Focus on Mental Health Care Reforms in Europe: The European Alliance Against Depression: A Multilevel Approach to the Prevention of Suicidal Behavior
2009; American Psychiatric Association; Volume: 60; Issue: 5 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1176/appi.ps.60.5.596
ISSN1557-9700
AutoresUlrich Hegerl, Lisa Wittenburg,
Tópico(s)Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
ResumoBack to table of contents Previous article Next article ColumnFull AccessFocus on Mental Health Care Reforms in Europe: The European Alliance Against Depression: A Multilevel Approach to the Prevention of Suicidal BehaviorUlrich Hegerl M.D., Ph.D.Lisa Wittenburg M.S.W.Ulrich Hegerl M.D., Ph.D.Lisa Wittenburg M.S.W.Published Online:13 Jan 2015AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack Citations ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail Suicide is a major public health problem that both reflects and creates considerable human suffering. Every year more than 58,000 persons in the European Union die as a result of suicide. According to data from the World Health Organization (WHO), suicide is among the ten leading causes of death for all ages ( 1 ). In 1998 suicide represented 1.8% of the global burden of disease, and the figure is expected to increase to 2.4% by 2020 ( 2 ). Investigators in EAAD partner countriesUlrich Hegerl, M.D., Ph.D. Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyLisa Wittenburg, M.S.W. Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyKatrin Gottlebe, Dipl.Psych. Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, GermanyElla Arensman, Ph.D. National Suicide Research Foundation, Cork, IrelandChantal van Audenhove, Ph.D. LUCAS, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, BelgiumJean Herve Bouleau, M.D. Fédération de Psychiatrie, Hôpital René Dubos, Pontoise, FranceChristina M. van der Feltz-Cornelis, Trimbos Instituut, Utrecht, and the Institute of M.D., Ph.D. Extramural Research, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, NetherlandsGiancarlo Giupponi, M.D. Autonome Provinz Südtirol Amt für Gesundheitssprengel, Bozen, ItalyRicardo Gusmão, M.D., Ph.D. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisbon, PortugalMaria Kopp, M.D., Ph.D. Semmelweis University, Budapest, HungaryAndrej Marusic, M.D., Ph.D. Institute of Public Health, Republic of Slovenia, Ljubljana, SloveniaMargaret Maxwell, Ph.D. Department of Applied Social Sciences, University of Stirling, Scotland, United KingdomUllrich Meise, M.D. Pro Mente Tirol, Gesellschaft für Psychische Gesundheit, Innsbruck, AustriaHögni Óskarsson, M.D. Campaign Against Depression and Suicide, Directorate of Health, Seltjarnarnes, IcelandCharles Pull, M.D., Ph.D. Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg, Luxembourg CityArmin Schmidtke, Ph.D. Clinic for Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Department of Clinical Psychology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, GermanyVictor Pérez Sola, M.D. Psychiatry Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, SpainJyrki Tuulari, M.Sc. Lapuan Psykiatrinen Poliklinikaa, Lapua, FinlandAiri Värnik, M.D., Ph.D. Estonian-Swedish Mental Health and Suicidology Institute, Estonian Centre of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Estonia/Tallinn University, Tallinn, Estonia The number of attempted suicides (nonfatal) is estimated to be ten to 20 times higher than that of completed suicides. Although there is no single cause for suicidality, most suicidal acts occur in the context of a psychiatric disorder, most commonly a depressive disorder ( 3 ). It is estimated that 18.4 million Europeans have had depression, an estimation based on 12-month prevalence rates ranging between 3.1% and 10.1% in various European studies ( 4 ). Thus it is reasonable that efforts to reduce suicidality would include efforts directed at targeting people with depression as a major risk group. This column describes the European Alliance Against Depression (EAAD) and the four-level intervention that has been used to implement the program in EAAD partner countries. The European Alliance Against Depression The EAAD was formed in 2004 with funding from the European Commission to establish a network of experts across Europe with the objective of implementing action-oriented, community-based public health interventions to improve depression treatment and to reduce suicidality ( 5 ). The four separate levels of the approach are designed to work together to influence community attitudes about depression, improve treatment of depression at the primary care level, encourage help seeking, and directly address high-risk members of the community. The four levels are education of primary care physicians, a public relations campaign, training of community facilitators, and interventions with affected persons and high-risk groups. Strong empirical evidence of the effectiveness of programs for the prevention of suicidality is rare. The EAAD is unique in that it rests on evidence from a pilot program conducted in Germany in 2001–2002—the Nuremberg Alliance Against Depression (described below). The strength of the EAAD approach led to its recognition in 2005 by the European Commission as a best-practice approach to reducing suicidality ( 6 ). The experience of implementing the multilevel approach in culturally diverse countries has clearly shown that the approach can be adapted for wide use. The EAAD multilevel approach is currently employed in 17 European countries. [A map showing the EADD partner countries is available as an online supplement to this column at ps.psychiatryonline.org .] The EAAD has recently expanded its target population to include children and adolescents. In addition, in several countries the four-level intervention has been expanded to other regions of the country and nationwide, and other countries are joining the EAAD as new partners. The Nuremberg Alliance Against DepressionThe EAAD intervention approach is based on a pilot program that was first tested in Nuremberg, Germany, in 2001–2002. The Nuremberg Alliance Against Depression included an intervention region (Nuremberg, population 500,000) and a control region (Würzburg, population 270,000). The intervention region received the four-level community intervention (with general practitioners, general public, community facilitators, and high-risk groups) for two years. Because suicide is a rare event, a population of 500,000 would not be sufficient to detect a statistically significant reduction in suicide rates of less than 30%. Therefore the combined number of completed and attempted suicides was selected as the primary outcome indicator. Having a history of attempted suicide is one of the strongest predictors of future completed suicide. Attempted suicides in the 12 months preceding the intervention were also measured. During the two intervention years, the number of suicidal acts (attempted plus completed) decreased by 24% in the intervention region, a significant difference compared with the control region, where the rate remained stable. The effect was not only short term; a further decline was observed in the year after the two-year intervention (32% decline from the baseline year). When only nonfatal suicidal acts involving the five most lethal methods of suicide were examined, the reduction was even more pronounced—53% during the two intervention years ( 7 ). The success of this multilevel intervention is likely attributable not only to the effectiveness of the single interventions at the four levels but also to synergistic effects across the intervention levels. Because these results provided considerable evidence for the effectiveness of the four-level intervention concept, the same concept was used for EAAD. Four-level intervention Because many factors contribute to suicidality, interventions that address the problem at multiple levels through multifaceted programs are considered to be most effective ( 8 , 9 ). This approach is in line with evidence from other fields of prevention, such as tobacco control ( 10 ) and HIV prevention ( 11 ), showing that tackling a public health problem on multiple levels and with multiple strategies is more effective than using only a single strategy. The four levels of the EAAD intervention are described below. Level 1: primary care physiciansThe aim of this level of intervention is to improve the identification and treatment of depressed and suicidal persons. This is achieved through forming connections with primary care physicians in a local community by offering advanced training and offering suggestions regarding systemic factors that could improve the quality of treatment in local communities. The flexible nature of EAAD allows for variation in the duration and content of training to fit the specific needs of the target community. Partners may adapt the goals and materials of training as appropriate. A literature review published in 2002 estimated that 83% of people who die from suicide have contact with a primary care physician in the 12 months before death ( 12 ). In addition, over 75% of people who seek treatment for an anxiety or depressive disorder from a primary care provider in Europe do not receive minimally adequate treatment ( 13 ). This points to an important opportunity for intervention and serves as a call to action for the primary care community. The EAAD recommends use of short screening tools, such as the WHO-5 ( 14 ), in primary care practices as a first-level depression screen. EAAD interactive training sessions with general practitioners cover such topics as how to address the topic of depression and suicidality with patients and how to treat suicidal patients and interact with patients and their families. The use of role-plays is an important part of training. Level 2: public relations campaign Stigma surrounding mental disorders and lack of knowledge about them are barriers to treatment, which affect all community members at many stages in their lives. The EAAD media campaign targets the general public with the aim of encouraging treatment seeking by destigmatizing depression and challenging commonly held misconceptions about depression. In all regions where EAAD is implemented, the media campaign has three key messages: "Depression is treatable." "Depression can affect anyone." "Depression has many faces." [Public relations materials presenting the three messages are available as an online supplement to this column at ps.psychiatryonline.org .] The media campaign also includes distribution of guidelines to journalists to encourage responsible reporting of suicides. It is well known that the manner in which suicide is reported can have an impact on further suicides. In particular, when the act is romanticized or sensationalized, copycat suicides (known as the Werther effect) can result.Level 3: community facilitatorsTraining is provided for key individuals, or community facilitators, who are in contact with high-risk groups and vulnerable populations. Key facilitator groups include teachers, police, clergy, social workers, persons who provide care for elderly persons, and prison workers. The needs and resources in a particular community and other social and cultural factors determine which groups will be targeted.Level 4: affected persons and high-risk groupsDepression is known to be a chronic illness, and persons who have engaged in nonfatal suicidal acts are considered to be a high-risk group for future suicidality. Therefore, interventions at this level direct resources to those affected by depression and those who have engaged in suicide attempts. Specific interventions include offering individuals an emergency card after a suicide attempt and providing aftercare resources and support through self-help groups.Evaluation of the four-level intervention To evaluate the efficacy of the implemented measures, a set of evaluation indicators were defined that cover the following areas: suicide, suicide attempts and deliberate self-harm, rates of prescription of psychopharmaceutical drugs (mainly antidepressants), and attitudes toward and knowledge of depressive disorders and suicidality in the general public as well as among general practitioners and community facilitators. [A figure showing the EAAD outcome criteria is available as an online supplement to this column at ps.psychiatryonline.org .] Further, to assess, plan for, and promote sustainability of the individual regional networks, each EAAD region in the partner countries performed an assessment of key capacity-building areas: network partnerships, knowledge transfer, problem solving, and infrastructure. As noted above, experiences in Nuremberg showed that the four-level intervention approach was effective in reducing suicidal behavior by 24% ( 7 ). These results have been replicated in Regensburg, Germany (Spiessl H, Hübner-Liebermann B, Schmid R, et al., unpublished manuscript, 2009). However, it has yet to be shown whether the approach is equally successful in other countries and regions in Europe. Some EAAD partners are evaluating their intervention activities, and baseline data have been published ( 15 , 16 ). One area of particular interest is the analysis of suicidal behavior and suicide methods in 15 EU countries ( 16 ). Hanging (50%) was identified as the most prevalent suicide method among women and men in the 15 countries, followed by poisoning by drugs 13%) and jumping from a high place (10%). However, considerable gender differences and differences between countries were observed ( 15 ). These data suggest setting country-specific foci in awareness campaigns and suicide prevention strategies. Lessons learnedWhat can be learned from the experiences of the EAAD? Several points are discussed below that may be helpful to stakeholders in other community-based mental health interventions.First, public health messages can be translated across different European cultures. The EAAD is currently active in 17 European countries, and other countries are in the process of joining. In many countries, local alliances in model regions have expanded to other regions, and some EAAD partner countries have expanded the alliance nationwide. These wide-ranging activities show that the four-level intervention concept and the EAAD materials can be readily adapted to different cultures. Also, the strategy of beginning in each country with a regional pilot project and then building on local experiences and adapted materials to promote expansion to other regions of the country has been successful.Second, it is important to begin at the local level. Although differences in health care systems may necessitate some modifications, a strong bottom-up approach in the process of expansion of the regional alliances is recommended. This enables community members to identify with a local alliance against depression and boosts motivation and civil commitment.Third, the message should be carefully considered. Whereas the public campaign focused on depression, suicidality was a major issue in the intervention with health professionals. This strategy was chosen because the effects of a public campaign focusing on suicidality are difficult to predict and might be negative for some vulnerable persons.Fourth, the intervention will have broader destigmatizing effects. Although the public campaign focuses on depression, its effects are likely to generalize to other areas of mental health. Feedback from persons with anxiety disorders, schizophrenia, and other disorders indicated that the public campaign was perceived as helpful in reducing the stigma surrounding psychiatric disorders.ConclusionsThe EAAD offers an evidence-based concept and materials for conducting a community-based four-level intervention aimed at improving the care of depressed persons and preventing suicidality. The EAAD has shown that the model developed in Nuremberg and optimized by the experiences of all EAAD partners can be adapted to different countries and cultures with only minor changes.Acknowledgments and disclosuresThe European Alliance Against Depression is funded by grant number 20035323 from the Public Health Executive Agency, the European Commission.Dr. Hegerl and Ms. Wittenburg are affiliated with the Department of Psychiatry, University of Leipzig, Semmelweisstrasse 10, 04103 Leipzig, Germany (e-mail: [email protected]). The names and locations of the investigators in each partner country of the European Alliance Against Depression are listed in a box on the next page. Matt Muijen, M.D., Ph.D., is editor of this column.References1. The World Health Report 2003: Shaping the Future. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2003Google Scholar2. Bertolote JM, Fleischmann A: Suicidal behavior prevention: WHO perspectives on research. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part C: Seminars in Medical Genetics 133:8–12, 2005Google Scholar3. Lönnqvist JK, Koskenvuo M: Mortality in depressive disorders: a 3-year prospective follow-up in Finland, in Depressive Illness: Prediction, Course and Outcome. Edited by Helgason T, Darragh PM. Berlin, Springer, 1988Google Scholar4. Wittchen HU, Jacobi F: Size and burden of mental disorders in Europe: a critical review and appraisal of 27 studies. European Neuropsychopharmacology 15:357–376, 2005Google Scholar5. Hegerl U, Wittmann M, Arensman E, et al: The "European Alliance Against Depression (EAAD)": a multifaceted, community-based action programme against depression and suicidality. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 9:51–58, 2008Google Scholar6. Improving the Mental Health of the Population: Towards a Strategy on Mental Health for the European Union. Brussels, European Commission, 2005Google Scholar7. Hegerl U, Althaus D, Schmidtke A, et al: The alliance against depression: 2-year evaluation of a community-based intervention to reduce suicidality. Psychological Medicine 36:1225–1233, 2006Google Scholar8. Mann JJ, Apter A, Bertolote J, et al: Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. JAMA 294:2064–2074, 2005Google Scholar9. Althaus D, Hegerl U: The evaluation of suicide preventive activities: state of the art. World Journal of Biological Psychiatry 4:156–165, 2003Google Scholar10. Curbing the Epidemic: Governments and the Economics of Tobacco Control. Washington, DC, World Bank, 1999Google Scholar11. UNAIDS Action Plan on Intensifying HIV Prevention 2006–2007. Geneva, UNAIDS, 2006Google Scholar12. Luoma JB, Martin CE, Pearson JL: Contact with mental health and primary care providers before suicide: a review of the evidence. American Journal of Psychiatry 159:909–916, 2002Google Scholar13. Fernandez A, Haro JM, Martinez-Alonso M, et al: Treatment adequacy for anxiety and depressive disorders in six European countries. British Journal of Psychiatry 190:172–173, 2007Google Scholar14. Henkel V, Mergl R, Kohnen R, et al: Identifying depression in primary care: a comparison of different methods in a prospective cohort study. BMJ 326:200–201, 2003Google Scholar15. Värnik A, Kõlves K, van der Feltz-Cornelis C, et al: Suicide methods in Europe: a gender specific analyses of countries participating in the "European Alliance Against Depression." Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 62:545–551, 2008Google Scholar16. Värnik A, Kõlves K, Schmidtke A, et al: Gender issues in suicide rates, trends and methods among youths aged 15–24 in 15 European countries. Journal of Affective Disorders 113:216–226, 2009Google Scholar FiguresReferencesCited byDetailsCited byWhat Are Complex Interventions in Suicide Research? Definitions, Challenges, Opportunities, and the Way Forward14 July 2022 | International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, Vol. 19, No. 14Engaging primary care professionals in suicide prevention: A qualitative study30 November 2020 | PLOS ONE, Vol. 15, No. 11Cross-level sociodemographic homogeneity alters individual risk for completed suicide5 October 2020 | Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 117, No. 42« Premières analyses de mortalité par suicide en Nord-Pas-de-Calais depuis l'implantation de VigilanS »L'Encéphale, Vol. 45Public mental health ethicsPublic Health Ethics, Vol. 11, No. 2BMC Public Health, Vol. 18, No. 1BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 17, No. 1Effectiveness of Depression–Suicidal Behaviour Gatekeeper Training among police officers in three European regions: Outcomes of the Optimising Suicide Prevention Programmes and Their Implementation in Europe (OSPI-Europe) study26 September 2016 | International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 62, No. 7Global Mental Health, Vol. 3Suizidalität26 November 2016Psychiatry Research, Vol. 229, No. 1-2Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, Vol. 16, No. 2Forensic Science International, Vol. 234The Ecology of Multilevel Interventions to Reduce Social Inequalities in Health6 May 2013 | American Behavioral Scientist, Vol. 57, No. 8Slovenian Journal of Public Health, Vol. 52, No. 1Best Practice Elements of Multilevel Suicide Prevention StrategiesCrisis, Vol. 32, No. 6Setting up suicide prevention plans at the local level: the methodology of focus groups with stakeholders5 July 2011 | Journal of Community Psychology, Vol. 39, No. 6A Systematic Review of Scales That Measure Attitudes Toward Suicide8 April 2010 | International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 57, No. 4Community and Health Professionals' Attitude Toward Depression: a Pilot Study in Nine Eaad Countries11 March 2010 | International Journal of Social Psychiatry, Vol. 57, No. 4Recognition of Suicide Risk, Crisis Helplines, and Psychosocial Interventions: A Selective Review21 June 2011Suicide Prevention Strategies: Case Studies from across the Globe21 June 2011BMC Public Health, Vol. 11, No. 1Suicide in later life: public health and practitioner perspectives18 November 2010 | International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Vol. 25, No. 12Depression und Suizidalität9 January 2015 | Public Health Forum, Vol. 18, No. 1European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 260, No. 5International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, Vol. 12, No. 4BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 10, No. 1Optimizing Suicide Prevention Programs and Their Implementation in Europe (OSPI Europe): an evidence-based multi-level approach23 November 2009 | BMC Public Health, Vol. 9, No. 1 Volume 60Issue 5 May, 2009Pages 596-599PSYCHIATRIC SERVICES May 2009 Volume 60 Number 5 Metrics PDF download History Published online 13 January 2015 Published in print 1 May 2009
Referência(s)