Animal welfare risk assessment guidelines on housing and management (EFSA Housing Risk)
2010; European Food Safety Authority; Volume: 7; Issue: 11 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/sp.efsa.2010.en-87
ISSN2397-8325
Tópico(s)Agricultural safety and regulations
ResumoEFSA Supporting PublicationsVolume 7, Issue 11 87E External scientific reportOpen Access Animal welfare risk assessment guidelines on housing and management (EFSA Housing Risk) Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Wageningen UR Livestock Research Wageningen UR Livestock ResearchSearch for more papers by this author Wageningen UR Livestock Research, Wageningen UR Livestock Research Wageningen UR Livestock ResearchSearch for more papers by this author First published: 16 December 2010 https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2010.EN-87Citations: 1 The present document has been produced and adopted by the bodies identified above as author(s). In accordance with Article 36 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002, this task has been carried out exclusively by the author(s) in the context of a grant agreement between the European Food Safety Authority and the author(s). The present document is published complying with the transparency principle to which the European Food Safety Authority is subject. It may not be considered as an output adopted by EFSA. EFSA reserves its rights, view and position as regards the issues addressed and the conclusions reached in the present document, without prejudice to the rights of the authors. Published date: 16 December 2010 Question number: EFSA-Q-2009-00844 AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat 11. Literature Agreste Conjoncture. 2009. Vers une stabilisation de la production française de foie gras en 2008. Agreste Synthèses – Aviculture. 70, 1– 4. Alvarez, L., Gutiérrez, J., 2010. A first description of the physiological and behavioural responses to disbudding in goat kids. Animal welfare, 19: 55– 59. Anderson K. E., D.R. Jones, G.S. Davis & P.K. Jenkins, 2007. Effects of genetic selection on behavioral profiles of single comb white leghorn hens through two production cycles. Poultr. Sci. 86 (9): 1814– 1820. Aumaitre, A., Le Dividich, J., 1984. Improvement of piglet survival rate in relation to farrowing systems and conditions. Annales de recherché vétérinaire, 15: 173– 179. Baldock, N. M., Sibly, M., 1990. Effects of handling and transportation on the heart rate and behaviour of sheep. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 28: 15– 39. Barnett, J.L., Hemsworth, P.H., Cronin, G.M., Jongman, E.C., Hutson, G.D., 2001. A review of the welfare issues for sows and piglets in relation to housing. Australian journal of agricultural research, 52: 1– 28. Blokhuis, H.J. and J.W. van der Haar, (1992). Effects of pecking incentives during rearing on feather pecking of laying hens. Br Poult Sci. 1992 Mar; 33(1): 17– 24. BML, 1999. Bundeseinheitliche Eckwerte für eine freiwillige Vereinbarung zur Haltung von Jungmasthühnern (Broiler, Masthähnchen) und Mastputen. Broom, D.M., 1996. Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment. Acta agriculturae scandinavica. Section A. Animal science, 27: 22– 28. Brouns F., Edwards S.A., English P.R., 1995. Influence of fibrous feed ingredients on voluntary intake of dry sows. Animal feed science and technology, 54: 301– 313. Buckland, R., & Guy, G. (2002). Goose Production. FAO Agriculture Department. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper no 154: 151 pg Caja, G., Rancourt, M., 2002. Current situation and prospects of dairy sheep in Spain. Options Mediterranean, Serie B N39: 57– 66. Cherry P and Morris T. 2008. Domestic duck production. Science and practice. CABI Classen, H.L., Riddell, C., Robinson, F.E., Shand, P.J., McCurdy, A.R. 1994. Effect of lighting treatment on the productivity, health, behaviour and sexual maturity of heavy male turkeys. British Poultry Science 35: 215– 225. Cooper JJ, McAffee L, and Skinn H. 2002. Behavioural responses of domestic ducks to nipple drinkers, bell drinkers and water troughs. British Poultry Science. 43, 17– 18. Coppinger, T. R., Minton, J.E., Reddy, P.G., Blecha, F., 1991. Repeated restraint and isolation stress in lambs increases pituitary-adrenal secretion and reduces cell-mediated immunity. J. Anim. Sci., 69: 2808– 2814. Council of Europe. 1999a. Recommendation concerning domestic ducks (Anas Platyrhynchos) Standing Committee Of The European Convention For The Protection Of Animals Kept For Farming Purposes (T-AP), adopted on 22 June 1999. http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/biological_safety,_use_of_animals/Farming/Rec%20ducks.asp Council of Europe. 1999b. Recommendation concerning Muscovy ducks (Cairina Moschata) and hybrids of Muscovy and domestic ducks (Anas Platyrhynchos) Standing Committee Of The European Convention For The Protection Of Animals Kept For Farming Purposes (T-AP), adopted on 22 June 1999. http://www.coe.int/t/e/legal_affairs/legal_co-operation/biological_safety%2C_use_of_animals/farming/Rec%20Muscovy%20ducks%20E%201999.asp#TopOfPage Council of Europe. (1999). Recommendation concerning domestic geese (Anser Anser F. Domesticus, Anser Cygnoides F. Domesticus) and their crossbreeds. Council Directive 2007/43/EC of 28 June 2007 laying down minimum rules for the protection of chickens kept for meat production (Text with EEA relevance). Official Journal of the European Union L 182, 12.7.2007, p. 19– 28. Cronin, G.M., Simpson, G.J., Hemsworth, P.H., 1996. The effects of the gestation and farrowing environments on sow and piglet behaviour and piglet survival and growth in early lactatin. Applied animal behaviour science, 46: 175– 192. Dayen M and Fielder HH. 1990. Intensive raising of Muscovy ducks. Deutsche Tierarztliche Wochenschrift. 106, 55– 59. Decuypere, E., Hocking, P.M., Tona, K., Onagbesan, O., Bruggeman, V., Jones, E.k.M., Cassy, S., Rideau, N., Metayer, S., Jego, Y., Putterflam, J., Tesseraud, S., Collin, A., Duclos, M., Trevidy, J.J. & Williams, J., 2006. Broiler breeder paradox: a project report. World's Poultry Science Journal, 62: 443– 453. De Jong, I.C., Enting, H., van Voorst, A. & Blokhuis, H.J., 2005. Do low-density diets improve broiler breeder welfare during rearing and laying? Poultry Science 84: 194– 203. De Rancourt, M., Fois, N., Lavín, M.P., Tchakérian, E., Vallerand, F., 2006. Mediterranean sheep and goats production: an uncertain future. Small ruminant research, 62: 167– 179. Dýrmundsson, O.R., 2004. Sustainability of sheep and goat production in North European countries – from the Arctic to the Alps. 55th Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production. Bled, Slovenia, 5-9 September 2004. EC, 2009. Council Regulation (EC) No 1099/2009 of 24 September 2009 on the protection of animals at the time of killing PB L 303 van 18.11.2009, blz. 1–30. Edwards,D.S., Johnston, A.M., 1999. Welfare implications of sheep ear tags. Veterinary Record, 144: 603– 606. EFSA, 2000. The Welfare of Chickens Kept for Meat Production (Broilers). Report of the Scientific Committee on Animal Health and Animal Welfare. Adopted 21 March 2000. SANCO.B.3/AH/R15/2000. 149 pages. EFSA, 2004. Scientific report on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. The EFSA Journal, 611: 0– 13. EFSA, 2005a. The welfare of weaners and rearing pigs: effets of different space allowances and floor types. The EFSA Journal, 268: 1– 19. EFSA, 2005b. The welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens (EFSA-Q-2003-92). The EFSA Journal (2005) 197, 1– 23. EFSA, 2007a. Scientific report on animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry. The EFSA Journal, 564: 1– 14. EFSA, 2007b. Scientific report on animal health and welfare aspects of different housing and husbandry systems for adult breeding boars, pregnant, farrowing sows and unweaned piglets. The EFSA Journal, 572: 1– 13. EFSA, 2010. Draft version of Scientific Report to the Panel on AHAW on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and resistance to stress of commercial broilers; and welfare aspects of management and housing of grand-parent and parent stocks raised and kept for breeding purposes. The EFSA Journal (200x) xxx, 1– 3930. Ekkel, E.D., Van Doorn, C.E.A., Hessing, M.J.C., Tielen, M.J.M., 1995. The specific stress-free housing system has positive effects on productivity, health, and welfare of pigs. Journal of animal science, 73: 1544– 1551. EU, 1999. Council Directive 1999/74/EC of 19 July 1999 laying down minimum standards for the protection of laying hens. Official Journal of the European Communities (3.8.1999) L 203: 53– 57. FAO database: http://faostat.fao.org. FAWC, 1995. Report on the Welfare of Turkeys. Report 2033. Fiks - van Niekerk, T.G.C.M., M.A.W. Ruis, H. Gunnink and B.F.J. Reuvekamp, 2009a. Effect of human-animal contact with layer pullets on fearfulness and technical results in the rearing and laying periods. Proceedings 8th European Symposium on Poultry Welfare, Cervia, Italy, Book of Abstracts: 137. Fiks - van Niekerk, T.G.C.M., I.C.d. Jong, T. Veldkamp, M.M.v. Krimpem and R.A.v. Emous, 2009b. Ingrepen bij pluimvee. Update 'literatuurstudie ingrepen bij pluimvee, 2006'. Report Animal Sciences Group, no. 255: 46 pages. (Update literature study mutilations in poultry" in Dutch) Geers, R., Dellaert, B., Goedseels, V., Hoogerbrugge, A., Vranken, E., Maes, F., Berkmans, D., 1989. An assessment of optimal air temperatures in pig houses by the quantification of behavioural and health-related problems. Animal production, 48: 571– 578. Gentry, J.G., McGlone, J.J., Blanton, Jr. J.R., Miller, M.F., 2002a. Alternative housing systems for pigs: influences on growth, composition, and porl quality. Journal of animal science, 80: 1781– 1790. Gonyou, H.W., 2003. Group housing: alternative systems, alternative management. Advances in pork production, 14: 101– 107. Graham, M.J., Kent, J.E., Molony,V., 1997. Effects of four analgesic treatments on the behavioural and cortisol responses of 3-week-old lambs to tail docking. The Veterinary Journal, 153: 87– 97. Gravas, L., 1979. Behavioural and physical effects of flooring on piglets and sows. Applied animal ethology, 5: 333– 345. Gregory, NG. (2007). Poultry and Rabbits. Animal welfare and meat production. 2nd edition, CABI, pp 125– 126. Guémené D and Guy G. 2004. The past, present and future of force-feeding and « foie-gras » production. World's Poultry Science Journal. 60, 211– 222. Guémené D, Guy G, Noirault J, et al. 2006. Rearing conditions during the force-feeding period in male ducks and their impact upon stress and welfare. Animal Research. 55, 443– 458. Gunnarsson, S., Keeling, L.J. and Svedberg, J. (1999). Effect of rearing factors on the prevalence of floor eggs, cloacal cannibalism and feather pecking in commercial flocks of loose housed laying hens. British Poultry Science 40: 12– 18. Hargreaves, A. L., Hutson, G.D., 1990. An evaluation of the contribution of isolation, upending and wool removal to the stress response to shearing. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., 26: 103– 113. Havenstein, G.B., Ferket, P.R., Grimes, J.L. Qureshi, M.A., Nestor, K.E. 2004. Comparison of the performance of 1966- versus 2003-type turkeys when fed representative 1966 and 2003 turkey diets: Growth rate, livability, and feed conversion. Poultry Science 86: 232– 240. Held, S., Mendl, M., 2001. Behaviour of the young weaner. In M.A. Varley, J. Wiseman (eds.), The weaner pig: nutrition and management. Wallingford (UK), CAB Int., 273– 297. Hemsworth, P.H., Barnett, J.L., Hansen, C., Gonyou, H.W., 1986b. The influence of early contact with humans on subsequent behavioural response of pigs to humans. Applied animal behaviour science, 15: 55– 63. Henderson, S.N., Barton, J.T., Wolfenden, A.D., Higgins, S.E., Higgins, J.P., Kuenzel, W.J., Lester, C.A., Tellez, G., & Hargis, B.M., 2009. Comparison of beak-trimming methods on early broiler breeder performance. Poultry Science 88: 57– 60. Hendriks, H.J.M., van de Weerdhof, A.M., 1999. Dutch notes on BAT for pig and poultry intensive livestock farming, August (1999). Ministry of agriculture, nature management and fisheries. National reference centre agriculture. The Netherlands, pp. 1– 67. Hester, P.Y., Sutton, A.L., Elkin, R.G. 1987. Effect of light intensity, litter source and litter management on the incidence of leg abnormalities and performance of male turkeys. Poultry Science 66: 666– 675. Hocking, P.M., 2009. Feed restriction. In P.M. Hocking (ed): Biology of breeding poultry. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 307– 330. Hosie, B.D., Carruthers, J., Sheppard, B.W., 1996. Bloodless castration of lambs: results of a questionnaire. British Veterinary Journal, 152: 47– 55. Hughes, B.O., Grigor, P.N. 1996. Behavioural time-budgets and beak related behaviour in floor-housed turkeys. Animal Welfare 5: 189– 198. Jensen, K.H., Hansen, S.W., Pedersen, L.J., 1996. The effect of long-term stress on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical xis and the role of the stressor. Acta agriculturae scandinavica, 27: 40– 45. Kanitz, E., Tuchscherer, M., Tuchscherer, A., Stabenow, B., 2002. Neuroendocrine and immune responses to acute endotoxemia in suckling and weaned piglets. Biology of the neonate, 81: 203– 209. Kanitz, E., Tuchscherer, M., Puppe, B., Tuchscherer, A., 2004. Consequences of repeated early isolation in domestic piglets (Sus scrofa) on their behavioural, neuroendocrine, and immunological responses. Brain, behavior, and Immunity, 18: 35– 45. Kent, J.E., Molony, V., Jackson, R.E., Hosie, B.D., 1999. Chronic inflammatory responses of lambs to rubber ring castration: are there any effects of age or size of lamb at treatment? Pages 160– 162 in A.J.F. Russel, C.A. Morgan, C.J. Savory, M.C. Appleby, T.L.J. Lawrence, eds. Farm animal welfare-who writes the rules? 23 ed. British Society of Animal Science. Kent, J.E., Molony, V., Graham, M.J. 1998., Comparison of methods for the reduction of acute pain produced by rubber ring castration or tail docking of week-old lambs. The Veterinary Journal, 155: 39– 51. Kent, J.E., Molony, V., Robertson, I.S., 1991. Behaviour of lambs post castration and tail docking: effect of age and method. In: Applied Animal Behaviour: Past, Present and Future. Proc. Soc. Vet. Ethol., Edinburgh Univ. Fed. Anim. Welfare, Potters Bar, Great Britain. Kilgour, R., de Langen, H., 1970. Stress in sheep resulting from management practices. Proc. N. Z. Soc. Anim. Prod. 30: 65– 76. Kilgour, R.J., Waterhouse, T., Dwyer, C.M., Ivanov, I.D. 2008. Farming systems for sheep production and their effect on welfare. In: The welfare of sheep. Pp. 213– 265. C. Dwyer (ed.) Springer Science. Konyali, A., Tölü, C., Das, G., Savas, T., 2007. Factors affecting placental traïts and relationships of placental traïts with neonatal behaviour in goat. Animal reproduction science, 97: 394– 401. Lang C, Lang M, Witkos M et al. 2007a. Foie gras: the two faces of Janus. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association. 230 (11), 1624– 1627. Lang C, Witkos M, Uttaburanont M et al. 2007b. Debate over foie gras continues. Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association. 231 (2), 196– 198. Laughlin, K.F., 2009. Breeder management: how did we get there? In P.M. Hocking (ed): Biology of breeding poultry. CABI publishing, Wallingford, UK, pp 10– 25. LayWel, 2006. Description of housing systems for Laying hens. In: Laywel Project "Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens" (SSPE-CT-2004-502315). http:/www.laywel.eu Lewis, P.D., Perry, G.C., Sherwin, C.M. 1998. Effect of photoperiod and light intensity on the performance of intact male turkeys. Animal Science 66: 759– 767. Lewis, P.D., Perry G. C., Sherwin C. M., Moinard, C. 2000. Effect of Ultraviolet Radiation on the Performance of Intact Male Turkeys. Poultry Science 79: 850– 855. Mason, S.P., Jarvis, S., Lawrence, A.B., 2003. Individual differences in responses of piglets to weaning at different ages. Applied animal behaviour science, 80: 117– 132. McCowan, B., J. Schrader, A.M. DiLorenzo, C. Cardona & D. Klingborg, 2006. Effects of induced molting on the well-being of egg-laying hens. Journ. of Appl. Welfare Sci. 9(1): 9– 13. McGlone, J.J., 1999. Finishing pigs in less intensive production systems. In Proceedings of the 2nd symposium on swine raised outdoors. Concordia, Brazil, 126– 136. Merlot, E., Meunier-Salaün, M.C., Prunier, A., 2004. Behavioural, endocrine and immune consequences of mixing in weaned piglets. Applied animal behaviour science, 85: 247– 257. Miranda-de la Lama, G.C., Mattiello, S., 2010. Te importance of social behaviour for goat welfare in livestock farming. Small ruminant research (in press). Morishita, TY. (2004). Waterfowl husbandry for the avian health professional. Seminars in Avian and Exotic Pet Medicine, Vol 13, N°4 (October), pp 184– 190 Mouttotou, N., Hatchell, F.M., Green, L.E., 1999. The prevalence and risk factors associated with forelimb skin abrasions and sole bruising in preweaning piglets. Preventive veterinary medicine, 39: 231– 245. Newberry, R.C., 2004. Cannibalism. In: Welfare of the Laying Hen. Ed. by G.C. Perry, CABI Publishing, Wallingford UK, pp. 239– 258. Noonan, G.J., Rand, J.S., Priest, J., Ainscow, J., Blackshaw, J.K., 1994. Behavioural observations of piglets undergoing tail docking, teeth clipping and ear notching. Applied animal behaviour science, 39: 203– 213. Pajor, E.A., Weary, D.M., Fraser, D., Kramer, D.L., 1999. Alternative housing for sows and litters. 1. Effects of sow-controlled housing on responses to weaning. Applied animal behaviour science, 65: 105– 121. Pajor, E. A., Weary, D.M., Caceres, C., Fraser, D., Kramer, D. L., 2002. Alternative housing for sows and litters. 3. Effects of pigletdiet quality and sow-controlled housing on performance and behaviour. Applied animal behaviour science, 76: 267– 277. PIGCAS, 2008. Attitudes, practices and state of the art regarding piglet castration in Europe. Deliverable D2.4. Report on the practice of castration. Pol, F., Courboulay, V., Cotte, J.P., Martrenchar, A., Hay, M., Mormède, P., 2002. Urinary cortisol as an additional tool to assess the welfare of pregnant sows in two types of housing. Veterinary research, 33: 13– 22. PPE. 2003. Verordening welzijnsnormen vleeskalkoenen. Prunier, A., Hay, M., Servière, J., 2002. Evaluation et prevention de la douleur induite par les interventions de convenace chez le porcelet. Journées de la recherche porcine en France 34: 257– 268. Puppe, B., Tuchscherer, A., 2000. The development of suckling frequency in pigs from birth to weaning of their piglets. A sociobiological approach. Animal science, 71: 273– 279. Puppe, B., Tuchscherer, M., Tuchscherer, A., 1997. The effect of housing conditions and social environment immediately after weaning on the agonistic behaviour, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and plasma glucose level in pigs. Livestock production science, 48: 157– 164. Puppe, B., Schön, P.C., Tuchscherer, A., Manteuffel, G., 2005. Castration-induced vocalization in domestic piglets, Sus scrofa: complex and specific alterations of the vocal quality. Applied animal behaviour science, ( 95): 67– 78. Raud H and Faure, JM. 1994. Welfare of ducks in intensive units. Revue sicentifique et technique (International office of Epizootics). 13, 119– 129. Rochard O, Lubac S, Aliner A et al., 2008. Traitement du bec par la technique infra rouge ou l'épointage aux ciseaux: quelles conséquences? 8ème Journées de la Recherche sur les Palmipèdes à Foie Gras; Arcachon. 165– 169. Rodenburg TB, Bracke MBM, Berk J, et al. 2005. Welfare of ducks in European duck husbandry systems. Worlds Poultry Science Journal. 61 (4), 633– 646. Rhodes, R. C. III, Nippo, M.M., Morgan, T.J., Gross, W.A., 1989. Tail docking of lambs: evidence for both a long-term and short-term stress response. J. Anim. Sci 67 (Suppl. 1): 99 (Abstr.). Roger, P.A., 2008. The impact of disease and disease prevention on welfare in sheep. In: The welfare of sheep. Pp. 159– 212. C. Dwyer (ed.) Springer Science. RSPCA. 2010. RSPCA Welfare standards for turkeys. Rushen, J., 1986a. Aversion of sheep to electro-immobilization and physical restraint. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 15: 315– 324. Rushen, J., 1986b. Aversion of sheep to handling treatments; paired-choice studies. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 16: 363– 370. Rushen, J., Congdon, P., 1986. Relative aversion of sheep to simulated shearing with and without electro-immobilization. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 26: 535– 537. Rushen, J., Lawrence, A.B., Terlouw, E.M.C., 1993. The motivational basis of stereotypies. In A.B. Lawrence, J. Rushen (eds.), Stereotypic Animal Behaviour: Fundamentals and applications to welfare. Wallingford (UK), CAB Int., 41– 64. Scott, P.R., Dun, K., Penny, C.D., Strachan, W.D., Keeling, N., 1996. Field assessment of lamb behavior after xylazine hydrochloride epidural injection for castration using rubber rings. Agri-Practice 17: 19. Signoret, J.P., Ramonet, Y., Vieuille-Thomas, C., 1995. L'élevage en plein-air des truies gestantes:problèmes posés par les relations sociales. Journées de la recherche porcine en France, 27: 11– 18. Simon, D.L., Buchenauer, D., 1993. Genetic diversity of European livestock breeds. EAAP Publication No. 66, 1993. Wageningen Pers, Wageningen, 579p. Spoolder, H.A.M., Burbidge, J.A., Edwards, S.A., Simmins, P.H., Lawerence, A.B., 1995. Provision of straw as a foraging substrate reduces the development of excessive chain and bar manipulation in food restricted sows. Applied animal behaviour science, 43: 249– 262. SVC, 1997. The welfare of intensively kept pigs. Report of the Scientific Veterinary Committee. Directorate General XXIV of the European Commission. Adopted 30th September 1997. Doc XXIV/ScVc/0005/97. Scientific Veterinary Committee, Animal Welfare Section, Brussels, Belgium. Terlouw, E.M.C., Lawrence, A.B., Illius, A.W., 1991. Influences of feeding level and physical restriction on development of stereotypies in sows. Animal behavior, 42: 981– 991. Terlouw, E.M.C., Porcher, J., 2005. Repeated handling of pigs during rearing. I. Refusal of contact by the handler and reactivity to familiar and unfamiliar humans. Journal of animal science, ( 83): 1653– 1663. Thornton, P.D., Waterman-Pearson, A.E., 1999. Quantification of the pain and distress responses to castration in young lambs. Research in Veterinary Science. Valdmanis, L., Menzies, P., Millman, S., 2007. A survey of dehorning practices and pain management in goats. In: F Galindo and L Alvarez (eds) 41st Congress of the International Society for Applied Ethology. 30 July-3 August 2007, Mérida, México. Veldkamp, T., Kiezebrink, M.C. 1997. Meer beschadigingen bij ongekapte kalkoenen: lagere lichtsterkte nodig om pikkerij te beperken. Pluimveehouderij 27 (1997)39: 24– 25. Veldkamp, T., Kiezebrink, M.C. 1998a. Meer beschadigingen bij lichtschema: lichtschema versus continu licht. Pluimveehouderij 28 (1998)22: 20– 21. Veldkamp, T., Kiezebrink, M.C. 1998b. Speeltjes weerhouden kalkoenen niet van pikkerij: Onacceptabel veel beschadigingen en hoge uitval. Pluimveehouderij 28 (1998) 30 oktober: 8– 10. Veldkamp, T. 1998a. Onderzoeken naar management en huisvesting van onbehandelde vleeskalkoenen. PP-Uitgave No. 75. Veldkamp, T. 1998b. Speelobjecten: geen invloed op beschadigingen bij ongekapte kalkoenen. Praktijkonderzoek, september 1998. Veldkamp, T. 2000. Schuurmateriaal in de voerpan geen effect op beschadigingen en uitval bij niet gesnavelkapte kalkoenen. Praktijkonderzoek, april 2000. Veldkamp, T., Kiezebrink, M.C. 1999. Invloed van verrijking leefomgeving op pikkerij bij vleeskalkoenen met onbehandelde snavels. Praktijkonderzoek, maart 1999. Veldkamp, T., Kiezebrink, M.C. 2000. Ander type verlichting geen oplossing voor pikkerij bij onbehandelde kalkoenen. Praktijkonderzoek, oktober 2000. Veldkamp, T., Kiezebrink, M.C. 2005. Proef met kalkoenen met overdekte uitloop. Gunstige eerste indruk ondanks tegenslag. Pluimveehouderij (35) 23 juli 2005: 14– 15. Weber, R., Keil, N.M., Fehr, M., Horat, R., 2007. Piglet mortality on farms using farrowing systems with or without crates. Anim. Welfare, 16, 277– 279. Webster, 2000. Behavior of White Leghorn Laying hens after withdrawal of feed. Poultry Science 79: 192– 200. Zeltner, E. & H. Hirt, 2005. Ethological investigation on moulting laying hens in organic farming. in: Proceedings 7th European symposium on Poultry Welfare, 15-19 June 2005, Lublin, Poland. Institute of Genetics and Animal Breeding, Jastrzçbiec, Poland. Animal science Papers and Reports vol. 23(2005) suppl. 1: 175– 179. 17. References Botreau, R.; Veissier, I.; Butterworth, A.; Bracke, M.B.M.; Keeling, L.J, 2007. Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare, Volume 16, Number 2, May 2007, pp. 225– 228(4) EFSA, 2009. Scientific report on the effects of farming systems on dairy cow welfare and disease. Report of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (Question No. EFSA-Q-2006-113). European Food Safety Authority. Annex to the EFSA Journal 1143, 1– 38. Accessed at: http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/1143r.htm, 1 Feb. 2010. Report, 284 pp. Webster, J. 1994. Animal Welfare, A cool eye towards Eden. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK. Welfare Quality®, 2009. Animal Welfare principles and criteria formulated by Welfare Quality®. Accessed at: http://www.welfarequality.net/, 29 Mar. 2010. Internet website. 42. References Algers, B. A, 2009, Risk assessment approach to animal welfare. In: F.J.M. Smulders, B. Algers (Eds.) Welfare of production animals: assessment and management of risks. Food safety assurance and veterinary public health, Volume 5. Wageningen Academic Publishers, The Netherlands. p. 223– 237. Angus, L.J., Bowen, H, Gill, L.A.S., Knowles, T.G. and Butterworth, A. 2005. The use of conjoint analysis to determine the importance of factors that affect on-farm welfare of the dairy cow. Animal Welfare; 14 (3); p. 203– 213 Bartussek, H., 1999. A review of the animal needs index (ANI) for assessment of animal's well-being in the housing systems for Austrian proprietary products and legislation. Levest. Prod.Sci. 61, 179– 192 Botreau, R., Veissier, I., Butterworth, A., Bracke, M.B.M., Keeling, L.J., 2007. Definition of criteria for overall assessment of animal welfare. Animal Welfare, Volume 16, Number 2, May 2007, pp. 225– 228(4) Botreau, R., 2008. Multicriteria evaluation of animal welfare at farm level: An application of MCDA methodologies. Agro Paris Tech, Dissertation. Bracke, M.B.M., Spruit, B.M. and Metz, J.H.M., 1999a. Overall welfare assessment reviewed, Part 1: Is it possible, Netherland Journal of Agricultural Science 47, 279– 291. Bracke, M.B.M., Metz, J.H.M., Spruijt, B.M., 1999b. Overall welfare assessment reviewed, Part 2: Assessment tables and schemes,. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 47 (1999) 293– 305 Bracke, M.B.M., Metz, J.H.M., Spruijt, B.M. and Dijkhuizen, A.A., 1999c. Overall welfare assessment of pregnant sow housing systems based on interviews with experts. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 47: 93– 104 Bracke, M.B.M., Spruit B.M., Metz J.H.M. and Schouten W.G.P., 2002. Decision support system for overall welfare assessment in pregnant sows A: Model structure and weighting procedure, Journal of Animal Science 8: 1819– 1834. Bracke, M.B.M., 2008, RICHPIG: a semantic model to assess enrichment materials for pigs, Animal Welfare, 17: 289– 304 Bracke, M.B.M., Edwards, S.A., Engel, B., Buist, W.G., Algers, B., 2009. Expert opinion as 'validation' of risk assessment applied to calf welfare. Acta Vet. Scand. 50: 29 Broom, D.M., 1996. Animal welfare defined in terms of attempts to cope with the environment. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A, Animal Science, Suppl. 27: 22– 28. Broom, D.M., 1986. Indicators of poor welfare. British Veterinary Journal, 142: 524– 526 Broom, D.M., 1998. Welfare, stress and the evolution of feelings. Advances in the Study of Behavior, 27, 371– 403. Cagienard A, Regula G, Danuser J., 2005. The impact of different housing systems on health and welfare of grower and finisher pigs in Switzerland, Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 68, (1), 49– 61 Codex Alimentarius, 1999. Principles and Guidelines for the Conduct of Microbiological Risk Assessment, CAC/GL-30, 7pp. EFSA, 2004. Scientific report on the risks associated with tail biting in pigs and possible means to reduce the need for tail docking considering the different housing and husbandry systems. The EFSA Journal, 611: 0– 13. EFSA, 2005. The welfare aspects of various systems of keeping laying hens (EFSA-Q-2003-92). The EFSA Journal (2005) 197, 1– 23. EFSA, 2005. The welfare of weaners and rearing pigs: effets of different space allowances and floor types. The EFSA Journal, 268: 1– 19. EFSA, 2006a. Basic Information for the development of the animal welfare risk assessment guidelines, EFSA/ AHAHW/2006/01 EFSA, 2006b. The risks of poor welfare in intensive calf farming systems (http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/science/ahaw/ahaw_opinions/1516.html). EFSA, 2007a. Scientific report on animal health and welfare in fattening pigs in relation to housing and husbandry. The EFSA Journal, 564: 1– 14. EFSA, 2007b. Scientific report on animal health and welfare aspects of different housing and husbandry systems for adult breeding boars, pregnant, farrowing sows and unweaned piglets. The EFSA Journal, 572: 1– 13. EFSA, 2007c. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare on a request from EFSA on the Framework for the AHAW Risk Assessments. The EFSA Journal (2007) 550, 1– 46. http://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/scdocs/scdoc/550.htm EFSA, 2008. Animal welfare aspects of husbandry systems for farmed Atlantic salmon - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Animal Health and Welfare Question number: EFSA-Q-2006-033. Adopted: 19 June 2008 EFSA, 2009. Guidance on Good Practice in Conducting Scientific Assessments in Animal Health using Modelling; EFSA-Q-2009-408 EFSA, 2010a. Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW): Scientific Opinion on the influence of genetic parameters on the welfare and the resistance to stress of commercial broilers. EFSA Journal 2010; 8 (7):1666. [ 82 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1666. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu EFSA, 2010b. Panel on Animal Health and Welfare (AHAW): Scientific Opinion on welfare aspects of the management and housing of the grand-parent and parent stocks raised and kept for breeding purposes. EFSA Journal 2010; 8(7):1667. [ 81 pp.]. doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1667. Available online: www.efsa.europa.eu FAO database: http://faostat.fao.org. FAWC, 1995. Report on the Welfare of Turkeys. Report 2033. Fraser, A., F. and Broom, D.M. (1990). Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. Wallingford: C.A.B.I. http://www.cabi-publishing.org Fraser, D., 2008. Understanding animal welfare. Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica 2008, 50(Suppl 1), S1doi:10.1186/1751-0147-50-S1-S1. Garvey, P.R., 2009. Analytical methods for risk management: a systems engineering perspective, Taylor & Francis.pp. 264 LayWel, 2006. Welfare implications of changes in production systems for laying hens (SSPE-CT-2004-502315). http:/www.laywel.eu Lund, V., 2006. Natural living — a precondition for animal welfare in organic farming. Livestock Sci. 100, 71– 83. Müller-Graf, CDC., C. Candiani, S. Barbieri, O. Ribo, A. Afonso, E. Aiassa, P. Have, S. Correia, F. De Massis, T. Grudnik & J. Serratosa, 2008, "Risk assessment in animal welfare – EFSA approach", AATEX 14, Special Issue, March 31, 789– 794. OIE 2004a, Handbook on Import Risk Analysis for Animals and Animal Products, Volume 1. Introduction and qualitative risk analysis pp. 57. OIE 2004b, Handbook on Import Risk Analysis for Animals and Animal Products, Volume 2. Quantitative risk assessment, pp. 126. PIGCAS, 2008. Attitudes, practices and state of the art regarding piglet castration in Europe. Deliverable D2.4. Report on the practice of castration. Rollin, B.E., 1993. Animal welfare science and value. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 6 (Suppl. 2), 44– 50. Rowe and Wright (1999): The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. International Journal of Forecasting, Volume 15, Issue 4, 353– 375. SVC, 1997. The welfare of intensively kept pigs. Report of the Scientific Veterinary Committee. Directorate General XXIV of the European Commission. Adopted 30th September 1997. Doc XXIV/ScVc/0005/97. Scientific Veterinary Committee, Animal Welfare Section, Brussels, Belgium. Webster, J. 1994. Animal Welfare, A cool eye towards Eden. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK. Wedemeyer, G.A., 1996. In: Physiology of Fish in Intensive Culture Systems, Chapman & Hall, New York. Welfare Quality® (2009a). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for poultry. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. Welfare Quality® (2009b). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for pigs. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. Welfare Quality® (2009c). Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. Welfare Quality® Consortium, Lelystad, Netherlands. Citing Literature Volume7, Issue11December 201087E ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)