Regorafenib Efficacy After Sorafenib in Patients With Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Liver Transplantation: A Retrospective Study
2021; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; Volume: 27; Issue: 12 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1002/lt.26264
ISSN1527-6473
AutoresMassimo Iavarone, Federica Invernizzi, Tommy Ivanics, Stefano Mazza, Claudio Zavaglia, Marco Sanduzzi‐Zamparelli, Miguel Fraile López, Carolin Czauderna, Giovanni Di Costanzo, Sherrie Bhoori, Matthias Pinter, M.A. Manini, Giuliana Amaddeo, Ainhoa Fernández Yunquera, Federico Piñero, María José Blanco Rodríguez, Margarita Anders, Gabriel Aballay Soteras, Gerda Elisabeth Villadsen, Peter Yoon, Lucia Cesarini, Álvaro Díaz‐González, M.L. González-Diéguez, Raffaella Tortora, Arndt Weinmann, Vincenzo Mazzaferro, Mario Romero Cristóbal, Gonzalo Crespo, Hélène Regnault, Massimo De Giorgio, Marı́a Varela, Rebecca M. Prince, Luigia Scudeller, Maria Francesca Donato, Marcus‐Alexander Wörns, Jordi Bruix, Gonzalo Sapisochín, Pietro Lampertico, María Reig,
Tópico(s)Liver physiology and pathology
ResumoSafety of regorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence after liver transplantation (LT) has been recently demonstrated. We aimed to assess the survival benefit of regorafenib compared with best supportive care (BSC) in LT patients after sorafenib discontinuation. This observational multicenter retrospective study included LT patients with HCC recurrence who discontinued first-line sorafenib. Group 1 comprised regorafenib-treated patients, whereas the control group was selected among patients treated with BSC due to unavailability of second-line options at the time of sorafenib discontinuation and who were sorafenib-tolerant progressors (group 2). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of group 1 compared with group 2. Secondary endpoints were safety and OS of sequential treatment with sorafenib + regorafenib/BSC. Among 132 LT patients who discontinued sorafenib included in the study, 81 were sorafenib tolerant: 36 received regorafenib (group 1) and 45 (group 2) received BSC. Overall, 24 (67%) patients died in group 1 and 40 (89%) in group 2: the median OS was significantly longer in group 1 than in group 2 (13.1 versus 5.5 months; P < 0.01). Regorafenib treatment was an independent predictor of reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.37; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.16-0.89; P = 0.02). Median treatment duration with regorafenib was 7.0 (95% CI, 5.5-8.5) months; regorafenib dose was reduced in 22 (61%) patients for adverse events and discontinued for tumor progression in 93% (n = 28). The median OS calculated from sorafenib start was 28.8 months (95% CI, 17.6-40.1) in group 1 versus 15.3 months (95% CI, 8.8-21.7) in group 2 (P < 0.01). Regorafenib is an effective second-line treatment after sorafenib in patients with HCC recurrence after LT.
Referência(s)