Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery

2021; Massachusetts Medical Society; Volume: 386; Issue: 2 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1056/nejmoa2112299

ISSN

1533-4406

Autores

William F. Fearon, Frederik M. Zimmermann, Bernard De Bruyne, Zsolt Piróth, Albert H.M. van Straten, L Székely, Giedrius Davidavičius, Gintaras Kalinauskas, Samer Mansour, Rajesh Kharbanda, Nikolaos Östlund-Papadogeorgos, Adel Aminian, Keith G. Oldroyd, Nawwar Al‐Attar, Nikola Jagić, Jan‐Henk E. Dambrink, Petr Kala, Oskar Angerås, Philip MacCarthy, Olaf Wendler, Filip Casselman, Nils Witt, Kreton Mavromatis, Steven E.S. Miner, Jaydeep Sarma, Thomas Engstrøm, Evald Høj Christiansen, Pim A.L. Tonino, Michael J. Reardon, Di Lu, Victoria Y. Ding, Yuhei Kobayashi, Mark A. Hlatky, Kenneth W. Mahaffey, Manisha Desai, Y. Joseph Woo, Alan C. Yeung, Nico H.J. Pijls,

Tópico(s)

Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Resumo

Patients with three-vessel coronary artery disease have been found to have better outcomes with coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) than with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but studies in which PCI is guided by measurement of fractional flow reserve (FFR) have been lacking.

Referência(s)