Portal de Periódicos da CAPES

The critical effective size for a genetically secure population

1998; Wiley; Volume: 01; Issue: 01 Linguagem: Inglês

10.1017/s136794309822110x

1469-1795

Michael Lynch, Russell Lande,

Genetic diversity and population structure

Animal ConservationVolume 1, Issue 1 p. 70-72 Free Access The critical effective size for a genetically secure population Michael Lynch, Michael Lynch Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USASearch for more papers by this authorRussell Lande, Russell Lande Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USASearch for more papers by this author Michael Lynch, Michael Lynch Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USASearch for more papers by this authorRussell Lande, Russell Lande Department of Biology, University of Oregon, Eugene, Oregon 97403, USASearch for more papers by this author First published: 28 February 2006 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-1795.1998.tb00229.xCitations: 148AboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat REFERENCES Arnold, S. J. (1995). Monitoring quantitative genetic variation and evolution in captive populations. In Population management for survival and recovery: 295– 317. J. D. Ballou, M Gilpin & T. J Foose (Eds). New York : Columbia University Press. Bürger, R &Lande, R (1994). On the distribution of the mean and variance of a quantitative trait under mutation-selection-drift balance. Genetics 138: 901– 912. Bürger, R &Lynch, M (1994). Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49: 151– 163. Burger, R &Lynch, M (1997). Adaptation and extinction in changing environments. In Environmental stress, adaptation and evolution: 209– 240. R Bijlsma & V Loeschcke (Eds). Basel : Birkhäuser Verlag. Crow, J. F. (1993). Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 9: 3– 42. Frankham, R. (1995). Effective population size / adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. 66: 95– 107. Franklin, I. R. (1980). Evolutionary changes in small populations. In Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective: 135– 149. M. E Soulé & B. A Wilcox (Eds). Sunderland : Sinauer. Franklin, I. R &Frankham, R (1998). How large must populations be to retain evolutionary potential Anim. Conserv. 1: 69– 70. Houle, D., Morikawa, R &Lynch, M (1996). Comparing mutational variabilities. Genetics 143: 1467– 1483. Keightley, P. D. (1994). The distribution of mutation effects on viability in D. melanogaster. Genetics 138: 1315– 1322. Kimura, M., Maruyama, T &Crow, J. F (1963). The mutation load in small populations. Genetics 48: 1303– 1312. Lande, R. (1994). Risk of population extinction from new deleterious mutations. Evolution 48: 1460– 1469. Lande, R. (1995a). Mutation and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 9: 782– 791. Lande, R. (1995b). Breeding plans for small populations based on the dynamics of quantitative genetic variance. In Population management for survival and recovery: 318– 340. J. D. Ballou, M Gilpin & T. J Foose (Eds). New York : Columbia University Press. Lynch, M. (1995). A quantitative-genetic perspective on conservation issues. In Conservation genetics: case histories from nature: 471– 501. J Avise & J Hamrick (Eds). New York : Chapman & Hall. Lynch, M., Conery, J &Bürger, R (1995a). Mutational meltdowns in sexual populations. Evolution 49: 1067– 1080. Lynch, M., Conery, J &Bürger, R (1995b). Mutation accumulation and the extinction of small populations. Am. Nat. 146: 489– 518. Lynch, M &Walsh, B (1998). Genetics and analysis of quantitative traits. Sunderland : Sinauer. Mace, G. M &Lande, R (1991). Assessing extinction threats: towards a reevaluation of IUCN threatened species categories. Conserv. Biol. 5: 148– 157. National Research Council. (1995). Science and the endangered species act. Washington , DC : National Academy Press. Schultz, S. T &Lynch, M (1997). Deleterious mutations and extinction: effects of variable mutational effects, synergistic epistasis, beneficial mutations, and degree of outcrossing. Evolution 51: 1363– 1371. Soulé, M. E. (1980). Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. In Conservation biology: an evolutionary-ecological perspective: 151– 170. M. E Soulé & B. A Wilcox (Eds). Sunderland : Sinauer. Wright, S. (1969). Evolution and the genetics of populations. 2 The theory of gene frequencies. Chicago : University of Chicago Press. Citing Literature Volume1, Issue1February 1998Pages 70-72 This article also appears in:20th anniversary collection of high-impact conservation research ReferencesRelatedInformation