Errata
2020; University of Chicago Press; Volume: 126; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.1086/710273
ISSN1537-5390
ResumoPrevious article FreeErrataOriginal articleThe Imperial Origins of American Policing: Militarization and Imperial Feedback in the Early 20th CenturyThe Disciplining Effect of Mass Incarceration on Labor OrganizationFull TextPDF Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmailQR Code SectionsMoreThe Imperial Origins of AMERICAN PolicingIn the March 2020 issue of AJS, in “The Imperial Origins of American Policing: Militarization and Imperial Feedback in the Early 20th Century” by Julian Go, the following errors appeared in the initial version of the article:1. In table 6 (p. 1233), on the “Reg-S” row, the entry -.07 appeared without the minus sign; on the “Intercept” row, 1.89*** appeared with two rather than three asterisks.2. In table 8 (p. 1236), on the “Labor strike” row, .53** appeared with one rather than two asterisks.Complete, corrected versions of table 6 and table 8 are printed below, and corrections were made directly to the PDF and HTML versions available online. The publisher regrets these typesetting errors.Table 6. Negative Binomial Regressions (All Regions) 123456Alternative theories: Arrests …4.863.631.219.09−.07−.98 (3.01)(3.95)(3.52)(3.53)(3.44)(3.42) Labor strike ….13.22.34.33.34.29 (.20)(.21)(.21)(.21)(.21)(.22) Civil service ….03.20.44.35.33.31 (.20)(.27)(.29)(.27)(.27)(.30)Imperial feedback: Veteran … 1.01***1.03***.93***1.06***1.05*** (.24)(.25)(.24)(.31)(.29) Foreign white … −.03* (.01) Nonwhite … .03**.04**.04** (.01)(.02)(.01) Interaction veteran × nonwhite … −.014 (.02) Controls: Population ….00***.00***.00**.00**.00**.00*** Density ….00.00.00.00.00.00 Reg-S … -.07 (.94) Reg-W … .93 (.84) Reg-MW … .26 (.82) Reg-E … .04 (.81)Intercept …1.43***1.39***1.89***1.13**1.08**1.25Likelihood ratio χ2 …200.96***127.00***135.60***136.40***136.84***141.436***AIC …990.05639.61633.00634.09636.14635.17BIC …1,007.52656.79652.64651.85655.86664.625Log likelihood …−488.73−312.80−308.50−308.11−302.97−300.78n …1508686868686Note. Data are shown as coefficients with SEs in parentheses.*P ≤ .05.**P ≤ .01.***P ≤ .001. View Table Image Table 8. Negative Binomial Regressions (Select Regions) 78 Excludes SouthExcludes EastLabor strike ….53**.186 (.21)(.34)Civil service ….29−.117 (.29)(.28)Veteran ….92**1.02*** (.25)(.28)Nonwhite ….11***.02* (.03)(.01)Population ….00.00*Density ….00.00Intercept ….4921.37***Likelihood ratio χ2 …165.99***65.231***Log likelihood …−282.39−233.24n …8568Note. Data are shown as coefficients with SEs in parentheses.*P ≤ .05.**P ≤ .01.***P ≤ .001. View Table Image The Disciplining Effect of Mass Incarceration on Labor OrganizationIn the March 2020 issue of AJS, in “The Disciplining Effect of Mass Incarceration on Labor Organization” by Adam Reich and Seth J. Prins, the following errors appeared in the initial version of the article:1. In table 1 (p. 1315), the first row in the left-hand column, “Zip code incarceration data,” appeared as “NLRB election data.”2. In table 2 (p. 1316), “Loss” appeared as “Lose”; in addition, two complete rows were dropped following “County total crime rate”: these are “State-industry % black” and “State-industry mean income ($).”3. In table 6 (p. 1332), numbers in the final row (“Observations”) were meant to be centered under the spanned column heads.Complete, corrected versions of table 1 and table 2 are printed below, and corrections were made directly to the PDF and HTML versions available online. The formatting for the online versions of table 6 were also corrected, but that table is not reprinted here. The publisher regrets these typesetting errors.Table 1. Characteristics of the OUR Walmart SamplesCharacteristicValueZip code incarceration data: Participants …16,137 States …2 Zip codes …1,379 Association member: yes …835 (5) Association member: no …15,302 (95) Zip code prison admission rate per 1,000, mean …5.3 (5.68, 0, 40.2) % zip code black …19.7 (19, 0, 96.7 % zip code poor …21.3 (11.5, 0, 76.3)State incarceration data: Participants …68,653 States …51 Association member: yes …4,388 (6) Association member: no …64,265 (94) State incarceration rate per 1,000 …4.5 (1.3, 1.3, 8.5) % county black …14.6 (12.8, 0.24, 82.6)Individual-level incarceration data: Participants …691 Association member: yes …123 (18) Association member: no …567 (82) White …480 (70) Person of color …211 (31) Male …260 (38) Female …431 (62) Prior incarceration …19 (3) Any criminal justice contact …27 (5)Note. Data in parentheses are percentages or SD, min, max. No. of states includes Washington, D.C. View Table Image Table 2. Characteristics of the National Labor Relations Board and National Longitudinal Survey of Youth 1979 SamplesCharacteristicValueNLRB election data: NLRB Cases …18,318 Years …2000–2009 States …46 Counties …914NLRB election results: Loss …8,568 (47) Win …9,750 (53) County jail average daily population rate per 1,000 …2.40 (1.65, 0, 47.5) County % black …15.4 (14.2, 0.03, 80.5) County % poor …12.4 (4.7, 2.5, 42.2) County total crime rate …1 (1, 0, 6.6) State-industry % black …10.9 (8.1, 0, 58) State-industry mean income ($) …37,353 (10,074; 12,132; 85,908)Party control of state legislature, %: Republican …42 Democratic …35 Split …23NLSY 1979 data: Participants ever incarcerated …697Race: Black …345 (49) Hispanic …137 (20)Male …621 (89)Female …76 (11)Years …1979–94, 1996, 1998, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014Quit main job (person-year): Yes …1,312 (15) No …7,660 (85)Job satisfaction (person-year) Satisfied …8,583 (88) Unsatisfied …1,184 (12)Age (years) …30.55 (10.34, 14, 58)Hourly wage ($) …16.98 (10.45, 1.76, 75.5)Job tenure (weeks) …213.38 (152.12, 1, 1561)Weeks worked (weeks) …24.49 (21.74, 0, 52)Note. Data in parentheses are percentages or SD, min, max. View Table Image Previous article DetailsFiguresReferencesCited by American Journal of Sociology Volume 126, Number 1July 2020 Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/710273 Views: 520 © 2020 by The University of Chicago. All rights reserved. Crossref reports no articles citing this article.Related articlesThe Imperial Origins of American Policing: Militarization and Imperial Feedback in the Early 20th Century22 May 2020American Journal of SociologyThe Disciplining Effect of Mass Incarceration on Labor Organization22 May 2020American Journal of Sociology
Referência(s)