Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

A comparative evaluation of the strengths of association between different emergency department crowding metrics and repeat visits within 72 hours

2021; Springer Nature; Volume: 24; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1007/s43678-021-00234-4

1481-8043

Andrew D. McRae, Brian H. Rowe, Iram Usman, Eddy Lang, Grant Innes, Michael J. Schull, Rhonda J. Rosychuk,

Healthcare Policy and Management

We sought to compare strengths of association among multiple emergency department (ED) input, throughput and output metrics and the outcome of 72-h ED re-visits. This database analysis used healthcare administrative data from three urban, university-affiliated EDs in Calgary, Canada, calendar years 2010–2014. We used data from all patients presenting to participating EDs during the study period, and the primary analysis was performed on patients discharged from the ED. Regression models quantified the association between input, throughput and output metrics and the risk of return ED visit within 72 h of discharge from the index ED encounter. Strength of association between the crowding metrics and 72-h ED re-visits was compared using Akaike's Information Criterion. The findings of this study are based on data from 845,588 patient encounters ending in discharge. The input metric with the strongest association with 72-h re-visits was median ED waiting time. The throughput metric with the strongest association with 72-h re-visits was the ED occupancy. The output metric with the strongest association with 72-h re-visits was the median inpatient boarding time. Input, throughput and output metrics are all associated with 72-h re-visits. Delays in any of these operational phases have detrimental effects on patient outcomes. ED waiting time, ED occupancy, and boarding times are the most meaningful input, throughput and output metrics. These should be the preferred metrics for quantifying ED crowding in research and quality improvement efforts, and for clinicians to monitor ED crowding in real time.