Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Sulcus fluid volume, IL‐6, and Il‐1b concentrations in periodontal and peri‐implant tissues comparing machined and laser‐microtextured collar/abutment surfaces during 12 weeks of healing: A split‐mouth RCT

2021; Wiley; Volume: 33; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/clr.13868

1600-0501

Renzo Guarnieri, Gabriele Miccoli, Rodolfo Reda, Alessandro Mazzoni, Dario Di Nardo, Luca Testarelli,

Dental materials and restorations

Abstract Objectives To compare gingival tissue healing at surgically manipulated periodontal sites and at sites receiving implants and healing abutments with machined (MS) vs laser‐microtextured (LMS) surface placed with one‐stage protocol. Material and Methods Twenty‐four non‐smoking patients each received two implants with one‐stage protocol in a split‐mouth design on the same jaw. In each patient, one implant with a MS collar and one immediate healing abutment with a MS, and one implant with a LMS collar and one immediate healing abutment with a LMS were used. Soft tissues healing at surgically manipulated periodontal tissues (T+) and at non‐surgically manipulated periodontal tissues (T‐) at MS implant sites and at LMS implant sites were compared by means of clinical and biochemical parameters at baseline and at 1–2–3–4–6–8 and 12 weeks. Results PD and BoP mean values were statistically higher in MS than LMS implant sites ( p <0.05). During early healing phase (1–4 weeks), MS and LMS peri‐implant tissues and periodontal tissues at T(+) showed no statistically significant difference in crevicular fluid volume changes ( p >0.05). Between 6 and 12 weeks, compared with T(+), no statistically significant difference in crevicular fluid volume and IL‐6 and IL‐1β concentrations was noted in LMS implant sites ( p >0.05), while statistically significantly higher mean values were noted in MS implant sites ( p <0.05). Conclusions Compared with T(+) and T(‐), both MS and LMS implant sites presented a higher pro‐inflammatory state in the early phase after surgery (1–4 weeks). At 12 weeks, only MS implant sites kept a higher pro‐inflammatory state, while at LMS implant sites, it becomes similar to T(+) and T(‐).