Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Learning from a retraction

2020; Elsevier BV; Volume: 396; Issue: 10257 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/s0140-6736(20)31958-9

1474-547X

The Editors of the Lancet Group,

Reflective Practices in Education

The publication and subsequent retraction1The Lancet EditorsExpression of concern: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis.Lancet. 2020; 395: e102Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (59) Google Scholar, 2Mehra MR Ruschitzka F Patel AN Retraction—Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis.Lancet. 2020; 3951820Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (376) Google Scholar in June, 2020, of the Article Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without a macrolide for treatment of COVID-19: a multinational registry analysis, based on an alleged dataset associated with Surgisphere, prompted us to examine The Lancet's peer-review processes to identify ways of further reducing risks of research and publication misconduct. As a result of this review, with immediate effect, we have made changes to the declarations we seek from authors, the data sharing statements we require for published research papers, and the peer-review process for similar papers based on large datasets or real-world data. Changes to the signed declarations by authors in the author statements form will require that more than one author has directly accessed and verified the data reported in the manuscript. We will require that the authors who have accessed and verified underlying data are named in the contributors' statement. For research Articles that are the result of an academic and commercial partnership, one of the authors named as having accessed and verified data must be from the academic team. In addition, all authors will be asked to sign the author statements form to confirm they had full access to the data reported in their Article, and accept responsibility for submitting the Article for publication. Journals that adhere to guidance from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors require a data-sharing statement for papers that report results of a clinical trial.3Taichman DB Sahni P Pinborg A et al.Data sharing statements for clinical trials: a requirement of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.Lancet. 2017; 389: e12-e14Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (34) Google Scholar Lancet journals will now require all research papers, irrespective of method, to include a data-sharing statement that details what data will be shared, whether additional documents will be shared (eg, the study protocol), when data will become available, and by what access criteria data will be shared. Investigators should be aware that editors will take data-sharing statements into account when making editorial decisions. All Lancet journals will now introduce additional peer-review requirements for papers based on large, real-world datasets. Editors will ensure that at least one peer reviewer is knowledgable about the details of the dataset being reported and can understand and comment on its strengths and limitations in relation to the research question being addressed. For studies that use very large datasets, editors will ensure that in addition to statistical peer review, a review from an expert in data science is obtained. Finally, we will explicitly ask reviewers if they have concerns about research integrity or publication ethics regarding the manuscript they are reviewing. Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic the work of the research community in generating new knowledge has resulted in rapid advances in our understanding of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 and COVID-19. As trusted sources of information, the Lancet journals are committed to ensuring that our editorial processes will continue to be as robust as possible. COVID-19: a stress test for trust in sciencePeer Review Week is the annual celebration of the importance of peer review, running Sept 21–25. The theme this year is trust in peer review, a particularly appropriate focus during the COVID-19 pandemic. Trust in research and its role in political decision making and policy changes have never been more at the forefront of public discussion and scrutiny than during the current public health crisis. But what is everyone's role in strengthening this trust? Full-Text PDF