Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Allergy‐related outcomes at 12 months in the CORAL birth cohort of Irish children born during the first COVID 19 lockdown

2022; Wiley; Volume: 33; Issue: 3 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1111/pai.13766

1399-3038

Sadhbh Hurley, Ruth Franklin, Naomi McCallion, Aideen Byrne, John Fitzsimons, Susan Byrne, Martin White, Liam O’Mahony, Jonathan O’B Hourihane,

Dermatology and Skin Diseases

The CORAL Birth cohort is a unique birth cohort project examining allergic and autoimmune dysregulation in infants born between March and May 2020, during the first SARS-CoV-2 lockdown in Ireland. We hypothesised that the dramatic social and environmental changes imposed by the pandemic-mandated lockdown would have implications on the incidence of allergic conditions, possibly mediated by changes in microbiome diversity. We report here interim data of health outcomes, including allergic conditions, at 12 months in this cohort. We have previously published health outcome data at 6 months.1 A total of 365 infants were enrolled, and 344 were retained to 12 months. Allergic outcomes in the CORAL cohort were compared with a national pre-pandemic birth cohort from the BASELINE study.2 The 12-month appointment involved skin prick testing (SPT), assessment of any atopic dermatitis (AD), lateral flow SARS-CoV-2 antibody testing and stool and blood sample for analysis. Patient demographic characteristics for the cohort at 12 months are outlined in Table 1. CORAL cohort at 12 months n = 344 (%) Including results from both community-based PCR testing and CORAL appointment antibody testing 16/344 (4.7%), CORAL infants had been diagnosed with SARS-2-CoV by 12 months. Despite the second and third waves prior to 12-month appointments, antibody positivity remained low in infants at 11/344 (3%) (Table 2). 6 months n = 354 (%) 12 months n = 344 (%) 0–6 months n = 354 (%) 6–12 months n = 344 (%) Return to work was reported by 227/344 (66%) of mothers at 12-month review. This included mothers who returned to work from home. The infant age at return ranged from 2 to 12 months (mean age 9.1 months). There is a statistically significant difference in breastfeeding between working and non-working mothers at 12 months (p < .001). Infants of mothers who have returned to work were more than twice as likely to be formula fed at 12 months (odds ratio 2.29; CI 95% (1.44–3.64). At 12 months, more CORAL infants—87/344 (25.3%)—had AD than in the BASELINE cohort—232/1495 (15.5%, p < .0001). Out of 87, 74 CORAL infants had active AD at 12-month appointment undergoing SCORAD (SCORing AD) assessment identifying 56/74 (76%) with mild AD (SCORAD 40). Milk, egg and peanut introduction, sensitization and allergy in the CORAL group are summarised in Table 3. Sensitization was defined as: a positive skin prick test (>3 mm, in the presence of a negative control of 0 mm to saline and a positive control of >3 mm to histamine) and/or evidence of food allergen-specific IgE (>0.35 kUA/L). Food allergy was diagnosed as evidence of IgE sensitization, as defined, and either a positive history of clinical reaction or a positive oral food challenge. Sensitization and allergy are compared between the CORAL and BASELINE cohorts at 12 months in Table 4. We hypothesised that social restrictions imposed by the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown would result in altered infant microbiome and atopic outcomes through reduced encounters with ‘old friend’ microbes brought to the infant through family members, creche and sibling school attendance. However, changes in other related health factors, including reduced antibiotic use and increased breastfeeding, which may positively affect gut microbiome diversity were also noted in this cohort. At 12 months, less than half of CORAL babies had experienced any infective illness and just 17% had received a systemic antibiotic. 90% of infants in a UK Birth cohort in 2008 had experienced an illness by 1 year, and 80% had received a systemic antibiotic in the first year of life.3 The low rates of infant illness and hospitalisation in CORAL support the pre-study expectation of fewer viral infections circulating due to lockdown restrictions. Fewer antibiotics likely reflect a combination of fewer infections and less health care utilisation. Powerful community-based epidemiological data that support our focussed prospective study have confirmed dramatically reduced admission rates for pediatric respiratory and severe bacterial infections since March 2020 when compared to the preceding 3 years.4 An analysis of antibiotic consumption in 5 European countries (Austria, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland) identified antibiotic usage between 17% and 60% in the first year of life.5 Antibiotic consumption in the CORAL group at 12 months was in line with the lowest prescription rate, seen in Switzerland, in this study. Of note, the recently published EuroPrevall study demonstrated unexpectedly low prevalence of probable cow's milk and egg food allergy in Switzerland.6 Ireland has the lowest breastfeeding rate in Europe. In 2015, the National Perinatal Reporting System recorded that only 58% of babies in the Republic of Ireland were receiving any breast milk on discharge from the maternity hospital after birth.7 This falls significantly to 35% of babies receiving some breast milk at 3 months, 15% at 6 months and 11% at 9 months.8 In the CORAL cohort, rates were markedly different with 192/354 (54%) of infants at 6 months and 121/344 (35%) of infants at 12 months still receiving breast milk. Maternal return to work has previously been associated with the discontinuation of breastfeeding. In a pre-pandemic Irish cohort ‘Growing Up in Ireland’, researchers identified mothers returning to part-time work were 30% more likely and those returning to full-time work 113% more likely to quit breastfeeding.8 These differences were noted in the CORAL cohort with higher formula use at 12 months in those who had returned to work. However, 29% of mothers who had returned to work were still breastfeeding at 12 months in the CORAL group, which is dramatically higher than pre-pandemic figures. This may reflect mothers who returned to work from home and due to convenience, access or privacy were able to continue breastfeeding. This dramatic and rapid change in breastfeeding rates seen in this group of mothers may direct further research into barriers to breastfeeding in Ireland. Despite lower antibiotic use and higher breastfeeding rates, our data show AD incidence has increased in Irish infants. The AD incidence of 15.5% in the BASELINE cohort in 2008 is in keeping with incidence data from the International Study of Asthma and Allergies in Childhood (ISAAC) of between 15 and 20% in 2006.9 There are limited recent epidemiological data on the current incidence of AD, especially in the first year of life. The AD incidence of 25.3% in the CORAL cohort may reflect a slow upward trend in AD since the national data set in 2008. However, it may also reflect more recent pandemic-related changes as outlined above. Food allergen introduction continued to improve from 6 to 12 months although 20% of infants had still not yet introduced peanut at 12 months despite early weaning advice. Egg sensitization was statistically significantly higher in the CORAL group, which may be a result of the higher incidence of AD. This higher incidence of sensitization has not translated into a higher incidence of egg allergy at 12 months when compared to the BASELINE cohort. This likely reflects the change in clinical practice regarding the graded reintroduction of baked egg in infants with a history of reaction to egg, which has led to tolerance by 12 months in most treated infants.10 At 12 months, the CORAL cohort has higher rates of egg sensitization and AD, but not egg allergy, when compared to a national historic data set. Antibiotic use and infant illness and hospitalisation were much lower in this cohort, and breastfeeding rates were dramatically higher than pre-pandemic Irish figures. Microbiome analysis from 6-month and 12-month appointments is ongoing and may offer further explanation for the increased sensitization and AD seen in this cohort at 12 months in the context of other favourable factors including increased breastfeeding. JO'BH is a board member of Clemens Von Pirquet Foundation. No other conflicts declared. Sadhbh Hurley: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (lead); Investigation (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Writing – original draft (lead); Writing – review & editing (lead). Ruth Franklin: Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (lead); Resources (supporting); Software (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Naomi McCallion: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Visualization (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Aideen Byrne: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Resources (supporting); Software (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (supporting); Visualization (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). John Fitzsimons: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Resources (supporting); Software (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (supporting); Visualization (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Susan Byrne: Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Martin White: Conceptualization (supporting); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (supporting); Software (supporting); Supervision (supporting); Validation (supporting); Visualization (supporting); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Liam O Mahony: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (equal); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (supporting); Investigation (equal); Methodology (equal); Project administration (supporting); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (equal); Validation (equal); Visualization (equal); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (supporting). Jonathan Hourihane: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (equal); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (lead); Methodology (lead); Project administration (lead); Resources (equal); Software (equal); Supervision (lead); Validation (lead); Visualization (lead); Writing – original draft (supporting); Writing – review & editing (lead). The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/pai.13766. The peer review history for this article is available at https://publons.com/publon/10.1111/pai.13766.