Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The Case for Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Health Care Workers

2021; American College of Physicians; Volume: 174; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.7326/m21-2366

1539-3704

Michael Klompas, Madelyn Pearson, Charles A. Morris,

Infection Control and Ventilation

Ideas and Opinions13 July 2021The Case for Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Health Care WorkersFREEMichael Klompas, MD, MPH, Madelyn Pearson, DNP, RN, and Charles Morris, MD, MPHMichael Klompas, MD, MPHHarvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (M.K.)Search for more papers by this author, Madelyn Pearson, DNP, RNBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (M.P., C.M.).Search for more papers by this author, and Charles Morris, MD, MPHBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (M.P., C.M.).Search for more papers by this authorAuthor, Article, and Disclosure Informationhttps://doi.org/10.7326/M21-2366 SectionsAboutVisual AbstractPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissions ShareFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail Almost 15 years have passed since hospitals first began mandating influenza vaccines for health care workers. This initially innovative but now common policy was prompted by a dual desire to protect patients from health care–acquired influenza and to protect the workplace from the disruption and expense of worker illnesses. Health care organizations are now wrestling with whether to mandate SARS-CoV-2 vaccination for all employees. We believe that the case for mandating SARS-CoV-2 vaccines for health care workers is substantially stronger than the case was for mandating influenza vaccines (Table).Table The Case for Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Health Care Workers: Comparison of Influenza Versus COVID-19The Morbidity and Mortality of COVID-19 Far Exceeds That of InfluenzaThe mortality rate for influenza is estimated to be 1 in 1000, whereas that for SARS-CoV-2 is closer to 1 in 100 to 250 (1). Patients with COVID-19 are more likely to require hospital admission, have respiratory failure, and require prolonged intensive care than those with influenza (2). In 2020 alone, SARS-CoV-2 is estimated to have caused more than 522 000 excess deaths in the United States (3). Post–COVID-19 symptoms also seem to be more common, more pronounced, and more long-lasting than those after influenza.SARS-CoV-2 Threatens Essential Workers' LivesVaccines for SARS-CoV-2 save lives (4). Health care workers and other essential workers have higher rates of infection than people in other fields (5). According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 1600 U.S. health care workers have died of COVID-19 thus far. Although it is unclear how many of these infections were acquired in the workplace versus the community, vaccine mandates will prevent infections, severe illness, and deaths in health care workers no matter where they are exposed.Nosocomial Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 Is CommonUp to two thirds of cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection are attributable to asymptomatic and presymptomatic transmissions. Hospitals have undertaken considerable efforts to stop staff from working while sick, but these policies do not prevent staff with silent infections from coming to work and potentially infecting patients and colleagues. In some cases, staff-to-patient and staff-to-staff transmissions have led to large clusters (6). Universal masking diminishes this risk, but perfect adherence is not realistic and surgical masks are not perfectly protective; nosocomial transmission despite masks has been well documented (7). Vaccines, by contrast, provide constant protection without requiring reminders, persuasion, mask-fitting aids, or behavioral changes.SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination for Health Care Workers Is Health Care DeliveryWe believe that there is an extra onus on health care workers to protect themselves from SARS-CoV-2 in order to protect patients. Health care workers routinely tend to the elderly, ill, and vulnerable, in whom SARS-CoV-2 infection is more likely to be deadly. We cannot rely on patients being vaccinated to prevent nosocomial transmission because some patients cannot get the vaccine, some will decline, and vaccine may not be effective in immunocompromised patients (8). Vaccinating health care workers, however, helps protect even unvaccinated patients because SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are associated with fewer infections overall, less silent carriage, and less risk for transmission (4, 9).COVID-19 Vaccines Are More Effective Than Influenza VaccinesThe estimated effectiveness of influenza vaccines varies by season but generally ranges from 30% to 50%. The 2 messenger RNA vaccines for SARS-CoV-2, by contrast, are more than 90% effective. Notwithstanding the moderate effectiveness of influenza vaccines, randomized trials suggest that vaccinating health care workers in congregate health care settings may decrease patient deaths by 30% (10). The life-saving effects of vaccinating health care workers against COVID-19 will be that much greater given these vaccines' greater effectiveness against a pathogen that is more common and more deadly than influenza.SARS-CoV-2 Is More Disruptive to Hospital Operations Than InfluenzaThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has had an unprecedented effect on day-to-day operations in health care. Changes include universal masking, daily attestations of health, limitations on visitors, cancellations of surgery and elective admissions, cancellation of in-person meetings and education sessions, cancellation of travel, and much more. Universal vaccination is the pathway to rolling back these disruptions and returning to normal operations.SARS-CoV-2 Is More Disruptive to Workforce Continuity Than InfluenzaVaccinating health care workers will help preserve workforce continuity. Workers with influenza are typically allowed to return to work 24 hours after their fever subsides. Staff with SARS-CoV-2 infection, however, are required to isolate for at least 10 days, even if their symptoms resolve well before then. Staff shortages have pushed some hospitals to cancel procedures, close units, and reduce elective admissions, thereby putting patients at risk due to deferred care. Vaccines will help keep more staff healthy and at work.SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines Are SafeMore adults have now been inoculated against SARS-CoV-2 than are typically vaccinated against influenza in a given year. More than 300 million doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine have been administered in the United States alone, and more than 65% of U.S. adults have been vaccinated. By contrast, in a typical influenza season only about 150 million to 175 million doses of influenza vaccine are administered and fewer than 50% of adults are immunized. Despite the enormous number of people who have now received SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, serious side effects have been exceedingly rare. We acknowledge that some life-threating adverse effects and deaths have occurred, but the incidence of these complications is vanishingly small, is substantially lower than the risk for complications of COVID-19, and is far outweighed in our opinion by the likelihood of benefit to both health care workers and their patients. Similarly, we believe that these benefits also outweigh the other possible reasons that health care workers may object to vaccination, including fear of postvaccine side effects, concerns about fetal safety, philosophical disagreement, and perceived invulnerability to serious infection.Many organizations contemplating mandating SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are reluctant to move forward while vaccines remain under emergency use authorization. Some are also concerned about legal challenges. As more safety data on the vaccines rapidly accumulate, however, there is every expectation of full approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration later this year, and the courts have ruled in favor of health care organizations on the legal challenges that have come forward thus far. Now is the time for organizations to ready themselves to adopt mandatory vaccination policies as soon as full approval is granted. This includes drafting policies, educating employees about vaccine safety and effectiveness, developing strategies to address unvaccinated employees' specific concerns, ensuring easy vaccine access, partnering with employee leaders and unions to make a shared case for universal vaccination, weighing potential exemptions, and foreshadowing the road ahead for all.References1. Ward H, Atchison C, Whitaker M, et al. SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence in England following the first peak of the pandemic. Nat Commun. 2021;12:905. [PMID: 33568663] doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21237-w CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar2. Piroth L, Cottenet J, Mariet AS, et al. Comparison of the characteristics, morbidity, and mortality of COVID-19 and seasonal influenza: a nationwide, population-based retrospective cohort study. Lancet Respir Med. 2021;9:251-259. [PMID: 33341155] doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30527-0 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar3. Woolf SH, Chapman DA, Sabo RT, et al. Excess deaths from COVID-19 and other causes in the US, March 1, 2020, to January 2, 2021. JAMA. 2021. [PMID: 33797550] doi:10.1001/jama.2021.5199 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar4. Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 vaccine in a nationwide mass vaccination setting. N Engl J Med. 2021;384:1412-1423. [PMID: 33626250] doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2101765 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar5. Shah ASV, Wood R, Gribben C, et al. Risk of hospital admission with coronavirus disease 2019 in healthcare workers and their households: nationwide linkage cohort study. BMJ. 2020;371:m3582. [PMID: 33115726] doi:10.1136/bmj.m3582 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar6. Cavanaugh AM, Fortier S, Lewis P, et al. COVID-19 outbreak associated with a SARS-CoV-2 R.1 lineage variant in a skilled nursing facility after vaccination program — Kentucky, March 2021. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:639-643. [PMID: 33914720] doi:10.15585/mmwr.mm7017e2 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar7. Klompas M, Baker MA, Griesbach D, et al. Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 from asymptomatic and presymptomatic individuals in healthcare settings despite medical masks and eye protection. Clin Infect Dis. 2021. [PMID: 33704451] doi:10.1093/cid/ciab218 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar8. Marion O, Del Bello, Abravanel F, et al. Safety and immunogenicity of anti-SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccines in recipients of solid organ transplants [Letter]. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:1336. [PMID: 34029487]. doi:10.7326/M21-1341 LinkGoogle Scholar9. Harris RJ, Hall JA, Zaidi A, et al. Effect of vaccination on household transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in England [Letter]. N Engl J Med. 2021. [PMID: 34161702] doi:10.1056/NEJMc2107717 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar10. Ahmed F, Lindley MC, Allred N, et al. Effect of influenza vaccination of healthcare personnel on morbidity and mortality among patients: systematic review and grading of evidence. Clin Infect Dis. 2014;58:50-7. [PMID: 24046301] doi:10.1093/cid/cit580 CrossrefMedlineGoogle Scholar Comments 0 Comments Sign In to Submit A Comment Brenda Jacobsen, DOn/a13 July 2021 Coercion of the vaccine(s) I strongly disagree with this opinion article for many reasons. First of all, even locations that 'mandate' the flu vaccine allow for exceptions or mask wearing in lieu of getting the vaccine. You state that the risk of the vaccines is low. If you're the one who was affected by the vaccine, or a friend/family member was affected, then your risk is high regardless of the statistics. Furthermore, more and more adverse effects are being reported every day. Rather than 'number needed to treat' data, why don't you report 'number died/number injured' in your risk analysis. Vaccines need to remain a personal choice. Rev Dr Don J.H. Tynes, MD, FACPBenton Harbor Health Center & Wayne State University School of Medicine12 July 2021 Mandating vaccines Hospital and businesses must be held medically liable for any harm or injury sustained by an employee that has forced mandated vaccination, the pharmaceutical industry exemption does not apply to local businesses. The belief in vaccines should be backed financially and supportive services should be provided. Alex SherriffsUCSF-Fresno10 August 2021 First do no harm. An abiding ethic for physicians is "first do no harm". We expect to face some personal risks as we care for patients. I feel a duty to all patients to try to protect them from harm that I might cause, including exposing them to infections. The personal protection (and risk) I might gain (or be exposed to) from an immunization is outweighed again and again by how my being immunized can protect my patients and others I come in contact with. Author, Article, and Disclosure InformationAuthors: Michael Klompas, MD, MPH; Madelyn Pearson, DNP, RN; Charles Morris, MD, MPHAffiliations: Harvard Medical School, Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (M.K.)Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts (M.P., C.M.).Disclosures: Disclosures can be viewed at www.acponline.org/authors/icmje/ConflictOfInterestForms.do?msNum=M21-2366.Corresponding Author: Michael Klompas, MD, MPH, Department of Population Medicine, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA 02215; e-mail, mklompas@bwh.harvard.edu.Current Author Addresses: Dr. Klompas: Department of Population Medicine, 401 Park Drive, Suite 401 East, Boston, MA 02215.Drs. Pearson and Morris: Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115.Author Contributions: Conception and design: M. Klompas, C. Morris.Drafting of the article: M. Klompas, M. Pearson, C. Morris.Critical revision of the article for important intellectual content: M. Klompas, C. Morris.Final approval of the article: M. Klompas, M. Pearson, C. Morris.This article was published at Annals.org on 13 July 2021. PreviousarticleNextarticle Advertisement FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsSee AlsoAnnals On Call - The Case for Mandating COVID-19 Vaccines for Health Care Workers Robert M. Centor , Michael Klompas , Madelyn Pearson , and Charles Morris Metrics Cited byPolitical Partisanship and Trust in Government Predict Popular Support for COVID-19 Vaccine Mandates for Various Professions and Demographic Groups: A Research NoteHealthcare workers’ attitudes on mandates, incentives, and strategies to improve COVID-19 vaccine uptake: A mixed methods studyConsidering a COVID-19 vaccine mandate for pediatric kidney transplant candidatesPrevention of SARS-CoV-2 and respiratory viral infections in healthcare settings: current and emerging conceptsDecisions to Choose COVID-19 Vaccination by Health Care Workers in a Southern California Safety Net Medical Center Vary by Sociodemographic FactorsEthical Issues in Kidney Transplant and Donation During COVID-19 PandemicCOVID-19 Vaccination Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers—A ReviewExplaining higher Covid-19 vaccination among some US primary care professionalsCOVID-19 vaccine uptake and attitudes towards mandates in a nationally representative U.S. sampleNew Insights into the Prevention of Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia Caused by VirusesSARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant: Exploring Healthcare Workers' Awareness and Perception of Vaccine Effectiveness: A National Survey During the First Week of WHO Variant AlertPredictors of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance and Hesitancy among Healthcare Workers in Southern California: Not Just “Anti” vs. “Pro” VaccineThe Impact of Social Media Exposure and Interpersonal Discussion on Intention of COVID-19 Vaccination among NursesMandating COVID-19 Vaccination for Health Care WorkersEzekiel J. Emanuel, MD, PhD and David J. Skorton, MD September 2021Volume 174, Issue 9 Page: 1305-1307 Keywords COVID-19 Death rates Health care Health care policy Health care providers Hospital medicine Medical ethics Vaccines Viral transmission and infection ePublished: 13 July 2021 Issue Published: September 2021 Copyright & PermissionsCopyright © 2021 by American College of Physicians. All Rights Reserved.PDF downloadLoading ...