Existing approaches incorporating replacement, reduction and refinement of animal testing: applicability in food and feed risk assessment
2009; Wiley; Volume: 7; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1052
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 7, Issue 6 1052 OpinionOpen Access Existing approaches incorporating replacement, reduction and refinement of animal testing: applicability in food and feed risk assessment European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Search for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)Search for more papers by this author First published: 08 June 2009 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1052Citations: 3 Panel members: Sue Barlow, Andrew Chesson, John D. Collins, Albert Flynn, Anthony Hardy, Klaus-Dieter Jany, Ada Knaap, Harry Kuiper, John Christian Larsen, David Lovell2, Pierre Le Neindre, Jan Schans, Josef Schlatter, Vittorio Silano, Staffan Skerfving and Philippe Vannier. Acknowledgement: The European Food Safety Authority wishes to thank the members of the Working Group for the preparation of this Opinion: Sue Barlow, Diane Benford, Erik Dybing (member of the working group until July 2008), Alberto Mantovani, Otto Meyer, David Morton, Iona Pratt, Horst Spielmann (Vice-Chair) and Pierre Le Neindre (Chair). The contributions received by Marlies Halder (DG JRC), Marcelle Holloway (DG Environment) and Antonio Lacerda (DG Enterprise) were also highly appreciated. Adoption date: 8 April 2009 Published date: 8 June 2009 Question number: EFSA-Q-2005-231 AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat References Ashby J. and Tennant R.W. 1991. Definitive realtionshiips among chemical structure, carcionogencity and mutagenicity for 301 chemicals tested by the US NTP. Mutat Res. 257: 229– 306. Erratum in: Mutat Res 1994 317:175. Ashby J. and Paton D. 1993. The influence of chemical structure on the extent and sites of carcinogenesis for 522 rodent carcinogens and 55 different human carcinogen exposures. Mutat Res. 286: 3– 74. Ashby J. 1996. Alternatives to the 2-species bioassay for the identification of potential human carcinogens. Human and Experimental Toxicology, 196, 15: 183– 202. Balls M., Blaauboer B.J., Brusick D., Frazier J., Lamb D., Pemberton M., Reinhardt C., Roberfroid M., Rosenkranz H., Schmid B., Spielmann H., Stammati A.L. and Walum E. 1990. Report and recommendations of the CAAT/ERGATT workshop on the validation of toxicity testing procedures. ATLA 18, 313– 336. Balls M., Blaauboer B.J., Fentem J., Bruner L., Combes R.D., Ekwall B., Fielder R.J., Guillouzo A., Lewis R.W., Lovell D.P., Reinhardt C.A., Repetto G., Sladowski D., Spielmann H. and Zucco F. 1995. Practical aspects of the validation of toxicity test procedures. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 5. ATLA 23, 129– 147. Balls M., Botham P.A., Bruner L.H. & Spielmann H. 1995. The EC/HO international validation study on alternatives to the Draize eye irritation test. Toxicology in Vitro 9, 871– 929. Balls M., Berg N., Bruner L.H., Curren R., de Silva O., Earl L.K., Esdaile D.J., Fentem J.H., Liebsch M., Ohno Y., Prinsen M.K., Spielmann H. & Worth, A.P. 1999. Eye irritation testing: the way forward. The report and recommendations of ECVAM workshop 34. ATLA 27, 53– 77. Benigni R., Netzeva T.I., Benfenati E., Bossa C., Franke R., Helma C., Hulzebos E., Marchant C., Richard A., Woo Y.T., Yang C. 2007. The expanding role of predictive toxicology: an update on the (Q)Sar models for mutagens and carcinogens. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev., 25, 53– 97. Blaaubour B.J. 2001. Toxicodynamic modelling and the interpretation of in vitro toxicity data. Toxicol letter 31, 120: 111– 123. Blaaubour B.J. 2002. The necessity of biokinetic information in the interpretation of in vitro toxicity data. ATLA 30 supp. 2: 85– 91. Braunbeck T., Boettcher M., Hollert H., Kosmehl T., Lammer E., Leist E., Rudolf M., Seitz N. 2005. Towards an alternative for the acute fish LC(50) test in chemical assessment: the fish embryo toxicity test goes multi-species -an update. ALTEX, 22: 87– 102. Bremer S., Cortvrindt R., Daston G., Eletti B., Mantovani A., Maranghi F., Pelkonen O., Ruhdel I., Spielmann H. 2005. Reproductive and Developmental Toxicity. ATLA, 33 (Suppl. 1): 183– 209. Burg B. 2006. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo screening models for androgenic and estrogenic activities. Toxicol Sci. Jan; 89 (1): 173– 87. Boobis A.R., Cohen S.M., Dellarco V., McGregor D., Meek M.E., Vickers C., Willcocks D., Farland W. 2006. IPCS framework for analyzing the relevance of a cancer mode of action for humans. Crit Rev Toxicol 36 (10): 781– 792. Chamberlain M., Gad S.C., Gautheron P., Prinsen M.K. 1997. IRAG (Interagency Regulatory Alternatives Group) working group 1. Organotypic models for the assessment/prediction of ocular irritation. Food and Chemical Toxicology 35, 23– 37. Cheeseman M.A., Machuga E.J. and Bailey, A.B. 1999. A tiered approach to threshold of regulation. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 37, 387– 412. Christian M.S. & Diener R.M. 1996. Soaps and detergents – alternatives to animal eye irritation Chapter 3.3: eye irritation 73 tests. Journal of the American College of Toxicology 15, 1– 44. COC - Committee on Carcinogenicity of Chemicals in Food, Consumer Products and Environment. 1991. Report on Health and Social Subjects 42, Guidelines for the Evaluation of Chemicals for Carcinogenicity. London, HMSO. Cooper R.L., Lamb J.C., Barlow S.M., Bentley K., Brady A.M., Doerrer N.G., Eisenbrandt D.L., Fenner-Crisp P.A., Hines R.N., Irvine L.F.H., Kimmel C.A., Koeter H., Li A.A., Makris S.L., Sheets L.P., Speijers G.J.A. and Whitby K.E. 2006. A tiered approach to life stages testing for agricultural chemical safety assessment. Crit Rev Toxicol 36, 69– 98. Corvi R., Albertini S., Hartung T., Hoffmann S., Maurici D., Pfuhler S., Van Benthem J., Vanparys P. 2008. “ECVAM retrospective validation of in vitro micronucleus test (MNT)”. Mutagenesis 23 (4): 271– 283. Council Directive 86/609/EEC of 24 November 1986 on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal L 358, published on 18.12.1986, 1– 28. Council Directive 91/414/EEC of 15 July 1991 concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market. Official Journal L230, published 19.08.1991. Council Regulation (EC) No 440/2008 of 30 May 2008 laying down test methods pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1907/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH). Official Journal of the European Union L142, published on 31.5.2008. Curren R.D., Southee J.A., Spielmann H., Liesch M., Fentem J.H. and Balls M. 1995. The role of prevalidation in the development, validation and acceptance of alternative methods. ATLA 23, 211– 217. de Wolf W., Comber M., Douben P., Gimeno S., Holt M., Léonard M., Lillicrap A., Sijm D., Van Egmond R., Weisbrod A., Whale G. 2007. Animal use replacement, reduction, and refinement: development of an integrated testing strategy for bioconcentration of chemicals in fish. Integr Environ Assess Manag. 3, 3– 17. DIN 2001. German standard methods for the examination of water, waste water and sludge – Subanimal testing (group T) – Part 6: Toxicity to fish. Determination of the nonacute-poisonous effect of waste water to fish eggs by dilution limits (T 6). DIN 38415–6; German Standardization Organization. Draize J.H., Woodard G. & Calvery H.O. 1944. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied topically to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics 82, 377– 390. Doe J.E., Boobis A.R., Blacker A., Dellarco V., Doerrer N.G., Franklin C., Goodman J.I., Kronenberg J.M., Lewis R., Mcconnell E.E., Mercier T., Moretto A., Nolan C., Padilla S., Phang W., Solecki R., Tilbury L., Van Ravenzwaay B., Wolf D.C. 2006 “A Tiered Approach to Systemic Toxicity Testing for Agricultural Chemical Safety Assessment”. Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 36: 37– 68. ECETOC 2005. Alternative testing approaches in environmental safety assessment. Technical Report No 97. ISSN-0773- 8072– 97. ECHA 2008a. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.6: QSARs and grouping of chemicals. guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r6_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08. ECHA 2008b. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7a: Endpoint specific guidance. guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7a_en.pdf?vers=20_08_08. ECHA 2008c. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7b: Endpoint specific guidance. guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7b_en.pdf ?vers=20_08_08. ECHA 2008d. Guidance on information requirements and chemical safety assessment. Chapter R.7c: Endpoint specific guidance. guidance.echa.europa.eu/docs/guidance_document/information_requirements_r7c_en.pdf ?vers=20_08_08. EFSA 2004. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in contact with Food (AFC) on a request from the Commission related to Flavouring Group Evaluation 11 (FGE.11): Aliphatic dialcohols, diketones, and hydroxyketones from chemical group 10 (Commission Regulation (EC) No 1565/2000 of 18 July 2000) (Adopted on 9 December 2004). www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178620762424.htm. EFSA 2005. Scientific report. Aspects of the biology and the welfare of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Annex to the EFSA Journal 292, 1– 136. EFSA 2006. “Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues on a request from the Commission related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market – residues”. The EFSA Journal, 364, 1– 27. EFSA 2007a. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues on a request from the Commission related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market – toxicological and metabolism studies. The EFSA Journal, 449, 1– 60. EFSA 2007b. “Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant Protection Products and their residues on a request from the Commission related to the revision of Annexes II and III to Council Directive 91/414/EEC concerning the placing of plant protection products on the market – ecotoxicological studies”. The EFSA Journal 461, 1– 44. EFSA 2007c. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Plant protection products and their residues (PPR) on the Acute Reference Dose (ARfD) for imazalil, The EFSA Journal 460, 1– 15. EFSA 2007d. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on the Introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA - The EFSA Journal 587, 1– 16. EFSA 2008a. GMO Panel Report ‘Safety and Nutritional Assessment of Genetically Modified Plants and Derived Food and Feed: The Role of Animal Feeding Trials, Food & Chemical Toxicology 46, supplement 1. EFSA 2008b. The maintenance of the list of QPS microorganisms intentionally added to food or feed. Scientific Opinion of the Biological Hazards Panel. The EFSA Journal 923, 1– 48. EFSA 2008c. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant protection products and their Residues (PPR) on the Science behind the Guidance Document on risk assessment for birds and mammals. The EFSA Journal (2008) 734, 1– 181. EPA 2005. The juvenile/peripubertal assays, also known as the “Female and Male Pubertal Assays”. Available at: www.epa.gov/endo/pubs/edmvac/pubertal_story_111605.pdf. EPA 2008. The use of structure-activity relationships (SAR) in the high production Volume Challenge Program. Available at: www.epa.gov/oppt/chemrtk/pubs/general/sarfinl1.htm. European Commission 2000a. Commission Directive 2000/33/EC of 25 April 2000 adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Annex I – B.40 Skin corrosion. Official Journal of the European Communities L 136; 91– 97. European Commission 2000b. Commission Directive 2000/33/EC of 25 April 2000 adapting to technical progress for the 27th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. Annex II – B.41 Phototoxicity. Official Journal of the European Communities L 136; 98– 107. European Commission 2004. Annex 2D to Commission Directive 2004/73/EC adapting to technical progress for the 29th time Council Directive 67/548/EEC on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions relating to the classification, packaging and labelling of dangerous substances. European Commission 2007. Commission recommendation 2007/526/EC on guidelines for the accommodation and care of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes. Official Journal of the European Union L197/1, published on 30.7.2007. European Convention on protection of vertebrate used for experimental and other scientific purposes – Strasburg 18.03.1986, amended 2.12 2005 (ETS 123). conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/123.htm. FELASA 1994. Recommendations for the health monitoring of mouse, rat, hamster, guinea-pig and rabbit breeding colonies. Report of the Federation of European Laboratory Animal Science Associations Laboratory Animals 28, 1– 12. FELASA 2002. Recommendations for the health monitoring of rodent and rabbit colonies in breeding and experimental units. Laboratory Animals 36, 20– 42. Fentem J.H., Archer G.E.B., Balls M., Botham P.A., Curren R.D., Earl L.K., Esdaile D.J., Holzhütter H.G., Liebsch M. 1998. The ECVAM international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity. 2. Results and evaluation by the management team. Toxicology in Vitro 12, 483– 524. Festing M.F.W., Overend P., Gaines Das R., Cortina Borja M., Berdoy M. 2002. The Design of Animal Experiments: Reducing the Number of Animals in Research through Better Experimental Design. Laboratory Animal Handbooks Series, 14. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press. Flammang T.J., von Tungeln L.S., Kadlubar F.F., and Fu P.P. 1997. Neonatal mouse assay for tumorigenicity: Alternative to the chronic rodent bioassay. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 26, 230– 240. Gallegos Saliner A., Patlewicz G., Worth A.P. 2006. Review of literature-based models for skin and eye irritation and corrosion. JRC report EUR 22320 EN. European Chemicals Bureau, Ispra, Italy. Accesible from: www.ecb.jrc.it. Gelbke HP, Kayser M, Poole A. 2004. OECD test strategies and methods for endocrine disruptors. Toxicology. Dec 1; 205 (1–2): 17– 25. Gerner I., Graetschel G., Kahl J. & Schlede E. 2000a. Development of a decision support system for the introduction of alternative methods into local irritancy/corrositivity testing strategies. Development of a relational database. ATLA 28, 11– 28. Gerner I., Zinke S., Graetschel G. & Schlede E. 2000b. Development of a decision support system for the introduction of alternative methods into local irritancy/corrosivity testing strategies. Creation of fundamental rules for a decision support system. ATLA 28, 665– 698. Gerner I., Spielmann H., Hoefer T., Liebsch M., Herzler M. 2004. Regulatory use of (Q)SARs in toxicological hazard assessment strategies. SAR QSAR Environ Res.; 15 (5–6): 359– 6. Gerner I., Liebsch M., Spielmann H. 2005. Assessment of the eye irritating properties of chemicals by applying alternatives to the Draize rabbit eye test: the use of QSARs and in vitro tests for the classification of eye irritation. ATL. 33: 351– 67. Halle W., Liebsch M., Traue D., Spielmann H. 1997. Reduction of the numbers of animals used for the classification of the acute oral toxicity of chemicals by taking into account cytotoxicity data from the Registry of Cytotoxicity. ALTEX 14 (1), 8– 15. Haneke K.E., Tice R.R., Carson B.L., Margolis B.H. & Stokes W.S. 2001. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. III. Data analysis completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 34, 274– 286. Hinderling P.H. 1997. Red blood cells: a neglected compartment in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacol Rev.; 49 (3): 279– 95. Hareng L., Pellizzer C., Bremer S., Schwarz M., Hartung T. 2005. The integrated project ReProTect: a novel approach in reproductive toxicity hazard assessment. Reprod Toxicol.; 20 (3): 441– 52. Hartmann E, Strauss V, Eiben R, Freyberger A, Kaufmann W, Loof I, Reissmueller. 2008. “ESTP comments on the draft updated OECD test guideline 407”. Expo Toxicol Pathol, 59 (5): 297– 300. Hinderung PH. 1997. Commentary ‘Prediction of absolute bioavailability for drugs using oral and renal clearance following a single oral dose: a critical review’ (I. Mahmood). Biopharmaceutic and Drug Disposition 18 (9), 821– 4. Hoeger B., Jeram S., Holt M., Douben P., Halder M. 2006. Reduction of animal use in acute aquatic toxicity testing: Further development of the threshold approach and its application to existing chemicals and plant production products. Poster presentation at 16th Annual SETAC Europe meeting The Hague, NL. Hoekzema C., Murk J.A., Van de Waart B.J., van der Hoeven J.C.M., de Roode D.F. 2006. Alternative approaches can greatly reduce the number of fish used for acute toxicity testing. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22, 1322– 1325. Holzhütter H.G., Genschow E., Diener W., Schlede E. 2003. Dermal and inhalation acute toxic class methods: test procedures and biometric evaluations for the Globally Harmonized Classification System. Arch Toxicol 77, 243– 254. Hurtt M.E., Cappon G.D., Browning A. 2003. Proposal for a tiered approach to developmental toxicity testing for veterinary pharmaceutical products for food-producing animals. Food Chem Tox 41, 611– 619. Hutchinson T.H., Barrett S., Buzby M., Constable D., Hartmann A., Hayes E., Huggett D., Länge R., Lillicrap A.D., Straub J.O., Thompson R.S. (2003). A strategy to reduce the numbers of fish used in acute ecotoxicity testing of pharmaceuticals. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 22, 3031– 3036. ICH 1997. S1B. Testing for Carcinogenicity of Pharmaceuticals. Available at: www.ich.org/cache/compo/276-254-1.html. ISO 2007. Water quality – Determination of the acute toxicity of waste water to zebrafish eggs (Danio rerio). ISO 15088:2007, International Organization for Standardization. IPCS. Global Assessment of the State-of-the-Science of Endocrine Disruptors. International Programme on Chemical Safety. 2002. Editors: T Damstra, S Barlow, A Bergman, R Kavlock, and G Kraak. World Health Organization, Geneva. WHO/IPCS/EDC/02.2, 180 p. Also at ehp.niehs.nih.gov/who. Jeram S., Riego Sintes J.M., Halder M., Baraibar Fentanes J., Sokull-Klüttgen B., Hutchinson T.H. 2005. A strategy to reduce the use of fish in acute ecotoxicity testing of new chemical substances notified in the European Union. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 42, 218– 224. Kasper P, Uno Y, Mauthe R, Asano N, Douglas G, Matthews E, Moore M, Mueller L, Nakajima M, Singer T, Speit G; 2007. IWGT Workgroup. “Follow-up testing of rodent carcinogens not positive in the standard genotoxicity testing battery: IWGT workgroup report”. Mutat Res, 627 (1): 106– 16. Kimber I., Dearman R.J., Basketter D.A., Ryan C.A. & Gerberick, G.F. 2002. The local lymph node assay: past, present and future. Contact Dermatitis 47, 315– 328. Kimber I., Dearman R.J., Betts C.J., Gerberick G.F., Ryan C.A., Kern P.S., Patlewicz G.Y., Basketter D.A. 2006. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization: a cut-down screen to reduce animal requirements? Contact Dermatitis; 54 (4): 181– 5. Kirkland D., Aardema M., Henderson L., Müller L. 2005. “Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens I. Sensitivity, specificity and relative predictivity” Mutat Res, 584 (1–2): 1– 256. Kirkland D., Aardema M., Müller L., Makoto H. 2006. Evaluation of the ability of a battery of three in vitro genotoxicity tests to discriminate rodent carcinogens and non-carcinogens II. Further analysis of mammalian cell results, relative predictivity and tumour profiles. Mutat Res, 608 (1): 29– 42. Kirkland D., Pfuhler S., Tweats D., Aardema M., Corvi R., Darroudi F., Elhajouji A., Glatt H., Hastwell P., Hayashi M., Kasper P., Kirchner S., Lynch A., Marzin D., Maurici D., Meunier J.R., Müller L., Nohynek G., Parry J., Parry E., Thybaud V., Tice R., Van Benthem J., Vanparys P., White P. 2007. How to reduce false positive results when undertaking in vitro genotoxicity testing and thus avoid unnecessary follow-up animal tests: Report of an ECVAM Workshop. Mutat Res, 628 (1): 31– 55. Kirkland D., Kasper P., Müller L., Corvi R., Speit G. 2008. Recommended lists of genotoxic and non-genotoxic chemicals for assessment of the performance of new or improved genotoxicity tests: a follow-up to an ECVAM workshop. Mutat Res. 31; 653 ( 1– 2):99-108. Epub 2008 Apr 11. Krishna G. and Hayashi M. 2000. “In vivo rodent micronucleus assay: protocol, conduct and data interpretation”. Mutat Res, 455 (1–2): 155– 66. Kroes R., Galli C., Munro I., Schilter B., Tran L.A., Walker R., Wurtzen G. 2000. Threshold of toxicological Concern for chemical substances present in the diet: a practical tool for assessing the need for toxicity testing. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 38, 255– 312. Kroes R., Renwick A.G., Cheeseman M., Kleiner J., Mangelsdorf I., Piersma, A., Schilter B., Schlatter J., Van Schothorst F., Vos J.G. and Wurtzen G. 2004. Structure-based Thresholds of Toxicological Concern (TTC): Guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 42, 65– 83. Liebsch M., Traue D, Spielmann H., Uphill P., Wilkins S., Wiemann C., Kaufmann T., Remmele M. & Holzhuetter H-G. 2000. The ECVAM prevalidation study on the use of EpiDerm for skin corrosivity testing. ATLA 28, 371– 401. Mantovani A. 2006 Risk assessment of endocrine disrupters. The role of toxicological studies. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1076: 239– 252. Maurici D., Aardema M., Corvi R., Kleber M., Krul C., Laurent C., Loprieno N., Pasanen M., Pfuhler S., Phillips B., Prentice D., Sabbioni E., Sanner T., Vanparys P. 2005. Carcinogenicity. ATLA 33, suppl 1, 177– 182. McClain R.M., Keller D, Casciano D., Fu P., MacDonald J., Popp J., and Sagartz J. 2001. Neonatal Mouse Model: Review of Methods and results. Toxicologic. Pathology, vol 29 (Suppl) 128– 137. Meylan W.M., Howard P.H., Boethling R.S., Aronson D., Printup H., Gouchie S. 1999. Improved method for estimating bioconcetration/bioaccumulation factor from octanol/water partition coefficient. Environ Toxicol Chem.; 18: 664– 672. Munro I.C., Ford R.A., Kennepohl E. and Sprenger J.G. 1996. Correlation of a structural class with no-observed-effect levels: a proposal for establishing a threshold of concern. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 34, 829– 867. Munro I.C., Kennepohl E., Kroes R. 1999. A procedure for the safety evaluation of flavouring substances. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 37, 207– 232. Nagel R. 2002. DarT: The embryo test with the zebrafish Danio rerio – a general model in ecotoxicology and toxicology. Altern Tierexp 19: 38– 48. Nagel R. and Isberner K. 1998. Testing of chemicals with fish – a critical evaluation of tests with special regard to zebrafish. In: Braunbeck T, Hinton DE and Streit B: Fish Ecotoxicology. Basel, pp 337– 352. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS - 1997). Validation and Regulatory Acceptance of Toxicological Test Methods: A report of the ad hoc Interagency Coordinating Committee on the Validation of Alternative Methods (ICCVAM). NIH Publication No. 97–3981, NIEHS, Research Triangle Park, NC, USA. iccvam.niehs.nih.gov/docs/about_docs/validate.pdf. NIH 1999. Corrositex®: an in vitro test method for assessing dermal corrosivity potential of chemicals. NIH Publication No. 99–4495, 236pp. Research Triangle Park, NC, USA: NIEHS. OECD 1996. Report of the SETAC/OECD Workshop on Avian Toxicity Testing. OECD/GD (96) 166. OECD 2000. Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No. 19: Guidance Document on the Recognition Assessment and Use of Clinical Signs as Humane Endpoints for Experimental Animals Used in Safety Evaluation. OECD 2001. Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No. 24: Guidance Document on Acute Oral Toxicity Testing, 24pp. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD 2004. OECD principles for the Validation, for Regulatory Purposes, of (Quantitative) Structure-Activity Relationships Models. OECD 2005. Guidance Document on the Validation and International Acceptance of New or Updated Test Methods for Hazard Assessment. OECD Series on Testing and Assessment No. 34, ENV/JM/MONO(2005) 14, 96 pp. Paris, France: OECD. applil.oecd.org/olis/2005doc.nsf/linkto/env-jm-mono(2005)14. www.oecd.Org/document/23/0,2340,en_2649_34365_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html#OEC D_Principles_for_the_Validation. OECD 2008a. Environmental Health and Safety Monograph Series on Testing and Assessment No. 39: Draft guidance document on acute inhalation toxicity testing. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. OECD 2008b. Draft Extended One-Generation Reproductive Toxicity Test. Test Guideline. Merged draft version 4, 2008- 06– 18. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/22/20/40899803.pdf. OECD 2008c. OECD Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships [(Q)SARs] Project. Available at:. www.oecd.org/document/23/0,3343,en_2649_34379_33957015_1_1_1_1,00.html. OECD 2008d. Draft Detailed Review Paper on Transgenic Rodent Mutation Assays. Prepared by Lambert IB et al., Environmental Directorate, OECD, 2nd draft May 2008. Available at: www.oecd.org/dataoecd/43/38/40830957.pdf. Pavan M., Netzeva T.I. and Worth AP 2006. EUR Technical Report 22327 EN. Review of QSAR Models for Bioconcentration. Ispra, Italy. Pelkonen O., Boobis AR, Gundert-Remy U. 2001. In vitro prediction of gastrointestinal absorption and bioavailability: an experts' meeting report. Eur J Clin Pharmacol; 57 (9): 621– 9. Pelkonen O., Turpeinen M., Uusitalo J., Rautio A., Raunio H. 2005. Prediction of drug metabolism and interactions on the basis of in vitro investigations. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 96 (3): 167– 75. Piersma AH. 2004.Validation of alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing. Toxicol Lett. 149 (1–3): 147– 53. RIVM 2004. RIVM report 340700001/2004. Transgenic mice as alternatives in carcinogenicity testing: current status. Available at: rivm.openrepository.com/rivm/bitstream/10029/8911/1/340700001.pdf. Reuter U, Heinrich-Hirsch B, Hellwig J, Holzum B, Welsch F. 2003. Evaluation of OECD screening tests 421 (reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test) and 422 (combined repeated dose toxicity study with the reproduction/developmental toxicity screening test). Regul Toxicol Pharmacol.; 38 (1): 17– 26. Robinson S., Chapman K., Delongeas JL., Donald E., David Dreher D., Festag M., Kervyn S., Lampo A., Nahas K., Nogues V., Ockert D. Quinn K., Old S., Pickersgill N., Somers K., Stark C., Stei P., Waterson L. 2008. A European pharmaceutical company initiative challenging the regulatory requirement for acute toxicity studies in pharmaceutical drug development, Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 50, 345– 52. Rorije E. & Hulzebos E. 2005. Evaluation of (Q)SARs for the prediction of Skin Irritation/Corrosion Potential. Physico-chemical exclusion rules. Final report for ECB contract IHCP.B430206. European Chemicals Bureau, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy. Accessible from: www.ecb.jrc.it. Russel W.M.S. & Burch R.L.(1959). The principles of humane experimental techniques, 238pp. London UK: Methuen. SCF 2001. Guidelines of the Scientific Committee on Food for the Presentation of an Application for Safety Assessment of a Substance to be Used in Food Contact Materials Prior to its Authorisation. Adopted 18 May 1990. Reports of the Scientific Committee for Food, Twenty-Sixth Series. Commission of the European Communities, Luxembourg. Available at: ec.europa.eu/food/fs/sc/scf/out82_en.pdf. Schiede E. & Gerner I. (1995). The Draize eye test and progress in development and acceptance of alternatives to this test in Europe. In The World Congress on Alternatives and Animals Use in the Life Sciences: Education, Research, Testing (ed. A.M. Goldberg & L.F.M. Van Zutphen), pp. 333– 336. New York, USA: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Schulte C., Nagel R. 1994. Testing acute toxicity in the embryo of zebrafish (Brachydanio rerio) as an alternative to the acute fish test: preliminary results. ATLA 22: 12– 19. Seely JC. 2008. Toxicology and pathology considerations for the design of juvenile animal studies. Lab Anim; 37 (5): 206– 9. Silva O. de, Cottin M., Dami N., Roguet R., Catroux P., Toufic A., Sicard C., Dossou K.G., Gerner I., Schlede E., Spielmann H., Gupta K.C. & Hill R.N. 1997. Evaluation of eye irritation potential: statistical analysis and tier testing strategies. Food and Chemical Toxicology 35, 159– 164. Spielmann H., Balls M., Dupuis J., Pape W.J., Pechovitch G., de Silva O., Holzhütter H.G., Clothier R., Desolle P., Gerberick F., Liebsch M., Lovell W.W., Maurer T., Pfannenbecker U., Potthast J.M., Csato M., Sladowski D., Steiling W., Brantom P. 1998a. The International EU/COLIPA In Vitro Phototoxicity Validation Study: Results of Phase II (Blind Trial). Part 1: The 3T3 NRU Phototoxicity Test. Toxicology In Vitro 12, 305– 327. Spielmann H., Balls M., Dupuis J., Pape WJW., de Silva O., Holzhütter H.G., Gerberick F., Liebsch M., Lovell WW, Pfannenbecker U. 1998b. A Study on UV Filter Chemicals from Annex VII of European Union Directive 76/768/EEC, in the in vitro 3T3 NRU phototoxicity test. ATLA 26, 679– 708. Spielmann H., Genschow E., Liebsch M. and Halle W. 1999. Determination of the starting dose for acute oral toxicity (LD50) testing in the up and down procedure (UDP) from cytotoxicity data. ATLA 27, 957– 966. Spielmann H., Hoffmann S., Liebsch M., Botham P., Fentem J., Eskes C., Roguet R., Cotovió J., Cole T., Worth A., Heylings J., Jones P., Robles C., Kandárová H., Gamer A., Remmele M., Curren R., Raabe H., Cockshott A., Gerner I. and Zuang, V. 2007. The ECVAM International Validation Study on In Vitro Tests for Acute Skin Irritation: Report on the Validity of the EPISKFN and EpiDerm Assays and on the Skin Integrity Function Test. ATLA 35, 559– 601. Spielmann H, Genschow E, Brown NA, Piersma AH, Verhoef A, Spanjersberg MQ, Huuskonen H, Paillard F, Seiler A. 2004. Validation of the rat limb bud micromass test in the international ECVAM validation study on three in vitro embryotoxicity tests. Altern Lab Anim. 32: 245– 74. Sonneveld E., Riteco JA., Jansen HJ., Pieterse B., Brouwer A., Schoonen WG., van der Burg, B. 2006. Comparison of in vitro and in vivo models for androgenic and estrogenic activities. Toxicological Sciences 89, 173– 187. Stigler SM 1982, Thomas Bayes's Bayesian inference, J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. A 145 (2), 250– 258. Tsakovska I., Saliner AG., Netzeva T., Pavan M., Worth AP. 2007. Evaluation of SARs for the prediction of eye irritation/corrosion potential: structural inclusion rules in the BfR decision support system. SAR QSAR Environ Res. 18 (3–4): 221– 35. Van Oosterhout JP, van der Laan JW, de Waal EJ, Olejniczak K, Hilgenfeld M, Schmidt V, Bass R. 1997. The utility of two rodent species in carcinogenic risk assessment of pharmaceuticals in Europe. Regul Toxicol Pharmaco. 25: 6– 17. VICH 2002. Studies to evaluate the safety of residues of veterinary drugs in human food: Developmental toxicity testing. VICH GL 32. October 2002. Available at: www.vichsec.org/pdf/11_2002/G*132_st7.pdf. Weil CS & Scala RA 1971. Study of intra- and interlaboratory variability in the results of rabbit eye and skin irritation tests. Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology 19, 276– 360. Weisbrod A.V., Burkhard L.P., Arnot J., Mekenyan O., Howard P.H., Russom C., Boethling R., Sakuratani Y., Traas T., Bridges T., Lutz C., Bonnell M., Woodburn K., Parkerton T. 2007. Workgroup report: review of fish bioaccumulation databases used to identify persistent, bioaccumulative, toxic substances. Environ Health Perspect: 115, 255– 61. Weyers A., Sokull-Klüttgen B., Baraibar-Fentanes J., Vollmer G., 2000. Acute toxicity data: a comprehensive comparison of results of fish, Daphnia and algae tests with new substances notified in the EU. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 1931– 1933. Worth A. and Balls M. 2002. The principles of validation and the ECVAM validation process. ATLA Suppl 2, 5– 21. Worth A.P. & Cronin M.T.D. 2001. The use of pH measurements to predict the potential of chemicals to cause acute dermal and ocular toxicity. Toxicology 169, 119– 131. Citing Literature Volume7, Issue6June 20091052 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)