolutionary Psychological Science 2, no.33 (Mar 2016): 165–170.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-016-0046-8D.P. Danel, A. Dziedzic-Danel, K. Kleisner Does age difference really matter? Facial markers of biological quality and age difference between husband and wife, HOMO 67, no.44 (Aug 2016): 337–347.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2016.05.002Mathieu Alemany Oliver Consumer Neoteny, Evolutionary Psychology 14, no.33 (Aug 2016): 147470491666182.https://doi.org/10.1177/1474704916661825Simon D. Reeve, Kristine M. Kelly, Lisa L. M. Welling Transitory Environmental Threat Alters Sexually Dimorphic Mate Preferences and Sexual Strategy, Evolutionary Psychological Science 2, no.22 (Jan 2016): 101–113.https://doi.org/10.1007/s40806-015-0040-6Wenwen Zheng, Qian Yang, Kaiping Peng, Feng Yu What's in the Chinese Babyface? Cultural Differences in Understanding the Babyface, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (May 2016).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00819Masaru Hasegawa, Emi Arai, L. Fusani Female Attraction to Higher Pitched Male Enticement Calls in Barn Swallows, Ethology 122, no.55 (Mar 2016): 430–441.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12492David Frederick, Reyn Yoshiura, Terri Scott Cosmetic Surgery in the United States, (Apr 2016): 1–3.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118663219.wbegss387Marta Borgi, Francesca Cirulli Pet Face: Mechanisms Underlying Human-Animal Relationships, Frontiers in Psychology 7 (Mar 2016).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00298C. Tanikawa, E. Zere, K. Takada Sexual dimorphism in the facial morphology of adult humans: A three-dimensional analysis, HOMO 67, no.11 (Feb 2016): 23–49.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2015.10.001Elisabeth Oberzaucher Evolutionary Standards of Female Attractiveness, (Sep 2016): 1–4.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_4-1 References, (Dec 2015): R1–R38.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444344714.refsLawrence S. Sugiyama Physical Attractiveness in Adaptationist Perspective, (Sep 2015): 292–343.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch10David P. Schmitt Fundamentals of Human Mating Strategies, (Sep 2015): 258–291.https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470939376.ch9Kyoung-Ho Kwak, Yong-Il Kim, Hyung-Jin Nam, Seong-Sik Kim, Soo-Byung Park, Woo-Sung Son Differences Among Deviations, Genders, and Observers in the Perception of Eye and Nose Asymmetry, Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 73, no.88 (Aug 2015): 1606–1614.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.02.009José Antonio Muñoz-Reyes, Marta Iglesias-Julios, Miguel Pita, Enrique Turiegano, Cheryl M McCormick Facial Features: What Women Perceive as Attractive and What Men Consider Attractive, PLOS ONE 10, no.77 (Jul 2015): e0132979.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0132979Edward R. Morrison Beauty or physical attractiveness, (Apr 2015): 113–196.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118896877.wbiehs044Neelam A. Vashi Objective Aspects of Beauty, (Sep 2015): 17–43.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17867-7_2Michel Kreutzer, Verena Aebischer The Riddle of Attractiveness: Looking for an ‘Aesthetic Sense’ Within the Hedonic Mind of the Beholders, (Jan 2015): 263–287.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9585-2_12L. Höfel Einfluss der Psyche auf kosmetische Maßnahmen, HNO 63, no.11 (Dec 2014): 22–27.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00106-014-2954-xShelly Zhou, Marie B. Chelberg, Arthur Aron Interpersonal Attraction, Psychology of, (Jan 2015): 626–630.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.25017-4Jan Havliček, Kelly D. Cobey, Louise Barrett, Kateřina Klapilová, S. Craig Roberts The spandrels of Santa Barbara? A new perspective on the peri-ovulation paradigm, Behavioral Ecology 26, no.55 (May 2015): 1249–1260.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv064Sae Yong Kim, Mohamed Bayome, Jae Hyun Park, Yoon-Ah Kook, Ju Hee Kang, Kang Hyuk Kim, Hong-Beom Moon Evaluation of the facial dimensions of young adult women with a preferred facial appearance, The Korean Journal of Orthodontics 45, no.55 (Jan 2015): 253.https://doi.org/10.4041/kjod.2015.45.5.253Isabel M. Scott, Andrew P. Clark, Steven C. Josephson, Adam H. Boyette, Innes C. Cuthill, Ruby L. Fried, Mhairi A. Gibson, Barry S. Hewlett, Mark Jamieson, William Jankowiak, P. Lynne Honey, Zejun Huang, Melissa A. Liebert, Benjamin G. Purzycki, John H. Shaver, J. Josh Snodgrass, Richard Sosis, Lawrence S. Sugiyama, Viren Swami, Douglas W. Yu, Yangke Zhao, Ian S. Penton-Voak Human preferences for sexually dimorphic faces may be evolutionarily novel, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111, no.4040 (Sep 2014): 14388–14393.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1409643111Rose McDermott, Dustin Tingley, Peter K. Hatemi Assortative Mating on Ideology Could Operate Through Olfactory Cues, American Journal of Political Science 58, no.44 (Sep 2014): 997–1005.https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12133Maximilian Padden Elder The Fish Pain Debate: Broadening Humanity’s Moral Horizon, Journal of Animal Ethics 4, no.22 (Oct 2014): 16–29.https://doi.org/10.5406/janimalethics.4.2.0016David M. Weeks, J. Regan Thomas Beauty in a Multicultural World, Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America 22, no.33 (Aug 2014): 337–341.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsc.2014.04.005Vinet Coetzee, Jaco M. Greeff, Ian D. Stephen, David I. Perrett, Cheryl McCormick Cross-Cultural Agreement in Facial Attractiveness Preferences: The Role of Ethnicity and Gender, PLoS ONE 9, no.77 (Jul 2014): e99629.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0099629Urszula M. Marcinkowska, Mikhail V. Kozlov, Huajian Cai, Jorge Contreras-Garduño, Barnaby J. Dixson, Gavita A. Oana, Gwenaël Kaminski, Norman P. Li, Minna T. Lyons, Ike E. Onyishi, Keshav Prasai, Farid Pazhoohi, Pavol Prokop, Sandra L. Rosales Cardozo, Nicolle Sydney, Jose C. Yong, Markus J. Rantala Cross-cultural variation in men's preference for sexual dimorphism in women's faces, Biology Letters 10, no.44 (Apr 2014): 20130850.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2013.0850David P. Schmitt Evaluating Evidence of Mate Preference Adaptations: How Do We Really Know What Homo sapiens sapiens Really Want?, (Jan 2014): 3–39.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-0314-6_1Carolyn Rando, Simon Hillson, Daniel Antoine Changes in mandibular dimensions during the mediaeval to post-mediaeval transition in London: A possible response to decreased masticatory load, Archives of Oral Biology 59, no.11 (Jan 2014): 73–81.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.archoralbio.2013.10.001Åse Kristine Rognmo Mikalsen, Ivar Folstad, Nigel Gilles Yoccoz, Bruno Laeng The spectacular human nose: an amplifier of individual quality?, PeerJ 2 (Apr 2014): e357.https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.357E. Oberzaucher, A. Mühlhauser Evolutionäre Ästhetik, wissen kompakt 7, no.44 (Oct 2013): 3–11.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11838-013-0181-zI. E. Elia and A Foxy View of Human Beauty: Implications of the Farm Fox Experiment for Understanding the Origins of Structural and Experiential Aspects of Facial Attractiveness, The Quarterly Review of Biology 88, no.33 (Jul 2015): 163–183.https://doi.org/10.1086/671486Judith Morales, Alberto Velando Signals in family conflicts, Animal Behaviour 86, no.11 (Jul 2013): 11–16.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.04.001Katarzyna Pisanski, David R. Feinberg Cross-Cultural Variation in Mate Preferences for Averageness, Symmetry, Body Size, and Masculinity, Cross-Cultural Research 47, no.22 (Jan 2013): 162–197.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397112471806Zaneta M. Thayer, Seth D. Dobson, Janet M. Monge Geographic Variation in Chin Shape Challenges the Universal Facial Attractiveness Hypothesis, PLoS ONE 8, no.44 (Apr 2013): e60681.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060681E. Oberzaucher, A. Mühlhauser Evolutionäre Ästhetik, Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie 6, no.11 (Jan 2013): 9–12.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12631-012-0218-8Emanuela Sala, Marco Terraneo, Mario Lucchini, Gundi Knies Exploring the impact of male and female facial attractiveness on occupational prestige, Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 31 (Mar 2013): 69–81.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2012.10.003Markus Klein, Ulrich Rosar Pretty Politicians: Die physische Attraktivität von Spitzenkandidaten, ihr Einfluss bei Wahlen und die These der Personalisierung des Wahlverhaltens, (Jun 2013): 149–170.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-94010-6_8Robert G. Bednarik African Eve: Hoax or Hypothesis?, Advances in Anthropology 03, no.0404 (Jan 2013): 216–228.https://doi.org/10.4236/aa.2013.34031Susanne Röder, Bernhard Fink, David R. Feinberg, Nick Neave Facial Visualizations of Women's Voices Suggest a Cross-Modality Preference for Femininity, Evolutionary Psychology 11, no.11 (Jan 2013): 147470491301100.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491301100119Lena S. Pflüger, Elisabeth Oberzaucher, Stanislav Katina, Iris J. Holzleitner, Karl Grammer Cues to fertility: perceived attractiveness and facial shape predict reproductive success, Evolution and Human Behavior 33, no.66 (Nov 2012): 708–714.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.05.005Kyoko Yamaguchi, Chiaki Watanabe, Akira Kawaguchi, Takehiro Sato, Izumi Naka, Misaki Shindo, Keiichi Moromizato, Kenichi Aoki, Hajime Ishida, Ryosuke Kimura Association of melanocortin 1 receptor gene (MC1R) polymorphisms with skin reflectance and freckles in Japanese, Journal of Human Genetics 57, no.1111 (Aug 2012): 700–708.https://doi.org/10.1038/jhg.2012.96Vinet Coetzee, Stella J. Faerber, Jaco M. Greeff, Carmen E. Lefevre, Daniel E. Re, David I. Perrett, Galit Yovel African Perceptions of Female Attractiveness, PLoS ONE 7, no.1010 (Oct 2012): e48116.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0048116Robert G. Bednarik An aetiology of hominin behaviour, HOMO 63, no.55 (Oct 2012): 319–335.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchb.2012.07.004Bruce Rind, Richard Yuill Hebephilia as Mental Disorder? A Historical, Cross-Cultural, Sociological, Cross-Species, Non-Clinical Empirical, and Evolutionary Review, Archives of Sexual Behavior 41, no.44 (Jun 2012): 797–829.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-012-9982-yPeter Claes, Mark Walters, Mark D. Shriver, David Puts, Greg Gibson, John Clement, Gareth Baynam, Geert Verbeke, Dirk Vandermeulen, Paul Suetens Sexual dimorphism in multiple aspects of 3D facial symmetry and asymmetry defined by spatially dense geometric morphometrics, Journal of Anatomy 221, no.22 (Jun 2012): 97–114.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7580.2012.01528.xRobert G. Bednarik The Origins of Human Modernity, Humanities 1, no.11 (Sep 2011): 1–53.https://doi.org/10.3390/h1010001Qian Wang Dental Maturity and the Ontogeny of Sex-Based Differences in the Dentofacial Complex of Rhesus Macaques from Cayo Santiago, (Sep 2011): 177–194.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-1046-1_8Debra Lieberman, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Adam Smith The Relationship Between Familial Resemblance and Sexual Attraction, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37, no.99 (Apr 2011): 1229–1232.https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211405997Sybil Geldart Perceptions of attractiveness in female adolescents, university students, and mothers with experience viewing immature faces, European Journal of Developmental Psychology 8, no.33 (May 2011): 295–310.https://doi.org/10.1080/17405629.2010.490028Gerulf Rieger, Lorenz Gygax, Joan A. W. Linsenmeier, Amber Siler-Knogl, David A. Moskowitz, J. Michael Bailey Sex Typicality and Attractiveness in Childhood and Adulthood: Assessing their Relationships from Videos, Archives of Sexual Behavior 40, no.11 (Jul 2009): 143–154.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-009-9512-8Robert G. Bednarik An Alternative Paradigm, (Jun 2011): 121–144.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-9353-3_5Zaneta M. Thayer, Seth D. Dobson Sexual dimorphism in chin shape: Implications for adaptive hypotheses, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 143, no.33 (May 2010): 417–425.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.21330Chin-Chang Ho, Karl F. MacDorman Revisiting the uncanny valley theory: Developing and validating an alternative to the Godspeed indices, Computers in Human Behavior 26, no.66 (Nov 2010): 1508–1518.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.05.015Darren Burke, Danielle Sulikowski A New Viewpoint on the Evolution of Sexually Dimorphic Human Faces, Evolutionary Psychology 8, no.44 (Oct 2010): 147470491000800.https://doi.org/10.1177/147470491000800404David P. Schmitt Reproduction, (Jul 2010): 293–294.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781193.021David P. Schmitt Human Mate Choice, (Jul 2010): 295–308.https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511781193.022Sheryl Brahnam, Loris Nanni Predicting trait impressions of faces using local face recognition techniques, Expert Systems with Applications 37, no.77 (Jul 2010): 5086–5093.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2009.12.002Eduardo A. Undurraga, Dan T. A. Eisenberg, Oyunbileg Magvanjav, Ruoxue Wang, William R. Leonard, Thomas W. McDade, Victoria Reyes-García, Colleen Nyberg, Susan Tanner, Tomás Huanca, , Ricardo A. Godoy, Angela Sirigu Human's Cognitive Ability to Assess Facial Cues from Photographs: A Study of Sexual Selection in the Bolivian Amazon, PLoS ONE 5, no.66 (Jun 2010): e11027.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0011027Karl F MacDorman, Joseph A Coram, Chin-Chang Ho, Himalaya Patel Gender Differences in the Impact of Presentational Factors in Human Character Animation on Decisions in Ethical Dilemmas, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 19, no.33 (Jun 2010): 213–229.https://doi.org/10.1162/pres.19.3.213Mirjam Berneburg, Klaus Dietz, Claudia Niederle, Gernot Göz Changes in esthetic standards since 1940, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137, no.44 (Apr 2010): 450.e1–450.e9.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.029S. Geldart That woman looks pretty, but is she attractive? Female perceptions of facial beauty and the impact of cultural labels, European Review of Applied Psychology 60, no.22 (Apr 2010): 79–87.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erap.2009.12.003Norbert Meskó Female face and hairstyles: Alternative mate choice tactics related own attractiveness, Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle 65, no.11 (Mar 2010): 133–147.https://doi.org/10.1556/MPSzle.65.2010.1.10David Perrett His and Hers, (Jan 2010): 97–118.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-230-36484-4_6Ulrich Rosar, Markus Klein And the Winner is … Ein Drei-Länder-Vergleich zum Einfluss der physischen Attraktivität von Direktkandidaten auf den Wahlerfolg bei nationalen Parlamentswahlen, (Jan 2010): 307–335.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-92472-4_12M. Gründl Ursachen von Attraktivität und ihre Bedeutung für die ästhetische Medizin, Journal für Ästhetische Chirurgie 3, no.11 (Feb 2010): 23–29.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12631-009-0067-2Ulrich Rosar, Markus Klein Mein(schöner)Prof.de, KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie 61, no.44 (Dec 2009): 621–645.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-009-0086-1T. J. Wells, A. K. Dunn, M. J. T. Sergeant, M. N. O. Davies Multiple signals in human mate selection: A review and framework for integrating facial and vocal signals, Journal of Evolutionary Psychology 7, no.22 (Jun 2009): 111–139.https://doi.org/10.1556/JEP.7.2009.2.2Karl F. MacDorman, Robert D. Green, Chin-Chang Ho, Clinton T. Koch Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces, Computers in Human Behavior 25, no.33 (May 2009): 695–710.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.026Vincent Egan, Giray Cordan Barely legal: Is attraction and estimated age of young female faces disrupted by alcohol use, make up, and the sex of the observer?, British Journal of Psychology 100, no.22 (Mar 2011): 415–427.https://doi.org/10.1348/000712608X357858Patrick Randolph-Quinney, Xanthé Mallett, Sue Black Anthropology, (Sep 2009).https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470061589.fsa058Terry F. Pettijohn, Donald F. Sacco Tough times, meaningful music, mature performers: popular Billboard songs and performer preferences across social and economic conditions in the USA, Psychology of Music 37, no.22 (Apr 2009): 155–179.https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735608094512Tamas Bereczkei, Gabor Hegedus, Gabor Hajnal Facialmetric similarities mediate mate choice: sexual imprinting on opposite-sex parents, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276, no.16541654 (Sep 2008): 91–98.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2008.1021Dariusz Danel, Bogusław Pawłowski Biologiczne znaczenie atrakcyjności twarzy, (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323511854.pp.166-205Irmina Sukiennik, Bogusław Pawłowski Biologiczne znaczenie atrakcyjności cech dziecięcych, (Jan 2009).https://doi.org/10.31338/uw.9788323511854.pp.46-65Peter Deuflhard Was ist ein schönes Gesicht?, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 38, no.44 (Feb 2017): 42–71.https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03379804Robert D. Green, Karl F. MacDorman, Chin-Chang Ho, Sandosh Vasudevan Sensitivity to the proportions of faces that vary in human likeness, Computers in Human Behavior 24, no.55 (Sep 2008): 2456–2474.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2008.02.019Wataru Nakahashi Quantitative genetic models of sexual selection by male choice, Theoretical Population Biology 74, no.22 (Sep 2008): 167–181.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tpb.2008.06.001William Jankowiak, Peter B. Gray, Kelly Hattman Globalizing Evolution, Cross-Cultural Research 42, no.33 (Apr 2008): 248–269.https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397108317672Sam S. Rakover Is Facial Beauty an Innate Response to the Leonardian Proportion?, Empirical Studies of the Arts 26, no.22 (Jul 2008): 155–179.https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.26.2.bRicardo Godoy, Dan T.A. Eisenberg, Victoria Reyes-García, Tomás Huanca, William R. Leonard, Thomas W. McDade, Susan Tanner Assortative mating and offspring well-being: theory and empirical findings from a native Amazonian society in Bolivia, Evolution and Human Behavior 29, no.33 (May 2008): 201–210.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.12.003Peter T. Ellison Beauty: In the gonads of the beholder — and the beheld, Hormones and Behavior 53, no.11 (Jan 2008): 11–13.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.09.019Anja Roye, Lea Höfel, Thomas Jacobsen Aesthetics of Faces, Journal of Psychophysiology 22, no.11 (Jan 2008): 41–57.https://doi.org/10.1027/0269-8803.22.1.41Sybil Geldart Tall and Good-Looking?, Journal of Individual Differences 29, no.33 (Jan 2008): 148–156.https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-0001.29.3.148Krzysztof Kościński Facial attractiveness: General patterns of facial preferences, Anthropological Review 70 (Dec 2007): 45–79.https://doi.org/10.2478/v10044-008-0001-9Eugene Burnstein, Christine Branigan Evolutionary Analyses in Social Psychology, (Dec 2007): 3–2
Referência(s)