Déliberation et action publique
2004; Wiley; Volume: 10; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Francês
10.1002/j.1662-6370.2004.tb00044.x
ISSN1662-6370
Tópico(s)Electoral Systems and Political Participation
ResumoSwiss Political Science ReviewVolume 10, Issue 4 p. 147-210 Free Access Déliberation et action publique First published: 20 January 2011 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1662-6370.2004.tb00044.xCitations: 2AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Axelrod, R. (1984). The Evolution of Cooperation New York: Basic books. Benhabib, S. (1996). “ Toward a Deliberative Model of Democratic Legitimacy”, in S. Benhabib (ed.), Democracy and Difference: Contesting the Boundaries of the Political Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 67– 94. Blondiaux, L. & Sintomer, Y. (2002). “L'impératif délibératif”, Politix 15 (57): 17– 35. Cohen, J. & Rogers, J. (1995). “ Solidarity, Democracy, Association”, in E.O. Wright (ed.), Associations and Democracy London-New York: Verso, pp. 236– 267. Cooke, M. (2000). “Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy”, Political Studies 48: 947– 969. Crozier, M. & Friedberg, E. (1981). L'acteur et le système Paris: Editions du Seuil. Fischer, F. (1995). Evaluating Public Policy Chicago: Nelson-Hall. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing Public Policy Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fischer, F. & Forester, J. (1993). The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning Londres: Duke University Press. Fishkin, J. S. (1991). Democracy and Deliberation New Haven: Yale University Press. Haas, P.M. (1992). “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization 46 (1): 1– 35. M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar, (eds.) (2003). Deliberative Policy Analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Hall, P. (1989). The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations Princeton: Princeton University Press. Hermet, G. (2004). “Un régime à pluralisme limité? A propos de la gouvernance démocratique”, Revue française de science politique 54 (1): 159– 178. Hunold, C. & Young, I.M. (1998). “Justice, Democracy, and Hazardous Siting”, Political Studies XLVI: 82– 95. Jobert, B. & Muller, P. (1987) L'État en action. Politiques publiques et corporatismes Paris: Presses universitaires de France. Kuebler, D. (1995). “Problèmes de mise en oeuvre de la politique sociale en milieu urbain: l'exemple des services médico-sociaux pour consommateurs de drogues”, Revue suisse de science politique 1.(4): 99– 120. Manin, B. (1985). “Volonté générale ou délibération? Esquisse d'une théorie de la délibération politique”, Le débat 33: 72– 93. March, J. & Olsen, J. (eds). (1989). Rediscovering Institutions New York: The Free Press. Marx Ferree, M., Gamson, W.A., Gerhards, J. & D. Rucht (2002). “Four models of the public sphere in modern democracies. Theory and Society 31: 289– 324. Mayntz, R. (1997). “ Politische Steuerung: Aufstieg, Niedergang und Transformation einer Theorie”, in R. Mayntz, Soziale Dynamik und Politische Steuerung. Theoretische und methodologische Ueberlegungen Frankfurt/Main-New York: Campus, pp. 263– 292. Offe, C. (1992). Thesen zur öffentlichen Anhörung der gemeinsamen Verfassungskommission zum Thema Bürgerbeteiligung/Plebiszite Mimeo: Bonn. Papadopoulos, Y. (1995). Complexité sociale et politiques publiques Paris: Montchrestien. Papadopoulos, Y. (2002). “ Démocratie, gouvernance, et ‘management de l'interdépendance’: des rapports complexes”, in J. Santiso (dir.), A la recherche de la démocratie. Mélanges offerts à Guy Hermet Paris: Karthala, pp. 133– 157. Papadopoulos, Y., (2003). “Cooperative Forms of Governance: Problems of Democratic Accountability in Complex Environments. European Journal of Political Research 42 (4): 473– 501. Sanders, L. (1997). “Against Deliberation”, Political Theory 25: 347– 376. Scharpf, F.W. (2000). “Institutions in Comparative Policy Research”, Comparative Political Studies 33 (6–7): 762– 790. Waelti, S. Kuebler, D. & Y. Papadopoulos (2004). “How Democratic is ‘Governance’? Lessons from Swiss Drug Policy. Governance 17 (1): 83– 113. Walzer, M. (1999). “ Deliberation, and What Else?”, in S. Macedo (ed.). Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement Oxford-New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 58– 69. Warren, M. (2002). “ Deliberative Democracy”, in A. Carter & G. Stokes (eds.). Democratic Theory Today Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 173– 202. Wildavsky, A. (1989). Speaking Truth to Power. The Art and craft of Policy Analysis New Brunswick/Oxford: Transaction Publishers. Trom, D. (1999). “De la réfutation de l'effet Nimby considérée comme une pratique militante. Notes pour une approche pragmatique de l'activité revendicative”, Revue française de science politique 49 (1): 31– 50. Young, I.M. (2000). Inclusion and Democracy Oxford: Oxford University Press. References Ackerman, Bruce et Fishkin, James (2003), “ Deliberation Day”, in James Fishkin et Peter Laslett (eds.). Debating Deliberative Democracy, Oxford, Blackwell Publishing: pp. 7– 30. Bacque, Marie-Hélène et Sintomer, Yves (1999) “ L'espace public dans les quartiers d'habitat social”, in Catherine Neveu (dir.). Espace public et citoyenneté locale, Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 115– 148. Badiou, Alain (1999). Abrégé de métapolitique, Paris, Seuil. Barber, Benjamin (1997). Démocratie forte. Paris, Desclée de Brouwer (Premièreédition: 1984). Benhabib, Sheyla (1996), “ Towards a deliberative model of democratic legitimacy” in Sheyla Benhabib (ed.). Democracy and difference. Contesting the boundaries of the political Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 67– 94. Bherer, Laurence (2003). La politique consultative de la Ville de Québec. Une lecture institutionnaliste du phénomène participatif. Thèse de science politique sous la direction de V. Hoffman-Martinot, IEP Bordeaux. Blatrix, Cécile (2002), “Devoir débattre. Les effets de l'institutionnalisation de la participation sur les formes de l'action collective”, Politix, 15 (57): 79– 102. Blondiaux, Loïc (1999), “ Représenter, délibérer ou gouverner ? Les assises politiques fragiles de la démocratie participative de quartier” in Loïc Blondiaux, Gérard Marcou et François Rangeon (dirs.). La démocratie locale. Représentation, participation et espace public Paris: P.U.F., pp. 367– 404. Blondiaux, Loïc et Sandrine Leveque (1999), “ La politique locale à l'épreuve de la démocratie” in C. Neveu (dir.). Espace public et engagement politique. Enjeux et logiques de la citoyenneté locale Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 17– 82. Blondiaux, Loïc (2000), “La démocratie par le bas. Prise de parole et délibération dans les conseils de quartier du XXè arrondissement”, Hermès, 26–27, pp. 323– 338. Blondiaux, Loïc et Yves Sintomer (2002), “ L'impératif délibératif”, Politix, no57: 17– 35. Blondiaux, Loïc (2003), “ Publics imaginés et publics réels. La sollicitation des habitants dans une expérience de participation locale”, in D. Cefaï et D. Pasquier (dirs.). Les sens du public. Publics politiques, publics médiatiques Paris: P.U.F., pp. 313– 326. Blondiaux, Loïc (2004), “ L'idée de démocratie participative. Enjeux, impensés et questions récurrentes”, in Marie-Hélène Bacqué et Yves Sintomer (dirs). Participation démocratique et gestion de proximité Paris: La Découverte (à paraître). Callon, Michel, Lascoumes, Pierre, Barthe, Yves (2001). Agir dans un monde incertain, Essais sur la démocratie technique Paris: Seuil. Carrel, Marion (2003), “ Saisir un public local. Habitants et professionnels du transport en confrontation dans un quartier d'habitat social”, in Claudia Barril et al (dirs.). Le public en action. Usages et limites de la notion d'espace public en sciences sociales Paris: L'Harmattan, pp. 219– 240. Defrance, Jacques (1988), “Donner la parole. La construction d'une relation d'échange”, Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 73: 52– 66. Drocourt, Eric, Isabelle Ras (2003), “Regards sur une scène de débat local. Une approche anthropologique des situations de délibération in B. Castagna et al (dirs.). La situation délibérative dans le débat public Tours: Presses universitaires François Rabelais (à paraître). Dryzek, John (2000). Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberal, Critics and Contestations New York: Oxford University Press. Elster, Jon (1994), “Argumenter et négocier dans deux assemblées constituantes”, Revue française de science politique, 44 (2): 210– 229. Jon Elster, (ed.) (1999). Deliberative democracy Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Fishkin, James (1993). Democracy and Deliberation: New Directions for Democratic Reform New Haven: Yale University Press. Fishkin, James (1997). The Voice of the People. Public Opinion and Democracy New Haven: Yale University Press. Fourniau, Jean-Michel (2004), “ Mésentente et situations délibératives. L'expérience de la participation aux débats publics dans le domaine de l'aménagement”, in B. Castagna et al. (dirs.). La situation délibérative dans le débat public. Tours, Presses universitaires François Rabelais (à paraître). Fraser, Nancy (2001), “Repenser la sphère publique: une contribution à la critique de la démocratie telle qu'elle existe réellement” in Loïc Blondiaux et Dominique Reynie (dirs.). L'opinion publique. Perspectives anglo-saxonnes. numéro spécial de la revue Hermès, 31 (Première édition du texte: 1992): 125– 156. Gutmann, Amy et Thompson Dennis (1996). Democracy and Disagreement Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Gutmann, Amy et Thompson, Dennis (2002), “Pourquoi la démocratie délibérative est-elle différente?”, Philosophiques, 29 (2): 193– 214. Habermas, Jürgen (1997), Droit et démocratie, Paris: Gallimard (Première édition: 1992). Hauptman, Emily (1999), “Review Essay: Deliberation = Legitimacy = Democracy?”, Political Theory, 27 (6): 857– 872. Mac Pherson, C.B. (1985), Principes et limites de la démocratie libérale, Paris: La Découverte. (Première édition: 1971). Manin, Bernard (2002), “L'idée de démocratie délibérative dans la science politique contemporaine. Introduction, généalogie et éléments critiques. Entretien avec L. Blondiaux”, Politix, 15 (57): 37– 56. Mansbridge, Jane (1980). Beyond adversary democracy, Chicago: Chicago University Press. Mansbridge, Jane (1999a), “ On the Idea that Participation Makes Better Citizen”, in Stephen Elkin et Karen Soltan (eds.). Citizen Competence and Democratic Institutions Philadelphie: Temple University Press, pp. 291– 325. Mansbridge, Jane (1999b), “ Everyday talk in the deliberative system”, in Stephen Macedo (ed.), Deliberative Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211– 242. Mendelberg, Tali (2002), “ The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence”, in Michaël Delli-Carpini et al.. Research in Micropolitics. vol. 6, Elsevier Press, pp. 152– 153. Mouffe, Chantal (1999), “Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?”, Social Research, 66 (3): 745– 759. Papadopoulos, Yannis (1995), Complexité sociale et politiques publiques, Paris: Montchrestien. Pateman, Carol (1970). Participation and Democratic Theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pernot, Hélène (2003). Un projet de démocratie à l'épreuve du quotidien syndical. Enquête ethnographique sur le fonctionnement interne de Sud-Ptt. Thèse de science politique sous la direction de P. Bacot, IEP de Lyon. Price, Vincent et Neijens, Peter (1997), “Opinion Quality in Public Opinion Research”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 9 (4): 336– 360. Price, Vincent et Neijens, Peter (1998), “Deliberative Polls: Towards Improved Measures of ‘Informed’ Public Opinion”, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10 (2): 145– 176. Rawls, John (1995). Libéralisme politique. Paris: P.U.F (Première édition: 1993). Rawls, John (2003). La justice comme équité. Paris: La Découverte (Première édition: 2001). Rowe, Gene et Frewer, Lynn (2000), “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation”, Science, Technology and Human Values, 25 (1): 3– 29. Rui, Sandrine (2004). La démocratie en débat. Les citoyens face à l'action publique. Paris, Armand Colin. Sanders, Lynn (1997), “Against deliberation”, Political Theory, 25: 347– 375. Schaut, Christine (2003), “Une participation sur ordonnance: les conseils consultatifs de locataires en région de Bruxelles-Capitale”, Espaces et sociétés, 113: 41– 58. Simard, Louis (2003). Conflits d'environnement et concertation: le ces des lignes THT en France et au Québec. Thèse de science politique sous la direction de C. Musselin, IEP Paris. Sintomer, Yves et Koehl, Eléonore (2002). Les jurys de citoyens berlinois. Rapport pour la Délégation Interministérielle à la Ville. Sintomer, Yves et Gret, Marion (2002). Porto Alegre, l'espoir d'une autre démocratie Paris: La Découverte. Sunstein, Cass (1996). Legal Reasoning and Political Conflict New York: Oxford University Press. Sunstein, Cass (1998), “ Agreeement without Theory”, in Stephen Macedo (ed.). Deliberative Politics. Essays on Democracy and Disagreement. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 123– 150. Talpin, Julien (2003). Une politique de la présence. Les vertus éducatives de la délibération et de la particiation au test des assemblées populaires argentines. Mémoire présenté pour le DEA de Pensée politique, sous la direction de J. Leca, IEP: Paris. Walzer, Michael (1999), “ Deliberation, and what else?”, in Stephen Macedo (ed.). Deliberative Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 58– 69. Young, Iris Marion (1996), “ Communication and the Other: Beyond Deliberative Democracy”, in Sheyla Benhabib (ed.). Democracy and Difference Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 120– 135. Young, Iris Marion (2000). Inclusion and Democracy New York: Oxford University Press. References Abelson, Julia, Pierre-Gerlier Forest, John Eyles, Patricia Smith, Elisabeth Martin and Francois-Pierre Gauvin (2003). “Deliberations about Deliberative Methods: Issues in the Design and Evaluation of Public Participation Processes”, Social Science and Medicine 57: 239– 251. Abers, Rebecca N. (2000). Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Ackerman, Bruce and James Fishkin (2002). “Deliberation Day”, Journal of Political Philosophy 10(2): 129– 152. Ackerman, Bruce and James Fishkin (2004). Deliberation Day New Haven: Yale University Press. Avritzer, Leonardo (2002). Democracy and the Public Sphere in Latin America Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2003). “ Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment”, in Archon Fung and Erik O. Wright (eds.). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance London: Verso, pp. 45– 76. Cohen, Joshua (1989). “ Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy”, in Alan Harmlin and Philip Petit (eds.). The Good Polity. Oxford: Blackwell. Cohen, Joshua (1996). “ Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy”, in Seyla Benhabib (ed.). Democracy and Difference: Changing Boundaries of the Political Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 95– 119. Cohen, Joshua with Charles Sabel (1997). “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy”, European Law Journal 3 (4): 313– 342. Cohen, Joshua with Charles Sabel (2003). “ Sovereignty and Solidarity in the EU”, in Jonathan Zeitlin and David Trubek (eds.). Governing Work and Welfare in a New Economy: European and American Experiments Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 345– 75. Crosby, Ned (1995). “ Citizen's Juries: One Solution for Difficult Environmental Questions”, in Ortwin Renn, Thomas Webler, and Peter Wiedelmann (eds.). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Boston: Kluiver Academic Press, pp. 157– 174. Ellis, Richard J. (2002). Democratic Delusions: The Initiative Process in America Lawrence: University Press of Kansas. Fung, Archon (2003). “Associations and Democracy: Between Theories, Hopes, and Realities”, Annual Review of Sociology 29: 515– 539. Fung, Archon (2003a). “Deliberative Democracy and International Labor Standards”, Governance 16(1): 51– 71. Fung, Archon (2003b). “Recipes for Public Spheres: Eight Institutional Design Choices and Their Consequences”, Journal of Political Philosophy 11 (3): 338– 367. Fung, Archon (2004). Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy Princeton: Princeton University Press. Archon Fung and Erik O. Wright, (eds.) (2003). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance London: Verso. Fung, Archon with Charles Sabel and Bradley Karkkainen (2000). Beyond Backyard Environmentalism Boston: Beacon Press. Fung, Archon with Charles Sabel and Dara O'rourke (2001). Can We Put an End to Sweatshops Boston: Beacon Press. Gastil, John (2000). By Popular Demand Los Angeles and Berkeley: University of California Press. Habermas, Jürgen (1975). Legitimation crisis Boston: Beacon Press. Habermas, Jürgen (1996). Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Magnette, Paul (unpublished). “ Democracy in the European Union: Why and How to Combine Representation and Participation. Papadopoulos, Yannis (1995). “A Framework for Analysis of Functions and Dysfunctions of Direct Democracy: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Perspectives”, Politics and Society 23(4): 289– 301. Smith, Graham and Corinne Wales (1999). “The Theory and Practice of Citizens' Juries”, Policy and Politics 27 (3): 295– 308. Sousa Santos, Boaventura de (1998). “Participatory Budgeting in Porto Alegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy”, Politics and Society 26 (4): 461– 510. References Fishkin, James (1991). Democracy and Deliberation New Haven: Yale University Press. Fishkin, James (1995). The Voice of the People New Haven: Yale University Press. Frey, Dieter, (1986). “Recent research on selective exposure”, in Leonard Berkowitz, (ed.). Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19: 41– 80. Hansen, Mogens Herman (1993). La démocratie athénienne à l'époque de Démosthène Paris: Les Belles Lettres. Lord, Charles, Lee Ross, Mark Lepper (1979). “Biased assimilation and attitude polarization. The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 2098– 2109. Lord, Charles, Mark Lepper, Elizabeth Preston (1984). “Considering the opposite: A corrective strategy for social judgment”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 1231– 1243. Luskin, Robert, James Fishkin, Roger Jowel (2002). “Considered opinions: deliberative polling in Britain”, British Journal of Political Science 32: 455– 487. Mill, John Stuart (1974). On Liberty. [1859], Penguin. Mutz, Diana, Paul Martin (2001). “Facilitating communication across lines of political difference: the role of mass media”, American Political Science Review 95(1): 97– 114. Popper, Karl (1985). “ Opinion publique et principes libéraux”, reproduit dans Conjectures et Réfutations. [1963] Paris: Payot. Rabin, Matthew (1998). “Psychology and economics”, Journal of Economic Literature 36: 11– 46. Schudson, Michael (1997). “Why conversation is not the soul of democracy”, Critical Studies in Mass Communications 14(4): 297– 309. Sunstein, Cass R. (2000). “Deliberative trouble? Why groups go to extremes”, Yale Law Journal 110: 71– 119. Sunstein, Cass R. (2001). Republic.com Princeton: Princeton University Press. Sunstein, Cass R. (2002). “The Law of Group Polarization”, The Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2): 175– 195. References Amy, Douglas (1990). “ Decision Techniques for Environmental Policy: A Critique”, in Robert Paehlke and Douglas Torgerson (eds.). Managing Leviathan: Environmental Policies and the Administrative State Peterborough: Broadview Press, pp. 59– 80. Baiocchi, Gianpaolo (2003). “ Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment”, in Archon Fung and Erik O. Wright (eds.). Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance. London: Verso. pp. 45– 76. Bullard, Robert D. (1993). Environmental Justice and Communities of Color San Francisco: Sierra Club. Coates, Dennis, Victoria Heid, and Michael Munger (1994). “Not Equitable, Not Efficient: U.S. Policy on Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 13: 526– 541. Deleon, Peter (1997). Democracy and the Policy Sciences Albany: SUNY. Dobson, Andrew (1999). Justice and the Environment Oxford: Oxford University Press. Fiorino, Daniel J. (1990). “Citizen Participation and Environmental Risk: A Survey of Institutional Mechanisms”, Science, Technology, and Human Values 15: 226– 243. Fischer, Frank (2000). Citizens, Experts, and the Environment: The Politics of Local Knowledge Durham: Duke University Press. Fraser, Nancy (1998). “ Social Justice in the Age of Identity Politics: Redistribution, Recognition, and Participation”, The Tanner Lectures on Human Values, Vol. 19, Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. Frey, Bruno S. and Felix Oberholzer-Gee (1996). “Fair Siting Procedures: An Empirical Analysis of Their Importance and Characteristics”, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 15: 353– 376. Gerrard, Michael B. (1994). Whose Waste, Whose Risk Fear and Fairness in Toxic and Nuclear Waste Siting Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Hunold, Christian (2002). “Canada's Low-Level Radioactive Waste Disposal Problem: Voluntarism Reconsidered”, Environmental Politics 11: 49– 72. Hunold, Christian and Iris M. Young (1998). “Justice, Democracy and Hazardous Siting”, Political Studies 46: 82– 95. Ibitayo, Olurominiyi O. and K. David Pijawka (1999). “Reversing NIMBY: An Assessment of State Strategies for Siting Hazardous Waste Facilities”, Environment and Planning C 17: 379– 389. Kunreuther, Howard, Kevin Fitzgerald, and Thomas D. Aarts (1993). “Siting Noxious Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting Credo”, Risk Analysis 13: 301– 318. Lake, Robert W. and Lisa Disch (1992). “Structural Constraints and Pluralist Contradictions in Hazardous Waste Regulation”, Environment and Planning A 24: 663– 681. Mcavoy, Gregory (1999). Controlling Technocracy: Citizen Rationality and the NIMBY Syndrome Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press. Paterson, D. J. and Richard N. L. Andrews (1995). “Procedural and Substantive Fairness in Risk Decisions: Comparative Risk Assessment Procedures”, Policy Studies Journal 23: 85– 95. Rabe, Barry G. (1994). Beyond NIMBY: Hazardous Waste Siting in Canada and the United States Washington, DC: Brookings. Ortwin Renn, Thomas Webler, and Peter Wiedemann, (eds.) (1995). Fairness and Competence in Citizen Participation: Evaluating Models for Environmental Discourse Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Schlosberg, David (1999). Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism Oxford: Oxford University Press. U. S. General Accounting Office. (1999). Low-Level Radioactive Wastes: States Are Not Developing Disposal Facilities. Washington, DC (GAO/Rced-99–238). Young, Iris M. (1990). Justice and the Politics of Difference Princeton: Princeton University Press. Young, Iris M. (2000). Democracy and Inclusion New York: Oxford University Press. References Amy, Douglas J. (1987). The Politics of Environmental Mediation New York: Columbia University Press. Aubert, Vilhelm (1963). “Competition and Dissensus: Two Types of Conflict and of Conflict Resolution”, Journal of Conflict Resolution 7: 26– 42. Austin, John L. (1962). How to do things with Words London: The William James Lectures. Benz, Arthur (1994). Kooperative Verwaltung. Funktionen, Voraussetzungen, Folgen Baden-Baden: Nomos. Elster, Jon (1986). “ The Market and the Forum: Three Varieties of Political Theory”, in Jon Elster & Aanund Hylland (ed.). Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 103– 132. Elster, Jon (1992). “ Arguing and Bargaining in the Federal Convention and the Assemblée Constituante”, in Raino Malnes & Arild Underdal (ed.). Rationality and Institutions. Essays in honour of Knut Midgaard Oslo: Universitetsforlaget, pp. 13– 51. Habermas, J. (1984). Theory of Communicative Action, Vol. 1. London: Heinemann. Habermas, Jürgen (1971). “ Vorbereitende Bemerkungen zu einer Theorie der kommunikativen Kompetenz”, in Jürgen Habermas & Niklas Luhmann, Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 101– 141. Holzinger, Katharina (2001a). “Negotiation in Public Policy-Making: Exogenous Barriers to Succesful Dispute Resolution”, Journal of Public Policy 21: 81– 106. Holzinger, Katharina (2001b). “Evaluating Environmental Mediation. Mediation in the Waste Management Programme of Neuss County, Germany. Results of a Participant Survey”, Mediation Quarterly 18: 397– 427. Holzinger, Katharina & Helmut Weidner (1997). Das Neusser Mediationsverfahren im politischen Umfeld. WZB Discussion paper FS II 97–303. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung. Majone, Giandomenico (1989). Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy-Process New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Risse, Thomas (2000). ““Let's Argue!” Communicative Action in World Politics”, International Organization 54: 1– 39. Risse, Thomas, Stephen Ropp & Kathryn Sikkink (1999). The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Schimmelfennig, Frank (1997). “Rhetorisches Handeln in der internationalen Politik”, Zeitschrift für Internationale Beziehungen 4: 219– 254. Searle, John R. (1969). Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Searle, John R. (1974). “ Was ist ein Sprechakt?”, in Siegfried J. Schmidt (ed.). Pragmatik I. München: Beck, pp. 84– 102. Susskind, Lawrenc & Jeffrey Cruikshank (1987). Breaking the Impasse. Consensual Approaches to Resolving Disputes Basic Books: New York. Citing Literature Volume10, Issue4December 2004Pages 147-210 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)