Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance buprofezin
2010; Wiley; Volume: 8; Issue: 6 Linguagem: Inglês
10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1624
ISSN1831-4732
Tópico(s)Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies
ResumoEFSA JournalVolume 8, Issue 6 1624 Conclusion on PesticideOpen Access Conclusion on the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance buprofezin European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author European Food Safety Authority, European Food Safety AuthoritySearch for more papers by this author First published: 03 June 2010 https://doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1624Citations: 6 Correspondence: [email protected] Published date: 3 June 2010 Question number: EFSA-Q-2009-00913 On request from: European Commission AboutPDF ToolsExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL References ACD/ChemSketch, Advanced Chemistry Development, Inc., ACD/Labs Release: 12.00 Product version: 12.00 (Build 29305, 25 Nov 2008). Bergman K., Müller L., Weberg Teigen S. (1996). The genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of paracetamol: a regulatory (re)view, Mutation Research, 349, 263– 288. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion on Genotoxic and Carcinogenic Potential of Buprofezin in the Context of the Human Risk Assessment - Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Plant Protection Products and their Residues (PPR). The EFSA Journal (2007), 620, 1– 28. www.efsa.europa.eu/EFSA/efsa_locale-1178620753812_1178680773087.htm. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance buprofezin. EFSA Scientific Report (2008) 128. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2010. Peer Review Report to the conclusion regarding the peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance buprofezin. European Commission, 2002a. Guidance Document on Risk Assessment for Birds and Mammals Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/4145/2000. European Commission, 2002b. Guidance Document on Aquatic Ecotoxicology Under Council Directive 91/414/EEC. SANCO/3268/2001 rev 4 (final), 17 October 2002. European Commission, 2008. Review Report for the active substance buprofezin finalised in the Standing Committee on the Food Chain and Animal Health at its meeting on 20 May 2008 in support of a decision concerning the non-inclusion of buprofezin in Annex I of Directive 91/414/EEC and the withdrawal of authorisations for plant protection products containing this active substance. SANCO/110/08-rev. final, 2 October 2008. Finland, 2005. Draft Assessment Report (DAR) on the active substance buprofezin prepared by the rapporteur Member State Finland in the framework of Directive 91/414/EEC, May 2005. Finland, 2008. Final Addendum to Draft Assessment Report on buprofezin, compiled by EFSA, February 2008. FOCUS (2000). “FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios in the EU review of active substances”. Report of the FOCUS Groundwater Scenarios Workgroup, EC Document Reference SANCO/321/2000-rev.2. 202 pp, as updated by the Generic Guidance for FOCUS groundwater scenarios, version 1.1 dated April 2002. FOCUS (2001). “FOCUS Surface Water Scenarios in the EU Evaluation Process under 91/414/EEC”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Surface Water Scenarios, EC Document Reference SANCO/4802/2001-rev.2. 245 pp. FOCUS (2006). “Guidance Document on Estimating Persistence and Degradation Kinetics from Environmental Fate Studies on Pesticides in EU Registration” Report of the FOCUS Work Group on Degradation Kinetics, EC Document Reference Sanco/10058/2005 version 2.0, 434 pp. FOCUS (2007). “Landscape And Mitigation Factors In Aquatic Risk Assessment. Volume 1. Extended Summary and Recommendations”. Report of the FOCUS Working Group on Landscape and Mitigation Factors in Ecological Risk Assessment, EC Document Reference SANCO/10422/2005 v2.0. 169 pp. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry), 2001. Guidance Document on Regulatory Testing and Risk Assessment procedures for Plant Protection Products with Non-Target Arthropods. ESCORT 2. The United Kingdom, 2009. Additional Report to the Draft Assessment Report on the active substance buprofezin prepared by the rapporteur Member State The United Kingdom in the framework of Commission Regulation (EC) No 33/2008, August 2009. The United Kingdom, 2010. Final Addendum to the Additional Report on buprofezin, compiled by EFSA, February 2010. Citing Literature Volume8, Issue6June 20101624 ReferencesRelatedInformation
Referência(s)