Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Current Awareness in Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging

2006; Hindawi Publishing Corporation; Volume: 1; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/cmmi.117

1555-4317

Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes

Contrast Media & Molecular ImagingVolume 1, Issue 6 p. 291-298 Current AwarenessFree to Read Current Awareness in Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging First published: 08 December 2006 https://doi.org/10.1002/cmmi.117AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract In order to keep subscribers up-to-date with the latest developments in their field, John Wiley & Sons are providing a current awareness service in each issue of the journal. The bibliography contains newly published material in the field of Contrast Media and Molecular Imaging. Each bibliography is divided into 15 sections: 1 Reviews; 2 General; Contrast Agents: 3 Chemistry; 4 Technique; 5 Experimental; 6 Applications; Molecular Imaging: 7 Carbon; 8 Fluorine; 9 Gallium; 10 Hydrogen; 11 Indium; 12 Iodine; 13 Phosphorus; 14 Technetium; 15 Others. Within each section, articles are listed in alphabetical order with respect to author. If, in the preceding period, no publications are located relevant to any one of these headings, that section will be omitted. Current Awareness 1. Reviews Google Scholar Aspelin P, Stacul F, Thomsen HS, Morcos SK, Van der Molen AJ. Effects of iodinated contrast media on blood and endothelium. Eur Radiol 16, 1041-1049 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Belhocine T, Spaepen K, Dusart M, Castaigne C, Muylle K, Bourgeois P, Bourgeois D, Dierickx L, Flamen P. 18FDG PET in oncology: The best and the worst. Int J Oncol 28, 1249-1261 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Chang JM, Lee HJ, Lee HY, Lee JJ, Chung JK, Im JG. False positive and false negative FDG-PET scans in various thoracic diseases. Korean J Radiol 7, 57-69 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Chin BB, Chang PPL. Gastrointestinal malignancies evaluated with 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 20, 3-21 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Choyke PL, Kobayashi H. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the kidney using macromolecular contrast agents. Abdom Imaging 31, 224-231 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Cuenod CA, Fournier L, Balvay D, Guinebretiere JM. Tumor angiogenesis: Pathophysiology and implications for contrast-enhanced MRI and CT assessment. Abdom Imaging 31, 188-193 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Goyen M, Shamsi K, Schoenberg SO. Vasovist-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 16, B9-B14 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hartmann M, Wiethoff AJ, Hentrich HR, Rohrer M. Initial imaging recommendations for Vasovist angiography. Eur Radiol 16, B15-B23 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kim DH, Choi SI, Chang HJ, Choi DJ, Lim C, Park JH. Delayed hyperenhancement by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Clinical application for various cardiac diseases. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30, 226-232 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lucignani G. The immune system and cancer: The evolving role of molecular imaging and molecular targeted therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 33, 503-505 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Mulder WJM, Strijkers G, Van Tilborg GAF, Griffioen A, Nicolay K. Lipid-based nanoparticles for contrast-enhanced MRI and molecular imaging. NMR Biomed 19, 142-164 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Rosenbaum SJ, Lind T, Antoch G, Bokisch A. False-positive FGD PET uptake - The role of PET/CT. Eur Radiol 16, 1054-1065 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Santangelo P, Nitin N, Bao G. Nanostructured probes for RNA detection in living cells. Ann Biomed Eng 34, 39-50 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Smith AM, Ruan G, Rhyner MN, Nie SM. Engineering luminescent quantum dots for in vivo molecular and cellular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 34, 3-14 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Thorek DLJ, Chen A, Czupryna J, Tsourkas A. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle probes for molecular imaging. Ann Biomed Eng 34, 23-38 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Zijlstra JM, Lindauer-van der Werf G, Hoekstra OS, Hooft L, Riphagen II, Huijgens PC. 18F-fluoro-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography for post-treatment evaluation of malignant lymphoma: A systematic review. Haematologica 91, 522-529 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Contrast Agents: 3. Chemistry Google Scholar Chong HS, Garmestani K, Bryant LH, Milenic DE, Overstreet T, Birch N, Le T, Brady ED, Brechbiel MW. Synthesis and evaluation of novel macrocyclic and acyclic ligands as contrast enhancement agents for magnetic resonance imaging. J Med Chem 49, 2055-2062 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Fulton DA, Elemento EM, Aime S, Chaabane L, Botta M, Parker D. Glycoconjugates of gadolinium complexes for MRI applications. Chem Commun 1064-1066 (2006) Google Scholar Goertz DE, Frijlink ME, De Jong N, Steen AFWV. High frequency nonlinear scattering from a micrometer to submicrometer sized lipid encapsulated contrast agent. Ultrasound Med Biol 32, 569-577 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gustafsson B, Youens S, Louie AY. Development of contrast agents targeted to macrophage scavenger receptors for MRI of vascular inflammation. Bioconjug Chem 17, 538-547 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hainfeld JF, Slatkin DN, Focella TM, Smilowitz HM. Gold nanoparticles: A new X-ray contrast agent. Br J Radiol 79, 248-253 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kim JK, Kim DM, Kang MS, Kim HK, Kim JS, Yu EK, Jeong JH. Gadolinium-chlorin is potentially a new tumor specific MRI contrast agent. Arch Pharm Res 29, 188-190 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar McDonald MA, Watkin KL. Investigations into the physicochemical properties of dextran small particulate gadolinium oxide nanoparticles. Acad Radiol 13, 421-427 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Miyamoto A, Okimoto H, Shinohara H, Shibamoto Y. Development of water soluble metallofullerenes as X-ray contrast media. Eur Radiol 16, 1050-1053 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Moran CM, Ross JA, Cunningham C, Butler M, Anderson T, Newby D, Fox KAA, McDicken WN. Manufacture and acoustical characterisation of a high-frequency contrast agent for targeting applications. Ultrasound Med Biol 32, 421-428 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Nestle N, Pauls S, Wunderlich A. Oral magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent based on Ilex paragulayensis herbal extract. Magn Reson Med 55, 923-929 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sboros V, Glynos E, Pye SD, Moran CM, Butler M, Ross J, Short R, McDicken WN, Koutsos V. Nonointerrogation of ultrasonic contrast agent microbubbles using atomic force microscopy. Ultrasound Med Biol 32, 579-585 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Terreno E, Crich SG, Belfiore S, Biancone L, Cabella C, Esposito G, Manazza AD, Aime S. Effect of the intracellular localization of a Gd-based imaging probe on the relaxation enhancement of water protons. Magn Reson Med 55, 491-497 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4. Technique Google Scholar Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, Flohr T, Ohnesorge B, Bruder H, Theessen H, Karakaya M, Daniel WG, Bautz W, Kalender WA, Anders K. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography - Initial experience. Eur J Radiol 57, 331-335 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Chung JJ, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MRI for the detection and characterization of focal hepatic lesions: Is delayed imaging useful?. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 706-711 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Cockman MD, Blanton CA, Chmielewski PA, Dong L, Dufresne TE, Hookfin EB, Karb MJ, Liu S, Wehmeyer KR. Quantitative imaging of proteoglycan in cartilage using a gadolinium probe and microCT. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 14, 210-214 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ferencik M, Lisauskas JB, Cury RC, Hoffmann U, Abbara S, Achenbach S, Karl WC, Brady TJ, Chan RC. Improved vessel morphology measurements in contrast-enhanced multi-detector computed tomography coronary angiography with non-linear post-processing. Eur J Radiol 57, 380-383 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Goertz DE, Frijlink ME, De Jong N, Steen AFWV. Nonlinear intravascular ultrasound contrast imaging. Ultrasound Med Biol 32, 491-502 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ichikawa T, Nakajima H, Nanbu A, Hori M, Araki T. Effect of injection rate of contrast material on CT of hepatocellular carcinoma. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1413-1418 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Kiryu S, Watanabe M, Kabasawa H, Akahane M, Aoki S, Ohtomo K. Evaluation of super paramagnetic iron oxide-enhanced diffusion-weighted PROPELLER T2-fast spin echo magnetic resonance imaging: Preliminary experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30, 197-200 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lebel RM, Menon RS, Bowen CV. Relaxometry model of strong dipolar perturbers for balanced-SSFP: Application to quantification of SPIO loaded cells. Magn Reson Med 55, 583-591 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Matsumoto K, Hyodo F, Matsumoto A, Koretsky AP, Sowers AL, Mitchell JB, Krishna MC. High-resolution mapping of tumor redox status by magnetic resonance imaging using nitroxides as redox-sensitive contrast agents. Clin Cancer Res 12, 2455-2462 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Mucelli RMP, Como G, Del Frate C, Iuri D, Furlan A, Al-Grhiw E, Bazzocchi M. Multidetector CT with double arterial phase and high-iodine-concentration contrast agent in the detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Radiol Med (Torino) 111, 181-191 (2006) Google Scholar Murakami T, Onishi H, Mikami K, Iannaccone R, Federle MP, Kim T, Hori M, Okada A, Marukawa T, Higashihara H, Passariello R, Nakamura H. Determining the optimal timing for early arterial phase hepatic CT imaging by measuring abdominal aortic enhancement in variable contrast injection protocols. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30, 206-211 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Nanz D, Andreisek G, Frohlich JM, Weishaupt D, Treiber K, Ess S, Pfammatter T. Contrast material-enhanced visualization of the ablation medium for magnetic resonance-monitored ethanol injection therapy: Imaging and safety aspects. J Vasc Interv Radiol 17, 95-102 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Tatsugami F, Matsuki M, Kani H, Tanikake M, Miyao M, Yoshikawa S, Narabayashi I. Effect of saline pushing after contrast material injection in abdominal multidetector computed tomography with the use of different iodine concentrations. Acta Radiol 47, 192-197 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Vignaud A, Rodriguez I, Ennis DB, DeSilva R, Kellman P, Taylor J, Bennett E, Wen H. Detection of myocardial capillary orientation with intravascular iron-oxide nanoparticles in spin-echo MRI. Magn Reson Med 55, 725-730 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Wilson SR, Burns PN. An algorithm for the diagnosis of focal liver masses using microbubble contrast-enhanced pulse-inversion sonography. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1401-1412 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Yoshikawa T, Mitchell DG, Hirota S, Ohno Y, Oda K, Maeda T, Fujii M, Sugimura K. Gradient- and spin-echo T2-weighted imaging for SPIO-enhanced detection and characterization of focal liver lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 712-719 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5. Experimental Google Scholar Aoki I, Takahashi Y, Chuang KH, Silva AC, Igarashi T, Tanaka C, Childs RW, Koretsky AP. Cell labeling for magnetic resonance imaging with the T1 agent manganese chloride. NMR Biomed 19, 50-59 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Cartwright L, Farhat WA, Sherman C, Chen J, Babyn P, Yeger H, Cheng HLM. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to quantify VEGF-enhanced tissue-engineered bladder graft neovascularization: Pilot study. J Biomed Mater Res Pt A 77A, 390-395 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Ceelen W, Smeets P, Backes W, Van Damme N, Boterberg T, Demetter P, Bouckenooghe I, De Visschere M, Peeters M, Pattyn P. Noninvasive monitoring of radiotherapy-induced microvascular changes using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) in a colorectal tumor model. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 64, 1188-1196 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Doria AS, Noseworthy M, Oakden W, Moineddin R, Rayner T, Tassos V, Engelberts D, Pritzker K, Rogers M, Jong R, Babyn P. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantification of synovium microcirculation in experimental arthritis. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1165-1171 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Egeland TAM, Gaustad JV, Vestvik IK, Benjaminsen RC, Mathiesen B, Rofstad EK. Assessment of fraction of radiobiologically hypoxic cells in human melanoma xenografts by dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 55, 874-882 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ewing JR, Brown SL, Lu M, Panda S, Ding GL, Knight RA, Cao Y, Jiang Q, Nagaraja TN, Churchman JL, Fenstermacher JD. Model selection in magnetic resonance imaging measurements of vascular permeability: Gadomer in a 9L model of rat cerebral tumor. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26, 310-320 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ford NL, Graham KC, Groom AC, MacDonald IC, Chambers AF, Holdsworth DW. Time-course characterization of the computed tomography contrast enhancement of an iodinated blood-pool contrast agent in mice using a volumetric flat-panel equipped computed tomography scanner. Invest Radiol 41, 384-390 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Gambarota G, Van Laarhoven HWM, Philippens M, Lok J, Van der Kogel A, Punt CJA, Heerschap A. Assessment of absolute blood volume in carcinoma by USPIO contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Imaging 24, 279-286 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lurie DM, Seguin BD, Schneider PD, Verstraete FJ, Wisner ER. Contrast-assisted ultrasound for sentinel lymph node detection in spontaneously arising canine head and neck tumors. Invest Radiol 41, 415-421 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ni YC, Chen F, Mulier S, Sun XH, Yu J, Landuyt W, Marchal G, Verbruggen A. Magnetic resonance imaging after radiofrequency ablation in a rodent model of liver tumor: Tissue characterization using a novel necrosis-avid contrast agent. Eur Radiol 16, 1031-1040 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Olsson LE, Chai CM, Axelsson O, Karlsson M, Golman K, Petersson JS. MR coronary angiography in pigs with intraarterial injections of a hyperpolarized 13C substance. Magn Reson Med 55, 731-737 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sbarbati A, Cavallini I, Marzola P, Nicolato E, Osculati F. Contrast-enhanced MRI of brown adipose tissue after pharmacological stimulation. Magn Reson Med 55, 715-718 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Yankeelov TE, Niermann KJ, Huamani J, Kim DW, Quarles CC, Fleischer AC, Hallahan DE, Price RR, Gore JC. Correlation between estimates of tumor perfusion from microbubble contrast-enhanced sonography and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med 25, 487-497 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6. Applications Google Scholar Aliprandi A, Fausto A, Quarenghi M, Modestino S, Randelli P, Sardanelli F. One-shot CT and MR anthrography of the shoulder with a mixture of iodinated and paramagnetic contrast agents using arthroscopy as a gold standard. Radiol Med (Torino) 111, 53-60 (2006) Google Scholar Boraschi P, Donati F, Gigoni R, Caramella D, Boggi U, Falaschi F, Bartolozzi C. Mangafodipir trisodium-enhanced MR imaging of pancreatic disease. Eur Radiol 16, 988-997 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Christiansen JP, Edwards C, Sinclair T, Armstrong G, Scott A, Patel H, Hart H. Detection of myocardial scar by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with troponin-positive chest pain and minimal angiographic coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 97, 768-771 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar D'Onofrio M, Mansueto G, Faccioli N, Guarise A, Tamellini P, Bogina G, Mucelli RP. Doppler ultrasound and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in assessing carotid artery stenosis. Radiol Med (Torino) 111, 93-103 (2006) Google Scholar Eyding J, Krogias C, Schollhammer M, Eyding D, Wilkening W, Meves S, Schroder A, Przuntek H, Postert T. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonic parametric perfusion imaging detects dysfunctional tissue at risk in acute MCA stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26, 576-582 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Florie J, Wasser MNJM, Arts-Cieslik K, Akkerman EM, Siersema PD, Stoker J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the bowel wall for assessment of disease activity in Crohn's disease. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1384-1392 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Caron S, Taschner CA, Lejeune JP, Pruvo JP. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils - Imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 37, 1033-1037 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Goldfarb JW, Holland AE, Heijstraten FMJ, Skotnicki S, Barentsz JO. Cardiac-synchronized gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: Preliminary experience for the evaluation of the thoracic aorta. Magn Reson Imaging 24, 241-248 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Holmquist F, Nyman U. Eighty-peak kilovoltage 16-channel multidetector computed tomography and reduced contrast-medium doses tailored to body weight to diagnose pulmonary embolism in azotaemic patients. Eur Radiol 16, 1165-1176 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hori M, Murakami T, Kim T, Iannaccone R, Abe H, Onishi H, Tomoda K, Catalano C, Passariello R, Nakamura H. Hemodynamic characterization of focal hepatic lesions: Role of ferucarbotran-enhanced dynamic MR imaging using T2-weighted multishot spin-echo echo-planar sequence. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 509-519 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hsu LY, Rhoads KL, Holly JE, Kellman P, Aletras AH, Arai AE. Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 315-322 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ishiyama K, Motoyama S, Tomura N, Sashi R, Imano H, Ogawa J, Narita K, Watarai J. Visualization of lymphatic basin from the tumor using magnetic resonance lymphography with superparamagnetic iron oxide in patients with thoracic esophageal cancer. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30, 270-275 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Iwazawa J, Nishida N, Yamamoto A, Nango M, Ninoi T, Murakami Y, Nakamura K, Inoue Y. Detection of portal perfusion abnormalities: Comparison of 3 ferucarbotran-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging sequences. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30, 165-172 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Karahan OI, Yikilmaz A, Artis T, Canoz O, Coskun A, Torun E. Contrast-enhanced dynamic magnetic resonance imaging findings of hepatocellular carcinoma and their correlation with histopathologic findings. Eur J Radiol 57, 445-452 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kawata N, Igarashi T, Ichinose T, Hirakata H, Hachiya T, Takimoto Y, Ogawa M. Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for the diagnosis of recurrent renal cell carcinoma in contralateral kidney. Int J Urol 13, 325-328 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kim HJ, Kim KW, Byun JH, Won HJ, Shin YM, Kim PN, Lee MS, Lee MG. Comparison of mangafodipir trisodium- and ferucarbotran-enhanced MRI for detection and characterization of hepatic metastases in colorectal cancer patients. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1059-1066 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Kim KA, Seo JB, Do KH, Heo JN, Lee YK, Song JW, Lee JS, Song KS, Lim TH. Differentiation of recently infarcted myocardium from chronic myocardial scar: The value of contrast-enhanced SSFP-based cine MR imaging. Korean J Radiol 7, 14-19 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kneeshaw PJ, Lowry M, Manton D, Hubbard A, Drew PJ, Turnbull LW. Differentiation of benign from malignant breast disease associated with screening detected microcalcifications using dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Breast 15, 29-38 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Kuhl HP, Lipke CSA, Krombach GA, Katoh M, Battenberg TF, Nowak B, Heussen N, Buecker A, Schaefer WM. Assessment of reversible myocardial dysfunction in chronic ischaemic heart disease: Comparison of contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance and a combined positron emission tomography-single photon emission computed tomography imaging protocol. Eur Heart J 27, 846-853 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Lammentausta E, Kiviranta P, Nissi MJ, Laasanen MS, Kiviranta I, Nieminen MT, Jurvelin JS. T2 relaxation time and delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC) of human patellar cartilage at 1.5 T and 9.4 T: Relationships with tissue mechanical properties. J Orthop Res 24, 366-374 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ludemann L, Grieger W, Wurm R, Wust P, Zimmer C. Glioma assessment using quantitative blood volume maps generated by T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: A receiver operating characteristic study. Acta Radiol 47, 303-310 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Malm S, Frigstad S, Torp H, Wiseth R, Skjarpe T. Quantitative adenosine real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography for detection of angiographically significant coronary artery disease. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19, 365-372 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Micari A, Sklenar J, Belcik TA, Kaul S, Lindner JR. Automated quantification of the spatial extent of perfusion defects and viability on myocardial contrast echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 19, 379-385 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Mitra D, Connolly D, Jenkins S, English P, Birchall D, Mandel C, Shrikanth K, Gregson B, Gholkar A. Comparison of image quality, diagnostic confidence and interobserver variability in contrast enhanced MR angiography and 2D time of flight angiography in evaluation of carotid stenosis. Br J Radiol 79, 201-207 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Moftakhar R, Niemann DB, Turk A, Pulfer K. Evaluation of cerebral hemodynamics with computed tomography perfusion using gadolinium as an alternative to iodinated contrast - A case report. J Comput Assist Tomogr 30, 307-309 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Moselewski F, Ferencik M, Achenbach S, Abbara S, Cury RC, Booth SL, Jang IK, Brady TJ, Hoffmann U. Threshold-dependent variability of coronary artery calcification measurements --Implications for contrast-enhanced multi-detector row-computed tomography. Eur J Radiol 57, 390-395 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Nirmal D, Griffiths AN, Jose G, Evans J. Warming Echovist contrast medium for hysterocontrastsonography and the effect on the incidence of pelvic pain. A randomized controlled study. Hum Reprod 21, 1052-1054 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Nishimura H, Tanigawa N, Hiramatsu M, Tatsumi Y, Matsuki M, Narabayashi I. Preoperative esophageal cancer staging: Magnetic resonance imaging of lymph node with ferumoxtran-10, an ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide. J Am Coll Surg 202, 604-611 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Phan BAP, Chu BC, Kerwin WS, Xu DX, Yuan C, Hatsukami T, Zhao XQ. Effect of contrast enhancement on the measurement of carotid arterial lumen and wall volume using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 481-485 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Regge D, Campanella D, Anselmetti GC, Cirillo S, Gallo TM, Muratore A, Capussotti L, Galatola G, Floriani I, Aglietta M. Diagnostic accuracy of portal-phase CT and MRI with mangafodipir trisodium in detecting liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Clin Radiol 61, 338-347 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Saeed M, Lee RJ, Weber O, Do L, Martin A, Ursel P, Saloner D, Higgins CB. Scarred myocardium imposes additional burden on remote viable myocardium despite a reduction in the extent of area with late contrast MR enhancement. Eur Radiol 16, 827-836 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Sharma P, Socolow J, Patel S, Pettigrew RI, Oshinski JN. Effect of Gd-DTPA-BMA on blood and myocardial T1 at 1.5T and 3T in humans. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 323-330 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Simon GH, Von Vopelius-Feldt J, Wendland MF, Fu YJ, Piontek G, Schlegel J, Chen MH, Daldrup-Link HE. MRI of arthritis: Comparison of ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide vs. Gd-DTPA. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 720-727 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Thornhill RE, Prato FS, Wisenberg G, White JA, Nowell J, Sauer A. Feasibility of the single-bolus strategy for measuring the partition coefficient of Gd-DTPA in patients with myocardial infarction: Independence of image delay time and maturity of scar. Magn Reson Med 55, 780-789 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Tona F, Caforio ALP, Montisci R, Angelini A, Ruscazio M, Gambino A, Ramondo A, Thiene G, Gerosa G, Iliceto S. Coronary flow reserve by contrast-enhanced echocardiography: A new noninvasive diagnostic tool for cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Am J Transplant 6, 998-1003 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Tsutsui JM, Mukherjee S, Elhendy A, Xie F, Lyden ER, O'Leary E, McGrain AC, Porter TR. Value of dobutamine stress myocardial contrast perfusion echocardiography in patients with advanced liver disease. Liver Transplant 12, 592-599 (2006) Google Scholar Valentino M, Serra C, Zironi G, De Luca C, Pavlica P, Barozzi L. Blunt abdominal trauma: Emergency contrast-enhanced sonography for detection of solid organ injuries. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1361-1367 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Yabuuchi H, Kuroiwa T, Kusumoto C, Fukuya T, Ohno S, Hachitanda Y. Incidentally detected lesions on contrast-enhanced MR imaging in candidates for breast-conserving therapy: Correlation between MR findings and histological diagnosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 486-492 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Yamamoto K, Nakanishi S, Fuke H, Hashimoto A, Shimizu A, Hamataki T, Shiraki K. Corona enhancement in ultrasonographical post-vascular phase images with microbubble contrast agent: A novel specific sign for hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Rep 15, 785-790 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Yi A, Kim JK, Park SH, Kim KW, Kim HS, Kim JH, Eun HW, Cho KS. Contrast-enhanced sonography for prostate cancer detection in patients with indeterminate clinical findings. Am J Roentgenol 186, 1431-1435 (2006) Web of Science®Google Scholar Zhang HL, Ersoy H, Prince MR. Effects of gadopentetate dimeglumine and gadodiamide on serum calcium, magnesium, and creatinine measurements. J Magn Reson Imaging 23, 383-387 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Zhou ZR, Shen TZ, Chen XR, Peng WJ. Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery MRI for intracranial tumors in comparison with post-contrast T1W spin-echo MRI. Chin Med J (Engl) 119, 467-473 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Molecular Imaging: 7. Carbon Google Scholar Ametamey SM, Kessler LJ, Honer M, Wyss MT, Buck A, Hintermann S, Auberson YP, Gasparini F, Schubiger PA. Radiosynthesis and preclinical evaluation of 11C-ABP688 as a probe for imaging the metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 5. J Nucl Med 47, 698-705 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Doudet DJ, Ruth TJ, Holden JE. Sequential versus nonsequential measurement of density and affinity of dopamine D2 receptors with [11C]raclopride: 2: Effects of DAT inhibitors. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26, 28-37 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Ginovart N, Meyer JH, Boovariwala A, Hussey D, Rabiner EA, Houle S, Wilson AA. Positron emission tomography quantification of [11C]-harmine binding to monoamine oxidase-A in the human brain. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 26, 330-344 (2006) PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar Hennings J, Lindhe O, Bergstrom M, Langstrom B, Sundin A, Hellman P. [11C]metomidate posi