Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

Relevance of new scientific evidence on the occurrence of teosinte in maize fields in Spain and France for previous environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the cultivation of maize events MON810, Bt11, 1507 and GA21

2016; European Food Safety Authority; Volume: 13; Issue: 9 Linguagem: Inglês

10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.en-1094

2397-8325

Insect-Plant Interactions and Control

EFSA Supporting PublicationsVolume 13, Issue 9 1094E Technical reportOpen Access Relevance of new scientific evidence on the occurrence of teosinte in maize fields in Spain and France for previous environmental risk assessment conclusions and risk management recommendations on the cultivation of maize events MON810, Bt11, 1507 and GA21 European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author First published: 29 September 2016 https://doi.org/10.2903/sp.efsa.2016.EN-1094Citations: 28 Requestor: The European Commission Question number: EFSA-Q-2016-00388 AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References Andersson MS and de Vicente MC, 2010. Gene flow between crops and their wild relatives. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore. Arvalis, 2013. Téosinte: une adventice qui demande une vigilance toute particulière. 13/14 Service Communication Marketing Arvalis (Institut du vegetal), 4 pp. Balbuena MA, Rosales E Valencia JC, González A, Pérez D, Sánchez S, Franco ALY and Vences CC, 2011. Competencia entre maíz y teocintle: efecto en el rendimiento y sus componentes. Centro Agrícola, 38, 5– 12. Baltazar BM, Sanchez-Gonzalez JD, de la Cruz-Larios L and Schoper JB, 2005. Pollination between maize and teosinte: an important determinant of gene flow in Mexico. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 110, 519– 526. Chavez NB, Flores JJ, Martin J, Ellstrand NC, Guadagnuolo R, Heredia S and Welles SR, 2012. Maize × teosinte hybrid cobs do not prevent crop gene introgression. Economic Botany, 66, 132– 137. de Lange ES, Balmer D, Mauch-Mani B and Turlings TCJ, 2014. Insect and pathogen attack and resistance in maize and its wild ancestors, the teosintes. New Phytologist, 204, 329– 341. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010. Guidance on the environmental risk assessment of GM plants. EFSA Journal, 8(11), 1879, 111 pp., doi:10.2903/j.efsa.1879. Evans MMS and Kermicle JL, 2001. Teosinte crossing barrier1, a locus governing hybridization of teosinte with maize. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 103, 259– 265. Fukunaga K, Hill J, Vigouroux Y, Matsuoka Y, Sanchez JG, Liu K, Buckler ES and Doebley J, 2005. Genetic diversity and population structure of teosinte. Genetics, 169, 2241– 2254. Gruber S, Colbach N, Barbottin A and Pekrun C, 2008. Post-harvest gene escape and approaches for minimizing it. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 3, 1– 17. Guadagnuolo R, Clegg J and Ellstrand N, 2006. Relative fitness of transgenic vs. non-transgenic maize × teosinte hybrids: A field evaluation. Ecological Applications, 16, 1967– 1974. Hufford MB, Martínez-Meyer E, Gaut BS, Eguiarte LE and Tenaillon MI, 2012. Inferences from the historical distribution of wild and domesticated maize provide ecological and evolutionary insight. PLoS ONE, 7(11), e47659. López ANA, de Jesús Sánchez González J, Ruíz Corral JA, De La Cruz Larios L, Santacruz-Ruvalcaba F, Sánchez Hernández CV and Holland JB, 2011. Seed dormancy in Mexican teosinte. Crop Science, 51, 2056– 2066. OECD, 2003. Consensus Document on the biology of Zea mays subsp. mays (Maize). Series on Harmonisation of Regulatory Oversight in Biotechnology, No. 27. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, France, pp. 49. Palaudelmàs M, Peñas G, Melé E, Serra J, Salvia J, Pla M, Nadal A and Messeguer J, 2009. Effect of volunteers on maize gene flow. Transgenic Research, 18, 583– 594. Pardo G, Cirujeda A, Betrán E, Fernández-Cavada S, Fuertes S, Rodríguez E, Perdiguer A, Aibar J and Zaragoza C, 2014. El Teosinte (Zea mays, spp.). Informaciones Técnicas GIoberno del Aragone (Dirección General De Alimentación Y Fomento Agroalimentario, Centro de Sanidad y Certificacion Vegetal), 6 pp.. Pardo G, Fuertes S, Fernández-Cavada S, Betrán E, Cirujeda A, Marí AI, Aibar J, Zaragoza C, Perdiguer A, Llenes JM, Montull JM and Taberner A, 2015. Presencia de teosinte (Zea spp.) como mala hierba en los regadíos del valle del Ebro. In XV Congreso de la Sociedad Española de Malherbología: La Malherbología y la transferencia tecnológica, Junta de Andalucia ed, (Sevilla, 19 - 22 octubre 2015), pp. 417– 423. Pardo G, Cirujeda A, Marí AI, Aibar J, Fuertes S and Taberner A, 2016, El teosinte: descripción, situación actual en el valle del Ebro y resultados de los primeros ensayos. Vida Rural, 408, 42– 48. Raybould A, Higgins LS, Horak MJ, Layton RJ, Storer NP, Manuel De La Fuente JM and Herman RA, 2012. Assessing the ecological risks from the persistence and spread of feral populations of insect-resistant transgenic maize. Transgenic Research, 21, 655– 664. Ross-Ibarra J, Tenaillon M and Gaut BS, 2009. Historical divergence and gene flow in the genus Zea. Genetics, 181, 1399– 1413. Sánchez JJ, De La Cruz L, Vidal VA, Ron J, Taba S, Santacruz-Ruvalcaba D, Sood S, Holland JB, Ruíz JA, Carvajal S, Aragón F, Chávez VH, Morales MM and Barba-González R, 2011. Three new teosintes (Zea spp., Poaceae) from México. American Journal of Botany, 98, 1537– 1548. Silva NCdA, Vidal R, Costa FM, Vaio M and Ogliari JB, 2015. Presence of Zea luxurians (Durieu and Ascherson) bird in southern Brazil: Implications for the conservation of wild relatives of maize. PloS ONE 10(10), e0139034. Smith JSC, Goodman MM and Struber CW, 1985. Relationships between maize and teosinte of Mexico and Guatemala: numerical data analysis of allozyme data. Economic Botany, 39, 12– 24. van Heerwaarden J, Doebley J, Briggs WH, Glaubitz JC, Goodman MM, de Jesus Sanchez Gonzalez J and Ross-Ibarra J, 2011. Genetic signals of origin, spread, and introgression in a large sample of maize landraces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 1088– 1092. Warburton ML, Wilkes G, Taba S, Charcosset A, Mir C, Duman F, Madur D, Dreisigacker S, Bedoya C, Prasanna BM, Xie CX, Hearne S and Franco J, 2011. Gene flow among different teosinte taxa and into the domesticated maize gene pool. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 58, 1243– 1261. Wilkes HG, 1977. Hybridization of maize and teosinte, in Mexico and Guatemala and the improvement of maize. Economic Botany, 31, 254– 293. Wilkes HG, 2007. Urgent notice to all maize researchers: Disappearance and extinction of the last wild teosinte population is more than half completed. A modest proposal for teosinte evolution and conservation in situ: The Balsas, Guerrero, Mexico. Maydica, 52, 49– 58. Citing Literature Volume13, Issue9September 20161094E ReferencesRelatedInformation