Artigo Revisado por pares

Nivolumab VERSUS Cabozantinib as Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Real-World Comparison

2022; Elsevier BV; Volume: 20; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1016/j.clgc.2022.02.003

ISSN

1938-0682

Autores

Matteo Santoni, Gaetano Aurilio, Francesco Massari, Enrique Grande, Marc Matrana, Mimma Rizzo, Ugo De Giorgi, Lorena Incorvaia, Angelo Martignetti, Javier Molina‐Cerrillo, Ignacio Ortego Zabalza, Veronica Mollica, Alessandro Rizzo, Nicola Battelli, Camillo Porta,

Tópico(s)

Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Resumo

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) still represent a first-line option for selected patients with metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma (mRCC). We aimed to compare the real-world efficacy of nivolumab or cabozantinib as second-line therapy in specific mRCC subpopulations.We retrospectively collected data from 11 centers from Italy, Spain and US. Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves. Cox proportional models were used at univariate and multivariate analyses.We collected data from 343 patients with mRCC, 123 (36%) treated with cabozantinib and 220 (64%) with nivolumab. The median OS resulted longer, but not statistically significant, with nivolumab in patients aged >70 years (21.4 vs. 15.4 months, P = .746), treated with first-line pazopanib (26.8 vs. 11.6 months, P = .450), or with good (47.0 vs. 15.5 months, P = .285) or intermediate-risk criteria (14.4 vs. 11.0 months, P = .357), while it was longer, but even not statistically significant, for cabozantinib in patients who received previous sunitinib (25.7 vs. 21.7 months, P = .638) or with bone metastases (28.4 vs. 24.4 months, P = .871). The median PFS was significantly longer with cabozantinib in patients with clear cell histology (7.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = .026) and in patients with good risk features (12.3 vs. 5.7 months, P = .022).Nivolumab and cabozantinib resulted active in mRCC patients, showing distinct results when stratified into clinico-pathological features.

Referência(s)