Artigo Acesso aberto Revisado por pares

Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals ‐ Revision of Guidance Document under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/4145/2000 – final of 25 September 2002) ‐ Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals

2008; Wiley; Volume: 6; Issue: 7 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2903/j.efsa.2008.734

ISSN

1831-4732

Tópico(s)

Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies

Resumo

EFSA JournalVolume 6, Issue 7 734 OpinionOpen Access Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals - Revision of Guidance Document under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (SANCO/4145/2000 – final of 25 September 2002) - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for birds and mammals European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Search for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Search for more papers by this author First published: 24 July 2008 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2008.734Citations: 7 Panel members: Damia Barcelo Culleres, Jos Boesten, Claudia Bolognesi, Alan Boobis, Arne Büchert, Ettore Capri, David Coggon, Anthony Hardy, Andy Hart, Herbert Köpp, Matthias Liess, Robert Luttik, Otto Meyer, Stella Michaelidou-Canna, Mark Montforts, Angelo Moretto, Markus Müller, Bernadette Ossendorp, Walter Steurbaut, Maria Tasheva, Christiane Vleminckx. Acknowledgement: Membership of the Core Working Group (Core WG) Robert Luttik*, Mark Clook, Pierre Mineau, Andreas Höllrigl-Rosta, Kees Romijn**, Andy Hart*, Herbert Köpp*, Gunilla Ericson, Franz Streissl Membership of the sub-WG 'Focal species and ecological parameters' Robert Luttik, German Canomanuel**, Mark Clook, Joe Crocker, Markus Ebeling**, Peter Edwards**, Andreas Höllrigl-Rosta, Juan Pascual**, José Tarazona, Christian Wolf. Membership of the sub-WG 'Modelling approaches, dermal uptake, avoidance, metabolism' Andy Hart, Mark Clook, Peter Edwards, David Fischer**, Andreas Höllrigl-Rosta, Annegaaike Leopold, Leona Mattsoff, Pierre Mineau, Angelo Moretto*, Kees Romijn. Membership of the sub-WG 'Residues on insects and other food items' Robert Luttik, Kevin Brown, Carsten Brühl, Andreas Höllrigl-Rosta, Juan Pascual, Helen Thompson, Christian Wolf. Membership of the sub-WG 'Long term risk assessment (RA) and appropriate endpoints' Andreas Höllrigl-Rosta, Richard Bennett, Mark Clook, Gunilla Ericson, Leona Mattsoff, Pierre Mineau, Angelo Moretto, Spencer R. Mortensen**, Kees Romijn, Richard Shore. Adoption date: 17 June 2008 Published date: 24 July 2008 Question number: EFSA-Q-2006-064 AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Aldenberg, T. and Slob, W., 1993. Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data. Ecotoxicol Env Safety, 25, 48– 63. Anonymous, 1990. Recommendations of an international workshop on terrestrial field testing of pesticides. In: L. Somerville, and C.H. Walker, (eds.), 1990. Pesticide effects on terrestrial wildlife. Taylor and Francis, London, pp. 353– 393. Baillie, S.R., 1993. The implications of studies of the reporting rates of ringed birds for the interpretation of results from the WIIS. BTO Research Report no. 117, British Trust for Ornithology, The Nunnery, Thetford, Norfolk IP24 2PU, UK. Barber, I., Tarrant, K. A., and Thompson, H.M., 2003. Exposure of small mammals, in particular the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus, to pesticide seed treatments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 22, 1134– 1139. BBA (Biologische Bundesanstalt), 1993. Guidelines for testing plant protection products in the authorisation procedure. 25–1: Testing of baits, granules and treated seeds for hazards to birds - acceptance tests. Biologische Bundesanstalt für Land- und Forstwirtschaft, Berlin, Germany. BBA (Biologische Bundesanstalt), 2001. Growth stages of mono-and dicotyledonous plants. BBCH Monograph, 2. Edition, 2001. Edited by Uwe Meier. Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry. Bennett, R.S., Dewhurst, I.C., Fairbrother, A., Hart, A.D.M., Hooper, M.J., Leopold, A., Mineau, P., Mortensen, S.R., Shore, R.F. and Springer, T.A., 2005. A New Interpretation of Avian and Mammalian Reproduction Toxicity Test Data in Ecological Risk Assessment. Ecotoxicology, 14, 801– 815. Best, L.B., and Gionfriddo, J.P., 1994. House sparrow preferential consumption of carriers used for pesticide granules. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 13: 919– 925. Blus, L., 2003. Handbook of ecotoxicology: Organochlorine pesticides. Chapter 13. 2nd ed. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raton. Burn, A., 2000. Pesticides and their effects on lowland farmland birds. In: N.J. Aebischer, A.D. Evans, P.V. Grice, and J.A. Vickery (eds.). Ecology and Conservation of Lowland Farmland Birds, pp 89– 104. British Ornithologists' Union, London. Cooke, A.S., 1973. Shell thinning in avian eggs by environmental pollutants. Environmental Pollution, 4, 85– 152. Crocker, D.R., 2005. Estimating the exposure of birds and mammals to pesticides in long-term risk assessments. Ecotoxicology, 14, 833– 852. DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2005. Risks to small mammals from hoarding of solid pesticide formulations. DEFRA Project Code PS230899 DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs), 2007. Improved estimates of daily food and water requirements for use in risk assessments – DEFRA Project Code PS2330100. de Snoo, G.R., Scheidegger, N.M.I., and De Jong, F.M.W., 1999. Vertebrate wildlife incidents with pesticides: A European survey. Pestic Sc, 55, 47– 54. de Snoo, G.R., and Luttik, R., 2004. Availability of pesticide-treated seed on arable fields. Pesticide Management Science, 60 (5), 501– 506. Driver, C.J., Ligotke, M.W., Van Voris, P., McVeety, B.D., Greenspan, B.J., and Drown, D.B., 1991. Routes of uptake and their relative contribution to the toxicological response of northern bobwhite (Colinus virginianus) to an organophosphate pesticide. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 10, 21– 33. EC (European Commission – DG Health and Consumer Protection), 2002. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000 – final 25 September 2002, pp 74.101 EC (European Commission – DG Health and Consumer Protection), 2005. Guidance Document on the assessment of the equivalence of technical materials of substances regulated under Council Directive 91/414/EEC (Sanco/10597/2003 –rev. 7 final2; 14 December 2005). ECOFRAM (Ecological Committee on FIFRA Risk Assessment Methods), 1999. ECOFRAM Terrestrial Draft Report. Edwards, P.J., Bembridge, J., Jackson, D., Earl, M., and Anderson, L., 1998. Estimation of pesticides residues on weed seeds for wildlife risk assessment. Poster presentation at the Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19th annual meeting, 1998, Charlotte, NC, USA (summary on page 151 of abstract book). EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) on a request from the Commission related to the evaluation of methamidophos in ecotoxicology. The EFSA Journal (2004) 144, 1– 50. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005a. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Health, Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR) on a request from EFSA related to the evaluation of pirimicarb. The EFSA Journal (2005) 240, 1– 21. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005b. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant health, Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on a request from EFSA related to the assessment of the acute and chronic risk to aquatic organisms with regard to the possibility of lowering the uncertainty factor if additional species were tested. 14 December 2005. The EFSA Journal (2005) 301, 1– 45. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2005c. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. 18 October 2005. The EFSA Journal (2005) 282, 1– 31. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2006. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant health, Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on a request from the EFSA related to the choice of endpoints to assess the long-term risk to mammals. 06 April 2006. The EFSA Journal (2006) 344, 1– 22. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007a. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues on a request from the Commission related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market - Ecotoxicological studies. 07 March 2007. The EFSA Journal (2007) 461, 1– 44. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007b. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues on a request from the Commission on acute dietary intake assessment of pesticide residues in fruit and vegetables. 19 April 2007. The EFSA Journal (2007) 538, 1– 88. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007c. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues on a request from the Commission on the risks associated with an increase of the MRL for dieldrin on courgettes. 12 September 2007. The EFSA Journal (2007) 554, 1– 48. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection products and their Residues to evaluate the suitability of existing methodologies and, if appropriate, the identification of new approaches to assess cumulative and synergistic risks from pesticides to human health with a view to set MRLs for those pesticides in the frame of Regulation (EC) 396/2005. 15 April 2008. The EFSA Journal (2008) 704, 1– 3. EPCO (EFSA Peer Review Co-Ordination), 2005. EPCO manual Part E. EPCO Working Documents - Technical Advice No E 4, revision 4 (September 2005). Working Document for preparation of the 'List of End points' for chemical active substances. Fletcher, M.R., and Grave, R.C., 1992. Post-registration surveillance to detect wildlife problems arising from approved pesticides. Brighton Crop Protection Conference - Pests and Diseases, 793-798. FOCUS (Forum for the Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their Use), 2003. Focus surface water scenarios in the EU evaluation process under Directive 91/414/EEC, pp 238. Fryday, S.L., Hart, A.D.M., Langton, S.D., 1996. Effects of exposure to an organophosphorus pesticide on the behaviour and use of cover by captive starlings. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 15, 1590– 1596. Gould, A., 1990. Comments on statistical aspects of the 'Guidance document for contrasting terrestrial field studies'. In: L. Somerville, and C.H. Walker, (eds.): Pesticide effects on terrestrial wildlife. Taylor and Francis, London, UK, pp. 207– 215. Greaves, M.P., Smith, B.D., and Greig-Smith, P.W., 1988. Field methods for the study of environmental effects of pesticides. British Crop Protection Council, Monograph No. 40, Thornton Heath. 370 pp. Hardy, A.R., Fletcher, M.R., and Stanley, P.I., 1986. Twenty years of vertebrate wildlife incident investigations by MAFF. State Veterinary Journal, 117, 182– 192. Hardy, A.R., and Stanley, P.I., 1984. The impact of the commercial agricultural use of organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides on British wildlife. In: Agriculture and the Environment, D E Jenkins (Ed), pp 72– 80. ITE Symnposium No. 13, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Cambridge. Hommes, V.M., Buchs, W., Joermann, G., and Siebers, J., 1990. Vogelgefährdung durch Planzenschutzmittelrückstände in Blattpfützen von Gemüsekohl (Poisoning risk of birds by residues of pesticides in leaf puddles of cole crops). Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd, 42, 113– 117. Hull, R.N., Swanson, S., 2006. Sequential analysis of lines of evidence – an advanced weight of evidence approach for ecological risk assessment. Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management, 2, 302– 311. INRA (Institut national de la recherche agronomique), 1990. Methodologie d'acceptation de nourriture ou de semences traitees par une substance repulsive, par des oiseaux en conditions de captivite. G. Grolleau, 1/06/1990, Laboratoire de phytopharmacie unite d'eco-etho-toxicologie, Versailles Cedex. Jager, T., 1998. Mechanistic approach for estimating bioconcentration of organic chemicals in earthworms (Oligochaeta). Environ Toxicol Chem, 17, 2080– 2090. JMPR (Joint Meeting on Pesticide Residues), 2004. Pesticide Residues in Food. Report of the 2004 JMPR FAO/WHO Meeting of Experts. FAO Plant Poduction and Protection Paper 178102. Jongbloed, R.H., Traas, T.P., and Luttik, R., 1996. A probabilistic model for deriving soil quality criteria based on secondary poisoning of top predators. II. Calculations for dichlorodephenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and cadmium. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 34, 279– 306. Ludwigs, J.-D., Pascual, J., Wolf, A., von Blanckenhagen, F., 2007. Comparison of dehusking experiments of laboratory mice and wild Apodemus spec. mice. Poster, SETAC Europe Conference, Porto, PT. Luttik, R., 1998. Assessing repellency in a modified avian LC50 procedure removes the need for additional tests. Ecoxicology and Environmental Safety, 40, 201– 205. Luttik, R., 2003. Risk Assessment Scheme for the Impact of Plant Protection Products on Birds and Mammals. Thesis, Leiden University, The Netherlands. Luttik, R., and Aldenberg, T., 1997. Extrapolation factors for small samples of pesticide toxicity data: Special focus on LD50 values for birds and mammals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 16, 1785– 1788. Luttik, R., and de Snoo, G.R., 2004. Characterisation of grit in arable birds - to improve pesticide risk assessment. Ecoxicology and Environmental Safety, 57, 319– 329. Luttik, R., Mineau, P., and Roelofs, W., 2005. A review of interspecies toxicity extrapolation in birds and mammals and a proposal for long-term toxicity data. Ecotoxicology, 14, 817– 832. Madelin, R., 2004. The importance of scientific advice in the Community decision making process. Opening address to the Inaugural Joint Meeting of the members of the Non-Food Scientific Committees. Directorate General for Health and Consumer Protection, European Commission, Brussels. Mineau, P., 1993. The hazard of carbofuran to birds and other vertebrate wildlife. Technical Report Series. No. 177. Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service, Ottawa. XXii+96 pp. Mineau, P., 2002. Estimating the probability of bird mortality from pesticide sprays on the basis of the field study record. Env. Toxicol. Chem., 21, 1497– 1506. Mineau, P., 2005. A Review and Analysis of Study Endpoints Relevant to the Assessment of 'Long Term' Pesticide Toxicity in Avian and Mammalian Wildlife. Ecotoxicology, 14, 775– 799. Mineau, P., Collins, B.T., and Baril, A., 1996. On the use of scaling factors to improve interspecies extrapolation of acute toxicity in birds. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 24, 24– 29. Mineau, P., Fletcher, M.R., Glaser, L.C., Thomas, N.J., Brassard, C., Wilson, L.K., Elliott, J.E., Lyon, L.A., Henny, C.J., Bollinger, T., and Porter, S.L., 1999. Poisoning of raptors with organophosphorus and carbamate pesticides with emphasis on Canada, U.S. and U.K. J Raptor Res, 33, 1– 37. Nagy, K.A., and Peterson, C.C., 1988. Scaling of Water Flux Rate in Animals. University of California Press, Berkeley, USA. Newton, I., 1995. The contribution of some recent research on birds to ecological understanding. Journal of Animal Ecology, 64, 675– 696. NIEHS (National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences), 2002. Current Status of Test Methods for Detecting Endocrine Disruptors: In vitro Androgen receptor binding assays. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1993. OECD Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals. Section 2 – Effect on Biotic Systems: Test Guideline 206: Avian Reproduction Test, adopted April 1984. Paris, France. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1996. Report of the SETAC/OECD workshop on avian toxicity testing (1996) OECD Environmental Health and Safety Publications, Series on Testing and Assessment No. 5. OECD/GD(96)166, p. 185. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1998a. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 407: Repeated dose 28-day oral toxicity in rodents, adopted 27 July, 1995. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 1998b. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 408: Subchronic oral toxicity – rodent 90 day study, adopted 21 September, 1998. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001a. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 420: Acute Oral toxicity – Fixed Dose Method, 17 July 1992, adopted 20 December 2001. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001b. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 423: Acute Oral Toxicity – Acute Toxic Class Method, 22 March 1996, adopted 20 December 2001 OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001c. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 416: Two-generation reproduction toxicity study (Last version adopted 22 January, 2001 but currently under revision). OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2001d. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 414: Prenatal developmental toxicity study, adopted 22 January, 2001. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2002. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Proposal for a new Guideline 223: Avian acute oral toxicity test. October 2002. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2005. OECD Revised Draft report Phase 1B of the Validation of the 21-day Fish Assay for the Detection of Endocrine Active Substances. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2006a. Detailed Review Paper for Avian Two-Generation Toxicity Test. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, No. June 2006a. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2006b. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Detailed Review Paper on Thyroid Hormone Disruption Assays. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment, ENV/JM/MONO(2006)24 OECD Monograph No. 57. Paris, France, July 2006. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2006c. OECD Guidelines for the testing of chemicals. Section 4 – Health effects. No. 425: Acute Oral Toxicity: Up-and-Down Procedure, 21 September 1998, updated 23 March 2006. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2007a. Draft OECD guideline: The Uterotrophic Bioassay in Rodents: a short-term screening test for oestrogenic properties. Revised 23 January 2007. OECD(Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2007b. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Report of the validation of the rat Hershberger bioassay. Phase 3: Coded Testing of Androgen Agonists, Androgen Antagonists and Negative Reference Chemicals by Multiple Laboratories. Surgical Castrate Model Protocol. Environment, Health and Safety Publications. Series on Testing and Assessment No. 73. OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), 2007c. OECD Draft Report of the Validation of Amphibian Metamorphosis Assay for the Detection of Thyroid Active Substances. Phase 1: Optimisation of the Test Protocol. September 2004. Note: US is preparing an integrated summary of the assay to support further validation. This would be best to add here as a reference (to be completed 2nd half of 2007). OEPP/EPPO (Organisation Européene et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes/European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation), 1994. Decision-making scheme for the environmental risk assessment of plant protection products. Chapters 7, 9 and 11. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 24, 1– 88. OEPP/EPPO (Organisation Européene et Méditerranéenne pour la Protection des Plantes/European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation), 2003. Environmental risk assessment scheme for plant protection products. Environmental risk assessment scheme for plant protection products. Chapter 11: Terrestrial vertebrates. Bulletin OEPP/EPPO Bulletin, 33, 147– 149. Ottinger, M.A., and Abdelnabi, M.A., 1997. Neuroendocrine systems and avian sexual differentiation. American Zoologist., 37, 514– 523. Ottinger, M.A., Pitts, S., Abdelnabi, M.A., 2001. Steroid hormones during embryonic development in Japanese quail: plasma, gonadal and adrenal levels. 2001 Poultry Science, 80, 795– 799. Pascual, J.A., and Hart, A.D.M., 1997. Exposure of captive feral pigeons to fonofos-treated seed in a semi-field experiment. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 16, 2543– 2549. Pascual, J.A., Fryday, S.L., and Hart, A.D.M., 1999b. Effects of food restriction on food avoidance and risk of acute poisoning of captive feral pigeons from fonofos-treated seeds. Arch Env Contam Toxicol, 37, 115– 124. Pascual, J.A., Hart, A.D.M., and Fryday, S.L., 1999a. Incidence of lethal bird poisoning reduced by regurgitation of pesticide-treated food. Environ Toxicol Chem, 18, 247– 253. Pelz, H.-J., 1989. Ecological aspects of damage to sugar beet seeds by Apodemus sylvaticus. In: Mammals as pests (Ed. R. J. Putman), pp. 34– 48. London: Chapman and Hall. Peterson, C.A., Lee, S.L., and Elliott, J.E., 2001. Scavenging of waterfowl carcasses by birds in agricultural fields of British Columbia. J Field Ornithol, 72, 150– 159. Prosser, P., 1999. Potential exposure of birds to treated seed. Project PN0907 Final milestone report, CSL, UK103. Prosser, P.J., Hart, A.D.M., Langton, S.D., Mckay, H.V. and Cooke, A.S., 2006. Estimating the rate of poisoning by insecticide-treated seeds in a bird population. Ecotoxicology, 15, 657– 654. Prosser, P., 2001. Potential exposure of birds to treated seed. Project PN0907. Final milestone report. Central Science Laboratory104. Roelofs, W., Crocker, D.R., Shore, R.F., Moore, D.R.J., Smith, G.C., Akcakaya, H.R., Bennett, R.S., Chapman, P.F., Clook, M., Crane, M., Dewhurst, I.C., Edwards, P.J., Fairbrother, A., Ferson, S., Fischer, D., Hart, A.D.M., Holmes, M., Hooper, M.J., Lavine, M., Leopold, A., Luttik, R., Mineau, P., Mortenson, S.R., Noble, D.G., O'Connor, R.J., Sibly, R.M., Spendiff, M., Springer, T.A., Thompson, H.M., and Topping, C., 2005. Case Study Part 2: Probabilistic Modelling of Long-term Effects of Pesticides on Individual Breeding Success in Birds and Mammals. Ecotoxicology, 14, 895– 923. Romijn, C.A.F.M. Luttik, R., V.d. Meent, D., Slooff, W., and Canton, J.H., 1993. Presentation of a General Algorithm to Include Effect Assessment on Secondary Poisoning in the Derivation of Environmental Quality Criteria. Part 1. Aquatic Food Chains. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety, 26, 61– 85. Romijn, C.A.F.M., Luttik, R., and Canton, J.H., 1994. Presentation of a general algorithm to include effect assessment on secondary poisoning in the derivation of environmental quality criteria. 2. Terrestrial food chains. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety, 27, 107– 127. SCP (Scientific Committee on Plants), 2002. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants on specific questions from the commission concerning the evaluation of fosthiazate [ikki-1145 / to-1145] in the context of Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SCP/FOSTHIAZ/002-Final 22 January 2002. Adopted 20 December 2001. Sibly, R.M., Akcakaya, H.R., Topping, C.J. and O'Connor, R.J., 2005. Population-level Assessment of Risks of Pesticides to Birds and Mammals in the UK. Ecotoxicology, 14, 863– 876. Smit, C.E., 2005. Energy and moisture content and assimilation efficiency of bird and mammal food. RIVM report 601516013, pp. 57– 71. Somerville, L., and Walker, C.H., (eds.), 1990. Pesticide effects on terrestrial wildlife. Taylor and Francis, London. 404 pp. Tew, T.E., Todd, I.A., and Macdonald, D.W., 2000. Arable habitat use by wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). 2. Microhabitat. Journal of Zoology (London), 250, 305– 311. Topping, C.J., Sibly, R.M., Akcakaya, H.R., Smith, G.C., and Crocker, D.R., 2005. Risk Assessment of UK Skylark Populations Using Life-History and Individual-Based Landscape Models. Ecotoxicology, 14, 925– 936. Traas, T.P., Luttik, R., and Jongbloed, R.H., 1996. A probabilistic model for deriving soil quality criteria based on secondary poisoning of top predators. I. Model description and uncertainty analysis. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 34, 264– 278. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1996. Avian reproduction test. OPPTS 850.2300 'Public Draft' Ecological Effects Test Guidelines. EPA 712-C-96-141. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 1997. Guiding principles for Monte Carlo analysis. US Environmental Protection Agency, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington DC. EPA Document No. EPA/630/R-97/001, March 1997105. US EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency), 2005. Final Detailed Review Paper on Aromatase (EPA contract number 68-W-01-02; Work assignments 2–7 and 5–5 Task 2. Prepared for Gary E. Timm, EPA. Prepared by Battelle, Columbus, OH. Westerman, P., Hofman, A., Vet, L., and Van der Werf, W., 2003. Relative importance of vertebrates and invertebrates in epigeaic weed seed predation in organic cereal fields. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 95, 417– 425. Willis, G.H., and McDowell, L.L., 1987. Pesticide persistence on foliage. Rev Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 100, 23– 73. Wilson, L.K., Elliott, J.E., Vernon, R.S., Smith, B.D., Szeto, S.Y., 2002. Persistence and retention of active substances in four granular cholinesterase-inhibiting insecticides in agricultural soils of the lower Fraser River Valley, British Columbia, Canada, with implications for wildlife poisoning. Environ. Toxicol. Chem., 21, 260– 268. Citing Literature Volume6, Issue7July 2008734 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)