Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects
1990; Wiley; Volume: 45; Issue: 1 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2307/2328817
ISSN1540-6261
AutoresChristopher G. Lamoureux, William D. Lastrapes,
Tópico(s)Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
ResumoThe Journal of FinanceVolume 45, Issue 1 p. 221-229 Shorter Paper Heteroskedasticity in Stock Return Data: Volume versus GARCH Effects CHRISTOPHER G. LAMOUREUX, CHRISTOPHER G. LAMOUREUXSearch for more papers by this authorWILLIAM D. LASTRAPES, WILLIAM D. LASTRAPES John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University and Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, Louisiana State University, respectively. This work was completed while Lamoureux was at Louisiana State University. This paper has benefitted from the comments of seminar participants at LSU and Washington University. We are especially grateful to Richard T. Baillie, Frank Diebold, Phil Dybvig, Rob Engle, Clive Granger, Mel Jameson, Ken Kroner, Chowdhury Mustafa, David Mayers (the co-editor), Percy Poon, Mike Salemi, Gary Sanger, George Tauchen, and an anonymous referee. All errors remain ours.Search for more papers by this author CHRISTOPHER G. LAMOUREUX, CHRISTOPHER G. LAMOUREUXSearch for more papers by this authorWILLIAM D. LASTRAPES, WILLIAM D. LASTRAPES John M. Olin School of Business, Washington University and Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, Louisiana State University, respectively. This work was completed while Lamoureux was at Louisiana State University. This paper has benefitted from the comments of seminar participants at LSU and Washington University. We are especially grateful to Richard T. Baillie, Frank Diebold, Phil Dybvig, Rob Engle, Clive Granger, Mel Jameson, Ken Kroner, Chowdhury Mustafa, David Mayers (the co-editor), Percy Poon, Mike Salemi, Gary Sanger, George Tauchen, and an anonymous referee. All errors remain ours.Search for more papers by this author First published: March 1990 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1990.tb05088.xCitations: 522 Read the full textAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onEmailFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat ABSTRACT This paper provides empirical support for the notion that Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity (ARCH) in daily stock return data reflects time dependence in the process generating information flow to the market. Daily trading volume, used as a proxy for information arrival time, is shown to have significant explanatory power regarding the variance of daily returns, which is an implication of the assumption that daily returns are subordinated to intraday equilibrium returns. Furthermore, ARCH effects tend to disappear when volume is included in the variance equation. REFERENCES Baillie, Richard and Tim, Bollerslev, 1989, The message in daily exchange rates: A conditional variance tale, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Forthcoming. Bollerslev, Tim, 1986, Generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity, Journal of Econometrics 31, 307–327. Bollerslev, Tim, 1987, A conditionally heteroskedastic time series model for speculative prices and rates of return, Review of Economics and Statistics 69, 542–547. Clark, Peter, 1973, A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices, Econometrica 41, 135–56. Copeland, Thomas, 1976, A model of asset trading under the assumption of sequential information arrival, The Journal of Finance 31, 1149–1168. Diebold, Francis, 1986, Comment on modelling the persistence of conditional variance, Econometric Reviews 5, 51–56. Engle, Robert, 1982, Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimates of the variance of United Kingdom inflation, Econometrica 50, 987–1007. Engle, Robert, David F. Hendry, and Jean Francois Richard, 1983, Exogeneity, Econometrica 51, 277–304. Epps, Thomas and Mary L. Epps, 1976, The stochastic dependence of security price changes and transaction volumes: Implications for the mixture of distributions hypothesis, Econometrica 44, 305–321. Fama, Eugene, 1965, The behavior of stock market prices, Journal of Business 38, 34–105. Gallant, A. Ronald, David Hsieh, and George E. Tauchen, 1988, On fitting a reclacitrant series: The pound/dollar exchange rage, 1974–83, Mimeo, Duke University. Harris, Lawrence, 1987, Transaction data tests of the mixture of distributions hypothesis, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 127–141. Karpoff, Jonathon, 1987, The relation between price changes and trading volume: A survey, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 22, 109–126. Kiefer, Nicholas and Mark, Salmon, 1983, Testing normality in econometric models, Economics Letters 11, 123–127. Lakonishok, Josef and Theo, Vermaelen, 1986, Tax-induced trading around ex-dividend days, Journal of Financial Economics 16, 287–319. Lamoureux, Christopher and William D. Lastrapes, 1988, Persistence-in-variance, structural change and the GARCH model, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Forthcoming. Lastrapes, William, 1989, Exchange rate volatility and U.S. monetary policy: An ARCH application, Journal of Money Credit and Banking 21, 66–77. Mandelbrot, Benoit, 1973, Comments on: A subordinated stochastic process model with finite variance for speculative prices, Econometrica 41, 157–159. Mandelbrot, Benoit and H. Taylor, 1967, On the distribution of stock price differences, Operations Research 15, 1057–1062. Morgan, Ieuan, 1976, Stock prices and heteroskedasticity, Journal of Business 49, 496–508. Osborne, M. F. M., 1959, Brownian motion in the stock market, Operations Research 7, 145–173. Ross, Stephen, 1987, The interrelations of finance and economics: Theoretical perspectives, American Economic Review 77, 29–34. Royston, J. P., 1982, An extension of Shapiro and Wilk's W test for normality to large samples, Applied Statistics 31, 115–124. Stock, James, 1987, Measuring business cycle time, Journal of Political Economy 95, 1240–1261. Stock, James, 1988, Estimating continuous-time processes subject to time deformation, Journal of the American Statistical Association 83, 77–85. Tauchen, George and Mark, Pitts, 1983, The price variability-volume relationship on speculative markets, Econometrica 51, 485–505. Westerfield, Randolph, 1977, The distribution of common stock price changes: An application of transactions time and subordinated stochastic models, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 12, 743–765. Citing Literature Volume45, Issue1March 1990Pages 221-229 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)