Artigo Revisado por pares

Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis

1996; Wiley; Volume: 18; Issue: 4 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1002/(sici)1097-0347(199607/08)18

ISSN

1097-0347

Autores

Alice B. Kornblith, Ian M. Zlotolow, Jane Gooen, Joseph M. Huryn, Todd Lerner, Elliót W. Strong, Jatin P. Shah, Ronald H. Spiro, Jimmie C. Holland,

Tópico(s)

Pelvic and Acetabular Injuries

Resumo

Head & NeckVolume 18, Issue 4 p. 323-334 Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis Alice B. Kornblith PhD, Corresponding Author Alice B. Kornblith PhD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Psychiatry Service, Box 266, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021Search for more papers by this authorIan M. Zlotolow DMD, Ian M. Zlotolow DMD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJane Gooen MA, Jane Gooen MA Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJoseph M. Huryn DDS, Joseph M. Huryn DDS Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorTodd Lerner DDS, Todd Lerner DDS Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorElliot W. Strong MD, Elliot W. Strong MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJatin P. Shah MD, Jatin P. Shah MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorRonald H. Spiro MD, Ronald H. Spiro MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJimmie C. Holland MD, Jimmie C. Holland MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this author Alice B. Kornblith PhD, Corresponding Author Alice B. Kornblith PhD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Psychiatry Service, Box 266, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021Search for more papers by this authorIan M. Zlotolow DMD, Ian M. Zlotolow DMD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJane Gooen MA, Jane Gooen MA Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJoseph M. Huryn DDS, Joseph M. Huryn DDS Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorTodd Lerner DDS, Todd Lerner DDS Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorElliot W. Strong MD, Elliot W. Strong MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJatin P. Shah MD, Jatin P. Shah MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorRonald H. Spiro MD, Ronald H. Spiro MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this authorJimmie C. Holland MD, Jimmie C. Holland MD Psychiatry Service, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York City; Dental Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC; and Head and Neck Service, Department of Surgery, MSKCC.Search for more papers by this author First published: July/August 1996 https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0347(199607/08)18:4 3.0.CO;2-%23Citations: 163AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat Abstract Background The psychosocial adaptation of patients who had undergone a resection of the maxilla for cancer of the maxillary antrum and/or hard palate with the placement of an obturator prosthesis to restore speech and eating function was studied. Methods Forty-seven patients were interviewed who had a maxillectomy with an obturator prosthesis at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, an average of 5.2 years (SD = 2.4 years) ago, 94% of whom had some of their soft palate resected. Interviews were conducted by telephone by a trained research interviewer, using a series of questionnaires to assess their satisfaction with the functioning of their obturator, and the psychological, vocational, family, social, and sexual adjustment. Measures included the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS), Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS), Mental Health Inventory (MHI), Impact of Event Scale, and Family Functioning Scale. Results Using multiple regression and discriminant function analyses, satisfactory functioning of the obturator prosthesis, as measured by the OFS, was found to be (1) the most highly significant predictor of adjustment, as measured by the PAIS (p < .0001) and the MHI Global Psychological Distress Subscale (MHI-GPD) (p < .001), and (2) significantly related to their perception of the negative socioeconomic impact of cancer upon their lives. The most significant predictors of better obturator functioning were the extent of resection of their soft palate (one third or less, p < .001), and hard palate (one fourth or less, p < .01). Specific aspects of obturator functioning that most significantly correlated with better adjustment (PAIS, MHI-GPD) were: less difficulty in pronouncing words (r = .40 and r = .51, respectively, p < .01), chewing and swallowing food (r = .27–.46, p < .05), and less change in their voice quality after surgery (r = .52 and r = .56, respectively, p < .001). Conclusions These findings suggest that a well-functioning obturator significantly contributes to improving the quality of life of maxillectomy patients. HEAD & NECK 1996;18:323–334 © 1996 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. References 1 Beumer J, Zlotolow I, Curtis TA. Rehabilitation. In: S Silverman, ed. Oral cancer, 3rd ed. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 1990: 127–148. Google Scholar 2 Huryn JM, Piro JD. The maxillary immediate surgical obturator prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61: 343–347. 10.1016/0022-3913(89)90142-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 3 Rozen RD, Ordway DE, Curtis TA, Cantor R. Psychosocial aspects of maxillofacial rehabilitation. Part I. The effect of primary cancer treatment. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 423–428. 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90244-2 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 4 Sykes BE, Curtis TA, Cantor R. Psychosocial aspects of maxillofacial rehabilitation. Part II. A long-range evaluation. J Prosthet Dent 1972; 28: 540–545. 10.1016/0022-3913(72)90065-0 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 5 Derogatis LR. The Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness Scale (PAIS). J Psychosom Res 1986; 30: 77–91. 10.1016/0022-3999(86)90069-3 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 6 Brook RH, Ware JE Jr, Davies-Avery A, et al. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the Health Insurance Study: Overview. Vol. VIII. Santa Monica: Rand, October 1979. Google Scholar 7 Ware JE Jr, Johnston SA, Davies-Avery A, Brook RH. Conceptualization and measurement of health for adults in the Health Insurance Study: Mental Health. Vol. III. Santa Monica: Rand, December 1979. Google Scholar 8 Veit CT, Ware JE Jr. The structure of psychological distress and well-being in general populations. J Consult Clin Psychol 1983; 51: 730–742. 10.1037/0022-006X.51.5.730 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 9 Horowitz M, Wilner N, Alvarez W. Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress. Psychosom Med 1979; 41: 209–218. 10.1097/00006842-197905000-00004 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 10 Zilberg NJ, Weiss DS, Horowitz MJ. Impact of Event Scale: a cross-validation study and some empirical evidence supporting a conceptual model of stress response syndromes. J Consult Clin Psychol 1982; 50: 407–414. 10.1037/0022-006X.50.3.407 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 11 Billings AG, Moos RH. Family environment and adaptation. In: DH Olson, BC Miller, eds. Family studies review yearbook. Vol. II. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984: 628–640. Google Scholar 12 Epstein NB, Bishop DS, Baldwin LM. McMaster Family Assessment Device. J Marital Family Ther 1983; 9: 171–180. 10.1111/j.1752-0606.1983.tb01497.x Web of Science®Google Scholar 13 McCubbin HI, Patterson JM. Family transitions: adaptation to stress. In: HI McCubbin, CR Figley, eds. Stress and the family. Vol. I. Coping wiht normative transitions. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1983: 5–25. Web of Science®Google Scholar 14 Olson DH, Russell CS, Sprenkle DH. Circumplex model of marital and family systems. VI. Theoretical update. In: DH Olson, BC Miller, eds. Family studies review yearbook. Vol. I. Beverly Hills: Sage, 1984: 59–74. Google Scholar 15 Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978. Google Scholar 16 Kornblith AB, Anderson J, Cella DF, et al. Hodgkin's disease survivors at increased risk for problems in psychosocial adaptation. Cancer 1992; 70: 2214–2224. 10.1002/1097-0142(19921015)70:8 3.0.CO;2-X CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 17 Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1983. Web of Science®Google Scholar 18 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics, 2nd ed. New York: Harper & Row, 1989. Google Scholar 19 Kirk RE. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, 1982. Google Scholar 20 Derogatis L, Spencer P. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): administration, scoring & procedures manual. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1982. Google Scholar 21 Kornblith AB, Hollis D, Phillips CA, et al. Effect of megestrol acetate upon quality of life in a dose-response trial in women with advanced breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 2081–2089. 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.11.2081 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 22 Kornblith AB, Thaler H, Wong G, et al. Quality of life of women with ovarian cancer. Gynecologic Oncol 1995; 59: 231–242. 10.1006/gyno.1995.0014 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 23 Ross BR. The clinician and the head and neck cancer patient: psychodynamic interactions. In: J Beumer, TA Curtis, DN Firtell, eds. Maxillofacial rehabilitation: prosthodontic and surgical considerations. St. Louis: Mosby, 1979: 1–10. Google Scholar 24 Shontz FC. Body image and physical disability. In: TF Cash, T Pruzinsky, eds. Body images: development, deviance, and change. New York: Guilford Press, 1990: 149–169. Web of Science®Google Scholar 25 Bull R, Rumsey N. The social psychology of facial appearance. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1988. 10.1007/978-1-4612-3782-2 Google Scholar 26 English RW. Correlates of stigma towards physically disabled persons. Rehabil Res Pract Rev 1971; 2: 1–17. Google Scholar 27 Macgregor FC. Facial disfigurement: problems and management of social interaction and implications for mental health. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1990; 14: 249–257. 10.1007/BF01578358 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 28 Richardson SA. Some social psychological consequences of handicapping. Pediatrics 1963; 32: 291–297. CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 29 Richardson SA. Attitudes and behavior toward the physically handicapped. In: D Bergsma, AE Pulver, eds. Developmental disabilities: psychological and social implications. New York: Alan R. Liss, 1976: 15–34. Web of Science®Google Scholar 30 Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1963. 10.1207/s15327019eb0904_5 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 31 Davis F. Deviance Disavowal: the management of strained interaction by the visibly handicapped. Social Problems 1961; 9: 121–132. Web of Science®Google Scholar 32 Andrykowski MA, Brady MJ, Hunt JW. Positive psychosocial adjustment in potential bone marrow transplant recipients: cancer as a psychosocial transition. Psycho-Oncology 1993; 2: 261–276. 10.1002/pon.2960020406 Google Scholar 33 Bloom JR. Psychological response to mastectomy: a prospective comparison study. Cancer 1987; 59: 189–196. 10.1002/1097-0142(19870101)59:1 3.0.CO;2-6 PubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 34 Cassileth BR, Lusk EJ, Strouse TB, et al. Psychosocial status in chronic illness: a comparative analysis of six diagnostic groups. N Engl J Med 1984; 311: 506–511. 10.1056/NEJM198408233110805 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 35 Regier DA, Boyd JH, Burke JD, et al. One-month prevalence of mental disorders in the United States. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1988; 45: 977–986. 10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800350011002 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 36 Gurland B. Epidemiology of psychiatric disorders. In: J Sadavoy, LW Lazarus, LF Jarvik, eds. Comprehensive review of geriatric psychiatry. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press, 1991: 25–40. Google Scholar 37 Groves R, Kahn M. Surveys by telephone: a national comparison with personal interviews. New York: Academic Press, 1979. Google Scholar 38 Hill JM, Kornblith AB, Boyett JM, et al. Long-term function of childhood acute lymphocytic leukemia (ALL) survivors treated by CNS prophylaxis. Proc ASCO 1994; 13, Abstract No. 1508, 438. Google Scholar 39 Lesko LM, Ostroff JS, Mumma GH, Mashberg DE, Holland JC. Long-term psychological adjustment of acute leukemia survivors: impact of bone marrow transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy. Psychosom Med 1992; 54: 30–47. 10.1097/00006842-199201000-00006 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 40 Holland JC. Clinical course of cancer. In: JC Holland, JH Rowland, eds. Handbook of psychooncology: psychological care of the patient with cancer. New York: Oxford, 1989: 75–100. Google Scholar 41 Ness DE, Ende J. Denial in the medical interview: recognition and management. J Am Med Assoc 1994; 272: 1777–1781. 10.1001/jama.272.22.1777 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 42 Tattersall MHN, Butow PN, Griffin A, Dunn SM. The take-home message: patients prefer consultation audiotapes to summary letters. J Clin Oncol 1994; 12: 1305–1311. 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.6.1305 CASPubMedWeb of Science®Google Scholar 43 Lieberman MA. The role of self-help groups in helping patients and families cope with cancer. CA-A Cancer J Clinicians 1988; 38: 163–168. 10.3322/canjclin.38.3.162 Web of Science®Google Scholar 44 Mantell JE. Cancer patient visitor programs: a case for accountability. J Psychosoc Oncol 1983; 1: 45–58. 10.1300/J077v01n01_05 Google Scholar 45 Mastrovito R, Moynihan R, Parsonnet L. Self-help and mutual support programs. In: JC Holland, JH Rowland, eds. Handbook of psychooncology: psychological care of the patient with cancer. New York: Oxford, 1989: 502–507. Google Scholar 46 Kornblith AB, Herr HW, Ofman US, Scher HI, Holland JC. Quality of life of patients with prostate cancer and their spouses: the value of a data base in clinical care. Cancer 1994; 73: 2791–2802. 10.1002/1097-0142(19940601)73:11 3.0.CO;2-9 PubMedGoogle Scholar Citing Literature Volume18, Issue4July/August 1996Pages 323-334 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Referência(s)
Altmetric
PlumX