Global Optimization of Multiple-Spacecraft Rendezvous Mission via Decomposition and Dynamics-Guide Evolution Approach
2021; American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics; Volume: 45; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2514/1.g006101
ISSN1533-3884
AutoresAn-Yi Huang, Ya-Zhong Luo, Hengnian Li,
Tópico(s)Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
ResumoNo AccessEngineering NotesGlobal Optimization of Multiple-Spacecraft Rendezvous Mission via Decomposition and Dynamics-Guide Evolution ApproachAn-yi Huang, Ya-zhong Luo and Heng-nian LiAn-yi HuangNational University of Defense Technology, 410073 Changsha, People's Republic of China, Ya-zhong LuoNational University of Defense Technology, 410073 Changsha, People's Republic of China and Heng-nian LiXi'an Satellite Control Center, 710043 Xi'an, People's Republic of ChinaPublished Online:16 Sep 2021https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G006101SectionsRead Now ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload citationTrack citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail About References [1] Liou J. C., "Collision Activities in the Future Orbital Debris Environment," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 38, No. 9, 2006, pp. 2102–2106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2005.06.021 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[2] Krisko P. H., "The Predicted Growth of the Low-Earth Orbit Space Debris Environment—An Assessment of Future Risk for Spacecraft," Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part G: Journal of Aerospace Engineering, Vol. 221, No. 6, 2007, pp. 975–985. https://doi.org/10.1243/09544100 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[3] Francesc L., Camill C. and Hugh G. L., "Collision Probability due to Space Debris Clouds Through a Continuum Approach," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 39, No. 10, 2016, pp. 2240–2249. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G001382 Google Scholar[4] Kessler D. J. and Cour-Palais B. G., "Collision Frequency of Artificial Satellites: The Creation of a Debris Belt," Journal of Geophysical Research Space Physics, Vol. 83, No. A6, 1978, pp. 2637–2646. https://doi.org/10.1029/JA083iA06p02637 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[5] Bonnal C., Ruault J. M. and Desjean M. C., "Active Debris Removal: Recent Progress and Current Trends," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 85, April–May 2013, pp. 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2012.11.009 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[6] Shan M., Guo J. and Gill E., "Review and Comparison of Active Space Debris Capturing and Removal Methods," Progress in Aerospace Sciences, Vol. 80, Jan. 2016, pp. 18–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.001 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[7] Leomanni M., Bianchini G., Garulli A., Giannitrapani A. and Quartullo Q., "Orbit Control Techniques for Space Debris Removal Missions Using Electric Propulsion," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 7, 2020, pp. 1259–1268. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G004735 LinkGoogle Scholar[8] Missel J. and Mortari D., "Path Optimization for Space Sweeper with Sling-Sat: A Method of Active Space Debris Removal," Advances in Space Research, Vol. 52, No. 7, 2013, pp. 1339–1348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asr.2013.07.008 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[9] Tadini P., Tancredi U., Grassi M., Anselmo L., Pardini C., Francesconi A. and Shimada T., "Active Debris Multi-Removal Mission Concept Based on Hybrid Propulsion," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 103, Oct.–Nov. 2014, pp. 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.06.027 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[10] Gurfil P., "Analysis of J2-Perturbed Motion Using Mean Nonosculating Orbital Elements," Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, Vol. 90, No. 3, 2004, pp. 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-004-0890-x Google Scholar[11] Olympio J. T. and Frouvelle N., "Space Debris Selection and Optimal Guidance for Removal in the SSO with Low-Thrust Propulsion," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 99, June–July 2014, pp. 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2014.03.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[12] Casalino L. and Dario P., "Active Debris Removal Missions with Multiple Targets," AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference, AIAA Paper 2014-4226, Aug. 2014. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2014-4226 Google Scholar[13] Izzo D., Getzner I. and Hennes D., "Evolving Solutions to TSP Variants for Active Space Debris Removal," Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation (GECCO'15), Assoc. for Computing Machinery, New York, July 2015, pp. 1207–1214. https://doi.org/10.1145/2739480.2754727 Google Scholar[14] Li H. Y., Chen S. Y. and Baoyin H., "J2-Perturbed Multitarget Rendezvous Optimization with Low Thrust," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2018, pp. 796–803. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G002889 Google Scholar[15] Shen H. X., Zhang T. J., Casalino L. and Pastrone D., "Optimization of Active Debris Removal Missions with Multiple Targets," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 55, No. 1, 2018, pp. 181–189. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.A33883 LinkGoogle Scholar[16] Matthew L. M. and Raymond J. S., "Low Earth Orbit Debris Removal Technology Assessment Using Genetic Algorithms," Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2017, pp. 1110–1126. https://doi.org/10.2514/F1.A33671 Google Scholar[17] Cerf M., "Multiple Space Debris Collecting Mission: Optimal Mission Planning," Journal of Optimization Theory & Applications, Vol. 167, No. 1, 2015, pp. 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10957-015-0705-0 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[18] Berend N. and Olive X., "Bi-Objective Optimization of a Multiple-Target Active Debris Removal Mission," Acta Astronautica, Vol. 122, May–June 2016, pp. 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2016.02.005 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[19] Shen H. X., Zhang T. J., Huang A. Y. and Li Z., "GTOC 9: Results from the Xi'an Satellite Control Center (Team XSCC)," Acta Futura, Vol. 11, Jan. 2018, pp. 49–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1139240 Google Scholar[20] Zhang T. J., Shenm H. X. and Yang Y. K., "Ant Colony Optimization-Based Design of Multiple-Target Active Debris Removal Mission," Transactions of the Japan Society for Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Vol. 61, No. 5, 2018, pp. 201–210. https://doi.org/10.2322/tjsass.61.201 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[21] Luo Y. Z., Zhu Y. H. and Zhu H., "GTOC9: Results from the National University of Defense Technology," Acta Futura, Vol. 11, Jan. 2018, pp. 37–47. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1139226 Google Scholar[22] Petropoulos A. E., Grebow D., Jones D., Lantoine G., Nicholas A., Roa J., Senent J., Stuart J., Arora N., Pavlak T., Lam T., McElrath T., Roncoli R., Garza D., Bradley N., Landau D., Tarzi Z., Laipert F., Bonfiglio E., Wallace M. and Sims J., "GTOC9: Results from the Jet Propulsion Laboratory (Team JPL)," Acta Futura, Vol. 11, Jan. 2018, pp. 25–35. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1139152 Google Scholar[23] Gill P. E., Murray W. and Saunders M. A., "SNOPT: An SQP Algorithm for Large-Scale Constrained Optimization," SIAM Journal on Optimization, Vol. 12, No. 4, 2002, pp. 979–1006. https://doi.org/10.1137/S1052623499350013 CrossrefGoogle Scholar[24] Huang A. Y., Luo Y. Z. and Li H. N., "Fast Estimation of Perturbed Impulsive Rendezvous via Semi-Analytical Equality-Constrained Optimization," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 43, No. 12, 2020, pp. 2383–2390. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G005220 LinkGoogle Scholar[25] Yang Z., Luo Y. Z., Zhang J. and Tang G. J., "Homotopic Perturbed Lambert Algorithm for Long-Duration Rendezvous Optimization," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 38, No. 11, 2015, pp. 2215–2223. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.g001198 LinkGoogle Scholar[26] Larranaga P., Kuijpers C. M. H., Murga R. H., Inza I. and Dizdarevic S., "Genetic Algorithms for the Travelling Salesman Problem: A Review of Representations and Operators," Artificial Intelligence Review, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1999, pp. 129–170. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006529012972 Google Scholar[27] Zhang J., Parks G. T. and Luo Y. Z., "Multispacecraft Refueling Optimization Considering the J2 Perturbation and Window Constraints," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2014, pp. 111–122. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.61812 LinkGoogle Scholar[28] Chen D. S., Batson R. G. and Dang Y., Applied Integer Programming: Modeling and Solution, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010, Chap. 6.3. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118166000.ch1 Google Scholar[29] Deb K., Multi-Objective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2001, pp. 6–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10589-007-9053-9 Google Scholar[30] Roberto A., David G. and Juan F., "Multiple Revolution Perturbed Lambert Problem Solvers," Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 41, No. 9, 2018, pp. 2019–2032. https://doi.org/10.2514/1.G003531 Google Scholar[31] Izzo D., "Problem Description for the 9th Global Trajectory Optimisation Competition," Acta Futura, Vol. 11, May 2017, pp. 49–55. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.570193 Google Scholar Previous article Next article FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byAnalytical Gradient-Guided Nonlinear Programming Approach for Multitarget Rendezvous MissionAn-Yi Huang , Ya-Zhong Luo and Heng-Nian Li1 November 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 46, No. 3Two-Stage Dynamic-Assignment Optimization Method for Multispacecraft Debris RemovalNan Zhang , Shiyu Chen, Zhong Zhang and Hexi Baoyin9 June 2022 | Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 45, No. 9 What's Popular Volume 45, Number 1January 2022 CrossmarkInformationCopyright © 2021 by National University of Defense Technology. Published by the American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., with permission. All requests for copying and permission to reprint should be submitted to CCC at www.copyright.com; employ the eISSN 1533-3884 to initiate your request. See also AIAA Rights and Permissions www.aiaa.org/randp. TopicsAerospace SciencesAstrodynamicsAstronauticsEuropean Space AgencyOrbital ManeuversOrbital PropertyPlanetary AtmospheresPlanetary Science and ExplorationPlanetsSpace AgenciesSpace DebrisSpace OrbitSpace RendezvousSpace Science and Technology KeywordsSpacecraft RendezvousOrbit Transfer VehicleRocketsEarthTrajectory OptimizationEvolutionary AlgorithmSatellitesAnt Colony Optimization AlgorithmsSparse Nonlinear OptimizerEuropean Space AgencyAcknowledgmentThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11972044).PDF Received1 April 2021Accepted9 August 2021Published online16 September 2021
Referência(s)